← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Faust
Thread ID: 14081 | Posts: 16 | Started: 2004-06-06
2004-06-06 23:57 | User Profile
The Queer Onslaught
How can any decent citizen watch homosexuals prance away from city hall with a marriage license and not dread the future of America? The lack of public outrage over this brazen depravity is enough to conclude that the United States is doomed. Meanwhile, the news media, the entertainment industry, the major networks, and the rest of the liberal establishment carry the torch for the right of queers to marry. The queer marriages now being performed legally in Massachusetts mark the beginning of the slide into the abyss.
Since the first non-gender marriage licenses were issued in San Francisco, other similar and equally orchestrated events took place in Oregon and New York state. The media linked together these isolated incidents as a "growing national trend" towards granting queers full marriage rights. The publicity blitz favoring gay marriage caught both politicians and law enforcement authorities off guard, which means government officials are now reluctant to take action against the queers for fear of a media firestorm. The same thing happened in the South forty years ago when news coverage of the civil rights movement was editted to glorify black rioters and to villify white policemen. So the cities burned...
A Marriage of Convenience
Despite all the talkshow blather about queers wanting to marry for love and family, the real reasons are more venal. The vast majority of homosexual relationships are neither loving nor faithful. Queers are notoriously promiscuous and lascivious. Anyone who has witnessed Mardi Gras in New Orleans, or a Gay Pride celebration in San Franciso, can attest to the uninhibited public orgies performed by queers. The exhibitionist thrill queers enjoy from performing lewd acts in a crowd knows no shame. The ramifications of such debauchery are catastrophic. The 1989 Consumer Reports Medicine Book reported that the average homosexual male would have 1200 different sexual partners during his lifetime. This statistic reveals why AIDS became an epidemic.
Yet despite a lifestyle which is anathema to marriage (and public health) queers are now demanding the full rights and rites of matrimony. Greed, not domestic bliss, is the true motive behind the legal wrangle over gay marriage. The tax breaks and benefits married couples enjoy is what the queers are really after; and if queer marriage is made legal, group health insurance rates will skyrocket because of the risky behavior most queers pursue.
For now, the stage lights blind the guileless multitude to the true agenda behind gay marriage. Queers have invoked the rhetoric of the civil rights movement to stoke their campaign for marital status, and because Americans are now so intimidated by the scrosanctity of the civil rights legacy, few iconoclasts will rise to slaughter that sacred bull. Anyway, homosexuals fit perfectly into the civil rights saga. Like negroes half a century ago, dikes and fags lament that they are "second class citizens" who are being denied freedoms that the rest of society enjoys.
The queer civil rights movement picked a good time to push for marital equality with normal people. The 50th anniverary of Brown v. Topeka is this year. Now that blacks have used their "rights" to pillage and wreck the institutions built by whites, queers will invade the sanctity of marriage and home to destroy the family.
There will be a fight against queer marriage, and in that battle the South should draw the sword and throw away the scabbard. For against such abomination the South either stands up to its Bible Belt heritage or dwindles into wretchedness along with stinking New England. This battle will also produce a unique opportunity. As of today, queer marriage is a states rights issue. If the South seizes upon queer marriage and beheads that serpent, then a new era for States Rights will commence. Not even the dissipated Federal Government has the nerve to send troops into the South to enforce sodomy. Almost certainly, mutiny would break out in every branch of the service if troops were deployed to guard the nuptials between fags on the courthouse steps.
By the Grace of God, queer marriage may be the petard upon which Brown v. Topeka, and all other pernicious civil rights regulations, will be blasted down the memory hole.
[url]http://www.cofcc.org/[/url]
2004-06-07 00:30 | User Profile
As long as they don't try to do it to me or do it in front of me they can do what ever they feel like doing,,,,,, there is no use in my getting mad about the situation or talking about it.
Did you know that the greatest ratio, per capita, of homosexuals in the world is in the state of Israel? That's according to AMA (American Medical Association)
Have anyone here ever read about those with Aids in the state of Israel? What they do with them, I never have read anything about this.
