← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · il ragno

Berg's Dad: Bush, Rumsfeld Killed My Son

Thread ID: 13690 | Posts: 9 | Started: 2004-05-14

Wayback Archive


il ragno [OP]

2004-05-14 10:46 | User Profile

Looks like Dubya loses, even when he 'wins'.

[QUOTE][B]Father Blames Bush, Rumsfeld for Berg's Death[/B]

PHILADELPHIA (May 13) - The father of Nick Berg, the Pennsylvania contractor beheaded in Iraq, on Thursday directly blamed President Bush and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld for his son's death.

"My son died for the sins of George Bush and Donald Rumsfeld. This administration did this," Berg said in the interview with radio station KYW-AM.

In the radio interview from outside his home in West Chester, Pa., a seething Michael Berg also said his son probably would have felt positive even about his executioners until the last minute.

"I am sure that he only saw the good in his captors until the last second of his life," Berg said.

Then, referring to his son's executioners, he said: "They did not know what they were doing. They killed their best friend."

Two days after the publication of a video showing the execution of his son by five masked men, Berg attacked Bush administration for its invasion of Iraq and its sponsorship of the Patriot Act, which gave increased powers of surveillance to the federal government.

Berg described the Patriot Act as a "coup d'etat." He added: "It's not the same America I grew up in."

05/13/04 13:26 ET[/QUOTE]

Wait till Sean Hannity and Ann Coulter and Boy Jonah rip this traitorous weasel to shreds, eh? Maybe Sean will book him in split-screen for that "I want you to tell this boy's grieving father that George Bush is responsible! Oops. Well anyway, Pat Tillman's father!" kill-shot FoxNews specializes in.


Sertorius

2004-05-14 11:52 | User Profile

Il Ragno,

They are treating this with kid gloves. I'm listening to fat head Bill Bennett take the view that the father is grieving and we should understand his anger, however, he shouldn't blame Bush and Rumsfeld. In fairness, he is correct up to a point. Berg got himself in his position due to his own stupidity. Nonetheless, if Bush hadn't embraced this damn fool idea in the first place we wouldn't be in this kosher mess. It's funny to hear all the "christian"zioNuts calling in with calls to invade the rest of the Middle East to "unite the country."

I find the neo-con reaction interesting when I think about what they said about the son who lost his father in the WTC. I remember O'Reilly cussing him out. I reckon that the reason for the different treatment is due to the fact that Berg was a Jew and the other guy was a Gentile.

I believe most of the comments are based on crocodile tears more than anything else. This allows them to wave the bloody shirt again.


Paleoleftist

2004-05-14 12:13 | User Profile

Well, Jewish or not, the father deserves a thumbs-up for not letting the Neocons get away with using his son´s death for their nefarious propaganda.


heritagelost

2004-05-14 14:11 | User Profile

Nick Bergs' dad is a whiney bitch. His son asked for it big time. We was wondering around alone in Iraq with no job, and an Israeli stamp on his passport. He had already been arrested and detained for two weeks by the Iraqi police and still didn't go home.


DakotaBlue

2004-05-14 14:20 | User Profile

Check out today's news. AlQ knew of Nick Berg. His password was on Moussouai's computer, the terrorist the FBI zeroed in on prior to 9-11 but couldn't access his computer. The Israeli stamp on his passport now takes on new significance.


TexasAnarch

2004-05-14 18:40 | User Profile

[QUOTE=DakotaBlue]Check out today's news. AlQ knew of Nick Berg. His password was on Moussouai's computer, the terrorist the FBI zeroed in on prior to 9-11 but couldn't access his computer. The Israeli stamp on his passport now takes on new significance.[/QUOTE]

Click.
Here's the connections we are looking at through the communications (sign-uses, [B]S*[/B] ). I was going to post it under "politics", but Current Events it is, and I appreciate your posts.

 Berg is picked up and held for the second time after he checks out of the $30 a night hotel April 10, until he is "needed".  The plan must co-ordinate time and manner of release to go with Abu Ghraid bombshell.  We don't know when those pics were made.  When the news broke, it was made to sound recent.

