← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Jack Cassidy
Thread ID: 14865 | Posts: 20 | Started: 2004-08-30
2004-08-30 15:02 | User Profile
As a former conservative and Republican I can't help but notice the conspicuous absence of substantial criticism against Bush and Co. Pres. Gump's side appears to be hammering away with none of the feisty and inflammatry counter-attack I used to see the liberals and Democrats launch. Now they are up against a guy who is the first since Hoover to loose jobs, with an economy and stock market in the tank, a soaring record-deficit, a proven bogus war that cost $300,000,000,000/1000+ American lives/5000+ burned and limbless, and on and on, and I hear NOTHING! This is a guy who has said things like, "If your children are disturbed by the images of war they see on tv, tell them it is because we are a nation that believes in peace." Attack ads work and all I see is Kerry being attacked and attacked and taking a nose dive in the polls, especially in battleground states, and no counterpunching-- against a target that is wide open with his ching sticking out and eyes closed. If there isn't a 1000% change after Labor Day and they don't launch a full assault against Pres. Gump, we can assume that for all the rhetoric, the liberal Jews have gotten the message that this useful idiot goy Dubya will take out Iran next term, thus Israel will be safe again for decades, and THEN they can go back to socialist, multicultural, and anti-Christian and anti-European domestic politics. Alas, let all the stupid redneck goyim reap the result of their blind pseudo-patriot bs. Yeah, right, terrorism is the big threat. I read the employment ads in Sunday's Washington Post and it is clear that the defense and related industries have hit a post-Soviet Union jackpot. The neo-cons don't give a damn about Islamic terrorism, per se, hell, look at the list of neo-cons (most Jew) supporting the Chechen Islamic separatists (Bill. Kristol, Michael Ledeen, Richard Pipes, Alexander Haig, Richard Perle, et al.). Perhaps I hould amend that to say that neo-cons don't care about Islamist terrorism directed at Christian lands (Serbia, Russia, Eastern Africa). Last month the Bush Admininstration granted asylum to a Chechen Islamic terrorist, Ilas Ahkmadov-- he was behind the killing of hundreds of Russians in a hospital siege. But they wasted no time arresting some Palestinian from Chicago who donated money to support PLO political causes. But go on Free Republic to understand how these Islamists are freedom fighters and the blowing up of the two Russian jets was simply a retaliation for Russian "brutality" against the Chechens-- and all the comments there inappropriately bring up how this is different from the problems facing Israel and the U.S. (the latter thrown in to placate the ignorant flag-raising redneck goyim). Pres. Gump has certainly played up the danger from some unsophisticated Islamic terrorists. Hell, more people died last year from under-cooked meat in the U.S. (approx. 6500) than died in the past decade from terrorism in all countries of the world (including, of course, 9/11). More people died in hospital mistakes last year in the U.S. (approx. 190,000), than in any war around the globe in the past decade.
2004-08-30 16:33 | User Profile
Kerry thinks he'll get more votes by being a fellow hawk than by criticizing Bush.
2004-08-30 16:43 | User Profile
That crazy guy of Sharon (like Castro) have bigger balls (sorry ladies) than Bush will ever have, Sharon and Castro are the only two dictators that have told Bush to go to hell and really meant it.
At least Sharon dosent flip-flop and is at lost for words like Bush, Sharon stated at one time that at the end there will be no Palestinians left in Palestine and that's what he is doing.
He has one goal and he is following that guide line.
How many time have Sharon or Castro done what Bush has told them?, never.
If Sharon were to be a "positive" instead of a "negative" I would vote for him as president of the US any day.
2004-08-30 16:46 | User Profile
I would think all the behind-the-scenes promises going on now between the US Presidential candidates and their bosses in Tel Aviv indicate that Bush is winning the favor of his masters by promising to annihilate Iran and Syria whereas Kerry may be the one who's having second thoughts about such a warmongering policy.
Kerry is losing points, not because of some stupid "Swift Boaters for Truth" but because he's balking at promising the bosses in Tel Aviv that he'll nuke Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia. The bosses in Israel relay this to their brothers in the US media and stories are spun to reflect negatively on John Kerry. All that matters in this country's politics is Israel. Right now, Bush is promising big stuff (killing millions of Muslims) to his masters, hence Kerry's slide in the polls.
It's that simple.
2004-08-30 19:00 | User Profile
[QUOTE=xmetalhead]I would think all the behind-the-scenes promises going on now between the US Presidential candidates and their bosses in Tel Aviv indicate that Bush is winning the favor of his masters by promising to annihilate Iran and Syria whereas Kerry may be the one who's having second thoughts about such a warmongering policy.
