← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Jim Giles
Thread ID: 14648 | Posts: 62 | Started: 2004-08-08
2004-08-08 12:43 | User Profile
As the only pro-white political leader in America, I'm handing out some orders beginning right now.
[color=red][size=4]DESTROY THE REPUBLICAN PARTY![/size][/color]
Vote for John Kerry.
As pro-whites, we must get Bush and the Republicans out of the White House.
All this other chatter about voting for some 'other' person is crap. Your 'other' candidate will not even utter the word pro-white.
Putting Kerry in gives the pro-white community lots and lots of new opportunites. We know the Republicans for what they are but many conservative Americans must begin to see them in the same light. As long as we are competing against Republicans our task is much harder. We need to clear the field and prop up one weak opponent rather than combat two foes at once. Remember the two armies fortified on that hilltop.
And for God's sake forget what the JewsMedia says about anything. Who had you rather draw your sword against, the Democrat party ONLY or the Democrat party and the Republican party AT THE SAME TIME?
You have got your orders. Now act like a white man and make the most of your vote come this November 2, 2004. It's okay to fight mean. You have my permission.
2004-08-08 15:14 | User Profile
I stand corrected. There are two pro-white political leaders in America.
[url="http://www.jameshartforcongress.com/"][color=#22229c]www.jameshartforcongress.com[/color][/url]
[url="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,127932,00.html"][color=#22229c]http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,127932,00.html[/color][/url]
Racist Wins GOP House NominationFriday, August 06, 2004 [img]http://www.foxnews.com/images/service_ap_36.gif[/img] MEMPHIS, Tenn. ââ¬â An unabashed racist will represent the Republican party in the November election for a congressional seat after a write-in candidate failed to derail his effort.
With 86 percent of the primary vote counted Thursday, write-in candidate Dennis Bertrand ([url="http://search.foxnews.com/info.foxnws/redirs_all.htm?pgtarg=wbsdogpile&qcat=web&qkw=Dennis%20Bertrand"][color=#0000ff]search[/color][/url]) had just 1,554 votes compared to 7,671, or 83 percent, for James L. Hart ([url="http://search.foxnews.com/info.foxnws/redirs_all.htm?pgtarg=wbsdogpile&qcat=web&qkw=James%20L.%20Hart"][color=#0000ff]search[/color][/url]), a believer in the discredited, phony science of eugenics.
In November, the GOP candidate will oppose Rep. John Tanner, a Democrat who has represented the northwest Tennessee district for 15 years.
Hart, 60, vows if elected to work toward keeping "less favored races" from reproducing or immigrating to the United States. In campaign literature, Hart contends that "poverty genes" threaten to turn the United States into "one big Detroit."
"I didn't expect to win," Hart said. "I thought their network would beat my ideas."
He has run for the 8th District seat before and drawn little attention. But people began to notice this time because he was the only Republican on the ballot.
Since the deadline for getting on the ballot had passed, Bertrand, also a Republican, began a write-in campaign, saying he wanted to protect the party's honor.
2004-08-08 15:42 | User Profile
A distant second to you..oh great one...:notworth:
I only know what's been reported by the jewsmedia and talmudavision about Mr. Hart, but eugenics like phrenology is a little on the whacky side...so at this point Mr. Hart is strictly a sub-genius compared to you oh great one...plus I'm pretty sure Mr. Hart wants to give the social security trust fund to the Wall Street jews...
2004-08-08 15:56 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Pennsylvania_Dutch]A distant second to you..oh great one...:notworth:
I only know what's been reported by the jewsmedia and talmudavision about Mr. Hart, but eugenics like phrenology is a little on the whacky side...so at this point Mr. Hart is strictly a sub-genius compared to you oh great one...plus I'm pretty sure Mr. Hart wants to give the social security trust fund to the Wall Street jews...[/QUOTE]Not everyone can be perfect like me. Still Mr. Hart is one of only two men in the country. Not bad.
2004-08-08 20:48 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Jim Giles] Putting Kerry in gives the pro-white community lots and lots of new opportunites. [/QUOTE] Please elaborate on this. How will putting a Jew in office create new opportunities for us? The only good I can think of is that in an attempt to dispel any rumors of a Jewish cospiracy, he might take some token anti-Israel measures.
2004-08-08 22:37 | User Profile
[QUOTE=travis]Please elaborate on this. How will putting a Jew in office create new opportunities for us? The only good I can think of is that in an attempt to dispel any rumors of a Jewish cospiracy, he might take some token anti-Israel measures.[/QUOTE]The Republicans are out of the picture. Republicans need to be viewed as losers; Republicans need to be rejected as representative of white people; once Republicans are no longer an alternative, the people can focus on new pro-white candidates.
Destroy the Republican party; reject the Republican party; and embrace new pro-white independent candidates. The first step is to turn away from the Republican party.
Embrace this idea completely. It's the healthy and patriotic thing to do.
Vote for John Kerry.
2004-08-09 08:17 | User Profile
You are absolutely right, JG -- if fact, you've only just begun to tell it like it is. It goes on from there.