2004-06-07 01:34 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Ponce]As long as they don't try to do it to me or do it in front of me they can do what ever they feel like doing,
Homosexual marriage is not about doing as they want. It's about changing the culture of this nation.
there is no use in my getting mad about the situation or talking about it.
There is hardly anything in this world more worthy at being mad at than a handful of people sodomizing this nation.
Did you know that the greatest ratio, per capita, of homosexuals in the world is in the state of Israel? That's according to AMA (American Medical Association)
Isreal has been a world leader in mainstreaming homosexuality.
Have anyone here ever read about those with Aids in the state of Israel? What they do with them, I never have read anything about this.[/QUOTE]
A few thousand Isrealis have AIDS. Isreal has a low AIDS.
I'd prefer to live in a country full of Jews than a country that has homosexual marriage.
2004-06-07 04:48 | User Profile
Homosexuals prance, and I fear for the future of America. However, the two aren't connected. I have feared for the future of America since junior high school.
If we had everything else under control, and this sprang up out of the blue, it would be 'cause' for concern. At present, it is something to be combated with about 0.000001% of white racialist energy.
2004-06-07 05:17 | User Profile
It has been roughly estimated that at least 1/2 of all israeli jews also have US citizenship. When someone gets AIDS they general come to the US (with their citizenship or apply for citizenship) and use our medical system as is much better and easier to get free treatment out of.
2004-06-07 07:06 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Ponce]As long as they don't try to do it to me or do it in front of me they can do what ever they feel like doing,,,,,, there is no use in my getting mad about the situation or talking about it.
You must admit there is an enormous distinction between individual tolerance for what a couple of sexual eccentrics may decide to do behind closed doors and the state issuing marriage licenses to homosexual couples.
2004-06-07 12:37 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Kevin_O'Keeffe]You must admit there is an enormous distinction between individual tolerance for what a couple of sexual eccentrics may decide to do behind closed doors and the state issuing marriage licenses to homosexual couples.[/QUOTE] Yes, there is. The former is just a couple of perverts plooking each other out of sight, while the latter is an assault upon Western Civilization. The traditional tolerance of homosexuals, which consisted of them being absolutely discreet at all times in exchange for the community ignoring their proclivities, has worked well for thousands of years. Demanding that a unhealthy, childless, promiscuous perversion be granted the same status as a traditional, fruitful, God-ordained marriage (which produces the families that are the building blocks of a society) is not only evil, it's insane.
2004-06-07 13:52 | User Profile
[QUOTE]The traditional tolerance of homosexuals, which consisted of them being absolutely discreet at all times in exchange for the community ignoring their proclivities, has worked well for thousands of years. Demanding that a unhealthy, childless, promiscuous perversion be granted the same status as a traditional, fruitful, God-ordained marriage (which produces the families that are the building blocks of a society) is not only evil, it's insane.[/QUOTE]
Ditto.
2004-06-08 07:37 | User Profile
There will be a fight against queer marriage, and in that battle the South should draw the sword and throw away the scabbard. For against such abomination the South either stands up to its Bible Belt heritage or dwindles into wretchedness along with stinking New England. This battle will also produce a unique opportunity. As of today, queer marriage is a states rights issue. If the South seizes upon queer marriage and beheads that serpent, then a new era for States Rights will commence. Not even the dissipated Federal Government has the nerve to send troops into the South to enforce sodomy. Almost certainly, mutiny would break out in every branch of the service if troops were deployed to guard the nuptials between fags on the courthouse steps.*
By the Grace of God, queer marriage may be the petard upon which Brown v. Topeka, and all other pernicious civil rights regulations, will be blasted down the memory hole.*
Then by all means let it come, and the sooner the better. The hyper-aggressive fudge packers simply will no longer be satisfied with mere tolerance; now they're demanding total acceptance as equals. I say it's high time we herd all the freak-scum - and their kike enablers - into San Fagcisco & Assajewsetts and snuff the whole filthy mob with a couple of neutron bombs.