Kerry is losing points, not because of some stupid "Swift Boaters for Truth" but because he's balking at promising the bosses in Tel Aviv that he'll nuke Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia. The bosses in Israel relay this to their brothers in the US media and stories are spun to reflect negatively on John Kerry. All that matters in this country's politics is Israel. Right now, Bush is promising big stuff (killing millions of Muslims) to his masters, hence Kerry's slide in the polls.
It's that simple.[/QUOTE]
You perfectly said what I failed to say in my rambling rant. But I would add that we must wait till post-Labor Day campaigning to see if this is in fact true.
2004-08-30 19:10 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Ponce]That crazy guy of Sharon (like Castro) have bigger balls (sorry ladies) than Bush will ever have, Sharon and Castro are the only two dictators that have told Bush to go to hell and really meant it.
At least Sharon dosent flip-flop and is at lost for words like Bush, Sharon stated at one time that at the end there will be no Palestinians left in Palestine and that's what he is doing.
He has one goal and he is following that guide line.
How many time have Sharon or Castro done what Bush has told them?, never.
If Sharon were to be a "positive" instead of a "negative" I would vote for him as president of the US any day.[/QUOTE]
This goes without saying. Bush is on the second-level closer to the Platonic Form of dumb. Sharon is [I]Israel's[/I] useful dumb guy, while Bush is [I]Sharon's[/I] useful dumb goy. At least with Kerry we would transcend one level to him being merely Israel's useful goy.
2004-08-30 21:22 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Jack Cassidy]You perfectly said what I failed to say in my rambling rant. But I would add that we must wait till post-Labor Day campaigning to see if this is in fact true.[/QUOTE] Regardless, of who gets in we are going toward punch in the head politics; I don't know if the politicians of either party realize that or not?
People, don't see any ideology in any of this, except that I am hearing the "j" word used for the first time in anger by people. Particularly people with draft-military age children.
I'm for Kerry, but, if he doesn't get our troops out of Iraq and the rest of the middle east/asia as quick as he can---I might just become a punch in the head victim myself.
Folks are pissed off.
2004-08-30 21:40 | User Profile
No matter who is the next president of the USA as far as the Arabs nations is concern WE HAD IT,,,,,,,,,,, the Arabs consist of 2.5 billion people and like a bee hive we have hit it with stones one time to many.
As long as the Zionists are incharge of the US government there will be no chance of peace in my life time, and maybe in that of your childrens.
I see WWWIII in the future and the only way to obtain peace once and for all will be to get rid of the Zionists from the state of Israel, there will be many deaths but in the long run it will be worth while.
Sharon is using a new tactic,,,,,, he is pretending to be the good guy who wants peace and love between the Palestinians and the Zionists and is allowing his government to go against him,,,,,, he show us his open hands and says " you see guys? I am doing all that I can but the people wont let me"...... sure, he is crazy,,,,,crazy like a fox.
2004-08-31 09:52 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Ponce]I see WWWIII in the future and the only way to obtain peace once and for all will be to get rid of the Zionists from the state of Israel, there will be many deaths but in the long run it will be worth while.[/QUOTE]
The fact that "our" government paid for an Israeli fleet of nuclear-armed submarines to patrol the Atlantic makes the above statement, which would otherwise be true, largely moot. I mean, what POSSIBLE purpose could those subs serve, other than to destroy the cities of Europe and North America? And what do you think they will do, the moment they start to lose? When the Jews die, so do we. Western Civilization had a nice run, but its over now. The only way I can be wrong about that is if a bold American President (or possibly a future European Union leader? Or maybe even Putin?) orders the pre-emptive destruction of that Israeli nuke sub fleet. If that doesn't happen, nothing else will ever much matter (and there's no concrete guarantee such a pre-emptive strike would even be successful; remember that we've given the Israelis the very best stealthy sub technology that human science has been able to generate, which we used to use against the Soviets).
We've placed a loaded pistol in the hands off a deranged lunatic who hates us, and are presently holding our only child's head up to the barrel. Good riddance to us, I'm starting to almost think. Our continued existence is becoming an offense to natural law. Would nature permit a canine to live, if it chose to eat only wood? No more than nature will allow us to survive the mistakes we have already made.
With all that said, we should go on fighting 'til the end. Why? Because miracles happen. If Athens could defeat Persia, we still have a chance. But our basic position is similar to that of the Army of Northern Virginia after the fall of Richmond. If surrender didn't essentially mean having to watch as our families, friends and selves are raped & tortured to death, cooked and eaten, it would probably be the most logical option at this stage. Or perhaps our problem is that we've already surrendered decades ago....
2004-08-31 14:55 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Kevin_O'Keeffe]The fact that "our" government paid for an Israeli fleet of nuclear-armed submarines to patrol the Atlantic makes the above statement, which would otherwise be true, largely moot. [/QUOTE]
I know very little about this, could you please point me in the direction of reliable information on this vital topic?
