← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Hugh Lincoln
Thread ID: 14684 | Posts: 12 | Started: 2004-08-11
2004-08-11 16:00 | User Profile
Stormfront?
Lew Rockwell?
Original Dissent?
Vanguard News Network?
No.
Free Republic.
Tee-hee.
[url]http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=694&u=/ap/20040810/ap_on_el_pr/anti_kerry_book_1&printer=1[/url]
2004-08-11 22:36 | User Profile
Hugh Lincoln,
It is fun to see the truth spoken!
[QUOTE]Anti-Kerry Book Scribe Sorry for Slurs
Tue Aug 10, 5:36 PM ET
By JENNIFER C. KERR, Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON - One of the authors of a new anti-John Kerry (news - web sites) book frequently posted comments on a conservative Web site describing Muslims and Catholics as pedophiles and Pope John Paul (news - web sites) II as senile.
Photo AP Photo
But as he prepared to launch the book, "Unfit for Command," Jerry Corsi apologized for the remarks in an interview with The Associated Press Tuesday, saying they were meant as a joke and he never intended to offend anyone.
In chat room entry last year on freerepublic.com, Corsi writes: "Islam is a peaceful religion ââ¬â just as long as the women are beaten, the boys buggered and the infidels are killed."
In another entry, he says: "So this is what the last days of the Catholic Church are going to look like. Buggering boys undermines the moral base and the lawyers rip the gold off the Vatican (news - web sites) altars. We may get one more Pope, when this senile one dies, but that's probably about it."
Corsi, who described himself as a "devout Catholic," said the comments are being taken out of context. "I considered them a joke," said Corsi, who owns a financial services company and has written extensively on the anti-war movement.
In a March posting, Corsi discussed Kerry's faith, writing: "After he married TerRAHsa, didn't John Kerry begin practicing Judaism? He also has paternal grandparents that were Jewish. What religion is John Kerry?"
Kerry and his wife, Teresa Heinz Kerry, are Catholic.
"I don't stand by any of those comments and I apologize if they offended anybody," Corsi said. [/QUOTE]
2004-08-12 18:09 | User Profile
The really funny thing, is that Theresa Heinz Kerry, around Pittsburgh was known as an Episcopalian. Matter of fact, she allegedly got the late HJ mixed up with the Episcopal church. When did she become a Catholic???
Maybe she is a jew???? The story is really getting confused...:yawn:
Of the old German Barons of the Northside of Pittsburgh, most were German Catholics, but, the Heinz family as far as I know were "German Protestants".
2004-08-12 19:05 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Hugh Lincoln]No.
Free Republic. [/QUOTE]
I haven't checked in at Free Republic in many moons, but before I left that soap opera there were a number of whack jobs all over that board. Zionist Conspirator, Cachelot, and Nix something or other are a few that come immediately to mind. With the presidential election coming on that article doesn't surprise me in the least. In fact, I'm surprised there aren't more just like it. The Dems have lots of easy pickins for that sort of thing over there, if you ask me.
2004-08-12 20:26 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Texas Dissident]I haven't checked in at Free Republic in many moons, but before I left that soap opera there were a number of whack jobs all over that board. Zionist Conspirator, Cachelot, and Nix something or other are a few that come immediately to mind. With the presidential election coming on that article doesn't surprise me in the least. In fact, I'm surprised there aren't more just like it. The Dems have lots of easy pickins for that sort of thing over there, if you ask me.[/QUOTE] There are quite a few radical jew-commies at Free Republic too...also known as coonservatives and neo-coonservatives:bash:
2004-08-15 21:55 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Huda Salih Mahdi Ammash]Silly boy. Neocons are the opposite of commies![/QUOTE]
Sorry Huda but the communist party was founded by the Jews and they are the Necons,,,,,,,,,,,,, am I mistaken??????? if so, why?
Better to be ignorant one time than stupid for ever.
2004-08-16 04:12 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Huda Salih Mahdi Ammash]Perhaps both were founded by Jews, but that doesn't change the fact that Neocons support neoliberal economocs, which obviously are the opposite of communism. [/QUOTE]
Actually, they're not so different.
Soviet communism was characterized by broad central planning of the economy. The Soviets had an enormous ministry called Gosplan that made all major economic decisions.
Capitalism in its "neoliberal" form is just a few steps removed from that. A single company called Walmart plans which products will be available to millions of consumers from its corporate HQ in Arkansas. Same for alll the Fortune 100 in their own spheres.
Capitalism also has a Federal Reserve Bank - a private corporation - that plans by fiat monetary policy for the dollar, and through it for the world. LIkewise the Soviet Union established a purely imaginary value for the ruble and the exchange corridors for other socialist currencies.