You are right to call southerners back to the democrat party -- then kick out the Kerrykohns. I can't vote for johnboy, though. Would your local dems listen to a call for a "vote only under protest, with intent to purge America after the election (of pieces of :dung: " like Trent (the cow-) Lott), as well as John Kerry?
I would vote for you if you ran for president.
2004-08-09 12:43 | User Profile
[QUOTE=TexasAnarch]You are absolutely right, JG -- if fact, you've only just begun to tell it like it is. It goes on from there.
You are right to call southerners back to the democrat party -- then kick out the Kerrykohns. I can't vote for johnboy, though. Would your local dems listen to a call for a "vote only under protest, with intent to purge America after the election (of pieces of :dung: " like Trent (the cow-) Lott), as well as John Kerry?
I would vote for you if you ran for president.[/QUOTE]If you don't vote for Kerry, you're helping Bush win re-election.
2004-08-09 13:35 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Jim Giles]....... once Republicans are no longer an alternative, the people can focus on new pro-white candidates.
..........[/QUOTE]
This makes sense.
[QUOTE=Jim Giles]...... The first step is to turn away from the Republican party.
Embrace this idea completely. It's the healthy and patriotic thing to do.
Vote for John Kerry.[/QUOTE] What's this? [QUOTE=Jim Giles]Vote for John Kerry.[/QUOTE]
Jim Giles supports queers now? Jim Giles supports John Kerry?
John Kerry is ready to institute all forms of perverted social engineering programs designed to enhance more subversion in American society.
John Kerry is a damned communist Sympathizer. ( yes, spelt with a capitol "S" ) John Kerry endorses homosexuals and supports negroes and their lifestyle as well. [U][I][B]A vote for John Kerry is a vote for perversion and subverted society that is more perverted than it already is.[/B][/I][/U]
2004-08-09 13:47 | User Profile
[QUOTE=golfball]This makes sense.
What's this?
Jim Giles supports queers now? Jim Giles supports John Kerry?
John Kerry is ready to institute all forms of perverted social engineering programs designed to enhance more subversion in American society.
John Kerry is a damned communist Sympathizer. ( yes, spelt with a capitol "S" ) John Kerry endorses homosexuals and supports negroes and their lifestyle as well. [u]A vote for John Kerry is a vote for perversion and subverted society that is more perverted than it already is.[/u][/QUOTE]You've got to be a mean person to understand my approach.
2004-08-09 14:08 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Jim Giles]You've got to be a mean person to understand my approach.[/QUOTE] I understand, but the "media" and "public mediums" decides who gets more airtime and who does not. We need to get more of our people into the mainstream party that will help our nation, as well as independents that seek a different party ticket.
2004-08-09 16:03 | User Profile
[QUOTE=golfball]I understand, but the "media" and "public mediums" decides who gets more airtime and who does not. We need to get more of our people into the mainstream party that will help our nation, as well as independents that seek a different party ticket.[/QUOTE] Too intellectual for me bub, but, I know this, the Republicoons are the party of Mista Lincoon, and, they are the party that are destroying our democracy and our Constitution and have been since the get go.
We do have a problem with the jew-liberals in the Democrat party---but just remember---the operative word there is jew. I know just because they are jews, that makes them liberals! :argue:
2004-08-09 17:10 | User Profile
Immigration may be helping to destroy the GOP. Bushy and his babies think the Hispanics will join up, but they aren't. Blacks vote D by 90 percent. Not sure what it is for Hispanics, but it's not much better.
One alternative is to TAKE OVER the GOP. Force the Racial Communist Republicans to look like fools. It worked for Jim Hart.
2004-08-09 17:58 | User Profile
[QUOTE=golfball]I understand, but the "media" and "public mediums" decides who gets more airtime and who does not. We need to get more of our people into the mainstream party that will help our nation, as well as independents that seek a different party ticket.[/QUOTE]If you're pro-white, you're not welcome and never will be with the "media" and "public mediums." You can change your views but they never will. And you changing your views is a prerequisite to entry into their party.
There is no changing either party. We destroy the Republican party first and then we destroy the Democrat party. But we can't beat them both at the same time.
If you're not voting for Kerry, you're helping re-elect George Bush and the Republicans.
Destroy the Republican party.
2004-08-09 18:00 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Hugh Lincoln]Immigration may be helping to destroy the GOP. Bushy and his babies think the Hispanics will join up, but they aren't. Blacks vote D by 90 percent. Not sure what it is for Hispanics, but it's not much better.
One alternative is to TAKE OVER the GOP. Force the Racial Communist Republicans to look like fools. It worked for Jim Hart.[/QUOTE]The Republican party is not worth saving. Pro-whites should take enormous pride in destroying this party.
2004-08-09 21:23 | User Profile
I fear Jim Giles is right on this one. Bushie needs to go! Then Paleocons need to attack the Leadership of GOP and make a bid for power.
2004-08-09 23:40 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Jim Giles]If you don't vote for Kerry, you're helping Bush win re-election.[/QUOTE]
I don't trust you...
