← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · TexasAnarch

American atrocity in Fallujah

Thread ID: 14457 | Posts: 3 | Started: 2004-07-06

Wayback Archive

TexasAnarch [OP]

2004-07-06 06:57 | User Profile

An American atrocity in Fallujah

Newly installed Iraqi Prime Minister Allawi said (in re the US bombing in Fallujah)  “Iraqi forces provided the intelligence for the location of the al-Zarqawi safehouse so the strike could “terminate those terrorists, whose booby-trapped cars and explosive belts have harvested the souls of innocent Iraqis without discrimination, destroying Iraqi schools, hospitals and police stations.”” (Guardian 7.5.04)

The principle on which this act is predicated is the Achilles heel of democracy, and will defeat those who make war on “terror”.

The Achilles heel of democracy is fake hate crimes – either perpetrated on themselves by freak-outs (Tawanda Brawley, Clairmont College fem-lib prof) or by patsy set-ups (Reichstag fire) – in order to stir up public terror and outrage, discredit the responsible group, and  justify extreme measures, such as calling in 4 500 bombs and 2 1000 lb-ers (“2 tons of bombs” some reports said) on one house.

Such an atrocity could be triggered at any time in social situations of extreme tensions inflamed by killing.  For instance, it is reported that “over 40% of Canadian teens think America “evil” (Arthur Weinreb, Torontofreepress);  The number rose to 64% for French Canadian youth, he says.  All it would take to screw up the next election would be for some “extremist” anti-American to act out what Christian Soldiers sometimes feel called upon to do about evil in their midst.  Tons of bombs (of various kinds) follow.  No more anti-Americanism.  (uh….in the mentality of those who would pull off such a thing, and it has been done repeatedly)

Was there really any evidence the demolished house was used by al-Zarqari?  Who knows?  The 30 ft. hole blasted in the ground tells no tales.  Militarily, what was claimed to be provoked was clearly a retaliatory response to the whoever coordinated the “Tet offensive”  of mid-June.  But was Zarquari behind that? And were those in the targeted house really connected to him in any way?  He is also cited for suicide bombings, beheadings, and  links to al Quida, all of which may or may not be true, but how can they be so sure as to blast the house in Fallujah?

There is no legal justification for it, as there was none for Israel’s state targeted assassination of Hamas leader Sheik Yassin, also charged with sponsoring suicide bombers. In fact, the similarity of the two atrocities suggests the “Americans” are set up here to be the “Big Boy” criminals, blasting buildings with mega- bombs, whereas Mr. “Nice Guy” IDF-ers had merely used guided missiles on paraplegics in wheelchairs..

These are state forms of sniper shootings like the ones terrorizing Washington D.C. before the ’02 election, in which the Republicans squeaked by while the war was kept out of the campaign. These are just the second act in their re-election bid. Whatever it takes, said Lee Atwater, may he squirm in hell..

Let’s be clear on one point. Suicide bombers are a response to the illegal “suicide war” (Tom Friedman’s term for the Israeli-Palestine conflict, last year) on a helpless people by monsters. The l996 “Clean Break” document drawn up by the neocons, essentially subverting US policy toward Palestine/Israel based on the Oslo accords specifically called for making it “suicidal” to attack Israel. So they got what they asked for. (it was their suicide wish, at bottom) What makes them so radioactive is the fact that the psychological meaning of the suicide bombers is the death wish anybody and everybody can have toward Jews, delegated to children to carry out. That is what Israeli public relations must prevent the world form realizing.

It will be recalled that Fallujah erupted, with mutilated bodies swinging from a bridge, in retaliation to the Yassin shooting in late March. The US responded with an atrocity for Israel then, also, rather than allowing the rioters to have their say.

Now, having theoretically unified all enemies in the “war on terror”, they are set to shoot another poison dart into the heel of Achilles here at home, preventing suicide bombers. And blasting democracy.

But something else larger is happening, something the Canadian teens are picking up on (“liberal” ones). The storehouses of the world have been opened up to those who see the utter merciless inhuman, depraved, degraded mind set of little utterly terrorized children making war on themselves. It is a perception that, once realized, can never be changed. And it is being realized now. They are dead inside, already, and must kill everyone who knows the truth about them.

-st-

Mentzer

2004-07-07 06:10 | User Profile

TexasAnarch

You appear to like the Guardian. I assume you are making reference to the London Guardian newspaper and related website. A publication that promotes multiracial, multicultural and multifarious 'integration'.

It also supports muslim infiltration. It campaigns for Homosexual and Lesbian marriage. And the adoption of children by queers.

You quote it often.

TexasAnarch

2004-07-07 16:16 | User Profile

[QUOTE=Mentzer]TexasAnarch

You appear to like the Guardian. I assume you are making reference to the London Guardian newspaper and related website. A publication that promotes multiracial, multicultural and multifarious 'integration'.

It also supports muslim infiltration. It campaigns for Homosexual and Lesbian marriage. And the adoption of children by queers.

You quote it often.[/QUOTE]

I'll admit there is a decadent streak in the Brits a mile wide, but the Guardian's objectivity doesn't depend on being dominated by that. It is what it is, like their Times, and ours.

They never had real borders to defend, except by Her Royal Majesty's Navy, so had to go polyglot sooner or later, holding what England was together, if possible, through the langauge. That, according to Fichte, is where the deepest boundaries are etched in the psyche, but it needs a scene of application to continue. The reproduction of inner boundaries in forms true to history requires work that uprooted people in general cannot do, and settled ones stopped doing. A lot of this grtow wrong had to be undone this century. I enjoyed SARAJEVO REVISITED together with LL's comments immensely below, apropo of nothing in particular.