Both neoliberal capitalism and Soviet communism are characterized by mind numbing uniformity in material products as a result of this planning. While the quality of capitalism's products is generally better, this is due to the fact that capitalism is still not completely centrally planned, but its definitely moving in that direction, and overall the quality of products will decline as monopoly increases.
And both are characterized by a soul destryouing insistence on ideological uniformity. PeeCee is the official ideology of our emerging globalist-capitalist nightmare, which is of course just re-packaged Marxism.
There is a third way - and that is the restoration of the free market without the distorting mechanisms upon which capitalism is based.
Please check out the Distributism sub-forum under Business & Economics.
I hope to see you there.
Walter
2004-08-16 04:18 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Huda Salih Mahdi Ammash]Silly boy. Neocons are the opposite of commies![/QUOTE]
Why do you say that?
[URL=http://www.antiwar.com/justin/j061303.html]Horowitz, Radosh & company are all Trotskyites[/URL].
They regularly quote [URL=http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=3027]Trotsky (Bronshtein)[/URL] in their current writings. Christopher Hitchens wrote a pean to Bronshtein (Trotsky) in the [URL=http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/prem/200407/hitchens]Atlantic[/URL].
Their desire for a worldwide democratic revolution is exactly the same thing as Trotsky's permanent revolution.
The connection is simple enough once one sees that Bronshein and Horowitz are motivated by the same desires: Jewish interests. This is the constant, and ideology is the variable that changes with the perceived tactical advantages of Jewish interests.
But Jewish interests always remain unchanged.
Have you read [URL=http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0759672229/qid=1092629878/sr=8-1/ref=pd_ka_1/102-9779376-3141761?v=glance&s=books&n=507846]Kevin McDonald?[/URL]
I also suggest that you check out [URL=http://home.ddc.net/ygg/]Yggdrasil.[/URL]
Walter
2004-08-16 04:22 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Huda Salih Mahdi Ammash]Perhaps both were founded by Jews, but that doesn't change the fact that Neocons support neoliberal economocs, which obviously are the opposite of communism. I signed up for Free Republic but have not spent much time there (one post, I believe), but I doubt someone with Communist views would be tolerated there.[/QUOTE] Guess you'll have to do a little more study into the neocons, Huda. Can't recap everything we've learned here just for you. Just let's say what seems "obviously" true often isn't.
Especially since so many of the neocons started out as Trotskyites, as Walter notes. You might start with a search here of "neocon" and "Trotskyite".
2004-08-18 21:36 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Huda Salih Mahdi Ammash] Neocons support neoliberal economocs[/QUOTE]They dont support Capitalism any more than they "supported" Communism (when they were younger). The Neons have one ideology: the promotion and protection of the interests of Jews. Naturally, this means constantly evolving positions on everything. But at the heart of it is nothing but sectarianism - there is nothing "conservative" or "Liberal" about them. They would support ethnic cleansing in Israel and promote the bombing of Serbia simultaenously. Normal would people think this is a contradiction. Jews dont think that way. Before their interests as the "chosen people" all norms of human behaviour are rendered meaningless. Those norms apply only to the Goys.
The Lenin quote that History is not about ideas but about two questions: "Who?" and "Whom?" adequately sums up the Neo-con way of looking at things.
People tend to forget this very easily. The neo-conservatives have nothing but absolute contempt for the Constitution (that the Jews believed the US Constitution is a "living document" can be found in "The International Jew" by Ford, written in the 1920s). They are at heart criminals and slimeballs who would stop at nothing to achieve their own ends. They have no attachment to limited government, liberty or even that most hallowed of principles "equality". It all depends on what suits them at what time. So in a matter of a few months they can move from Trotskyists to "Reganites" to simply "conservatives".
And needless to say they are dangerous. In a saner time, men like Kristol would have been captured and subject to a public execution for various acts of treason. The same applies to Feith, Perle and their fellow tribesmen.
2004-08-18 21:47 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Faust]Hugh Lincoln,
It is fun to see the truth spoken![/QUOTE]Sounds like you and the FReepers have alot in common. Btw, Corasi calls himself a "devout Catholic" so understand his remarks properly, from within, not from without through the stained-glass darkly.
2004-08-19 08:33 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Huda Salih Mahdi Ammash]Silly boy. Neocons are the opposite of commies![/QUOTE]
Neo-"conservatives" are just capitalist Trotskyites. You can call them global imperialists if it makes you feel better, but six of one and a half-dozen of the other....