← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Franco
Thread ID: 13946 | Posts: 26 | Started: 2004-05-29
2004-05-29 03:12 | User Profile
5-28-04
Two Items
[url]http://wsi.matriots.com/memorials.html[/url]
[url]http://wsi.matriots.com/PolishComm.html[/url] [updates: 2 footnote links and 1 name]
2004-06-01 03:14 | User Profile
They died for nothing. My grandfather and great uncle were both in the war and saw HEAVY combat,things they won't talk about. One was on an aircraft carrier in the Pacific, which got bombed by Kamikazes. He's got a chest full of burns 50 years later. The other fought in the islands with the Army and has the Bronze Star ( before they started press printing medals ) and won't even talk about it, the things he saw.. except for eating rats.
They didn't want this shit. They were all good boys, did what they had to do. Don't turn them into a bunch of soldiers. They were good men, not soldiers. Do you understand the difference, do you ????
2004-06-01 07:40 | User Profile
Exelsis_Deo,
Sadly you are Right. Two of my great uncles saw combat in the Pacific did not make it back, both died in Jap POW camps.
You are most Right!
[QUOTE]They didn't want this shit. They were all good boys, did what they had to do. Don't turn them into a bunch of soldiers. They were good men, not soldiers. Do you understand the difference, do you ???? [/QUOTE]
2004-06-01 17:06 | User Profile
Did you know that there are more "Holocaust" memorials in the USA to foreign civilians who die in a foreign land killed by foreign people than there are memorials to our own troops who die in the name of democracy?
2004-06-02 00:38 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Faust]Exelsis_Deo,
Sadly you are Right. Two of my great uncles saw combat in the Pacific did not make it back, both died in Jap POW camps.
You are most Right![/QUOTE]
That's the Truth, well said, and Faust and I attest to it. I'm sorry about your uncles, Faust, I guess mine were the lucky ones. But they all came back scarred for life. They didn't whine about it like the Vietnam Vets, but every age has its own factors. May Our God Bless You My Friend, and let us Never Forget.
2004-06-02 00:46 | User Profile
You've sure got that right friend. My great grandmother has all FIVE of her sons drafted into WW2 to fight the Jews' war. Somehow, all five made it back alive (one of them was my grandfather). I have always been a little thankful he didn't live to see what the USA has become under Jewish rule.
[QUOTE=Exelsis_Deo]They died for nothing. My grandfather and great uncle were both in the war and saw HEAVY combat,things they won't talk about. One was on an aircraft carrier in the Pacific, which got bombed by Kamikazes. He's got a chest full of burns 50 years later. The other fought in the islands with the Army and has the Bronze Star ( before they started press printing medals ) and won't even talk about it, the things he saw.. except for eating rats.
They didn't want this shit. They were all good boys, did what they had to do. Don't turn them into a bunch of soldiers. They were good men, not soldiers. Do you understand the difference, do you ????[/QUOTE]
2004-06-02 08:33 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Exelsis_Deo]They died for nothing. My grandfather and great uncle were both in the war and saw HEAVY combat,things they won't talk about. One was on an aircraft carrier in the Pacific, which got bombed by Kamikazes. He's got a chest full of burns 50 years later. [/QUOTE]
Your great uncle sounds like my uncle Victor, who served on the USS Intrepid during Wolrd War II. The Intrepid was severely damaged (twice) when Kamikazes crashed into its deck in '44 and '45.
Pics below:
Uncle Victor survived the war only to die of cancer in the 70s.
2004-06-04 00:03 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Exelsis_Deo][I][COLOR=Red]But they all came back scarred for life. They didn't whine about it like the Vietnam Vets, but every age has its own factors.[/COLOR][/I]
May Our God Bless You My Friend, and let us Never Forget.[/QUOTE]Very, very few of those who went to Vietnam whined. The media catered to that segment for much of that. For myself, I wondered why our benefits were in no way comparable to those given to the veterans of World War II until I realized the great underlying principle of America at work. "I got mine - f*ck you."
For somebody who believes 100% of the northern troops went to the Civil War to end slavery your naivete continues into this century.
2004-06-08 02:53 | User Profile
You know its a fact that the media was only following the movements back in 1968-1973 and I know you are totally right to say that the majority by far of Vietnam Vets did not act nor suffer that way. It truly was a media scam, the whole psychological establishment, in their effort to ctredibilize themselves, literally stole soouls away from Salvation with their Freudian fantasies of material deprivation. Edward Gibbon, on OD, you make a MAJOR point but my own words only served to represent the majority, not you in you own heart, and you in your own heart has to look much deeper than the tele presents to you to find out how thesee evil warmongers LITERALLY PULL THE STRINGS and it's high time to think about PAYBACK. All of a sudden the Reagan death is real.. where were you all when it was already solved that Bush tried to kill Reagan. Before Hinkley was even suspect in their game [url]http://www.underreported.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=1322&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0[/url] Bush is Garbage, Bush is EVIL. Inmidst the chaos breaking out in the hours after the WTC and Pentagon attacks, between 10 a.m. and 11 a.m an airplane made an emergency landing at Cleveland Hopkins Airport . Rumours were going around that it was hijacked or had a bomb on board. The FBI evacuated the plane and searched it with bomb-sniffing dogs after the passengers had left. It turned out to be false alarm. The plane - Delta flight1989 - was not hijacked, and there was no bomb.
