← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Smedley Butler
Thread ID: 13475 | Posts: 20 | Started: 2004-05-01
2004-05-01 07:26 | User Profile
[url]www.freeAmerican.com[/url] Archived Radio shows are at the bottom of the page.. Good show!!! April 28 show, Clay Douglas, says he went to dinner with Alex Jones, and stated did, hey Alex, did you ever think that your jewish wife may be your handler? If I am correct, I think those are Clay Douglas's exact words. Allot of infomation on this show about some very interesting stuff, some good perspectives indeed... False flags, fear mongering will not do U.S. any good,etc. Enjoy
2004-05-04 03:50 | User Profile
Is that so ? I will ask Alex myself. Let me tell you something. I dated some hot Jewish girls in my life. And I would marry one if I wanted to .. the Jews have a pervasive network and its the elements within who are evil, the same way the British, French, Italian, Irish, ALL evil IS evil. I have no problem if Alex lovves a Jewish wife. This is where the line is drawn. If you think all Jews are bad then you are an ignorant basstard. The Anglo-Saxons are responssible for creating Israel. Solely. As long as Alex loves his wife .. isn;t that the point ? Yahweh and all his dosciples were Jewish.. even though history provves you as a German or Italain aand Englishman are of the same seed. Give me a f)(kn break !!!!!!!!!! Are you trying to slander Alex Jonees ?? There is NO slander !! As far as your overcoat condemnation of Jews, then you already damn yourself!! Bag of Bones !! Bag of Bones !!!!! How dare you insult one who could be in union with the Almighty !! Take your non-Jew bones to the dirt and see if they rot any lesser...............brother.
2004-05-04 04:02 | User Profile
I find myself in the predicament of defending what - " whiteness " to be white and not Jew. Well I am not Jew at all. I am fully not Jew. But all the records of who was Jew and that was only two tribes were totally destryed in 70 AD. Do you have any understanding of what Im saying ?
No, you must be too wondering who is Jewish and who is not.
Fact Is -Not One Single Jew can Prove Heritage any more than an Irishman can prove Jewish heritage
All the Apostles were in that area and called Jews to moderns.
Modern Jews have no connection at all to ancient Jews.
NONE.
NONE.
If you criticize Alex because he fell in love with a woman of Jewish heritage, then you are less than a man.
We are all a bag of bones.
Your bag better than mine ?
Let your bag givve you eternal life.
All History accepted the fact that HE rose from the dead.
You cannot do it on your own.
btw Shakespeare was Italian.
Its funny how 10000 years later people take pride in the most obvious fallacies.
btw Jesus never wore a beard.
2004-05-04 12:32 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Smedley Butler][url]www.freeAmerican.com[/url] Archived Radio shows are at the bottom of the page.. Good show!!! April 28 show, Clay Douglas, says he went to dinner with Alex Jones, and stated did, hey Alex, did you ever think that your jewish wife may be your handler? If I am correct, I think those are Clay Douglas's exact words. Allot of infomation on this show about some very interesting stuff, some good perspectives indeed... False flags, fear mongering will not do U.S. any good,etc. Enjoy[/QUOTE]Excellent questions. It's a very old story: goes right back to Esther, using Jewish women to infiltrate and control others.
No surprises that Rush Limbaugh's "lovely Marta" is a Jewess. Whether Soviet Russia, or the USA, you can spot the Jewish influence not just with the known Jews, but with the gentiles with Jewish spouses. I've known quite a few; their views and attitudes on Israel and other Jewish questions are almost always shaped accordingly. The Jewish wives really do act as "handlers" whether it is consciously understood or not.
I heard Alex Jones on the Coast to Coast program. He has lots of good points on our ruling elites, but he has a blind spot on the Jewish question that is a mile wide. He believes in all kinds of kooky stuff about secret societies and conspiracies, but when the idea of Jewish activities (not even "conspiracies" but out in the open, well known activities) he suddenly becomes a complete skeptic, unwilling to consider any possibilities at all, unwilling to listen or think or debate or discuss the issue at all.