2004-08-10 00:08 | User Profile
Here is a Republican:
"Democrats in Sacramento weren't amused when the Republican governor, in the midst of a deadlock in budget negotiations last month, mocked them as gutless "girlie men" unable to break away from trial lawyers, unions and other special interests."
[url]http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/08/07/schwarzenegger.ap/index.html[/url]
2004-08-10 08:13 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Faust]I fear Jim Giles is right on this one. Bushie needs to go! Then Paleocons need to attack the Leadership of GOP and make a bid for power.[/QUOTE]
One could certainly make the case that "swing state" residents should vote Kerry/Edwards, but I'll be hornswaggled before I exercise my franchise in contributing to the Kerry landslide here in California. The California Green Party appears about to defy the national leadership and dump David Cobb in favor of Ralph Nader (hopefully other Green state parties will follow suit), so I will vote for the only candidate who more-or-less named the Jew (and at the National Press Club, no less).
It should be noted that in the larger sense, Giles is totally correct; principled men of the Right, patriots of all kind, from libertarians to nazis to Christian Nationalists, to Birchers, etc., should all form a movement to vote Democrat whenever doing so can harm the Republicans (you probably wouldn't want to vote out Ron Paul or Tom Tancredo, or any other members of the House Immigration Caucus, however). However, until such a nationally publicized and coordinated movement actually exists, I shall refrain from tossing my vote away in an unnoticed gesture.
2004-08-10 11:46 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Kevin_O'Keeffe]One could certainly make the case that "swing state" residents should vote Kerry/Edwards, but I'll be hornswaggled before I exercise my franchise in contributing to the Kerry landslide here in California. The California Green Party appears about to defy the national leadership and dump David Cobb in favor of Ralph Nader (hopefully other Green state parties will follow suit), so I will vote for the only candidate who more-or-less named the Jew (and at the National Press Club, no less[/Quote]
A very serious source tells me that Nader may win California for the Republicans...
2004-08-10 13:03 | User Profile
The sodomites want kerry over Bush... how about you?
[B]" A parade of Democratic leaders and Hollywood stars, including Ben Affleck, yesterday reassured homosexual delegates and advocates that they have a lot to gain by defeating the Bush administration and electing a Kerry administration."[/B]
" "If nothing else, you will have a mom in the White House," Teresa Heinz Kerry said before the packed hotel room of homosexual delegates and advocates."
" The homosexual community "is no longer put on the sidelines," said New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson. "You're an essential part of the Democratic family."
[B]" Hollywood actor and director Rob Reiner said the Bush administration's support for the Federal Marriage Amendment was just one more "irrefutable" reason to defeat him in November."[/B]
[url]http://www.washtimes.com/national/20040729-120324-4788r.htm[/url]
2004-08-10 17:22 | User Profile
the hard core Abu Ghraib homos are for Bush. That's who and what you will get -- actually what you WANT -- if you vote for Bush. These are the worst kind -- they don't tell you up-front what they are (abused abusers) until you are on Lynddie's leash.
They have nothing to offer except hate. Hate and anal rape.
The dems .... more repulsive, psychologically, but less abusive, physically. (like I said, latent homos themselves love to be titilatated by the Bush powerstick, and that is who will vote for him --THOSE WHO ARE ALREADY TOO ABUSED TO SEE ANYTHING BUT PEOPLE WHO WANT TO KILL THEM -- THEY CAN'T TALK WITHOUT MOUTHING "...(X--READ ENEMY DE JOUR) WANTS TO KILL AMERICAN (themselves) ... BECAUSE THEY KNOW IT IS NOW JUSTIFIED WITH REGARD TO THEMSELVES, AND KNOW THE ARAB WORLD KNOWS IT, AND THEY WOULD KILL EVERYONE WHO WON'T VOTE FOR THEM -- HAVE TO DO IT )
But its the Jewish element in both parties that makes normal people hate the this faux election, and America, as such. The culture of self-hatred.
(Hate, Freud found -- see "Instincts and Their Vicissitudes, l915) - is not just the reverse of love -- it is the result of having to suppress love, which is what one ought to feel toward the nation's life, and its leaders. One has to hate, when the expression of love leads to abuse, as it is promised to do with "4 more years" of either. WE HAVE TO FIND SOMEONE WE WANT TO VOTE FOR, OR NOT VOTE. THE EVIL OF 2 LESSERS WILL BE MASS UPHEAVAL AND EXTERMINATION, LIKE THEY ARE DOING TO IRAQ'S RELIGIOUS MAJORITY AND AL SADR. WHAT DON'T YOU SEE ABOUT THAT, GABE?)
sign me: -old liberal majority, turned super-conservative in defense of truth, humanity, being.
2004-08-11 18:47 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Gabrielle]The sodomites want kerry over Bush... how about you?
" A parade of Democratic leaders and Hollywood stars, including Ben Affleck, yesterday reassured homosexual delegates and advocates that they have a lot to gain by defeating the Bush administration and electing a Kerry administration."
" "If nothing else, you will have a mom in the White House," Teresa Heinz Kerry said before the packed hotel room of homosexual delegates and advocates."