However, a closer examination reveals a bunch of conflicting statements concerning Delta 1989. Neither the moment of landing, nor the number of the passengers, nor the location of the grounded plane is clear. For every aspect of the incident there are two different versions. Not one or three or four versions, but two...
not one, but two planes made an emergency landing in Cleveland - in close succession. The proof is based on local newspaper and radio reports from September 11th and 12th (mainly from the Akron Beacon Journal and the Cleveland Plain Dealer), statements of eyewitnesses and internet postings in the morning of 9/11 (people were listening to the radio and immediately submitted the breaking news to the net). One of the flights was indeed Delta 1989. We don't know the identity of the other one, so we call it "Flight X."...
At 10 a.m., the airport was evacuated. Without doubt, this had to do with the rumours that a hijacked plane was going to land. The passengers had to leave the airport but were not allowed to take their car. They had to walk or got a ride at the highway. Busses were not allowed to leave the airport. People around the airport were told to go home...
Cleveland Mayor Michael White held a televised news conference at 11 a.m., after the emergency landing. According to the Cleveland Plain Dealer, "he said there was an unconfirmed report that the plane might have been hijacked or was carrying a bomb. But in the middle of the news conference, he reported that it had not been hijacked, and later in the day he said no bomb had been found." [...] There are two different data for every parameter, suggesting that we are dealing with two different planes...
The moment of landing -- AP and two Ohio newspapers report a landing at 10:45 (1A). However, Delta Airlines has registered 10:10 as the landing time and Cleveland firefighters can confirm that the landing took place before 10:30 (1B). Because Delta Airlines did not loose the track of its plane, the 10:10 plane was surely Delta 1989. So the 10:45 plane is - by definition - Flight X.
Evacuation of the passengers -- The Akron Beacon Journal writes in an extra edition from 9/11 that the passengers were released from the plane at 11:15. This is confirmed by internet postings describing the events in real-time (2A). However, a passenger from Delta 1989 relates that she had to stay more than two hours in the plane before the FBI started to search it and took the passengers away for questioning. The Plain Dealer has learned about a evacuation time of 12:30, confirming the witness' statement. (2B)...
We can conclude that Delta 1989 landed at 10:10 and was evacuated at 12:30. Flight X landed at 10:45 and was evacuated at 11:15.
number of passengers -- The first press reports tell us that the plane carried 200 passengers. Mayor White mentioned this number in his 11 o'clock conference (3A). He did not say how he got the number. The [aforementioned Delta 1989] passenger... made an estimation of "sixty or so" passengers. This is confirmed by later reports - the story changed quickly. Sixty-nine passengers [were] released from the plane (3B).
We can conclude that Delta 1989 landed at 10:10, with 69 passengers evacuated at 12:30. Flight X landed at 10:45, the 200 passengers released at 11:15.
The place the passengers were interviewed after the evacuation -- Most reports say the passengers were brought into a nearby NASA facility (4A). This is the NASA Glenn Research Center, located near the west end of the airport. It was already evacuated. The Delta 1989 passenger tells us she was taken into a "secure building at the airport". This is confirmed by a report that the Delta 1989 passengers were interviewed in the FAA headquarters (4B). Surely the FAA headquarters is not located in the NASA facility.
We can conclude Delta 1989 landed at 10:10, and at 12:30 the 69 passengers were taken into the FAA headquarters. Flight X landed at 10:45, and at 11:15 the 200 passengers were taken into the evacuated NASA Center.
Exact location of the plane -- Both planes were sitting on a runway, but miles away from each other. One plane was at the west end of runway 28/10 near the NASA center (point 10 in the map). This is confirmed by Associated Press and an eyewitness (5A). The other plane was sitting at the south end of runway 18/36 near the I-X-Center (point 36), also confirmed by two eyewitnesses (5B). The geographic conditions on the airport suggest that the passengers at the West end were taken to the NASA Center and the passengers at the South end to the FAA headquarters. [...] Flight X = United Airlines Flight?
White said the plane had been moved to a secure area of the airport, and was evacuated. United identified the plane as Flight 93. The airline did say how many people were aboard the flight. WCPO-TV, Cincinnati, 9/11/01, 11:43:57 [...] Follow source link for referenced footnotes. Excerpted text has been slightly edited since author's first language is not English.
