← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · All Old Right
Thread ID: 14485 | Posts: 16 | Started: 2004-07-09
2004-07-09 02:50 | User Profile
I posted in another thread of prioritizing opponents. The klans in Muslims countries do this all of the time, and it works very well. Some here seem so eager to fight and squabble for pleasure. What is the fixation with that? I thought only bitchy women did that. We have some men here with an "inner bitch"?
I'm not talking about the occasional shove, or good-natured disagreement. But, when someone gets so bent out of shape over what publication someone else subscribes to, this negatism fetish gets absurd.
If anyone here thinks for a second that I support zionist militants or third world tyrants, they haven't been reading a damn thing I've posted. If people are too stupid to know which way to point their rifle, maybe they just need to aim it at their own forehead and squeeze off a round. So, sheesh, save that super-militant crap if it's only targetting other westerners and other folks struggling to make it while under third world invasion and militant zionist attack. Fire control and correct target aquisition. It's time for some guys to grow up and stop emptying their "clip" at anything that russles in the bushes.
News flash...catholics and Protestants will disagree forever, with maybe some hatred mixed in. If we work hard, we will always find something amongst ourselves to kill each other over. I just can't understand it at this point in the game. We've got a GOP that may well start a global nuclear war if re-elected. There e just ins't a whole lot of time. I'd think it a terrbile waste to go out with our hands wrapped around each others' throats. So, where do we agree? And, let's start there.
2004-07-09 04:45 | User Profile
AOR
Thanks for bringing this up. In regards to religious theology, you bring up a good point. Protestants and Catholics no longer have the luxury of engaging in fratracide, when the turd-world, muslim, Chinese, Jewish led tidal wave is about to engulf all that western man has created.
Reminds me of a story I read years ago. Someone asked the (Catholic) foreman of a logging camp if it bothered him when a Protestant minister would show up to hold services in the camp. His reply was "Nah, it don't bother me, we're all heading for the same landing anyways".
2004-07-09 19:29 | User Profile
[QUOTE=All Old Right]I posted in another thread of prioritizing opponents. The klans in Muslims countries do this all of the time, and it works very well. Some here seem so eager to fight and squabble for pleasure. What is the fixation with that? I thought only bitchy women did that. We have some men here with an "inner bitch"?
I'm not talking about the occasional shove, or good-natured disagreement. But, when someone gets so bent out of shape over what publication someone else subscribes to, this negatism fetish gets absurd. [/QUOTE]
Well we just had a big dust up on this board, and the causes were illustrative. Nationalists and right-wingers tend to fight a lot. That is basically why Hitler took power over the nationalist movement in Germany - no one else, with no other methods, was possibly capable of uniting the various squabbling movements. And Hitler gained and kept power really by exploiting all these bitter internecine fueds, within Germany and the NS party. The necessity for such methods discredited not only NS but to a certain extent the whole right of center spectrum to some extent.
Of course not only are the WN hostile toward other nationalist and conservative factions, even ones very near to their own, they are even touchier about having this factious aspect to themselves pointed out. Maybe the pathologies of "The Authoritarian Personality" is not entirely without basis after all.
2004-07-10 05:10 | User Profile
All Old Right,
Yes you are Right. [QUOTE] I'm not talking about the occasional shove, or good-natured disagreement. But, when someone gets so bent out of shape over what publication someone else subscribes to, this negatism fetish gets absurd. . . If we work hard, we will always find something amongst ourselves to kill each other over. I just can't understand it at this point in the game. We've got a GOP that may well start a global nuclear war if re-elected. There e just ins't a whole lot of time. I'd think it a terrbile waste to go out with our hands wrapped around each others' throats. So, where do we agree? And, let's start there. [/QUOTE]
Looks like we have an example on this thread. Sad to see so many "Rightist" with the Hitler fixation; pro and anti. Sad that anyone on this forum would say anything so stupid as:
[QUOTE]Maybe the pathologies of "The Authoritarian Personality" is not entirely without basis after all.- Okiereddust[/QUOTE]
The claim of the "The Authoritarian Personality" was that middle Americans were Nazis just witing to take up Fascism and start killing people. It was one of worst works of trash ever put out by the marxists. It is anti-american trash at it's most hateful.