" The homosexual community "is no longer put on the sidelines," said New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson. "You're an essential part of the Democratic family."
" Hollywood actor and director Rob Reiner said the Bush administration's support for the Federal Marriage Amendment was just one more "irrefutable" reason to defeat him in November."
[url="http://www.washtimes.com/national/20040729-120324-4788r.htm"]http://www.washtimes.com/national/20040729-120324-4788r.htm[/url][/QUOTE]We install the Democrats and in doing so we destroy the Republicans. Then we destroy the Democrats.
2004-08-11 20:12 | User Profile
How do you destroy the democrats by voting them in? Personally I'd rather vote for a third party but since the votes don't count I'll do just that.
2004-08-11 20:41 | User Profile
Bush / Cheney 2004
:)
2004-08-11 21:39 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Solid]How do you destroy the democrats by voting them in?[/QUOTE]Like I said, you've got to be tough and mean to understand this approach.
[QUOTE]Personally I'd rather vote for a third party but since the votes don't count I'll do just that.[/QUOTE]Your vote counts bigtime when you cast it for Kerry. It does not count one bit if you vote for ANYONE else, assuming you are pro-white and want to destroy the Republican party. Apparently, neither of these assumptions apply to you.
2004-08-11 21:42 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Texas Dissident]Bush / Cheney 2004
:)[/QUOTE]And you call yourself a dissident? I bet you got a lot of money too.
BTW, the blood of those nearly 1,000 dead soldiers is on your hands. Why aren't you in Iraq?
2004-08-11 21:44 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Texas Dissident]Bush / Cheney 2004
:)[/QUOTE] WELCOME BACK, TD!
2004-08-11 22:10 | User Profile
[QUOTE=TexasAnarch]WELCOME BACK, TD![/QUOTE]
Thanks, TA. Sic 'em Bears.
Mr. Jimmy Giles,
Lighten up. Did you even check the attached picture?
No chance I'd ever vote for Bush. I would vote for Kerry 'cept I can't bring myself to vote for someone that supports women killing their babies. In all actuality, I'm probably best labeled as an old school Southern Democrat.
2004-08-11 22:13 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Jim Giles]We install the Democrats and in doing so we destroy the Republicans. Then we destroy the Democrats.[/QUOTE]
How?
2004-08-11 22:29 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Texas Dissident]Thanks, TA. Sic 'em Bears.
Mr. Jimmy Giles,
Lighten up. Did you even check the attached picture?
No chance I'd ever vote for Bush. I would vote for Kerry 'cept I can't bring myself to vote for someone that supports women killing their babies. In all actuality, I'm probably best labeled as an old school Southern Democrat. [/QUOTE] That's one of the odd, but, honest things about Kerry's character or that character Kerry---the guy says he is personally morally opposed to abortion.
Me, I don't like it, but, then again, I'm not going to practice medicine without a license.
Another thing I've noticed over the years, everyone is against abortion, until their kid has to have one!
I also think it's a state issue...and should be decided in each of the 50 states...
I'm not running for Congress in Mississippi...:bag:
2004-08-12 00:13 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Jim Giles] Your vote counts bigtime when you cast it for Kerry. It does not count one bit if you vote for ANYONE else, assuming you are pro-white and want to destroy the Republican party. Apparently, neither of these assumptions apply to you.[/QUOTE]:disgust: You're calling me anti-white but you want to vote in a jew.:wacko: But I'd be certainly willing to take in consideration what you suggest if you give an explanation how to destroy the democrats after the republicans.
2004-08-12 02:10 | User Profile
[quote=Jim Giles] ââ¬ÅJohn Kerry and the Democrats CAN BE DEFEATED by our pro-white movement. That's why we want them installed temporarily (We are setting them up to take them out.). George Bush and the Republicans confuse white people as 'conservative,' i.e., pro-white. The Republican party is a fraud and must be destroyed.
Once destroyed, pro-whites will only face the Democrats and then we will destroy them.
This is a no brainer. Who had you rather face, two armies or one army? One of course. And of the two armies who had you rather fight? The Democrats of course.
The difference between Bush and Kerry is that we can more easily defeat Kerry.
If you vote for anyone other than John Kerry you are helping George Bush win re-election. Make your vote count. Vote for John Kerry and destroy the Republican party.ââ¬Â
Let us reason together, shall we, what proof is there that it would be easier to destroy Kerry than Bush? Bush is a millionaire, but Kerry is a billionaire! Kerry is a jew, whereas Bush is a goy, and, according to all the WN writings, the Jews are the ones with the real power! As far as the Republican party, it will not be destroyed if Kerry wins; instead, it will make them think thatââ¬â¢s what the people want, and theyââ¬â¢ll get in line with the wishes of the massesââ¬Â¦after all, they are there to do the peopleââ¬â¢s will: for the people by the people. Mr.Giles says, ââ¬ÅJohn Kerry and the Democrats CAN BE DEFEATED by our pro-white movement. That's why we want them installed temporarily (We are setting them up to take them out.)ââ¬Â You do notice that he offers no real way to defeat the all-powerful billionaire Jew Kerry, or the powerful leftist democrats whose influence and support grows daily. He claims the pro-white movement is going to do thisââ¬Â¦lolââ¬Â¦ the pro white cannot stop fighting amongst itself long enough to change a light bulb. The WN movement is full of jews, government agents, and a heck a lot of back stabbers and leftover leftists that cannot and will not let go of their leftist ideology. So, even with its good people (and thereââ¬â¢s plenty of ââ¬Ëem, lost in the rabble), we will never be a force to reckon with because we can not even understand the basic strategy of our conquers - unityââ¬Â¦ The jewish people will always vote for a jew if that is an option, whether they like the jew or not. They know that they must stick together to winââ¬Â¦ they uniteââ¬Â¦ but not goy ââ¬â that is why they are ahead, and we (so very far) behind.