| Libertythink Perma-Link | by Total Information 6.6.04 | Send | |
Eight-second gap in Nick Berg video
Found on LibertyForum 05/30/04: The main part of the Nicholas Berg video is the reading of the statement scene which takes up 4:17 (4 minutes, 17 seconds) of a 5:38 composition. It begins at 0:20 elapsed time, 2:40:03 camera time. [...] Several who have analyzed the composition (Nick Possum, John Nada, bloggers Videoman, Valhall and others) detect a lapse between the audio and the video at the end of this scene. An audio scream begins at 4:31 elapsed time (2:44:06 camera) but at 4:37 (2:44:12) the victim still maintains a pleasant expression—6 seconds later. [...] Acting from the assumption that the two video scenes are of the same continuous event and the audio record is from the same event [this is the intended effect of the editors of the composition], the audio is about 8 seconds ahead of the video. Using enhanced audio, Valhall finds that this 8 second gap is present toward the end of statement-reading scene when the papers are handed by the reader to the man on his left (the paper shuffle can be heard). [...] Hypothesis: The video was "stretched" by adding frames to simulate movement of the victim. [...] Preliminary Finding: The video-audio divergence grows in relation to the occurrence of simulated movements of the victim. The 8-9 seconds estimated total movement corresponds well to the video-audio gap as well as to the gap between elapsed time and camera time...
| Libertythink Perma-Link | by Total Information 6.6.04 | Send | |
Cheney, Bush in hot water over CIA Plame leak
New York Times June 5, 2004: Vice President Dick Cheney was recently interviewed by federal prosecutors who asked whether he knew of anyone at the White House who had improperly disclosed the identity of an undercover C.I.A. officer, people who have been involved in official discussions about the case said on Friday.
Mr. Cheney was also asked about conversations with senior aides, including his chief of staff, I. Lewis Libby, according to people officially informed about the case. In addition, those people said, Mr. Cheney was asked whether he knew of any concerted effort by White House aides to name the officer
[Cheney] was not questioned under oath and he has not been asked to appear before the grand jury, people officially informed about the case said. [...] Mr. Bush has acknowledged that he had met with a Washington criminal lawyer, Jim Sharp, about the possibility that prosecutors might want to interview him about the case. So far, the White House has made no mention of Mr. Cheney's interview or whether it influenced the president's decision to meet with Mr. Sharp. [...]
| Libertythink Perma-Link | by Total Information 6.6.04 | Send | |
Crazed Boston PD arrests protester on orders of military
Boston Phoenix June 4 It was a skinny pair of stereo wires that got 21-year-old Joe Previtera charged with two felonies. A week ago on Wednesday, the Boston College student poked his head through a gauzy shawl, donned a black pointy hood, and ascended a milk crate positioned to the right of the Armed Forces Recruitment Center’s Tremont Street entrance. He extended his arms like a tired scarecrow; stereo wires dangled from his fingers onto the ground below... Those snaky cords made the costume’s import clear: Previtera was a dead ringer for one of Abu Ghraib’s Iraqi prisoners — specifically, the faceless man who’d allegedly been forced to balance on a cardboard box lest he be electrocuted. [...] Someone came out of the recruitment office and told him to get down; when Previtera didn’t, the person went inside. (No one from the Armed Forces Recruitment Center could be reached for comment.) Soon after, the cops appeared and watched the spectacle from their cruisers; shortly thereafter, the Boston Police bomb squad rolled up. Less than 90 minutes after the protest began, the police began taping off the area around him, and when Previtera stepped down, they took him into custody for "disturbing the peace." But Previtera had remained silent the entire time... Any disturbance came from the crowd of gawking spectators that, witnesses say, assembled once the policeman showed...
In addition to the initial misdemeanor, he’d been charged with two felonies: "false report of location of explosives" and a "hoax device." [...]
| Libertythink Perma-Link | by Total Information 6.6.04 | Send | |
Reagan dead 23 years after hit by Bush cabal
Gannett News Service 6/5/2004 5:03 PM: WASHINGTON — Ronald Reagan, the optimistic, patriotic Hollywood actor who as the nation's 40th president revived the conservative movement in America, died Saturday.
Reagan, who was diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease in 1994, died at his Los Angeles home. He was 93. [...] He also devalued the idea of a strong central government — to the chagrin of his detractors and delight of his supporters.
After he was shot... two months into his presidency... he told his wife, Nancy: "Honey, I forgot to duck." Brian Quig wrote in 1991: Goldwater's Administrative Director Tom Dunlevy... was an insider at the [1908 GOP] convention... I will always remember the very words of Tom Dunlevy following my protest of the selection of George Bush for VP. They were etched into my mind. "We didn't like that either. It was a deal with the Devil. Henry Kissinger and Gerald Ford, present at the convention as agents of David Rockefeller, assured Reagan the presidency if he accepted Bush on the ticket. Otherwise Rockefeller would swing the election to Carter."
Cleon Skousen spoke with Reagan at the convention, both before and after the Bush decision, and related how Reagan told how Kissinger and Ford with the support of Walter Cronkite coerced him. According to Skousen these are Reagan's very words "They showed me the brush by which I would be tarred if I did not go along." After the election, when George Bush's top man, campaign manager James Baker, became Reagan's chief of staff -- the one person who controlled who saw the president -- the betrayal of conservatism was complete. After Reagan was allegedly shot by John Hinckley, Jr. barely two months into his first term, this curious item turns up in the Associated Press March 31, 1981: Scott Hinckley, brother of John W. Hinckley Jr., who allegedly shot Reagan, was to have dined tonight in Denver at the home of Neil Bush, one of the vice president's sons...
Scott Hinckley [is] vice president of his father's Denver-based firm, Vanderbilt Energy Corp... Neil Bush lives in Denver, where he works for Standard Oil Co. of Indiana.
