← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Hugh Lincoln
Thread ID: 14869 | Posts: 15 | Started: 2004-08-31
2004-08-31 01:46 | User Profile
Here.
[url]http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=3675[/url]
2004-08-31 01:57 | User Profile
Congrats Mr.Lincoln. Any plans on writing more stuff for NV? I look forward to it.
2004-08-31 01:58 | User Profile
Good work Hugh.:clap:
2004-08-31 09:18 | User Profile
After I read your article at National Vanguard Online and saw that it was by "Hugh Lincoln," I was certain I knew that name from somewhere, but I couldn't recall from where. Its funny how seeing a familiar name in an unfamiliar context can so thoroughly discombobulate one. Anyway, in the unlikely event anyone cares, here are the addresses for my five articles at National Vanguard Online:
Open Letter to Harry Browne: Staying Irish Means Staying White (2004-06-22 11:50:54) [url]http://nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=3189[/url]
California: Children Given Pro-Genocide Propaganda (2004-02-10 09:48:22) [url]http://nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=2011[/url]
Some Thoughts on the Film 'Cold Mountain' (2003-12-29 10:07:53) [url]http://nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=1536[/url]
David Irving the 'Anti-Semite' (2003-12-20 19:51:39) [url]http://nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=1486[/url]
An Open Letter to Professor Mark Ellis (2003-11-04 18:14:47) [url]http://nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=1019[/url]
2004-08-31 18:12 | User Profile
All good pieces, Kevin. I like to contribute writings all over the place, but NVonline and National Vanguard magazine seem like natural spots for certain topics or treatments.
2004-08-31 20:06 | User Profile
I was watching jewperson Wolfie Blitzer on CNN apologize for the American people to his jew homeland ambassador because some kikes got exploded in the jew homeland. The kike Blitzer should only send his sympathy for himself---let's not drag gentile Americans into his personal jew or self a$$ kissing.
Of course the yids do own/run CNN...:angry:
We can talk rough here...but...I do think that National Vanguard News is doing a good solid job reporting the facts...and being subtle and humorous is hard work...harder than name calling...but still naming the jew none the less in a smart way.
I still think the runic symbolism, perrycomotheism and anything about foreign or domestic nutzis is nutzi...:hitler:
2004-09-01 09:45 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Pennsylvania_Dutch]I was watching jewperson Wolfie Blitzer on CNN apologize for the American people to his jew homeland ambassador because some kikes got exploded in the jew homeland. The kike Blitzer should only send his sympathy for himself---let's not drag gentile Americans into his personal jew or self a$$ kissing.
Of course the yids do own/run CNN...:angry:
We can talk rough here...but...I do think that National Vanguard News is doing a good solid job reporting the facts...and being subtle and humorous is hard work...harder than name calling...but still naming the jew none the less in a smart way.
I still think the runic symbolism, perrycomotheism and anything about foreign or domestic nutzis is nutzi...:hitler:[/QUOTE]
Perrycomotheism?
What's that?
Walter
2004-09-01 09:57 | User Profile
Isn't National Vanguard the flagship publication of the National Alliance? And isn't the National Alliance that neo-Nazi group whose membership handbook calls for the elimination of Christianity, among other goofy things? Does anyone here really think that Neo-Nazism is the way to go? I mean, aren't there much more promising ways to fight mass immigration, political correctness, etc.?
Is "Cosmotheism" (Neo-Nazism dressed up in New-Agey quasi-religious trappings) ever going to fly in this philo-Semitic, largely Protestant nation?
Maybe I'm just a scheming, lying, cosmopolitan Jew and that's clouding my judgement. Am I missing something here?
Hadassah
2004-09-01 15:28 | User Profile
Isn't "Hadassah" the Zionist Women's Organization?
2004-09-01 15:44 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Hugh Lincoln]Isn't "Hadassah" the Zionist Women's Organization?[/QUOTE] Yes. It's also the original form of Esther, meaning the "[size=-1]Myrtle tree" which represents joy and life. As Moses counseled, I choose life.
The NSDAP chose just the opposite, as was evident in their symbols, and their ultimate demise.
[img]http://www.nazi.org/images/skull1.gif[/img] [/size]
2004-09-01 16:08 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Hadassah]I mean, aren't there much more promising ways to fight mass immigration, political correctness, etc.?[/QUOTE]I certainly hope there are more effective ways to eliminate the source(s) of those symptoms. Granted the NA, among others, cleave to a monomaniacal - though not misplaced - perception of the disease.
[QUOTE=Hadassah]Maybe I'm just a scheming, lying, cosmopolitan Jew and that's clouding my judgement.[/QUOTE] Maybe baby, itââ¬â¢s often difficult to see the synagogue for the moneylenders' tables.
2004-09-01 20:38 | User Profile
[QUOTE=na Gaeil is gile]I certainly hope there are more effective ways to eliminate the source(s) of those symptoms. There better be; otherwise the anti-immigration movement is unlikely to get anywhere.
Granted the NA, among others, cleave to a monomaniacal - though not misplaced - perception of the disease. I would also say "misplaced".