If you see someone who claims to be a fearless researcher, thinker, and debunker, who behaves as such on every issue save one, an issue to which he reacts against as though reacting against a strong and fearsome social tabboo, you know you should disregard his reaction. The existance of the taboo points towards the real culprit, not away from it. That's why taboos are created: to steer sheeple away from the truth. React against the taboo and you move towards the truth. Always do the opposite of the sheeple.
Yes, Alex Jones is part of the problem, not part of the solution. No surprises there. Half a truth can be just as bad as a lie, because it sends you down false paths.
2004-05-05 03:19 | User Profile
Alex Jones is doing a major service to Americans and Constitutional Rights.. I do not think that most of what he says is paranoia .. although sometimes he goes into " mode "... granted. For example, Bohemian Grove. Just because George Bush 's family has ties and GWB himself " goes " there does not mean that our President condones or participates in the rituals within. In any event, I am not going to let go of Alex just because he has a Jewish wife. Take Alex away, and there would be a void. Let us challenge Alex on this, he is a stand up man and very very overworked who spends 16 hours a day on his patriotic efforts. We need to show space and respect for him while at the same time asking him about the Jewish/Zionist plan and control. He will tell you that there are evil people in every group, and that the evil has no boundaries concerning race or religion, and he is right. Many Englishmen are directly responsible for tyranny and the Illuminati strongold is mostly European !! Still, we must let him know that his audience will not let the Jewish problem pass and by calling and intellectually presenting this we can influence the discourse. But do not let your impression of ALex Jones be tainted automatically.. it is fact that the Jews are not the only ones behind the NWO and the world domination.
2004-05-05 20:31 | User Profile
I have no idea who Alex Jones is - but you can't whine about governmental curtailment of the right of free association, and then condemn a person for freely loving/marrying someone of their own choosing.
2004-05-05 23:17 | User Profile
[QUOTE=AntiYuppie]Il ragno, I hope your posts here are more than a stopover, because you always raise important points. Your comment here lays a finger on what is an open wound of inconsistency among many on the "far right" - a natural consequence of attempts to reconcile racialist collectivism with American style laissez-faire (cultural, economic, and otherwise).
This raises an interesting point. I've often been troubled by racialists who in one breath invoke the Constitution, hyper-individualism, etc. and in the next breath sound like one of Himmler's top racial hygeinists. Certainly there's a conflict there somewhere. Individualism means just that - judging all people on an individual basis without any collective sense of race or ethnicity, and freedom of association means that one can consort with, work for, hire, and mate with individuals irrespective of their "group" affiliation. Similarly, there's nothing in the US Constitution that forbids opening our borders to Third Worlders or permitting Jews to control our mass media and academia.
I am comfortable with sacrificing some, indeed a great deal of personal freedoms (indeed, I consider libertarianism to be an unworkable fantasy completely divorced from political reality), so as such I see no problem in advocating racialist policies. What bothers me is the fact that people seem to naively believe that "restoring the Constitution" or "more personal liberty" will somehow give us a racially homogeneous society. Here's a hint: the only successful attempts at "racial hygeine" in recent history took place in Nazi Germany and in Israel, and they didn't happen because of "liberty," "free markets," or adherence to an 1789 style US Constitution. Nor will "restoring the Constitution" do anything about colored minorities running rampant or the disproportionate Jewish share of the PRIVATE sector. Indeed, under laissez-faire and freedom of association, these are the sorts of outcomes one would expect as a natural outcome of economic competition.
What that means, of course, is that it's a little dishonest for those on our side to attack the Left for its attacks on Liberty and Constitutionalism when we'll have to do the same to secure our aims. If we can't be honest with the public, we should at least be honest with ourselves. It also means that people will have to chose just what they are loyal to: indivdualist liberty or our identity as a white, western people.[/QUOTE]
Although I am not nearly as committed to libertarian ideas as I used to be, I don't think we should abandon the Constitutional Republic form of government just yet. It seems to me that the real problem with the Constitution is that it extends the franchise to people who shouldn't have it, namely women and non-Whites. Orginally, the right to vote and participate in the Republic was limited to White men who owned property, and if things has stayed that way, and perhaps if Jews had been legally barred from holding office, we probably wouldn't be in the fix we're in now -- or at least things wouldn't be as bad as they are now. So it seems to me the real culprit in the degeneration of the Republic is not the influence of individualism, but rather the influence of egalitarianism and flawed notions of equality. Taking away the right to vote form everyone but White men would be a step in the right direction.
