← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · PaleoconAvatar
Thread ID: 14031 | Posts: 10 | Started: 2004-06-03
2004-06-03 00:06 | User Profile
Five men rule the world.
This Council of Five consists of Baron Guy de Rothschild, Evelyn de Rothschild, George Pratt Shultz, Robert Roosa (from Bush's family firm of Brown Brothers Harriman) and one vacancy, at this writing. In the past several years, members of the Council who have died include Averill Harriman, Lord Victor Rothschild, and Prince Thurn und Taxis of Regensburg, Germany. None of them holds public office, but they choose who shall hold office in the nations. These five men comprise the apex of the pyramid of power, the World Order. We may ask, Why should there be a World Order? Is it not sufficient to hold absolute power in a single nation, or in a group of nations? The answer is NO, because of the nature of international travel, international trade, and international finance. International travel requires that a person may travel in peace from one nation to another, without being molested. Excepting cases of anarchy, revolution or war, this requirement can usually be met. International trade requires that traders of one nation can go to another nation, transact their business, and return with their goods or their profits. This requirement too is usually met. If not, the offended nation can exercise military force, as Great Britain did in its Opium Wars.
It is the third requirement, international finance, which called into being the World Order. In earlier days, when international trade consisted of barter, payment in gold or silver or piracy, the seizure of goods by force, there was no need for a world arbiter to determine the value of instruments of trade. The development of paper money, stocks, bonds, acceptances and other negotiable instruments necessitated a power, able to exercise influence anywhere in the world, to declare that a piece of paper represented one billion dollars in real wealth, or even one dollar in real wealth. An entry on a computer, flashed from London to New York, states that someone owes five billion dollars to someone else. Without genuine power banking, no such sum could ever be collected, regardless of the factuality or morality of the debt. As anyone in the Mafia can tell you, you don't collect unless you are willing to break legs. The World Order is always prepared to break legs, and break them they do, by the millions.
What would have happened to the earliest settlers in America if they had gone to the Indians and said, "Give us your goods and the deeds to your homes and lands. In return, we will give you this beautifully printed piece of paper." The Indians would, and did, attack them. If the settlers arrived with an army led by a Pizaro or a Cortes, they took the lands without a piece of paper.
The World Order rules with its pieces of paper, but behind every paper is a force which can be employed anywhere in the world. The force may be disguised by various subterfuges as international agreement, associations or other camouflage, but its base is always force.
The World Order rules through a simple technique, Divide and Conquer (Divide et impera). Every natural or unnatural division among people, every occasion for hatred or greed, is exploited and exacerbated to the limit. The polarization of racial and ethnic groups in the U.S. is accelerated by a flood of government decrees, originating in foundation "studies", which are designed solely to set American against American. Only in this way can the World Order maintain its iron grip on the daily lives of the people. The World Order also rules by the principle of 1984 - no groups of two or more people are allowed to gather unless the World Order has a representative present. If you start a club of dandelion fanciers, the Order will send someone who will be quietly helpful, avoid taking the front position, and who will offer to pay the rent of a meeting place or the printing of the minutes. In more radical groups, the Order's representative will be the first to suggest dynamiting a building, assassinating an official, or other violent action.
The international terrorism of the Communist Party originated in a small club of German and French working men in Paris, dedicated to quiet reading and discussion, until Karl Marx joined. It was then converted into a revolutionary group. This one example explains the Order's determination to allow no group, however insignificant, to remain unmonitored. The World Order adopted the Hegelian dialectic, the dialectic of materialism, which regards the World as Power, and the World as Reality. It denies all other powers and all other realities. It functions on the principle of thesis, antithesis and a synthesis which results when the thesis and antithesis are thrown against each other for a predetermined outcome. Thus the World Order organizes and finances Jewish groups; it then organizes and finances anti-Jewish groups; it organizes Communist groups; it then organizes and finances anti-Communist groups. It is not necessary for the Order to throw these groups against each other; they seek each other out like heat-seeking missiles, and try to destroy each other. By controlling the size and resources of each group, the World Order can always predetermine the outcome.
