← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Samuel
Thread ID: 13549 | Posts: 8 | Started: 2004-05-05
2004-05-05 09:31 | User Profile
Farrakan was on C-span just the other day. I watched and was literally mesmerized. He is the only honest religious leader in the mainstream today. This makes me sad as I am Christian Identity.
I watched for the entire hour and a half.
Why can't we produce leaders of this caliber? Why are our leaders of such low quality? I know this hurts but we must ask ourselves this.
I would urge all to watch this.
[url]http://www.c-span.org/[/url]
2004-05-05 13:10 | User Profile
It is on LF's own site so nothing should happen to it.
[url]http://www.finalcall.com/pressconference/[/url]
Great Speech, names the Yid nicely!
2004-05-05 15:59 | User Profile
I watched the whole speech, thanks for the link. If Farrakhan was David Duke giving the same speech, Duke would be back in jail whereas Farrakhan gets C-Span exposure....but I'm not blaming Mr Farrakhan for that double standard.
Now, I've always known Louis Farrakhan was very attuned to the jewish problem within the United States and also the Middle East, and I think he's sounding like many of the White Nationalists of whom we all been reading for a long time. The basis of his speech, US foreign policy since and even before 9/11, of which I agreed with every word he said, could've easily been pulled from Rense.com, antiwar.com, Originaldissent, etc, etc. I actually think, through Farrakhan's delivery, that the PaleoCon message is getting out to more people in the "mainstream" via an outlet like C-Span. He certainly was naming the you-know-who.
If the letter which Mr Farrakhan said that he wrote to President Bush in late 2001 filled with predictions and consequences of a Mid East war was indeed the truth, then he certainly is a wise and honest man whom I could see Whites working with to attain a seperate-but-equal US Homeland.
The biggest problem I had with his speech is when, at the end, he spoke fervently about "slave reparations" and to that, I adamantly disagree with, of course, since they should be happy, thankful and grateful to God that they're not in Africa today, but in the United States, where they don't have the daily worry about becoming another tribesman's dinner.
2004-05-05 18:46 | User Profile
A big fat reparations bill would be a welcomed straw on the camel's back now, preferably introduced in tandem with a military draft (including women!).
Besides the worse-is-better theory, Amerikwans deserve it.
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything, he's no longer in your power - he's free again." ~ Alexander Solzhenitsyn
2004-05-05 19:43 | User Profile
Ruffin,
[QUOTE]A big fat reparations bill would be a welcomed straw on the camel's back now, preferably introduced in tandem with a military draft (including women!).[/QUOTE]
Take a look at this: [url]http://forums.originaldissent.com/showthread.php?goto=newpost&t=13555[/url]
2004-05-05 22:33 | User Profile
[QUOTE=xmetalhead]I watched the whole speech, thanks for the link. If Farrakhan was David Duke giving the same speech, Duke would be back in jail whereas Farrakhan gets C-Span exposure....but I'm not blaming Mr Farrakhan for that double standard.[/QUOTE]The greatest distinguishing feature of Mr Farrakhan is that he is the only man in America who publicly speaks his mind. For this I envy him.
2004-05-06 03:23 | User Profile
[QUOTE]Garvey promised his followers that a mass exodus of US negroes to Africa would be a tremendous boost to them, because after being exposed to western-style technology and government, the immigrants would be the ruling class in whatever African nation they returned to.[/QUOTE]
As proved by the history of Liberia. Although they were only a small percentage of the population, the descendants of American slaves ruled that country from 1847 until the Doe coup in 1980.
[QUOTE]On the other hand, Farrakhan's "reparations" option may have a silver lining. At one point he advocated that the reparations be used for US negroes to found their own nation somewhere in the "Black Belt"[/QUOTE]
Interestingly enough, this was the policy of the Communist Party USA in the 1920s.
2004-05-06 06:32 | User Profile
Farrakhan - is what the neocons get for not finding a way to send the negroe back(willingly or not) after they were set free. First we get negroe "emancipation" at bayonet point, and nowdays we will soon have latino "leagalization" because we have lost the will to oppose it strongly enough.