You mean "Muslim" clans not "klans," you only spell it with a "K" if you mean Ku Klux Klan.
2004-07-10 06:07 | User Profile
I would just like to begin my comments by saying that I disagree with most of what you said.... Seriously, I don't see how my expressing agreement with you, Quant-whatever the **** his name is, Okiererewho, etc., matters one goddam bit. What a joke to think that any of this OD talk matters beyond generating good ideas--something that can only be done through conflict and criticism.
[QUOTE=All Old Right]I posted in another thread of prioritizing opponents. The klans in Muslims countries do this all of the time, and it works very well. Some here seem so eager to fight and squabble for pleasure. What is the fixation with that? I thought only bitchy women did that. We have some men here with an "inner bitch"?
I'm not talking about the occasional shove, or good-natured disagreement. But, when someone gets so bent out of shape over what publication someone else subscribes to, this negatism fetish gets absurd.
If anyone here thinks for a second that I support zionist militants or third world tyrants, they haven't been reading a damn thing I've posted. If people are too stupid to know which way to point their rifle, maybe they just need to aim it at their own forehead and squeeze off a round. So, sheesh, save that super-militant crap if it's only targetting other westerners and other folks struggling to make it while under third world invasion and militant zionist attack. Fire control and correct target aquisition. It's time for some guys to grow up and stop emptying their "clip" at anything that russles in the bushes.
News flash...catholics and Protestants will disagree forever, with maybe some hatred mixed in. If we work hard, we will always find something amongst ourselves to kill each other over. I just can't understand it at this point in the game. We've got a GOP that may well start a global nuclear war if re-elected. There e just ins't a whole lot of time. I'd think it a terrbile waste to go out with our hands wrapped around each others' throats. So, where do we agree? And, let's start there.[/QUOTE]
2004-07-10 13:30 | User Profile
[QUOTE=darkstar]I would just like to begin my comments by saying that I disagree with most of what you said.... Seriously, I don't see how my expressing agreement with you, Quant-whatever the **** his name is, Okiererewho, etc., matters one goddam bit. What a joke to think that any of this OD talk matters beyond generating good ideas--something that can only be done through conflict and criticism.[/QUOTE]
Whoa! That wasn't a shot at you. Save it for the enemy, and that's not me. I'm just saying neither you, I, or any other of the world's 6.5 billion humans are ever going to resolve some disputes to our satisfaction. And, I can think of several more similar topics. I actually think the disputes define the cultures, preserve the cultures. But, if we are here at OD for a good reason, let's find it and at least work on those points of agreement also. If we are going to be extinct, let's use the Braveheart example and go out swinging(but not only at each other).
How do we define "we"? A lot of people here use only the word "white". I find that word inadequate, because it ignores cultural differences among those numbers, traitors, and the corrupt, and that lack of distinction will result is weak action, and the continued destruction of ALL of those cultures. There's friction there, like it or not, that needs to be addressed in a constructive manner. I think "we" are defined by the enemy's bias and similarities amongst ourselves. Who consistently loses out on political policy? Each culture, to survive, must organize and execute a plan. Just saying "white" is too general to communicate to future recruits. I suggest sticking to political policy, just as the enemy does. People need to stop insisting on carbon copies of themselves. A little of that is normal, but not to the point of self-destruction.
The entire INS has to be redesigned. The current crop of third parties are demanding excessive change(all or nothing). They're getting nothing, again and again. They're all over the place. Instead of insisting that everyone join a single group...let's define all of the varieties and then form allies among those differing viewpoints. There is massive support in this country for pro-RKBA and dramatic immigration reform. We need to start where the support is, not on some detailed philosophical concept 99% of US citizens have no knowledge of.