Cheers,
Walter
2004-08-31 16:53 | User Profile
I was waching just now the happy bombing of the two Zionists Israelis invaders buses and I notice some protesters next to the buses (some cops were traying to hold them back) and guess what? they were holding up some signs in protest against the occasion,,,,,,,,BUT,,,,,, THEY WERE PROFESSIONAL MADE SIGNS,,,,,,,,in other words,,,,,,they were not hand written, talking about being ready.
Which brings up another point,,,,,, who are the ones getting killed? are they the first, second or third class Zionists?,,,,,, they are usually the third class.
About the subs,,,,,,they came from germany, they are electric powered and not nuclear and the best in the world, to the best of my knowledge they already have three and soon will be getting two more.
The missiles, capable of nuclear, are from the USA.
Thank you Uncle Sam,,,,,,,,,,
2004-08-31 22:49 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Walter Yannis]I know very little about this, could you please point me in the direction of reliable information on this vital topic?[/QUOTE]
I can't recall where I specifically read about Israeli nuke subs in the Atlantic, other than that I read it recently in some mainstream news source. Wish I could be more helpful....
2004-08-31 23:10 | User Profile
I say again my last transmission,,,,, they are not nuke subs but electric subs.
If they were to be nuke subs then we may as well kiss our a*s bye bye.
Use the search engine in Rense.com and from there you will get other leads.
2004-09-01 00:09 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Ponce]I say again my last transmission,,,,, they are not nuke subs but electric subs.[/QUOTE]
The subs are nuclear-armed; that was my point. I'm not entirely certain it matters all that much how they are powered.
2004-09-01 07:11 | User Profile
Well, I think that Kerry and the anti-Bush crowd came out firing for several months (remember O'Neill, Zinni, Nader). Plus the 9/11 Commission and Abu Gharib helped to sink the President's approval ratings in the spring. However, a mediocre summer campaign (with Kerry in the lead for about 3 months) led to a near flop by Kerry at the beginning of this month. Now, Kerry is in the position of panicking because there was no poll jumps in his Democratic Convention. Also, Rove hit Kerry with ZOG's Swift Boat nonsense and Kerry took the low blow. Kerry seems like a pretty weak candidate now.
I'm not convinced that Bush is going to win. Things are looking good for Bush now, but what will America think of seeing the Retard fumbling like a bird on the presidential "debates" in a few weeks?
2004-09-01 13:28 | User Profile
Walter? how they are powered is very important, the Zionist with nuclear subs can lay low of the coast of the US for months at the time, just waiting to strike all over the USA.
This is the same thing that we are doing with China, Russia and maybe even with the State of Israel.
However, the missiles that the Zionists have at hand can reach all the way into the hearland of America right from the state of Israel, and once again thanks to the American government.
2004-09-02 07:50 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Ponce]Walter? how they are powered is very important, the Zionist with nuclear subs can lay low of the coast of the US for months at the time, just waiting to strike all over the USA.
This is the same thing that we are doing with China, Russia and maybe even with the State of Israel.
There would indeed be some tactical advantage to having nuclear-powered subs, but as long as they are smart enough to stagger the repowering of these electrical subs, I would think they should achieve largely the same thing.
[QUOTE=Ponce]However, the missiles that the Zionists have at hand can reach all the way into the hearland of America right from the state of Israel, and once again thanks to the American government.[/QUOTE]
Are you saying the Zionists (the ones in Palestine, that is) have ICBMs? I hope you're wrong....
2004-09-02 13:52 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Kevin_O'Keeffe]There would indeed be some tactical advantage to having nuclear-powered subs, but as long as they are smart enough to stagger the repowering of these electrical subs, I would think they should achieve largely the same thing.
Are you saying the Zionists (the ones in Palestine, that is) have ICBMs? I hope you're wrong....[/QUOTE]
You can always detect the tenders (supply ships) very easily,,,,,the Zionists have already sent missiles into space, all that they have to do is to drop them on us...........
The have were talking about building a telescope space station with the help of another country,,,,,,,, space station or missile base in space??????
America better put some brakes on those people,,,,, it might be to late now.
2004-09-02 23:07 | User Profile
I would think most of the jet liners the jew homeland owns could be easily converted to nuke armed long range bombers---if some haven't already.
A B-52 is an obsolete airliner with good electronics.
The yids are nuke armed and crazy dangerous!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2004-09-03 00:32 | User Profile
Now you really got me scare,,,,,,hell man, with friends like that do we have to call Iran our enemies???????
The Zionists have clearence to come in and out of the USA at will, who knows, maybe they even have a couple of nukes hidden away in the US already.
Like a bug in a spider webb, the Jews are wrapping the US tighter and tighter as time goes by.
WAKE UP AMERICA,,,,,,
"When the truth comes into the light, the lies will hide in the dark",,,Ponce