In 1978, Neil served as campaign manager for his brother, George W. Bush, the vice president's oldest son, who made an unsuccessful bid for Congress. Neil lived in Lubbock throughout much of 1978, where John Hinckley lived from 1974 through 1980...
Sharon Bush, Neil's wife, said... "From what I know and I've heard, they (the Hinckleys) are a very nice family and have given a lot of money to the Bush campaign." We can also see that George W. Bush was just as honest and straightforward a man in 1981 as he is today -- UPI March 31, 1981: Another of the vice president's sons, George W. Bush, lived in Lubbock in 1978 and ran unsuccessfully for Congress. Police have said John Hinckley Jr. lived in Lubbock at that time and once attended Texas Tech University.
Young George Bush did not recall meeting the suspect.
"It's certainly conceivable that I met him or might have been introduced to him," he said. "I don't recognize his face from the brief, kind of distorted thing they had on TV and the name doesn't ring any bells." Researcher John Judge, currently head of 9/11 Citizens Watch, pulled together threads in November 2000: In the period when Reagan came in, I believe Bush took over. He was vice president and rose to power, I believe, on March 31 1981 when Reagan was nearly assassinated. The person placed as the patsy, not the person that actually shot Reagan but the person placed as the patsy in the case, was John Hinckley. His family ties were to oil. Through that oil connection, Neil Bush -- George Herbert Walker Bush's son, who worked in oil -- knew Scott Hinckley who also worked in oil. Neil had been involved with Scott in many oil operations -- both working for oil speculation and oil companies.
The two families lived close to each other. They knew each other socially and financially. When the Hinckley oil company started to fail in the sixties, Bush's Zapata Oil financially bailed out Hinckley's company. It went from being Vanderbilt Oil to Vanderbilt Energy or Vanderbilt Resources in the 60s after Bush intervened. The Hinckleys had been running an operation with six dead wells but then they were making several million dollars a year after the Bush bailout. I always thought this was some sort of a money-pass front where they were laundering money through on this phony oil operation but actually operating some type of an intelligence pay-off.
The father in that family, John W. Hinckley Sr., was also the president of the board for World Vision. World Vision is a far-right evangelical missionary operation that does missionary and "good work" operations in countries where there is a political purpose for it to be there.
[...] The Secret Service helped to set-up Reagan too. Reagan was told not to wear his vest that day -- his protective vest. I'll bet he wore it after that. They did not call the procedure with the limousine. He should have come out the door and gone directly into the limousine. That's how he arrived.
He came, the Secret Service formed two rows on either side of the back door, they opened the back door and he goes in. When you hire a limousine, they don't go to the house down the street, they come to your door. When you're the president, they'll move it six inches to make sure that it's in the right place. It was in the right place when he arrived. He got out and went in through the phalanx of the two rows of agents. He's safe into the VIP entrance.
He comes out the same exit and where's the car?' It is nowhere near the door. It's 40-50 feet down the pavement. So, he's got to walk out into the open. What's supposed to happen? The Secret Service is supposed to surround him like a diamond and protect him. One guy goes forward, McCarthy, to open the door for him. The rest don't surround him. They all file out like a line of ducks off to the right and they leave Reagan walking in the open with Brady and these other guys. Then, the shooting happens.
The damage that was done there once the shooting started was quite extensive. Brady was hit which literally took a large chunk of his brain and knocked him on to the ground. A black cop was nicked in the neck, a big beefy cop, and he spun and hit the ground hard by the shot. McCarthy, 160 pounds, was lifted by the shot, that hit him in the groin at the back door of the car, and thrown through the air to the front bumper of the car. He himself says that was no 22.
All of the early press reports said that Hinckley was firing a 38 and that is much more consistent with these kinds of reactions. A 22 will hurt you, enter you and do damage inside you, but it's not going to knock you over. A 38 is a much larger caliber of bullet. Hinckley purchased a 38 at a pawn shop on Elm Street in Dallas -- the same street where Kennedy was assassinated...
Then the official story changes after three or four hours and Hinckley supposedly had a 22. I went through the ABC footage and you can actually see the replacement of the 22 and the pick-up of the 38 by a Secret Service agent. [...] Hinckley, instead of being taken under civilian custody or even federal custody -- he is in a military district in DC but he is also in several federal districts -- he's whisked off to Quantico Marine Base and that's where he is held for questioning. I think that that was part of his debriefing and deprogramming. But he's not taken under civilian control, he's taken under military custody.
Then he's moved from there for psychiatric evaluation to Fort Butner, South Carolina, which was the first prison that was developed where the cells (and the blueprints) were called labs. It was the first mind-control experimentation prison in the country. He spends his time down there. Again with a group of psychiatrists that are interlinked with other assassinations and then he is eventually brought to court and declared not guilty by reason of insanity for the assassination attempt.
It's a convoluted story but the patterns are always the same. You have a patsy that takes the blame. You have a second gunman that never comes to light. And indeed, Reagan told the Associated Press he thought he was shot by a Secret Service agent in an interview published in The New York Times April 23, 1981): "I knew I'd been hurt, but I thought that I'd been hurt by the Secret Service man landing on me in the car, and it was, I must say, it was the most paralyzing pain. I've described it as if someone had hit you with a hammer.