In this technique, members of the World Order are often identified with one side or the other. John Foster Dulles arranged financing for Hitler, but he was never a Nazi. David Rockefeller may be cheered in Moscow, but he is not a Communist. However, the Order always turns up on the winning side. A distinguishing trait of a member of the World Order, although it may not be admitted, is that he does not believe in anything but the World Order. Another distinguishing trait is his absolute contempt for anyone who actually believes in the tenets of Communism, Zionism, Christianity, or any national, religious or fraternal group, although the Order has members in controlling positions in all of these groups. If you are a sincere Christian, Zionist or Moslem, the World Order regards you as a moron unworthy of respect. You can and will be used, but you will never be respected.
It has taken centuries of patient effort for the World Order to attain the power it exercises today. Its origins as an international force go back to the Phoenician slave-traders, continues through the Phnariot families of the Byzantine Empire, then the Venetian and Genoese traders and bankers of the Middle Ages, who moved into Spain and Portugal, and later into England and Scotland. By the 14th Century, the Genoese controlled the Scottish landlords. The Imperial Family of the Byzantine Empire, the Paleologues (meaning 'the Word') were attacked by the Gnostic faction, whose materialistic Aristotelian philosophy was the forerunner of Hegelian dialective and Marxism. The Paleologues devoutly believed in the Christian faith, as expressed by the Orthodox Rite. The materialistic Venetian and Genoese armies, with the aid of the Turkish "infidels", looted and conquered Constantinople, the legendary "City of God". The Byzantine survivors recreated their culture in Russia, with Moscow as "the third Rome". The plan to destroy the Orthodox Church with its Romanov (new Rome) leaders was the hidden goal of the First World War. The victors came away with one billion dollars of the Romanov fortune, after achieving the defeat of their hated enemy, the Orthodox Church.
During the Middle Ages, European power centers coalesced into two camps, the Ghibellines, those who supported the Emperor's Hohenstaufen family, (an Italian adaptation of Weinblingen, the name of the Hohenstaufen estate), and the Guelphs, from Welf, the German prince who competed with Frederick for control of the Holy Roman Empire. The Pope then allied himself with the Guelphs against the Ghibellines resulting in their victory. All of modern history stems directly from the struggle between these two powers. The Guelphs, also called the Neri, or Black Guelphs, and Black Nobility, were the Normans who conquered England in the 11th century; the Genoese who backed Robert Bruce in his conquest of Scotland, and who supported William of Orange in his seizure of the throne of England. William's victory resulted in the formation of the Bank of England and the East India Company, which have ruled the world since the 17th century. Every subsequent coup d'etat, revolution and war has centered in the battle of the Guelphs to hold and enhance their power, which is now the World Order.
The power of the Guelphs grew through their control of banking and international trade. It was extended through the Italian centers to the north of Florence, in Lombardy, which became great financial centers. All Italian bankers, including the Genoese, the Venetians, and Milanese, were referred to as "Lombards": Lombard, in German, means "papers of monetary value (Wertpapiere)"; the Lombards were bankers to the entire Medieval world. Modern history begins with the transfer of their operations north to Hamburg, Amsterdam, and finally to London.
The great American fortunes originated with the Guelph slave trade to the colonies. Many of the slave traders doubled in piracy. Trinity Church, whose leading vestryman later was J.P. Morgan, was originally known as "the church of the pirates". Capt. William Kidd provided the material to build it in 1697, and a pew was reserved for him. He was arrested the next year, and hanged in chains at Newgate. In 1711, a slave market was set up on Wall Street near the church, and functioned there for many years.
Two of the most powerful influences in the world today are the international drug trade, which began with the East India Co., and international espionage, which began with the Bank of England.
ââ¬â Eustice Mullins' The World Order: Our Secret Rulers
2004-06-03 00:12 | User Profile
Another distinguishing trait is his absolute contempt for anyone who actually believes in the tenets of Communism, Zionism, Christianity, or any national, religious or fraternal group, although the Order has members in controlling positions in all of these groups. If you are a sincere Christian, Zionist or Moslem, the World Order regards you as a moron unworthy of respect. You can and will be used, but you will never be respected.
This is actually why the NWO will ultimately fail. They place no inherent value on any expression of particularity, be it racial or religious. They focus on calculating power in (and for) itself, but fail to realize that man is inherently "myth-making"--he needs the depth and content provided by these particular "sites of identity" that they so cynically discount. This explains the persistence of "identity politics" over the centuries. In fact, they discount these sites at their peril, since they form their own base for the organization and motivation of men (also known as power).
