← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Faust

US neo-cons: Kremlin is ‘morally’ to blame for the school massacre

Thread ID: 14987 | Posts: 5 | Started: 2004-09-13

Wayback Archive


Faust [OP]

2004-09-13 04:53 | User Profile

US neo-cons: Kremlin is ‘morally’ to blame for the school massacre

By Neil Mackay

WHY would a group of leading American neo-conservatives, dedicated to fighting Islamic terror, have climbed into bed with Chechen rebels linked to al-Qaeda? The American Committee for Peace in Chechnya (ACPC), which includes Pentagon supremo Richard Perle, says the conflict between Russia and Chechnya is about Chechen nationalism, not terrorism. The ACPC savaged Russia for the atrocities its forces have committed in the Caucuses, said President Vladimir Putin was “ridiculous”, claimed Russia was more “morally” to blame for the bloodshed than Chechen separatists and played down links between al-Qaeda and the “Chechen resistance”.

The ACPC’s support for the Chechen cause seems bizarre, as many of its members are among the most outspoken US policymakers who have made it clear that Islamist terror must be wiped out. But the organisation has tried to broker peace talks between Russia and Chechen separatists.

The ACPC includes many leaders of the neo-conservative think-tank, Project for the New American Century (PNAC), which advocates American domination of the world.

ACPC members who are also in the pro-Israeli PNAC include Elliott Abrams, head of Middle East affairs at the National Security Council; Elliot Cohen of the Pentagon’s Defence Policy Board; Frank Gaffney, president of the conservative Centre for Security Policy; Robert Kagan and William Kristol of The Weekly Standard, the house journal of Washington neo-cons, and former CIA director James Woolsey. Former Reagan defence secretary Caspar Weinberger is also in the ACPC.

ACPC executive director Glen Howard said the continuation of the “brutalising tactics” of Russian forces would only lead to “the resistance employing more brutal tactics” like the assault on School Number One in Beslan. He claimed one of the so-called “Black Widows” decided to become a suicide bomber after being forced to watch Russian troops “boil her three-year-old child alive”.

“This is a very brutal war,” he said. “There have been knocks in the night, people have disappeared. It’s an endless cycle of violence in which everyone has lost their sanity. It is not surprising the Chechens have resorted to the same level of violence.”

Howard said Putin comparing Osama bin Laden to the leaders of the Chechen resistance was “ridiculous”. Moscow has put a $10 million bounty on the heads of two Chechen leaders – the extremist and al-Qaeda connected commander Shamil Basayev, and the more moderate, one-time democratically elected Chechen President Aslan Maskhadov.

Basayev, according to the Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov, directed the hostage-taking raid in Beslan. As a young Islamist extremist Basayev was trained in Jihadist tactics by fundamentalists in Afghanistan. Many Chechens have fought in Afghanistan and many fundamentalist Arabs have fought in Chechnya....

[url]http://www.sundayherald.com/44741[/url]


Faust

2004-09-14 13:36 | User Profile

The Neocons are upset their marxists buddies lost Russia. Chechen like to murder Russian so the Neocons are pro-Chechen for now. Osama bin Laden wants the Zionist and Americans out of the mideast. So Neocons are anti-bin Laden, if the Chechen go more ant-Zionist, the Neocons will go anti-Chechen, but for now the Neocons gleefully enjoying seeing Russian murdered by Chechens.


Quantrill

2004-09-14 13:48 | User Profile

Yeah, I saw this article. What utter crap. The hypocrisy of these folks is unbelievable. Talk about whited sepulchres.


Quantrill

2004-09-14 13:56 | User Profile

It always comes down to 'what is good for the Jews,' doesn't it? I think the rationale goes like this: The US is already under significant Jewish control, to the extent that it will fight proxy wars on behalf of Israel. Because the US is already a tool of Jewish interests, aggression against the US is unacceptable. On the other hand, Russia and Serbia are not under Jewish control, and are still fighting for their national identities against globalisation. Because they resist this control, aggression against them is justified and defensible.

I think this is the key to understanding the US's seemingly schizophrenic view of Islamic militants.


neoclassical

2004-09-14 23:09 | User Profile

Neocons (internationalists) support whatever divides national entities against themselves and each other.

You might call them "International Socialists," as the only force opposing them is "National Socialism" - in every nationality.