← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · weisbrot
Thread ID: 14192 | Posts: 1 | Started: 2004-06-15
2004-06-15 16:15 | User Profile
[url]http://www.sobran.com/columns/2004/040527.shtml[/url] They Arenââ¬â¢t What They Used to Be
May 27, 2004
If I had to sum up American history in one sentence, Iââ¬â¢d put it this way: The United States arenââ¬â¢t what they used to be.
Thatââ¬â¢s not nostalgia. Thatââ¬â¢s literal fact. Before the Civil War, the United States was a plural noun. The U.S. Constitution uses the plural form when, for example, it refers to enemies of the United States as ââ¬Åtheirââ¬Â enemies. And this was the usage of everyone who understood that the union was a voluntary federation of sovereign states, delegating only a few specified powers, and not the monolithic, ââ¬Åconsolidated,ââ¬Â all-powerful government it has since become.
Maybe Americans prefer the present megastate to the one the Constitution describes. But they ought to know the difference. They shouldnââ¬â¢t assume that the plural United States were essentially the same thing as todayââ¬â¢s United State, or that the one naturally ââ¬Åevolvedââ¬Â into the other.
The change was violent, not natural. Lincoln waged war on states that tried to withdraw from the Union, denying their right to do so. This was a denial of the Declaration of Independence, which called the 13 former colonies ââ¬ÅFree and Independent States.ââ¬Â
Washington and Jefferson at times expressed their fear that some states might secede, but they took for granted that this was the right of any free and independent state. They advised against exercising that right except under serious provocation, but they assumed it was a legitimate option against the threat of a centralized government that exceeded its constitutional powers.
Before the Civil War, several states considered leaving the Union, and abolitionists urged Northern states to do so in order to end their association with slave states. Congressman John Quincy Adams, a former president, wanted Massachusetts to secede if Texas was admitted to the Union. Nobody suggested that Adams didnââ¬â¢t understand the Constitution he was sworn to uphold.
But the danger to the statesââ¬â¢ independence was already growing. Andrew Jackson had threatened to invade South Carolina if it seceded, shocking even so ardent a Unionist as Daniel Webster. Jackson didnââ¬â¢t explain where he got the power to prevent secession, a power not assigned to the president in the Constitution. Why not? For the simple reason that the Constitution doesnââ¬â¢t forbid secession; it presupposes that the United States are, each of them, free and independent.
Still, Lincoln used Jacksonââ¬â¢s threat as a precedent for equating secession with ââ¬Årebellionââ¬Â and using force to crush it. This required him to do violence to the Constitution in several ways. He destroyed the freedoms of speech and press in the North; he arbitrarily arrested thousands, including elected officials who opposed him; he not only invaded the seceding states, but deposed their governments and imposed military dictatorships in their place.
In essence, Lincoln made it a crime ââ¬â ââ¬Åtreason,ââ¬Â in fact ââ¬â to agree with Jefferson. Northerners who held that free and independent states had the right to leave the Union ââ¬â and who therefore thought Lincolnââ¬â¢s war was wrong ââ¬â became, in Lincolnââ¬â¢s mind, the enemy within. In order to win the war, and reelection, he had to shut them up. But his reign of terror in the North has received little attention.
He may have ââ¬Åsaved the Union,ââ¬Â after a fashion, but the Union he saved was radically different from the one described in the Constitution. Even his defenders admit that when they praise him for creating ââ¬Åa new Constitutionââ¬Â and forging ââ¬Åa second American Revolution.ââ¬Â Lincoln would have been embarrassed by these compliments: He always insisted he was only enforcing and conserving the Constitution as it was written, though the U.S. Supreme Court, including his own appointees, later ruled many of his acts unconstitutional.
The Civil War completely changed the basic relation between the states, including the Northern states, and the Federal Government. For all practical purposes, the states ceased to be free and independent.
Sentimental myths about Lincoln and the war still obscure the nature of the fundamental rupture they brought to American history. The old federal Union was transformed into the kind of ââ¬Åconsolidatedââ¬Â system the Constitution was meant to avoid. The former plurality of states became a single unit. Even our grammar reflects the change.
So the United States were no longer a ââ¬Åtheyââ¬Â; theyââ¬â¢d become an ââ¬Åit.ââ¬Â Few Americans realize the immense cost in blood, liberty, and even logic that lies behind this simple change of pronouns.
Joseph Sobran