2004-06-03 02:35 | User Profile
Someone mentioned a while back of being frustrated that when explaining the Jewish situation to one of our dull brethren, the listener did not have the capacity to understand "the dynamics of power". I really relate to this. I have always seen the world through Machiavellian glasses.
It's nearly impossible to figure out the power flow of the individuals that run things from behind the scenes based on all the endless conspiracy articles on the net and technical criteria. I find it much easier to analyze the power flow based on fundamentals. I look at the strategic value of the positions taken. We all know there are many secret societies...Skull and Bones, CFR, Trilateral, Freemasonry, Bilderbergers, etc., and Talmudic Judaism is structured as and operates as a secret society. We know that we seldom hear anything about these groups or any power struggles between then from the media. We know not based on inside knowledge but based on our understanding of human nature that all these groups have vows of secrecy and loyalty of some kind. We know that if an elected official has both taken a vow to his country and to a secret society, at some point a conflict of interest will occur. Thus we conclude that secret societies are structured for treason. We don't know, but there is considerable heresay that most, if not all these societies have a statement of purpose or creed implying world domination, world government or some sort of hegemonic design. We know that world government is creeping up on us in many ways. We know that the Jews control the media. We know that since the media does not scrutinize the secret societies, it must be of strategic value to the Jews to keep quiet about all of them. We know based on human nature that having many secret societies operating all over the world, and perhaps all having a hegemonic intent on the world, without having major conflicts between them is totally against human nature. We know of many politicians that overtly are members of more than one secret society. We conclude that there must be plenty of overlap. Since power struggles between these secret societies are almost nil, we conclude that one secret society dominates the rest. We know that loyalty and the means of fostering and enforcing it are an important issue in the operation of secret societies. We know that Jews are extremely cohesive. We know the Kol Nidre is structured to make all other vows obsolete in advance. We know Jews are more intelligent on average than gentiles. We know it's of strategic value to the Jews to be surrounded by crooked gentiles who will serve to absorb enough of the blame for all the misdeeds they commit to allow them to continue undetected in the darkness.
Is it difficult for anyone to see that Judaism is the secret society that rules all other secret societies? Is it difficult to understand why the Jewsmedia doesn't report on any secret societies? Is it difficult to understand that all the gentile members are useful idiots?
2004-06-03 02:48 | User Profile
[QUOTE=travis]We know the Kol Nidre is structured to make all other vows obsolete in advance.[/QUOTE]
That is the master key, isn't it? Excellent, excellent points. That chain you list accounts for the relative lack of friction among the competing secret societies. B'nai B'rith, as I'm sure you know, is itself a sort of "Jewish Masonic" lodge.
2004-06-03 02:56 | User Profile
I agree; fine analysis.
[QUOTE=travis]Someone mentioned a while back of being frustrated that when explaining the Jewish situation to one of our dull bretheren, the listener did not have the capacity to understand "the dynamics of power". I really relate to this. I have always seen the world through Machiavellien glasses.
It's nearly impossible to figure out the power flow of the individuals that run things from behind the scenes based on all the endless conspiracy articles on the net and technical criteria. I find it much easier to analyze the power flow based on fundamentals. I look at the strategic value of the positions taken. We all know there are many secret societies...Skull and Bones, CFR, Trilateral, Freemasonry, Bilderbergers, etc., and Talmudic Judaism is structured as and operates as a secret society. We know that we seldom hear anything about these groups or any power struggles between then from the media. We know not based on inside knowledge but based on our understanding of human nature that all these groups have vows of secrecy and loyalty of some kind. We know that if an elected official has both taken a vow to his counrty and to a secret society, at some point a conflict of interest will occur. Thus we conclude that secret societies are structured for treason. We don't know, but there is considerable heresay that most, if not all these societies have a statement of purpose or creed implying world domination, world government or some sort of hegemonic design. We know that world government is creeping up on us in many ways. We know that the Jews control the media. We know that since the media does not scrutinize the secret societies, it must be of strategic value to the Jews to keep quiet about all of them. We know based on human nature that having many secret societies operating all over the world, and perhaps all having a hegemonic intent on the world, without having major conflicts between them is totally against human nature. We know of many politicians that overtly are members of more than one secret society. We conclude that there must be plenty of overlap. Since power struggles between these secret societies are almost nil, we conclude that one secret society dominates the rest. We know that loyalty and the means of fostering and enforcing it are an important issue in the operation of secret societies. We know that Jews are extremely cohesive. We know the Kol Nidre is structured to make all other vows obsolete in advance. We know Jews are more intelligent on average than gentiles. We know it's of strategic value to the Jews to be surrounded by crooked gentiles who will serve to absorb enough of the blame for all the misdeeds they commit to allow them to continue undetected in the darkness.