Hey - why make 'em if you're never gonna use 'em?
2004-06-08 07:56 | User Profile
N.B.F. your post is right on the Bulls-eye.....Check mate! Here is a great chance for a winning play/battle.. [url]www.vonbluvens.com[/url]
2004-06-08 11:37 | User Profile
[QUOTE=N.B. Forrest] Then by all means let it come, and the sooner the better. The hyper-aggressive fudge packers simply will no longer be satisfied with mere tolerance; now they're demanding total acceptance as equals. I say it's high time we herd all the freak-scum - and their kike enablers - into San Fagcisco & Assajewsetts and snuff the whole filthy mob with a couple of neutron bombs.
Hey - why make 'em if you're never gonna use 'em?[/QUOTE]
Thilly thavage. I juth love it when you're tres butch!
But seriously, I doubt that there will be much of a reaction against all this. So many people agree with fag marriage, including tragically the mainline churches, that we're just not going to see the anger levels rise to the "draw sword and throw away the scabbard" level.
Only an economic collapse can do that.
Walter
2004-06-08 18:58 | User Profile
[color=navy]Provided certain legal provisions are met, it is now lawful for a 45 year old man to marry a 13 year old boy in Massachussetts. I know this is so, since I personally called the Marriage Bureau in a Massachussetts county and asked the licensing clerk about it. He informed me that the regulations for gay matrimony between a man and a boy size=1[/size] are the same as for a man and a 13 year old girl - getting the legal parent/guardian's written permission to do so. [/color] [color=navy][/color] [color=navy]So, there you have it - legalized, homosexual pedophilia now makes it lawful for a 45 year man to marry a boy, kiss and slobber over him in public, and then take him into a motel room and bang his buns raw - and there's absolutely NOTHING anyone can do to stop it.[/color] [color=navy][/color] [color=navy]Welcome to the New America. [/color]
2004-06-08 23:02 | User Profile
General Rommel,
You are most Right!
Lev 20:13
2004-06-09 08:50 | User Profile
I can marry a 13-year old girl in MA? Wow.
[QUOTE=General Rommel][color=navy]Provided certain legal provisions are met, it is now lawful for a 45 year old man to marry a 13 year old boy in Massachussetts. I know this is so, since I personally called the Marriage Bureau in a Massachussetts county and asked the licensing clerk about it. He informed me that the regulations for gay matrimony between a man and a boy size=1[/size] are the same as for a man and a 13 year old girl - getting the legal parent/guardian's written permission to do so. [/color] [color=navy][/color] [color=navy]So, there you have it - legalized, homosexual pedophilia now makes it lawful for a 45 year man to marry a boy, kiss and slobber over him in public, and then take him into a motel room and bang his buns raw - and there's absolutely NOTHING anyone can do to stop it.[/color] [color=navy][/color] [color=navy]Welcome to the New America. [/color][/QUOTE]
2004-06-09 16:57 | User Profile
[QUOTE=darkstar]I can marry a 13-year old girl in MA? Wow.[/QUOTE]
Actually the age is 12 for girls, 14 for boys, provided there is parental consent:
[url]http://www.law.cornell.edu/topics/Table_Marriage.htm[/url]
Most of the backwards Southern states have a parental consent age of 16. Guess they're just not as progressive as those Massachusetts humanists...
2004-06-09 18:35 | User Profile
[QUOTE=weisbrot]Actually the age is 12 for girls, 14 for boys, provided there is parental consent: [/QUOTE]
That was when girls normally married after high school, rather than after college. Early marriage can be very benificial to help people avoid extra-maritial sex (thus stronger marriages, fewer STDs, etc.).
These days, when the government allows something, it's a stamp of approval from the government that may be backed up by government promotion and punishment of those who disapprove. Back then, if the government allowed something, it was just the government staying out of your business, but everyone else was still free to refuse to support your behavior.