But that sensation, it seemed to me, came after I was in the car, and so I thought that maybe his gun or something... suddenly I found that I was coughing up blood." Then, after Reagan got himself to George Washington Hospital despite attempts to bring him to the Bethesda Naval Base, Michael Gilson De Lemos, author and member of the National Committee of the US Libertarian Party, picks up the story, writing on January 20, 2002: When Reagan was shot, he apparently assumed that his Vice President did it. How do I know this? From the fascinating information that my mother, who volunteered at the hospital where he was taken and was a friend of his from the old Hollywood days, shared with me. It seems that shortly after he woke up, he asked for a DC patrol officer, had this person find a US ship that had just reached the area, and soon sailors with sidearms guarded his bedside while he placed the whole hospital under his direct command and swore all to secrecy. They buffered him from the Secret Service and anyone else. He trusted no one—and perhaps, by protecting himself with unentangled sailors and officers fresh from sea, saved his own life, and the country from one more black mark of shame. One fellow Catcher in the Rye devotee and .38 caliber enthusiast -- and 'guest' of WorldVision -- was alleged (apparent?) Lennon assassin Mark David Chapman.
| Libertythink Perma-Link | by Total Information 6.6.04 | Send | |
Bilderberg 2004 underway
As previously noted, G. W. Bush may have snuck off this weekend to the Bilderberg meeting. Possibly soon after teeveenews went 24/7 on Ronald Reagan being dead. The agenda for Bilderberg 2004 as reported by journalist and Bilderberg expert Jim Tucker via NOLa JBS: (1) The implementation of a global tax, probably through a tax on all oil produced.
(2) Raising the U.S. tax rate - viewed as pathetically low by most Bilderbergers and most likely happen after the upcoming U.S. elections.
(3) Increasing U.S. foreign aid to underdeveloped countries.
(4) Implementing the American Union (FTAA) soon after the elections - scheduled for January 1, 2005. And a just a few names of the participants, excerpted from the confidential document obtained by British journalist Tony Gosling of Bilderberg.org : Honorary Chairman - Davignon, Etienne - Vice-Chairman, Suez-Tractebel
Honorary Secretary General - Taylor, Martin - International Adviser, Goldman Sachs International Nationalities of participants followed by names and partial portfolios
D - Ackermann, Josef - Chairman, Group Executive Committee, Deutsche Bank AG
I - Bernabe, Franco - Vice Chairman, Rothschild Europe
USA - Boot, Max - Neoconservative, Council on foreign Relations, Features Editor, Wall Street Journal
GB - Browne, John - Group Chief Executive, BP plc
GB - Clarke, Kenneth - Member of Parliament (Con.), Deputy Chairman, British American Tobacco
USA - Collins, Timothy C - MD and CEO, Ripplewood Holdings LLC, Yale School of Management, Trilateral Commission
USA - Corzine, Jon S. - Senator (D, New Jersey), Chairman and CEO, Goldman Sachs
USA - Donilon, Thomas L - Vice-President, Fannie Mae, Council on Foreign Relations
I - Draghi, Mario - Vice Chairman and Managing Director, Goldman Sachs
USA - Edwards, John - Senator (D. North Carolina), Democratic Presidential Candidate
USA - Feith, Douglas J. - Undersecretary for Policy, Department of Defense
USA - Gates, Melinda F. - Co-Founder, Gates Foundation, wife of Bill Gates
USA - Geithner, Timothy F. - President, Federal Reserve Bank of New York
USA - Graham, Donald E. - Chairman and CEO, Washington Post Company
USA - Haas, Richard N. - President, Council on Foreign Relations, former Director of Policy and Planning staff, State Department
USA - Holbrooke, Richard C - Vice Chairman, Perseus, former Director, Council on Foreign Relations, former Assistant Secretary of State
USA - Issacson, Walter - President and CEO, Aspen Institute USA - Jordan, Vernon E. Senior Managing Director, Lazard Freres & Co LLC
USA - Kagan, Robert - Senior Associate, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
GB - Kerr, John - Director, Shell, Rio Tinto and Scottish American Investment Trust, former secretary of European Constitution Commission
USA - Kissinger Henry A. - Chairman, Kissinger Associates Inc.
USA - Kravis, Marie Josee - Senoir Fellow, Hudson Institute Inc.
NL - Koenders, Bert (AG) - Member of Parliament, president, Parliamentary Network of the World Bank
USA - Kovner, Bruce - Chairman Caxton Associates LLC, Chairman, American Enterprise Institute
P - Lopes, Pedro M. Santana - Mayor of Lisbon
USA - Luti, William J. - Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Near Eastern and South Asian Affairs
GB - Neville-Jones, Pauline - Chairman, QuinetiQ (UK privatised military research/services company), governor of the BBC, former Chairman Joint Intelligence Committee
USA - Nooyi, Indra K. - President and CEO, PepsiCo Inc.