2004-08-12 02:21 | User Profile
Here on George "Wimp" Bush: [url]http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=3528[/url]
2004-08-12 02:26 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Solid]But I'd be certainly willing to take in consideration what you suggest if you give an explanation how to destroy the democrats after the republicans.[/QUOTE]With pro-white votes and independent pro-white candidates like me. Once the Republican party is no more, whites will have no where else to turn.
2004-08-12 02:30 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Texas Dissident]Thanks, TA. Sic 'em Bears.
Mr. Jimmy Giles,
Lighten up. Did you even check the attached picture?
No chance I'd ever vote for Bush. I would vote for Kerry 'cept I can't bring myself to vote for someone that supports women killing their babies. In all actuality, I'm probably best labeled as an old school Southern Democrat.
In the end I'll probably just write-in AntiYuppie.[/QUOTE]
I'm very pleased to see you back in action, Tex.
I think that Bush is the better of the two under a "worse is better" theory. We need a full blown collapse of the empire, which in my estimation is the best (only?) hope of our Republic's survival. This means that we should support whoever will screw things up best for the Empire - getting us ever deeper into the quagmires of Iraq and Afghanistan and breaking our budget. In short, imperial overstretch is good for us Christian republicans and bad for the Pharisees.
I believe that we need the bitterest of medicines. The sheeple need to suffer big time before they'll be able to hear our message, and I think Shrub is just the guy to bring on wars witih Iran & Syria, sustain ruinously high oil prices, and so on and so forth. He's an idiot, and that makes him much more dangerous to the Empire's health than Kerry.
I suppose that I should vote for Shrub, but I personally lack the courage of my convictions. I just can't bring myself to actually vote for that miserable little worm. I suspect I'll vote for Nader, with whom I at least agree mostly as to the dangers of corporations. He is a sodomite-loving baby killer, though. So, he, I'm conflicted.
By the way, good graphic:
[IMG]http://www.originaldissent.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=94[/IMG]
Walter
2004-08-12 02:33 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Pennsylvania_Dutch]Here on George "Wimp" Bush: [/QUOTE]
U.S. to Give Border Patrol New Powers to Deport Illegal Aliens ""There is a concern that as we tighten the security of our ports of entry through our biometric checks that there will be more opportunity or more effort made by terrorists to enter our country through our vast land borders," Asa Hutchinson, the undersecretary for border security at the Department of Homeland Security, said at a news conference.
"We recognize that we have to secure those and that's the president's first principle of immigration reform," Mr. Hutchinson said. "America must secure its borders and this is a part of that effort."
[url]http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/10/politics/10CND-IMMIG.html?ei=5006&en=ac4fb51864b62632&ex=1092801600&partner=ALTAVISTA1&pagewanted=print&position=[/url]
2004-08-12 02:35 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Texas Dissident]Thanks, TA. Sic 'em Bears.
Mr. Jimmy Giles,
Lighten up. Did you even check the attached picture?
No chance I'd ever vote for Bush. I would vote for Kerry 'cept I can't bring myself to vote for someone that supports women killing their babies. In all actuality, I'm probably best labeled as an old school Southern Democrat.
In the end I'll probably just write-in AntiYuppie.[/QUOTE]You got me. No doubt I'm wound way too tight. Plus, I'm pissed that the dang hawks where I live are slaughtering my chickens. They got a real pretty banty rooster the other day. When I get up in the morning I hear them calling. They say some man used to raise hawks near where I live. Anyway, we've got a super abundance of them.
I hope you don't throw your vote away. I'm more excited about voting for Kerry than any vote I can recall except voting for Mississippi's first and only state flag in 2001.
2004-08-12 02:39 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Walter Yannis]I suspect I'll vote for Nader,[/QUOTE]And in doing so help re-elect George Bush.
Any vote for anyone other than Kerry is a vote for Bush.
Destroy the Republican party.
2004-08-12 02:41 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Jim Giles] I'm more excited about voting for Kerry than any vote I can recall except voting for Mississippi's first and only state flag in 2001.[/QUOTE]
Yes - it's not everyday you get to put a jew in supreme conmand of your country. How exciting!
2004-08-12 02:45 | User Profile
[QUOTE][Jim Giles]And in doing so help re-elect George Bush. [/QUOTE]
Exactly.
Worse is better.