Is it difficult for anyone to see that Judaism is the secret society that rules all other secret societies? Is it difficult to understand why the Jewsmedia doesn't report on any secret societies? Is it difficult to understand that all the gentile members are useful idiots?[/QUOTE]
2004-06-03 10:49 | User Profile
Now that we understand that all conspiracies lead to the Jews......what is of strategic value to us? Individuals who become "paranoid conspiracy theorists" will likely eventually become "anti-Semites" as well. It's a natural progression! This is why I foster conspiracy theories and counter-attack anyone who attacks them in principle. All my aquaintances, few of whom know I'm an anti-semite, know that I'm smart, succesful, sober and a conspiracy theorist. I plant seeds of thought every opportunity I get. I encourage all of you to do the same. Be careful not to offend Masons, they are everywhere and half of them hate Jews. Hopefully, we can convert them from useful idiots to useful.
One mans paranoia is another man's vigilance.
2004-06-03 11:34 | User Profile
Travis:
David Icke is seemingly the best known conspirologist in media today. He's been on both BBC and Discovery, and he's on to the Jews.
Still this guy talks about reptiles from space, lurking inside the earths core alongside escaped Nazis, controlling our brainwaves..
Do you feel your brainwaves controlled?
Icke is counterproductive, he takes the the valid theories (Unspeakable-ness-ess) and he mixes it with the comical Area 51-reptile type theories, and his whole show is put in a light of something that cannot quite be taken seriously.
It seems like a way of swamping and degrading the real politics, them he also mentions, and does'ent really emphasize them.
He's mr. conspiracy in the media.. What do you think of this guy? How can he be used to our advantage?
2004-06-03 11:45 | User Profile
Whenever the subject of David Icke is brought up, I point out that it is of strategic value to the Jews to have a puppet on a string like him discredit conspiracy theorists in general, which is Jewish modus operandi.
Shape-shifting reptilians.....in about the same category as tin foil hats.
If he was exposing Jews they would not let him operate. The reason they do is because he "exposes" conspiracy theorists (himself in particular) as loonies. He is helping them stereotype conspiracy theorists in exchange for money. He is a book seller.
2004-06-03 13:00 | User Profile
Travis:
Do you see Mr. Icke as still doing anything beneficiary to "our cause"? He does after all adress the Rothschilds and Bilderbergers, as well as other and often hilarious yet interesting issues. Problem is, 'course he let's these interesting elements drown among all his other innumerous New-Agey-Dollar popular urban legend theory-stories.
Still, many, many people never heard the word Rothschild 'till he brought it up. That's gotta be worth something?
2004-06-03 21:31 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Kosmos Luftwaffe]Travis:
Do you see Mr. Icke as still doing anything beneficiary to "our cause"? He does after all adress the Rothschilds and Bilderbergers, as well as other and often hilarious yet interesting issues. Problem is, 'course he let's these interesting elements drown among all his other innumerous New-Agey-Dollar popular urban legend theory-stories.
Still, many, many people never heard the word Rothschild 'till he brought it up. That's gotta be worth something?[/QUOTE]
He does some good by planting seeds of thought and pointing a finger at the Rothschilds etc. without using the "J" word I assume ( I don't keep up with him) but he does damage to "conspiracy theorists" in general with the far-fetched stuff. David Icke is not a man dedicated to the truth. If you email him and try to discuss issues and challenge his positions with logic, there will be no feedback from him, or so I've heard. He is a book and seminar seller.
The Jews need to maintain the illusion of objectivity by pretending to promote diverse viewpoints. Icke gives them just such an opportunity. By no means is David Icke someone to rally behind and support.
If I were commiting all sorts of atrocities behind the scenes, Icke would be just the kind of opposition I'd want. The few that would glean some truths out of what he says would be outnumbered 10 to one by those who would direct ridicule at him.