USA - Perle, Richard N. - Resident Fellow, American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, former Likud policy adviser, former chair Defence Policy Board, former co-chairman, Hollinger Digital
B - Phillipe, HRH Prince
USA - Reed, Ralph E. - President, Century Strategies
USA - Rockefeller, David - Member JP Morgan International Council, Chairman, Council of the Americas
USA - Ross, Dennis B - Director, The Washington Institute for Near East Policy
USA - Thornton, John L. - Chairman, Brookings Institution, Professor, Tsinghua University
CH - Vasella, Daniel L. - Chairman and CEO, Novartis AG
INT - Vries, Gijs M. de - EU Counter Terrorism Co-ordinator
GB/USA - Weinberg, Peter - CEO, Goldman Sachs International
GB - Wolf, Martin H. - Associate Editor/Economic Commentator, The Financial Times
INT/USA - Wolfenson, James D. - President, The World Bank
RUS - Yavlinsky, Grigory A. - Member of Parliament
GB - Rachman, Gideon - Brussels Correspondent, The Economist
GB - Wooldridge, Adrian D. - Foreign Correspondant, The Economist Note John Edwards. Is he being groomed as Kerry's Vice-President?
Reagan, he was on the level of George Washington.
2004-06-08 03:41 | User Profile
Rosie the Riveter was an early nail in the coffin of the American family, a necessary institution to preserve the race and the culture.
2004-06-08 08:23 | User Profile
La Raza, Aztlan, open borders, hate speech, and strip searches at OUR airports for WHITES, and exported jobs with deminished private lands/farm's... Hey, there is drugs and peverison almost every where now.
All the wars in the last 100 years for U.S. were against our interest and damaged U.S.
2004-06-08 13:01 | User Profile
I'm not taking away the bravery of WWII vets but I have some questions.
I'd just like to ask those WWII veterans what they all think of gay marriage. I'd just like to ask those WWII veterans what they all think of their old neighborhoods that are now rotting cesspools inhabited by filthy sub-humans. I'd just like to ask those WWII veterans what they think of the "coincidence" of the state of Israel popping up right after the Gentile bloodbath in Europe. I'd like to ask those WWII veterans how they felt during the '60's when women became men, men became drug addicts, Whites were forced to take negroes into their schools, neighborhoods, and beds at the point of a gun, and also Vietnam War raged on for no good reason based on lies.
Unfortunately, my WWII vet uncle died 20 years ago. I know he'd be pissed to see the state of this disgraceful mess in the US.
2004-06-08 13:07 | User Profile
The vets of WWII showed great courage and sacrifice. I hope I could do the same. Their personal valor aside, however, WWII (or the Great War Part II) was a total waste that ran millions of promising young men through the meat grinder, gave half of Europe to the Communists, and put the final nail in the coffin of Western Civilization.
2004-06-09 16:08 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Quantrill]The vets of WWII showed great courage and sacrifice. I hope I could do the same. Their personal valor aside, however, WWII (or the Great War Part II) was a total waste that ran millions of promising young men through the meat grinder, gave half of Europe to the Communists, and put the final nail in the coffin of Western Civilization.[/QUOTE]
Is ok to blame the Communists for the millions of people that die in WWI and WWII as long as you know that the Jews were the founders of the Communist party and were the ones behind of not only those two wars but also of many more wars.
2004-06-10 00:58 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Ponce]Is ok to blame the Communists for the millions of people that die in WWI and WWII as long as you know that the Jews were the founders of the Communist party and were the ones behind of not only those two wars but also of many more wars.[/QUOTE] OK. I agree 100%, as all educated people must, that Communism/Marxism was/is quite clearly a Jewish Frankenstein's monster. However, we must bear in mind that Soviet Communism lost its Jewish character during the 1950s. Stalin was an enemy of the Jew and a Russian national-bolshevik. Francis Yockey went as far to suggest that the USSR was the last, best hope for the Aryan resistence post-1945...an opinion which did not win him many friends in more conventional rightist circles.
Cultural marxism is clearly a Jewish weapon of subversion. However, national-bolshevism (as practiced by Stalin) was and is IMO an Asiatic political variant that is closer to National Socialism than it is to Marxism. What do you think?
2004-06-10 03:04 | User Profile
Johnathan
I don't care if Stalin liked or dislike the tribe, he was still the most evil man to walk the earth in the last 300 years! The USSR was still funding Cultural marxism in the USA in the 1950's and American members of the tribe were doing Stalin's bidding.
2004-06-10 03:21 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Faust]Johnathan
I don't care if Stalin liked or dislike the tribe, he was still the most evil man to walk the earth in the last 300 years! The USSR was still funding Cultural marxism in the USA in the 1950's and American members of the tribe were doing Stalin's bidding.[/QUOTE] I personally don't agree with Yockey's ideas on this matter...however, Yockey's essay "What's Behind the hanging of Eleven Jews in Prague?" has some merit.
Stalin funded the CPUSA and used the Tribe for his own ends to bring down the West. There is no doubt about this. However, the fact that Stalin killed Trotsky and purged the Jews from the Party speaks for itself IMO.
Stalin and Mao were national Bolsheviks...they weren't Judeo-Marxists who wanted to transform their respective nations into multiracial hellholes. I think that first and foremost both of these men were murderous, rabid nationalists who wanted to bring down the West.
