← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · electrik
Thread ID: 13832 | Posts: 4 | Started: 2004-05-22
2004-05-22 19:06 | User Profile
Is Neocon Spokesman Soliciting Murder of David Duke? Raoul Lowery Contreras compares Duke to murdered Becket; asks 'Will someone rid us of this meddlesome racist jerk?'
by Kevin Alfred Strom
[img]http://www.nationalvanguard.org/images/teaser/contreras_raoul.jpg[/img] Raoul Lowery
IN A STATEMENT far more direct than anything Matt Hale ever said about Joan Lefkow -- and without the need for any provocateur -- Raoul Lowery Contreras (pictured), a neoconservative hack whose specialty is deception of members of his own ethnic group, Latinos, to get them to support the Iraq war and the new Zionist-dominated Republican party, has called for action to "rid us" of David Duke, a statement that may be interpreted by violent 'anti-racists' or Mestizo gangs as a call to murder.
Contreras' exact words, referring to David Duke, are: "Will someone rid us of this meddlesome racist jerk?"
Contreras' solicitation-column first appeared on the neocon-linked site Calnews.com, but it has since been picked up by HispanicVista.com and Latinobeat.net, which means it -- and its clear implication and call for action -- has now made a significant impact in 'Hispanic' media, likely reaching violence-prone elements of their audience. In contrast, the informer-provoked words for which Matt Hale was convicted were said in private, where they could not reach any audience, much less an audience containing perhaps millions of potential killers, as Contreras' words have.
Contreras tries to make his call to rid the world of David Duke sound 'literate': He invokes the 'spirit' of King Henry II and the 'Brown v. Board' decision. But he makes it clear that the words are his own.
Does his call to remove Mr. Duke just mean remove him from office? No, that can't be true, since Mr. Duke currently holds no public office.
Does it mean remove him from the political debate? Possibly, but if that's true, then why didn't Contreras say so? And how, exactly, should Duke be gotten "rid" of?
While calling for Duke to be removed, and simulataneously attacking Peter Brimelow, Pat Buchanan, Sam Francis, and yours truly, Contreras says that Black Muslims are quite benign compared to racially-aware White writers and thinkers:
"...a loudmouth ex-convict spouting racial hatred. Usually, that description is reserved for Black Muslims... But those guys are simple Louis Farrakhan followers who have little cachet even in the Black community and are not usually dangerous wearing their little bow ties and black suits."
But someone needs to "rid us" of Duke, according to Contreras.
Let me quote Contreras' solicitation and his invocation of Henry II precisely and in context:
"On the 50th anniversary of the Brown v. Board of Education and the important Hernandez v. Texas Supreme Court decisions, we must ask the same questionââ¬âin spirit, that is, of King Henry II, 'Will someone rid us of this meddlesome racist jerk?'"
The context actually makes it clearer than ever that it is murder that is being referred to:
In 1170, King Henry II of England had grown more and more frustrated with the Archbishop of Canterbury, Thomas Becket. Becket followed his conscience and would not compromise his ideals and principles, even when ordered to do so by Henry as part of the monarch's many political intrigues and power plays.
Contemporary accounts quote the king as shouting out in court ââ¬ÅWill no one rid me of this troublesome priest?ââ¬Â
Four of his knights heard what Henry shouted, and took it to heart. Clearly, the king wanted Becket dead. On the 29th of December of that year, they rode to Canterbury, seized Becket and tried to drag him from the cathedral. When he fought back, they slew him where he stood with their swords, and his blood flowed down the aisles as he died.
Now Contreras is no king, not by a long shot, but his call for the "removal" of a good man who has held to his principles is just as despicable as Henry's.
Contreras is no stranger to promoting violence as a solution to political problems.
As a contributor to Jewish World Review (JWR), he pushed hard for the Zionist war in Iraq. His JWR column of April 29, 2003, now rings more than a little hollow:
"Twenty-one Spring days proved that the armed forces of the United States led by the brilliant duo of President George W. Bush, and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfield [ sic -- K.A.S. ], is unmatched in today's world for the ability to gather resources, gather combat men and to attack and deliver victory in short order."