[QUOTE]Any vote for anyone other than Kerry is a vote for Bush.[/QUOTE]
Right. But what you're missing is that worse is better.
[QUOTE]Destroy the Republican party.[/QUOTE]
Respectfully, you're thinking small.
Death to the Empire.
Long live the Republic.
Walter
2004-08-12 02:47 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Gabrielle]Yes - it's not everyday you get to put a jew in supreme conmand of your country. How exciting![/QUOTE]Both parties are controlled equally by the Jews. It matters not to them who wins. But it does matter to us. In order to destroy both parties and install a new government we must take out our prime competitor first. Then we'll cut the other serpent's head off.
2004-08-12 02:47 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Gabrielle]U.S. to Give Border Patrol New Powers to Deport Illegal Aliens ""There is a concern that as we tighten the security of our ports of entry through our biometric checks that there will be more opportunity or more effort made by terrorists to enter our country through our vast land borders," Asa Hutchinson, the undersecretary for border security at the Department of Homeland Security, said at a news conference.
"We recognize that we have to secure those and that's the president's first principle of immigration reform," Mr. Hutchinson said. "America must secure its borders and this is a part of that effort."
[url]http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/10/politics/10CND-IMMIG.html?ei=5006&en=ac4fb51864b62632&ex=1092801600&partner=ALTAVISTA1&pagewanted=print&position=[/url][/QUOTE]
As I put it on the other thread:
[QUOTE]I suspect that this is purely for propaganda purposes.
They can cover a defacto amnesty with these expanded powers given to the police, while knowing full well that these powers may fail a court challenge on Constitutional grounds.
In the end the elites will get cheap brown labor and open borders while mollifying the sheeple by pointing the finger at the courts.
Walter[/QUOTE]
2004-08-12 02:50 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Walter Yannis]As I put it on the other thread:[/QUOTE]
Time will tell...
2004-08-12 02:53 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Walter Yannis]Worse is better.[/QUOTE]White is better.
[QUOTE]Right. But what you're missing is that worse is better.[/QUOTE]If your strategy were effective we would have no worries. We've been getting worse for a long time.
[QUOTE]Respectfully, you're thinking small.[/QUOTE]I'm trying to install a new government.
[QUOTE]Death to the Empire.[/QUOTE]Death to the Republican party first. Death to the Democrat party second. Then America becomes a white nation again.
2004-08-12 05:51 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Jim Giles]White is better.
If your strategy were effective we would have no worries. We've been getting worse for a long time.[/QUOTE]
Absolutely amazing! Right on, Jim. "Worse is better" is like "destroy America, that will save it." Its out and out psychosis. This is the end of that crap. It's the next millenium, already, and if anything is going to happen it will have to be people like you/us who see and takes action, if it kills them. There won't be any coming back anymore for any decent civilization if a big one goes off.
2004-08-12 06:33 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Jim Giles]With pro-white votes and independent pro-white candidates like me. Once the Republican party is no more, whites will have no where else to turn.[/QUOTE]I heard a similar idea before but I'm not a hundred percent convinced it will work without a violent revolt or a well established party. However, the former statement sounds good. I'll vote for you if you end immigration(except for whites to help repopulate, and it'd better be mostly nice looking women), make english the official and only language, stop sending technology overseas, and repatriate the non-whites.
2004-08-12 07:02 | User Profile
[QUOTE=TexasAnarch]Absolutely amazing! Right on, Jim. "Worse is better" is like "destroy America, that will save it." Its out and out psychosis. This is the end of that crap. It's the next millenium, already, and if anything is going to happen it will have to be people like you/us who see and takes action, if it kills them. There won't be any coming back anymore for any decent civilization if a big one goes off.[/QUOTE]
Oh, I dunno.
Recent history has many examples where multi-cultural empires collapsed down to their national components.
The USSR, Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia are good examples. In all of those cases, the sickness of the multicultural entity was the health of the national entity. Czhechoslovia had a "velvet" divorce, Yugslavia had your basic "bad train wreck" divorce. But in the end the results were the same - the little artificial empires fractured naturally along ethnic lines.
I see no reason that the failed American multi-culti enterprise should be any different. Hopefully, we can arise to the wisdom of Vaclav Havel's Czech Republic and do it the nice way instead of the Yugoslav way. But either way, we'll have our Europen, Christian and English-speaking American Republic.
And that's all I really want.
Walter
2004-08-12 09:01 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Pennsylvania_Dutch]A very serious source tells me that Nader may win California for the Republicans...[/QUOTE] I very much doubt it. Nader got approximately 4% of the vote here in 2000 (compared to 2.7% nationally), so its not like the Green Party and/or Nader constitutes some huge political force in this state (especially since most Yuppie Democrats now loathe Nader, whom they laughably blame for the Bush presidency, rather than blaming themselves for permitting the existence of a national political culture that doesn't simply laugh out loud at the very notion of some doltish scion essentially inheriting the Presidency from his daddy). Despite Schwarzenegger's victory (it should be remembered his "landslide" consisted of obtaining 48% of the vote, although paleoconservative/libertarianesque state Senator Tom McClintock picked up 12% of the vote in that same race, so it could reasonably be seen as a landslide for California Republicans - something we haven't seen since 1994) and his pretty strong (and largely deserved, it seems to me) popularity, George W. Bush's popularity is extremely low in this state. Since I don't see any way Bush can garner over 40% of the vote here in California, Nader (along with all other 3rd parties) would have to score at least 20% of the vote (and probably more) in order to prevent a Kerry victory. Barring a major national political event of the sort we haven't seen since 9/11, and one with essentially opposite results, that isn't going to happen.