2004-06-28 18:36 | User Profile
Much has been written about Stalin, and much has been contrived to be forgotten by those who control American memory. From my book:[QUOTE]In the spring of 1941 Matsuoka told Joseph Grew, the American ambassador to Japan, that if the United States became involved in a shooting war with Germany, even in defense against German submarines, Japan was obligated to enter the war on the side of the Germans. "Democracy is bankrupt" Grew was bluntly told by Matsuoka. This same Matsuoka stood with Stalin when the dictator of Russia proclaimed that the Soviets were all Asians. In April 1941 before Germany attacked the Soviet Union, Stalin told Matsuoka that since Japan and the Soviet Union had settled their dispute Japan should straighten out the Far East while Germany and his country took care of Europe. Later all three could confront the United States. [I][COLOR=Red]Even after the war had ended Stalin had told his daughter that together with the Germans the Soviet Union would have been invincible.[/COLOR][/I] [/QUOTE]How good of allies were the Germans and the Japanese?[QUOTE]Former Gestapo attaché to the German Embassy in Tokyo, [I][COLOR=Red]Joseph Albert Meisinger, accused Matsuoka of informing Stalin of the German plans for attacking Russia[/COLOR][/I]. This was the culminating factor for the agreement by the Soviets for the Japanese-Russian neutrality pact which was scrupulously observed by the Russians for over 5 years for their benefit as it protected their eastern flank, but certainly not for their alleged ally, the United States which could have used Soviet territory for bombing bases or shipping ports. One might ask if the Chinese would have appreciated a quicker end to the war in their part of the world. [I][COLOR=Red]Almost incredible to believe was the other assertion by Meisinger that until Pearl Harbor the German Embassy was not sure if the Japanese would fight on the side of the Axis or the Allies[/COLOR][/I].[/QUOTE]Stalin the nationalist.[QUOTE]On August 9 at 10 minutes after midnight the Soviet attack commenced without artillery preparation and was executed as violently as any attack on the western front. On August 14 the Japanese government announced surrender, but the Soviets have insisted the Kwantung army did not surrender until August 19. As late as August 18 the Red army was making parachute drops on Harbin, Mukden and other Manchurian industrial centers. [I][COLOR=Red]It must be noted that when Soviet troops entered Port Arthur they stood bareheaded and bowed before the monument erected for the Czarist Russian defenders of the Russo-Japanese War of 1904. One older Soviet remarked the defeat by Japan had weighed on Russian history like a dark blot. The Russian people had waited for the chance to avenge this insult. "For forty years we of the older generation have waited for this day. Now this day has come.", so said the Russian nationalist convert, Joseph Stalin, on September 2, 1945.[/COLOR][/I] The results and consequences of this limited ten day offensive still have managed to inspire awe in those who study these things[/QUOTE]For arguing against dunderheads from the left and right such as Pat Buchanan and Thomas Fleming the rather neglected fact that more Japanese were killed as a result of this late, late Russian offensive than died in the atomic bombings of both Hiroshima and Nagasaki should be brought up. This may not win the argument, but you will have the satisfaction of being right while others continue to blame the United States for all calumny.
2004-06-28 19:04 | User Profile
Didn't the United States deliberately incinerate and annihilate numerous Japanese cities killing gabillions of civilians [I]before[/I] the atom bombs were even dropped??
Also, were the Japanese warned by the US of the impending atom bomb holocaust on Hiroshima and Nagasaki if they didn't surrender? Were there any attempts by the US for a Japanese surrender before the US started targeting Japanese civilians??
2004-06-28 19:52 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Johnathan]OK. I agree 100%, as all educated people must, that Communism/Marxism was/is quite clearly a Jewish Frankenstein's monster. However, we must bear in mind that Soviet Communism lost its Jewish character during the 1950s. Stalin was an enemy of the Jew and a Russian national-bolshevik. Francis Yockey went as far to suggest that the USSR was the last, best hope for the Aryan resistence post-1945...an opinion which did not win him many friends in more conventional rightist circles.
Cultural marxism is clearly a Jewish weapon of subversion. However, national-bolshevism (as practiced by Stalin) was and is IMO an Asiatic political variant that is closer to National Socialism than it is to Marxism. What do you think?[/QUOTE]
You must learn that the Jews are like Chamaleon and change colors according to their surroundings.
The Jews will never be 100% communists or 100% democratic, they will always be what is best for them and what will work for their final goals.
The Jews don't care who they mix with or break bread with as long as those they are doing it with will be of some used to them.
The day that the USA stop giving aid to the Jews then they will turn to China, Russia, India or anyone who will obey them.
As you all know they are now selling US secrets to China, India and Pakistan,,,,, India and Pakistan at the same time because they want to be sure to be on the winning side.
I would like to say that that I hate the Jews but that would be a lie, it's gone beyond that, I have no feeling for them and maybe that's why I can feel them and know that they are evil.
2004-06-28 20:22 | User Profile
[QUOTE=xmetalhead]Didn't the United States deliberately incinerate and annihilate numerous Japanese cities killing gabillions of civilians [I]before[/I] the atom bombs were even dropped??
