← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · General Rommel
Thread ID: 13600 | Posts: 4 | Started: 2004-05-07
2004-05-07 17:35 | User Profile
April 27th, 2004
Dear Ed,
Thanks for the advance copy of your Homophobia article. Where to begin, where to begin...?
The text has one saving grace. You hedge your main point of "Don't ask, don't tell" (which I assume IS your main point) around with so many caveats and wrap it in so much protective and camouflaging verbiage that it's actually very difficult to wade through and get to what you're saying. Since the average "Movement" person has a room-temperature IQ and the attention span of a house fly, a lot of the people liable to give you the most trouble over it won't actually READ the article. They'll wander away after paragraph 12 or so to look at their porn sites.
Of course, this also means that they will be relying on that small strident minority of your enemies to tell them what THEY SAY you said, so the advantage of your prolixity may be lost.
As you may or may not be aware, right now there is a kind of "gay liberation movement within the Movement" which is attempting to advocate and make generally acceptable a policy of "don't ask, don't tell." This is being spearheaded by certain elements of the National Alliance who are walking the walk as well as talking the talk, if you get my drift. Apparently they have obtained Erich Gliebe's consent to this policy in at least two cases I am aware of. There are also some so-called Gay White Skinheads on the internet, but they may be agent provocateurs of some kind, or just silly idiots playing games.
My own view is simple. Homosexuality is a loathsome perversion and is absolutely unacceptable in any context public or private. Yes, it has always been with us throughout history, but it has NEVER been accepted as an "alternate lifestyle" by any culture or nation or civilization that lasted more than a generation or two beyond the date of such acceptance.
The problem with "don't ask, don't tell" is that it is the thin edge of the wedge, the top of the slippery slope. It implies that under certain very limited and restricted conditions, homosexuality is in some way acceptable to Aryan men or at least something we can live with. Once "don't ask, don't tell" is accepted in principle, then the precedent has been set and it becomes a question of details: exactly when and where and who and under what circumstances are we prepared to overlook a spot of buggery among friends? We already have an example just last weekend when there were people in the NA and elsewhere who were quite willing to hobknob with a self-admitted bugger boy, Walter Mueller, if there was money to be made. The wall of decency has been breached, and although now only it's a little trickle it will soon become a flood.
Another problem, Ed, is a cultural and historical one of attitude--THEIR attitude. History demonstrates that if you give faggots an inch, they'll take a mile. Homosexuals down through the ages have longed for public acceptance and if they are allowed to poke their dorks out of the closet without getting them lopped off, then before you know it you have what amounts to "gay pride parades" in every historical epoch this has happened. (The mignons at the French courts of Henri III and Louis XIV come to mind. Going further back there were the Scavengers of Thebes, a special unit of fighting chariots where the sodomite was the spearman and archer and the catamite was the driver.) I don't deny that history has produced such aberrations, but even then they were recognized by contemporaries as just that--aberrations.
Homosexuals will proselytize at the drop of a hat and do anything to get at young boys, which is how they reproduce. "Don't ask, don't tell" gives them a foothold in the community that they can use as a springboard and which they WILL use as a springboard to corrupt children. It is in the very nature of their perversion to do so. Whether or not that perversion is genetic is beside the point. I personally think that some people may be born as psycho serial killers too, given the way all this society's toxic wastes have poisoned the environment and ****ed with our genetic structure and mutated our DNA, etc. But that doesn't mean they should be tolerated.
Anyway, enough of my ravings on faggotry. You will get more than enough of those in days to come.
You asked my advice. My advice, Ed, is to put this one back in the closet and keep it there. It will be coming back to bite you twenty years from now, and you will spend the rest of your life trying to back away from it and explain it away.
Yours, Harold Covington
2004-05-07 20:44 | User Profile
General Rommel,
Let us remember Ed Steele is a Liberal at hart. But he is pro-Euro-Folk and anti-Marxist which makes him a very odd fish! But from what have read he is good man and should be respected.
2004-05-07 22:46 | User Profile
Why does everybody hate this guy Covington so much?
All of his writings that I've seen are good.
2004-05-07 23:33 | User Profile
Perhaps because 'the movement' in white racialist thinking he concerns himself with is (by his own words) composed largely of people with a 'room temperature' IQ.
[QUOTE=Valley Forge]Why does everybody hate this guy Covington so much?
All of his writings that I've seen are good.[/QUOTE]