Personally, I wish it would, just so Nader could demonstrate to the Democrats that they need independent thinkers (even those on the left) in order to remain in power, and can't just buy their way into the White House via 30-second commercials (as the Republicans have so clearly demonstrated they can do). Nader cost Gore the election in 2000, by taking not only Florida, but also New Hampshire "away" from Gore (either of which would have given Gore an Electoral College majority). In 1996, Nader cost Klinton a victory in Colorado. Anything that demonstrates to one or both of the major parties that there is some electoral price to pay for the policies they have chosen sounds like a good thing to me. In that vein, it should be noted that Buchanan's 0.4% of the vote was sufficient to cost Bush the states of Wisconsin, Iowa, New Mexico and Oregon, thus it is clearly demonstrated that under our Electoral College system, 3rd parties are still a potentially very potent weapon to wield against the treason duopoly.
It should be noted that the reason Buchanan cost Bush four states with 0.4% of the vote, while Nader could only cost Gore two states with nearly 7 times as many votes, is because while Nader's voters were concentrated in states such as California and Massachusetts, where the outcome was a foregone conclusion, Buchanan's voters were concentrated in the very "swing states" we've all heard so much about lately (which suggests that even a quarter of a million Peroutka voters could deny Bush his re-election). Let's hope that's exactly what happens!
2004-08-12 09:20 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Jim Giles]Any vote for anyone other than Kerry is a vote for Bush.[/QUOTE]
Only if you live in one of the 20 or so "swing states." For those of us living in places like Mississippi and California, there is no reason to vote for Kerry. If I lived in Ohio or Missouri, however, I would consider voting for that worthless Jew bastard. Fortunately, I'm not faced with that distasteful dilemma....and neither are you.
Additionally, what makes you think that "conservative" Whites would stop voting for the Republican Party, just because it could no longer win elections? Massachusetts Republicans still vote Republican, even though the state's entire congressional delegation and over 3/4ths of its legislature are Democrats. I think you are overestimating the capacity for independent thought & action on the part of the typical Boobus Americanus. Do you really believe that the Country Clubbers and the Christian Zionists are going to turn to people like you, James Hart and David Duke? I wish it were so, but it doesn't strike me as a particularly viable strategy at this time. I do, however, commend you for seeking election to the Congress, even if I think a lot of your rhetorical style leaves a great deal to be desired.
2004-08-12 14:00 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Gabrielle]Yes - it's not everyday you get to put a jew in supreme conmand of your country. How exciting![/QUOTE] Kerry has some very White ancestors too, including Winthorps'. These are very very White folks and I'm sure there are some interesting written quotes from them on race and the jews...it will be really funny when they are quoted...:thumbsup:
2004-08-12 17:26 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Solid]I heard a similar idea before but I'm not a hundred percent convinced it will work without a violent revolt or a well established party. However, the former statement sounds good. I'll vote for you if you end immigration(except for whites to help repopulate, and it'd better be mostly nice looking women), make english the official and only language, stop sending technology overseas, and repatriate the non-whites.[/QUOTE]Forget parties. They all end up being hijacked. Independent candidates committed to [url="http://www.rebelarmy.com/compact.htm"]Compact with New America[/url].
2004-08-12 17:28 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Kevin_O'Keeffe]Only if you live in one of the 20 or so "swing states." For those of us living in places like Mississippi and California, there is no reason to vote for Kerry. If I lived in Ohio or Missouri, however, I would consider voting for that worthless Jew bastard. Fortunately, I'm not faced with that distasteful dilemma....and neither are you.
Additionally, what makes you think that "conservative" Whites would stop voting for the Republican Party, just because it could no longer win elections? Massachusetts Republicans still vote Republican, even though the state's entire congressional delegation and over 3/4ths of its legislature are Democrats. I think you are overestimating the capacity for independent thought & action on the part of the typical Boobus Americanus. Do you really believe that the Country Clubbers and the Christian Zionists are going to turn to people like you, James Hart and David Duke? I wish it were so, but it doesn't strike me as a particularly viable strategy at this time. I do, however, commend you for seeking election to the Congress, even if I think a lot of your rhetorical style leaves a great deal to be desired.[/QUOTE]We are going to turn them all into swing states. And destroy the Republican party everywhere it breaths.
2004-08-13 01:48 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Walter Yannis]Oh, I dunno.
Recent history has many examples where multi-cultural empires collapsed down to their national components.
The USSR, Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia are good examples. .... But either way, we'll have our Europen, Christian and English-speaking American Republic.
And that's all I really want.