Describing the war as "short and brilliant," Contreras pooh-poohs those who said Iraq would be a quagmire for America: "Before the war, we were hysterically told by the objectors that thousands upon thousands of innocent people would die in Iraq," adding "The weapons of mass destruction are there and they will soon surface."
Contreras owes David Duke and all White Americans an abject apology, no matter what his intentions were when he wrote. And law enforcement owes us an investigation just as vigorous as any ever launched.
[URL=http://www.calnews.com/archives/contreras202.htm]Contreras' original column in CalNews[/URL]
[URL=http://www.latinobeat.net/html4/051504contreras.htm]'Latino Beat' reprints column, as previously published in 'Hispanic Vista'[/URL]
[URL=http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0403/contreras1.asp]Contreras on the Iraq War[/URL]
SOURCE: [url]http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=2938[/url]
2004-05-22 20:07 | User Profile
[QUOTE=electrik][img]http://www.nationalvanguard.org/images/teaser/contreras_raoul.jpg[/img] Raoul Lowery
IN A STATEMENT far more direct than anything Matt Hale ever said about Joan Lefkow -- and without the need for any provocateur -- Raoul Lowery Contreras (pictured), a neoconservative hack whose specialty is deception of members of his own ethnic group, Latinos, to get them to support the Iraq war and the new Zionist-dominated Republican party, has called for action to "rid us" of David Duke, a statement that may be interpreted by violent 'anti-racists' or Mestizo gangs as a call to murder.
Contreras' exact words, referring to David Duke, are: "Will someone rid us of this meddlesome racist jerk?"
Contreras' solicitation-column first appeared on the neocon-linked site Calnews.com, but it has since been picked up by HispanicVista.com and Latinobeat.net, which means it -- and its clear implication and call for action -- has now made a significant impact in 'Hispanic' media, likely reaching violence-prone elements of their audience. In contrast, the informer-provoked words for which Matt Hale was convicted were said in private, where they could not reach any audience, much less an audience containing perhaps millions of potential killers, as Contreras' words have.
SOURCE: [url]http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=2938[/url][/QUOTE]
You'd think if someone did succeed in murdering Duke, we'd be able to revover tens of millions of dollars from all the organizations supporting and serving as mouthpiece for Contreras under Morris Dees' "vicarious liability" doctrine.
But as Strom says - fat chance of equality.
Wonder btw if Contreras has any Marronos blood.
2004-05-22 20:20 | User Profile
Here's the spic's email if you wish to ask him directly if he's prodding Mexican thugs to murder David Duke:
[color=red][size=6][email="raoul@raoul.net"]raoul@raoul.net[/email][/size][/color] [size=6][color=#ff0000][/color][/size] [size=6][color=#ff0000][/color][/size] [size=6][color=#ff0000][/color][/size] [size=6][color=red][/color][/size]
2004-05-22 20:28 | User Profile
That makes my whole point about arguments about being "white". Supporting responsible political policy will filter out any third world riff raff, and keep on message. If you want to say northern Euro, fine, but "white" is no way to be clear on who you mean. There is no way the indian latinos that are coming in massive immigration surges to all of the US are compatible with current US culture. For one, they don't speak English. Two, they refuse to assimilate into what is an obvious culture of our founding fathers. Three, like Raoul, they not only don't assimilate, they prefer the extermination of white northern euros who don't surrender to the third world masses. If not through violence, race mixing. Interesting VDARE article...
[url]http://www.vdare.com/sailer/contra_contreras.htm[/url]
"New American" News Service. That's rich, huh? And, what heritage? It took me a while to get it. Duke is right about the attempt to wipe out white euros, and denying they even have a heritage is one of them. Telling a people they have no heritage is like telling a person they have no soul.