← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · All Old Right
Thread ID: 14479 | Posts: 13 | Started: 2004-07-08
2004-07-08 20:56 | User Profile
[url]http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/7/7/220030.shtml[/url]
You're helping him claim a "mandate" for more war and more spending... and more shitting on individual rights. This whole thing is a referendum on Bush.
"The president deserves more than simple re-election," the former senator added. "He deserves a mandate to continue to lead this nation to peace and prosperity."
2004-07-08 20:59 | User Profile
[QUOTE=All Old Right] "The president deserves more than simple re-election," the former senator added. "He deserves a mandate to continue to lead this nation to peace and prosperity."[/QUOTE] Peace? What has this guy been smoking? Counting the War on Afghanistan, the War on Iraq, and the War on Terror, we have had three wars in about as many years. If that's peace, I'd hate to see what war looks like.
2004-07-09 05:51 | User Profile
[QUOTE=All Old Right] You're helping him claim a "mandate" for more war and more spending... and more shitting on individual rights. This whole thing is a referendum on Bush. **[/QUOTE]
I'm not too crazy about Bush either, so possibly you can tell me who's the better candidate? Please give reasons.
2004-07-10 22:46 | User Profile
[QUOTE=OPERA96]I'm not too crazy about Bush either, so possibly you can tell me who's the better candidate? Please give reasons.[/QUOTE] A vote for Bush doesn't make that distinction. It says "I love George Bush and everything he has done."
2004-07-11 00:23 | User Profile
I'm writing in Buchanan or Tancredo or Brimelow.
Can't decide yet.
2004-07-11 01:11 | User Profile
A vote for Kerry is a vote for Bush and a vote for Bush is a vote for Kerry for they are both the same,,,,,, I am not talking about the war but their support for the Jews.
As long as the Zionists are around their will be more wars than call for for they are the cause of most wars,,,,,,,read history and you will see.
2004-07-11 13:41 | User Profile
There's no way I'd vote for Bush but I don't think I could vote for a guy like John Kerry. I've been thinking hard about how deep this country has fallen, now the laughing stock of the world, but I don't mean that we and the rest of the world are really laughing at this grievous predicament. Our situation is downright frightening. George Bush and his movers and shakers have a big hammer in their hands and everything-[I]everything they see[/I]-is a 8 penny nail waiting to be pounded. Bush has wrecked this country more rapidly than any president before. Even moreso, most White Americans still have all faith in our political process and think it serves them just fine. Crazy.
I was thinking of voting for Kerry, but I'm voting [B]Constitution Party[/B]. I would love to see George Bush and his wicked crew sent packing back to their caves but if you've been reading up on Kerry's view on the biggest issues, I'd think you would see that he's not about to change anything the US Gov does now. Kerry might be .1% less pure evil than George Bush, but I think what we have here in Amerikwa is a complete and total failure to communicate any form of honesty. This country is ruled by terror.
2004-07-11 15:02 | User Profile
Nader came out heavily against Israel recently. Maybe he is the best bet. On the other hand, it might be a better idea to engage in tactical voting to defeat Bush rather than simply facilitate a Bush victory by voting for a Candidate that scuttles Kerry.
Its a hobson's choice.
2004-07-11 15:41 | User Profile
I call that "being between a rock and a hard place".
Politics now days is not about managing the government but of controlling the government, and as long as the Jewish lobby controls the politicians they will control the government.
2004-07-11 15:48 | User Profile
We might look a little further down the road than 2004. I think Hillary Clinton would be far worse than Kerry. Of course, Kerry is no good. But, it's being said that Hillary supporters are trying to doom Kerry so she is the chosen Dem for 2008. Is it really better for Bush to win and set it up just right for Hillary in 2008? The ultimate choice might be Kerry or Hillary, not Kerry or Bush.
I think Bush took them all by surprise by screwing up as bad as he has. The 2004 re-election should have been a breeze for any incumbent.
2004-07-12 13:42 | User Profile
Back last year in '03, there were already discussions here on OD about the of the 2004 Presidential Elections. One scenario brought up by some posters was the possibility of the election being cancelled because of a "terrorist attack" and thereby enabling the current president to use the "Patriot Act" to cancel the elections for "national security" reasons. I was one who believed this scenario could take place, and seeing how divided this country is and the near dead heat of two pathetic presidential candidates, I'd say we're possibly gonna be doin' the new dance called the 'dictatorial hop' quite soon.
Read this story: [B]Election Day Worries[/B] July 19 issue - American counterterrorism officials, citing what they call "alarming" intelligence about a possible Qaeda strike inside the United States this fall, are reviewing a proposal that could allow for the postponement of the November presidential election in the event of such an attack, NEWSWEEK has learned. The rest:[url]http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5411741/site/newsweek[/url]
2004-07-13 02:03 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Quantrill]Peace? What has this guy been smoking? Counting the War on Afghanistan, the War on Iraq, and the War on Terror, we have had three wars in about as many years. If that's peace, I'd hate to see what war looks like.[/QUOTE] A few months back Imus had a funny sound clip from a Bush town hall discussion.
Bush: "If your children are disturbed by the images of war they see on tv, tell them it's because we are a nation that believes in peace."
2004-07-14 05:33 | User Profile
[QUOTE=xmetalhead]Back last year in '03, there were already discussions here on OD about the of the 2004 Presidential Elections. One scenario brought up by some posters was the possibility of the election being cancelled because of a "terrorist attack" and thereby enabling the current president to use the "Patriot Act" to cancel the elections for "national security" reasons. I was one who believed this scenario could take place, and seeing how divided this country is and the near dead heat of two pathetic presidential candidates, I'd say we're possibly gonna be doin' the new dance called the 'dictatorial hop' quite soon. [/QUOTE] Not out of the question. I mean, the GOP is the party of Lincoln afterall.