Walter[/QUOTE] maggots survive on carcasses too; and carpetbaggers buggered the old South.
Anything that compares this nation with anything European is to me indistinguishable from hatred of America.
2004-08-13 05:53 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Jim Giles]We are going to turn them all into swing states. And destroy the Republican party everywhere it breaths.[/QUOTE] I don't understand exactly how your running for office is consistent with your desire to destroy the multi-party electoral system in this country.
If we'll just have one viable party, a Marxist one, to vote for like in the former Soviet Union, what's the use of running for office anyway? Why is that such a superior means of political activity?
2004-08-13 05:58 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Jim Giles]We are going to turn them all into swing states. And destroy the Republican party everywhere it breaths.[/QUOTE] I don't understand exact;y how your running for office is consistent with your desire to destroy the multi-party electoral system in this country.
If we'll just have one viable party, a Marxist one, to vote for like in the former Soviet Union, what's the use of running for office anyway? Why is that such a superior means of political activity?
2004-08-13 09:13 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Okiereddust]I don't understand exactly how your running for office is consistent with your desire to destroy the multi-party electoral system in this country.
If we'll just have one viable party, a Marxist one, to vote for like in the former Soviet Union, what's the use of running for office anyway? Why is that such a superior means of political activity?[/QUOTE]
What JG is saying, as I see it, is there is no democracy in this party system, so it has to be destroyed to get some. It's leading straight to genocide, beginning with Falluja, Najaf, Iran, then China.
Because what exists now, installed by killers worse thand any Nazis ever were, since they were defending their coutnry, cannot continue to do so without genocide, against all men who will defend their right to live in freedom.
SUPPORT AL SADR AND ARAFAT
neither are enemies of America. Both are enemies of the enemies inside America who have seized its government through the "parties".
Sid Thomas
2004-08-13 09:33 | User Profile
[QUOTE=TexasAnarch]Anything that compares this nation with anything European is to me indistinguishable from hatred of America.[/QUOTE]
I'm not sure I understood that.
The American nation is the child of Europe. We're white by race, Christian by religion, and English in culture and tradition (and to a lesser degree French by political philosophy).
We are European in a very profound way. To love the best of America is to love the best of Europe.
No hatred there was expressed or implied.
Walter
2004-08-13 12:10 | User Profile
[QUOTE=TexasAnarch]Absolutely amazing! Right on, Jim. "Worse is better" is like "destroy America, that will save it." Its out and out psychosis. This is the end of that crap. It's the next millenium, already, and if anything is going to happen it will have to be people like you/us who see and takes action, if it kills them. There won't be any coming back anymore for any decent civilization if a big one goes off.[/QUOTE]
Worse is not better; history has proved this time and time again. 1. Russia 2. France 3. Italy 4. Greece
2004-08-13 12:16 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Gabrielle]Worse is not better; history has proved this time and time again. 1. Russia 2. France 3. Italy 4. Greece[/QUOTE]
The question is "better for whom?"
In Russia, the collapse brought on by WWI was good for Lenin and his Bolsheviks. As Lenin foresaw, his small party could take power only in the vacuum created by the collapse of the old power.
I'm not sure which historical events you have in mind for the other countries listed, but similarly collapse was good for Napoleon in France, Mussolini in Italy, and the Generals' Junta in Greece.
My point is that a collapse could be good for us American Nationalists, if we organize ourselves now and play our cards right.
That's how I understand Yggdrasil's proposed plan, which I think most of us are on board with.
Walter
2004-08-13 13:23 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Okiereddust]I don't understand exactly how your running for office is consistent with your desire to destroy the multi-party electoral system in this country.
If we'll just have one viable party, a Marxist one, to vote for like in the former Soviet Union, what's the use of running for office anyway? Why is that such a superior means of political activity?[/QUOTE]I'm running as an independent. Our revolution will be effected with independent candidates. No party.
I think you need to view my videos again:
[url="http://www.rebelarmy.net/video/lena/lena.htm"]http://www.rebelarmy.net/video/lena/lena.htm[/url] [url="http://www.rebelarmy.net/video/neshoba04/neshoba04.htm"]http://www.rebelarmy.net/video/neshoba04/neshoba04.htm[/url] [url="http://www.rebelarmy.net/video/take3/take3.htm"]http://www.rebelarmy.net/video/take3/take3.htm[/url]
Additionally, I want more contributions. I deserve them. Contribute here:
[url="https://rebelarmy.net/contribute.htm"]https://rebelarmy.net/contribute.htm[/url]
Self reporting of contributions/expenditures here: [url="http://www.rebelarmy.com/sourcesuses.htm"]http://www.rebelarmy.com/sourcesuses.htm[/url]
I want to run TV spots, [color=red]the first pro-White political spots in modern history[/color].
2004-08-14 17:11 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Walter Yannis]
My point is that a collapse could be good for us American Nationalists, if we organize ourselves now and play our cards right.
That's how I understand Yggdrasil's proposed plan, which I think most of us are on board with.
Walter[/QUOTE]
Wrong, the first people that will be rounded up and killed off will be Identity Christians and WN; history bears this out.