We the options of political change, taking no action and getting bullied to death, or grabbing the FAL and gear, and taking out as many government thugs/supporters as possible (civil war) before being killed or jailed. Although I think all should prepare for the worst, I think there's some agreement that we're not at the civil war stage yet. Let's find the common ground and move on that. If one person says they just can't go with a certain group, fine, form another. There's a real good chance that at some point, there'll be at least a single point two or more of the groups can join forces on. Just some serious organization fro a freaking change.
Thank you Faust...change noted.
For the other spelling-challenged [url]http://www.spellcheck.net/[/url]
I refuse to by any more MS products and don't have Linux online yet. Therefore, no sepll checked, until now.
2004-07-10 13:37 | User Profile
[url]http://www.azcapitoltimes.com/main.asp?SectionID=2&SubSectionID=2&ArticleID=1054[/url]
Think any of those people disagree on other major political issues? You bet. Do they let that keep them from fighting a common foe? Nope. There's no reason why this country shouldn't have a 5 million strong coalition of freedom advocates who are always working together on at least one issue. Understand what the enemy does...gets us looking at each other and not at changing issues. Divide and conquer. then again, I don't advocate going to the other extreme and intermarrying and destroying what I considered valued differences among people.
2004-07-10 16:55 | User Profile
Yes, lovely, save it for the Hallmark cards.
2004-07-10 17:34 | User Profile
[QUOTE=darkstar]Yes, lovely, save it for the Hallmark cards.[/QUOTE] LOL. No good ideas for a reply, huh? That made about as much intellectual contribution as a fart. I didn't say I wouldn't fight, just that I preferred not to. Ponce might have a point about you being an anti-freedom troll/instigator after all. Can't say I didn't try the olive branch before the club. What a sad life, walking around with a corn cob up your rear, hating the world, trying to act tough.
It's Quantrill. If you knew how to use google, you'd know who that was... [url]http://xroads.virginia.edu/~HYPER/HNS/Kansas/quantril.html[/url]
2004-07-10 17:39 | User Profile
AOR, I've always thought you were a moron. But of course, only an agent of 'the Jews' would let you know that, right?
2004-07-10 17:48 | User Profile
[QUOTE=darkstar]AOR, I've always thought you were a moron. But of course, only an agent of 'the Jews' would let you know that, right?[/QUOTE] Awww. Sorry. I'd like to roll around in the mud some, but just too busy. You should try it some time...doing something other than tapping that keyboard and seeing how many threads you can get on the index at once. Oh, do us all a favor and take your trash talk to PM, if it really means that much to you.
2004-07-10 19:43 | User Profile
Yes, I spend all my time writing on OD--what a laugh. What the hell do you know about my productivity levels, anyway?
Do not presume to speak for other OD members. In any case, I have no desire to engage in private discourse with you.
I enjoy some good insults, and think ad hominems can be very appropriate and very productive. And I do not suffer fools such as yourself gladly--when I can be bothered to notice your foolishness at all.
2004-07-12 03:37 | User Profile
All Old Right,
Good for you! I would love to go MS free! [QUOTE]I refuse to by any more MS products and don't have Linux online yet. Therefore, no sepll checked, until now.[/QUOTE]
2004-07-12 16:13 | User Profile
[QUOTE=darkstar]AOR, I've always thought you were a moron. But of course, only an agent of 'the Jews' would let you know that, right?[/QUOTE]
Hey, Darkstar, dude - what gives with this negativity?
You've been in a bad mood of late, compadre.
I fall into that stuff, too, but let's try to keep it constructive and civil.
Walter
2004-07-12 16:15 | User Profile
I am not sure, maybe it was the preceeding post that seems to endorse Ponce's Cubano rantings about me?
2004-07-12 17:06 | User Profile
test