← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Happy Hacker
Thread ID: 14131 | Posts: 5 | Started: 2004-06-10
2004-06-10 23:56 | User Profile
A couple of months ago, the Bush administration claimed that terrorist attacks were down in 2003, to the lowest level in 34 years. That now turns out to not be true (yes, Virginia, a lie). It turns out that the report that claim was based on covered only part of the year. In truth, both the number of terrorist attacks and the number killed in terrorist attacks were up sharply. [URL=http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/06/10/powell.terror.report.ap/index.html]Terror attacks increased in 2003[/URL]
I recall the neocons boasting about terrorist attacks were down in 2002 from the previous year. However, in 2002, if Colombia was excluded, the number of terrorist attacks were up. If the deaths at the World Trade Center were excluded, the number of deaths went up.
The neocons claim falling terrorism rates is proof that Bush's War on Terrorism is working.
Welcome the New World Order where we have traded freedom for safety without gaining safety.
2004-06-11 01:06 | User Profile
The problem is that Bush refuses to count the Israelis Zionists that have been arrested in the US as spys and terrorists,,,,, if that were to be done then "terrorists" in the US would be up by 500%.
2004-06-11 05:24 | User Profile
Hey people? take a look at this links and tell me that something is not going on.
[url]http://www.surfingtheapocalypse.net/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=4186[/url] [url]http://www.surfingtheapocalypse.net/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=4203[/url]
2004-06-11 16:00 | User Profile
Was there something wrong going on between Reagan and the US "best" friend's?
I haven't seen one single Zionist Jews representing the state of Israel, any idea why not?
2004-06-12 23:00 | User Profile
This is the trick of Bush cabinet used to fool people.
When they need something to show as achievement they said the terror attack were down. Once when they planned terror attacks the changed the tune to justify the new announcement. The number are in their pocket. They change it to their will.
This change is to justify the recent warning from D.O.D..
Terror attack and distraction (6/4)
On May 26, A.G. Ashcroft and FBI director Mueller warned public that based on credible source Al Qaida would attack US this summer. FBI also issued 7 pictures of most wanted terrorist suspects.
But in next few days the "credible source" was revealed as high suspect. Some of the "most wanted" were said arrested already. Re: "Terrorists on Ashcroft's 'Wanted List' Already in Jail May 27 2004 At least two of the terrorists identified by John Ashcroft as part of an 'Al-Qaeda cell' that is waiting to attack America this summer are already in jail.
[url]http://prisonplanet.tv/articles/may2004/052704wantedlist.htm[/url]
Re: "Terror threat source called into question Ashcroft cites al-Qaida plan, but how credible is the information?
By Lisa Myers Senior investigative correspondent NBC News Updated: 6:57 p.m. ET May 28, 2004
WASHINGTON - Earlier this week Attorney General John Ashcroft warned of an attack planned on America for sometime in the coming months. That may happen, but NBC News has learned one of Ashcroft’s sources is highly suspect.
A senior U.S. intelligence official previously told NBC News that this group has no known operational capability and may be no more than one man with a fax machine.
[url]http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5087301/[/url]
Under the Homeland Security Act of 2002, only the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) can publicly issue such threat warnings. What made D.O.J. neglect DHS? Is FBI really so incompetent to reward suspects whom are in jail already?
The fact that D.O.J. didn't inform Homeland Security Dept. proved that there is no threat from Al Qaida. Feds didn't have any material evidence to send to DHS. They just picked up randomly some information from their old data file to create an "Al Qaida attack".
Then why Ashcroft and Mueller gave such a warning? It's a psychological pre-propaganda for a possible real attack - an attack done by Feds in the name of terrorist in order to distract. Such like McVeigh's excution to divert attention on a framed drug case (soured) in 2001; Michael Jackson's case to divert public's attention on Bush's inglorious London visit; Nick Berg's beheading to divert criticism on abusing prisoners' case.
See the framed case they try to cover up at:
[url]http://hometown.aol.com/kathaksung/myhomepage/profile.html[/url] [url]http://hometown.aol.com/sunkat563/myhomepage/profile.html[/url] [url]http://hometown.aol.com/katsung563/myhomepage/profile.html[/url]
If there is harassment (blank page, slow entering, server busy....) try
[url]http://forums.delphiforums.com/police915/messages/?msg=25.1[/url]