Hypothesis:  these were coordinated; the first, to deliver the ultimate blow of shame against the United States of America, forever dismantling its moral pretentiousness -- whatever hi-rollers like Bill Bennett and Pat Robertson may say (I put them in the same boat, spiritually speaking -- then shove it out to sea, in my mind).  Moral goddamned entrepreneurs I call them.  "Sorry ass preachers, politicians and philosophers", Jim Giles puts it.

There was a Jewish/Israeli (ZOG) hand in this. It is hidden somewhere, at present, among the identities of Lynndie England's superiors, whosever bright idea it was to stage and film those particular obscenities.

Global, especially regional, outrage spikes through the roof. ?If "Americans" were looking bad before, which is all that matters under defacto Noahide (im-)morality (we're the good guys, right? ) Group Emotional Crisis planning board kicks in. Gotta revers ther effect the pics are having. Poisoning the airwaves and minds of young Arab Muslilm children. Not America. Yhat's the ticked. Need something that is [B]really[/B] "not america!", staged by her enemies, pronto. Some thing President Bush can, by golly, vow to defeat, with all his heart, soul and Jeezuserpy unction. Who better than one of YHWH's own, finest, like Daniel Pearl had been. Sad day for Nick, when they rang that bell. His dad said it was better him to go quick like that, without torture, humiliation, sexual perversion, etc., and every humanitarian would surely agree, including Nick himself, who went about doing good.

Now I submit: the fact that the identity of Pvt. England's superior is being scrupulously withheld, even while lurid accusations are leaked about her (NY Post "LEASH GAL'S SEX PICS", p. 1, 5.13.04) by anonymous senators violating their oath of confidentiality (whoever did it: Schumer was one quoted in the article) ... and that identity is in all probability Jewish. But this is left unspoken, split-off from mainstrean narrations. That is what I refer to elsewhere simply as "splitting", implying re-routing [B]S* [/B]- processing through (group) unconscious (formed by what each one contributes as a reaction from their own (Freud, Jung)). The Jewish connection is split-off the torture pictures, substituting England's role while hiding who ordered it. To bring it up is "anti-semitic", this term being that which is used to repress open accusations.

Then, the content split-off from the sadistic jail torture (deepest dream-thought: "This is what Jews are doing to America") is then displaced onto, and punished in, the execution of hapless Mr. Berg. [B]AMERICAN BEHEADED[/B] the breaking news crawl lines first blared out. [B]AMERICA SHAMED ... AMERICAN BEHEADED [/B] . Oh. (the consciousness struggling with repression says). [B]BUT BERG WAS A JEW![/B] Oh. (Double reversal now required as consciousness is confronted "as if from the other side" with its split-off content.) BUSH VOWS REVENGE FOR BARBARIC BEHEADING OF AMERICAN JEW. The Jewish identity, replete with admonishing anti-Bush liberal Jewish father, folds back in at another level, so it is still "anti-semitic" to mention it. (I know I am not saying new things; just saying the obvious ones better, for me) Now, there is something for everybody to hate, in all around, in this. As a 1-2 punch, it goes right up there with 911 and 11/11 -- or whenever the anthrax letters to the senators occurred.

Then, it was announced today that Berg's path was supposed to have crossed computers with Moussouai. But there is a question of whether Moussouai had anything to do with 911. So there is another double-double reverse negative sign-use formation. (My favorite kind: "FNARDS" of Anton Wilson, I hold)

A Vote for Bush is a vote for beheading America.


il ragno

2004-05-14 19:47 | User Profile

[QUOTE]Nick Bergs' dad is a whiney bitch. [/QUOTE]

I don't think you have to be a cryptoZionist to maybe concede that a father watching his son brutally die [I]on television[/I], with the whole world watching alongside him, is going to be utterly devastated, whether or not he's a Jew.

Calling him a "whiny bitch" is the kind of thing that repels doubters and fence-sitters right back into ZOG's backyard.


jay

2004-05-15 04:13 | User Profile

Il's very right on this issue.

There are few things in life that a person can do to deserve getting his head cut off. Seriously, let's think about it for a second.

Jay


Cruostagarana

2004-05-18 21:46 | User Profile

Funny that Mr. Berg does not implicate Paul Wolfowitz as well as Bush and Rumsfeld.

Of course, I shouldn't be suprised.