NA ideology blames falling birthrates on "The Jews". Yet birthrates are falling everywhere, including places like Japan where Jewish influence is close to nil.
NA ideology blames "degeneracy" (pornography, homosexuality, abortion) on "The Jews". Yet these things are most prevalent in countries with few or no Jews. Again, Japan would serve as an excellent example. So would the Scandinavian countries.
Fact is, even if every Jew disappeared tomorrow you'd still have the same problems. The NA is barking up the wrong tree.
2004-09-02 06:36 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Hadassah]Isn't National Vanguard the flagship publication of the National Alliance? And isn't the National Alliance that neo-Nazi group whose membership handbook calls for the elimination of Christianity, among other goofy things? Does anyone here really think that Neo-Nazism is the way to go? I mean, aren't there much more promising ways to fight mass immigration, political correctness, etc.?
Perhaps, but that remains to be determined by history. I've been an Agnostic all my life (I've had periodic tendencies towards being sympathetic with Christianity, but I find it very difficult to develop any real faith in it; perhaps due in no small part to the fact that I have yet to hear even ONE SINGLE remotely inspiring sermon in all my life; give me a sermon that speaks to me, and I might actually become a devoted Christian, but apparently no Priest or minister is willing to say anything that isn't banal and trite, alas) and a member of the National Alliance since 1996, but if I saw Christian Nationalism on the verge of becoming a real and powerful force for good, the way Walter, Tex and some of the others around here seek to make it (rather than just another splinter group with little more influence that neo-Nazism, as it is presently), I would no doubt put aside any misgivings I may have about Christianty and throw myself wholely into conversion and seeking to convert others. I like to think some of the Christian Nationaists and paleo-cons around here might be willing to lend a hand if it turns out neo-Nazis are going to be the ones to lead the fight against Zionism, multiracialism, imperialism, multinational corporate capitalism and the police state. In any event, I'm in favor of whatever works. Nazism has a lot of innate weaknesses, but it also has many innate strengths (most notable being the fact that it almost won back in the 1930s & 40s). In truth, neo-Nazism will likely be more of a factor in Europe, while America will likely ally itself with a National Socialist Europe and an Orthodox Nationalist Russia under the banner of some sort of paleo-con/Christian Nationalist fusionist party. But it all remains to be seen.
[QUOTE=Hadassah]Is "Cosmotheism" (Neo-Nazism dressed up in New-Agey quasi-religious trappings) ever going to fly in this philo-Semitic, largely Protestant nation?
Probably not, but then looking back to 1934, not many people would have conceived of an America like the one we have today coming about in a mere seven decades. In any event, the average member of the National Alliance has only a dim idea of the existence of Cosmotheism. There is a vocal faction in the Alliance that would like to make it a big part of our program, but the fact is that there are many Mormons and Catholics in the National Alliance, so pushing the Cosmotheism and/or anti-Christian thing is not nearly as high up on our agenda as Okieredust would no doubt tell you it is. Sure, our subsidiary, Resistance Records, sells some pretty grim musical CDs, but a lot of kids frankly aren't going to be reached today with Bible tracts, and we need to reach them somehow. That doesn't necessarily make our strategy right, either morally or strategically, but it does make it something about which sane men of good will can differ.
2004-09-02 06:48 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Hadassah]Yes. It's also the original form of Esther, meaning the "[size=-1]Myrtle tree" which represents joy and life. As Moses counseled, I choose life.
The NSDAP chose just the opposite, as was evident in their symbols, and their ultimate demise.
[img]http://www.nazi.org/images/skull1.gif[/img] [/size][/QUOTE]
As it so happens, the official symbol of the National Alliance, that rune which looks like the letter Y with the spine extended as high as the two flanks, sometimes called "The Tree of Life" or the "Yggdrassil," is most commonly known as "the Life Rune." The Swastika was also seen as a positive, life-affirming symbol. The fact that a particular military division with the Waffen section of the S.S. may have chosen a death's head as their symbol makes for good propaganda against us, but its not really all that representative of our movement.
2004-09-02 15:07 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Hadassah]Fact is, even if every Jew disappeared tomorrow you'd still have the same problems.[/QUOTE] Come now Hadassah, the problem of subservience to a foreign prince - in the shape of Israel - would certainly be eliminated. That both the domestic Zionist lobby and Mossad strive to involve America in alien conflicts is irrefutable; the Lavon affair, for example, is not a fantasy of some tin-foil-bedecked paranoid, nor are the billions of U.S. dollars pumped into Israel.
There is a problem with holistic anti-Semitism, or reductio ad Judea, perceiving Jewish influence where there is none, or over-inflating such influence where it does exist; mass-immigration is one such instance. Clearly America's relative wealth, corporate greed and the presence of a welfare state are all far greater causes in generating immigration than, say, multicultist propaganda. The 'one worlders' - and their disproportionately Jewish membership - merely ensure the effects of mass-immigration are as miserable as possible.
The Jewish Question is really a question about conflict of interests.