Also, were the Japanese warned by the US of the impending atom bomb holocaust on Hiroshima and Nagasaki if they didn't surrender? Were there any attempts by the US for a Japanese surrender before the US started targeting Japanese civilians??[/QUOTE]The United States killed more in the fire bombing of Tokyo than died either in Hiroshima or Nagasaki. I suspect many civilians were killed by the US and rather deliberately.
When I visited the atomic bomb remembrance site more than 30 years ago in Hiroshima, I asked why they did not save and display the warning the United States gave prior to dropping the bomb. I received no reply - just a look of anguish mixed with hate.
War is not a game nor is it especially chivalrous as many on this forum expect it to be. The objective is to break the enemy's will by killing them or making their life so insufferable that surrender will be preferred by them.
The United States had 100,000 dead in the Pacific War. Invasion of the Japanese homelands would have cost many thousands more. At the battle for Okinawa the United States had a fire-power advantage I suspect never before approached in history. Yet we lost over 10,000 dead. Do not waste tears on the Japanese. Just ask the Chinese if the war ended soon enough.
2004-07-02 05:16 | User Profile
I want America to be nuked. We are a bunch of assholes.
Dropping a bomb in a major metro center and killing 250,000 on impact might be just what America needs to understand that not everyone wwants to be part of the New World Order. Public appeearances of the Propagators if visited by vengeful kill are a matter of concience. Killing one man could actually save 500 lives ....
2004-07-02 15:17 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Exelsis_Deo]I want America to be nuked. We are a bunch of assholes.
Dropping a bomb in a major metro center and killing 250,000 on impact might be just what America needs to understand that not everyone wwants to be part of the New World Order. Public appeearances of the Propagators if visited by vengeful kill are a matter of concience. Killing one man could actually save 500 lives ....[/QUOTE]
Deo? I agree with you, to the American people war is only a TV show that they can tune in at 1800 hours every night.
They need to see and smell the burning flesh of those they love, a dead baby in the arms of his mother,,,,, a father trying to protect his son.
They need to see the brains of a person outside the skull splatter against a wall.
The guts sticking outside the stomach and the rotten smell of flesh.
You are right buddy, we need a wake up call for the American people and then, maybe, they will learn what is really happening all over the world, specially in Palestine, and something will be done.
2004-07-02 18:43 | User Profile
AntiYuppie - Sorry I didn't see this until now. I agree with your overall assessment and with your estimate of these particular points, BUT
I think the book may still be open on Castro (I agree about Batista). As with Mao and other communist revolutionaries, he was supported by the usual NY Jews, albeit the less openly gangster types. Always under the claim that he wasn't really a communist, just a 'reformer'. I've often wondered whether there is still some connection. As with South Africa, it got the whites out for the most part and made the place open only to those with connections (not counting the Canadian & Euro tourists who're allowed to frolic on the beach (gotta make that buck - very Jewish but very counter-revolutionary). No diamond mines in Cuba, but..... something?
Anyway, Kennedy's last minute pull back and his successors' hands off policy toward Cuba could just as easily have been due to some Jewish interest as it could have had to do with the much publicized threat from the USSR.
Thinking about Guantanamo, like Hong Kong - since when did communist revolutionaries respect western lease agreements with deposed leaders? Since they got something in return, like whites out? Like hands off? Like.... something?
Just some thoughts.
2004-07-03 00:46 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Ponce]Deo? I agree with you, to the American people war is only a TV show that they can tune in at 1800 hours every night.
They need to see and smell the burning flesh of those they love, a dead baby in the arms of his mother,,,,, a father trying to protect his son.
They need to see the brains of a person outside the skull splatter against a wall.
The guts sticking outside the stomach and the rotten smell of flesh.
You are right buddy, we need a wake up call for the American people and then, maybe, they will learn what is really happening all over the world, specially in Palestine, and something will be done.[/QUOTE]
Agreed, and I only wish it could be more surgical so as to strike those Americans who deserve it the most--for example, the Bushbots over at Free Republic. If only they could get a taste of what you describe above, the things that America's imperial wars have dished out to others for years.
2004-07-03 03:12 | User Profile
The mark of a true leader is not how he acts when he is in power, for he knows that he has the power, but when he is alone and isolated and without a friend.
Saddam has shown me that, good or bad, he is indeed a leader,,,,,, the way that he acted in court was irreproachable and dignified.
I was going to say that when Bush and Sharon turn comes up I would hoped that they would act the same way, but I know that they wont, Bush will swivel into a worn and Sharon will disappear like magic.
Like I said at one time,,,,, the time table for a dictator to kill is as follows, phase one,,war,,phase two,,,,,clean up,,,,and phase three,,,,control. Saddam was already on phase three and only keeping control of the situation, but now thanks to the US Iraq is once more at phase one.
I wish the US would leave Iraq but they can't, not now, if they were to leave the killing would be in the million and without a light at the end of the tunnel.
KERRY WILL BE THE NEXT PRESIDENT OF THE USA.
The reason for this is that Bush is now a liability to the Jews, and as you know the Jews decides who the next president will be,,,,,and Kerry already stated that he will continue to support the Zionist State of Israel.