2004-05-06 04:08 | User Profile
Modern society is so absolutely divorced and bears no resemblance to 1789 in this country that a vaild argument can be made that the Constitution is no longer vaild or applicable at all. The assumptions and way of life have passed so far into history's depths that I truly believe change is necessary. But the kind of change I want, the kind of change I firmly believe is necessary to bring righteousness back to America is totally unattainable. It used to be only free men who owned property. Then it was free men regardless of owning property or not. Then it was all free men regardless of their intelligence, then it was women, then it was Negroes, and now it is ANYONE.
Mob Rules, Republic loses, and the machinizations of a fallen Empire are working overtime.....................
2004-05-06 04:10 | User Profile
Modern society is so absolutely divorced and bears no resemblance to 1789 in this country that a vaild argument can be made that the Constitution is no longer vaild or applicable at all. The assumptions and way of life have passed so far into history's depths that I truly believe change is necessary. But the kind of change I want, the kind of change I firmly believe is necessary to bring righteousness back to America is totally unattainable. It used to be only free men who owned property. Then it was free men regardless of owning property or not. Then it was all free men regardless of their intelligence, then it was women, then it was Negroes, and now it is ANYONE.
Mob Rules, Republic loses, and the machinizations of a fallen Empire are working overtime.....................
2004-05-06 08:01 | User Profile
White European people who blossened in North America with creativity, hopes and faith, built North America. Though we now have to pander every day to the Marxist terror installed p.c. hate concepts forced on U.S. and based on a marxist strong hate towards white society for 59 years now at full speed...
N.A.M.B.L.A., N.E.A. N.P.R. splc, naacp, adl, jdl, Hooeyweird media, and many more of these get whitey outfit's, have resulted in white people having to pander daily, or face punitive measures of many sorts. Our open borders with a full fledged non-white invasion of the U.S. and Canada. Our hive enemy alien government took U.S. over under F.D.R., and has flown in millions of privmitive non-whites from Africa and S.E. Asia like Hmoogs, and Viet Namese, placing them in 140 plus white towns from Lewiston Maine to Sioux Falls S.D. Not to mention over 30 million South of the border white hating Mongols.
Whites are under full subjugation in all WESTERN Nation's today.. In todays mud Climate of P.C. Marxism, the Wright brothers could never have gotten off the ground, Ford would have rode horses, but the Carr brothers pathology can florish and be keep secret whites, just like Mr.Cool could throw four hand granades at 17 whites in a command center of the 101st Airborne Kuwait last year. The N.P.R. Twit Birds shed not one tear, for the black pathology that murdered 5 whites in Witchita with our mercy, but plenty of glee and howling.. Whites who grew in NYC and other hell holes know this.
99% of our wealthy and political representatives do not give a whit for working whites. Our representives represent the tyranny machine of our subjugation by the central goverment, they DO NOT represent U.S.,our will to control the anti-white central government that allows boom box speaker cars to roam the streets of our courtry for now.
Bird brain egalartarian's, make me want to yell, every word of John 8:44 and Heil Hitler. Murderous Egalitarian Marxist, have millions of white peoples blood on their hands. From WW1, and the 65 million white Christians murdered in one form or another,by being worked/starved to death or shoot out right. [url]www.jewwatch.com[/url] [url]www.ussliberty.com[/url]
Your integrated schools by force of government bayonet, to have mixed racial school systems was and is nothing but terrror against whites and the dumbing of U.S., "Ms. Brown" of Brown verus Board of Education fame, was not a gentile women or a Christian, and the men who backed her were not either except for ONE. [url]www.deliberatedumbing.com[/url] it's no joke. I attended inner city schools and every day was a mud hell, thank to homo loving Marxist. READ Alexander Solzhenitsyn, and Dr. Kevin MacDonalds " Culture of Critique.. Joe McCarthy was pure of hearth, but with so cowards who ran from the truth and the White Patriot he was, was enough to cause any man to drink..
Our citie's streets are all dangerous now, with vibrating speaker cars and non-white savage invaders who are the controlled storm troops used against whites. Marxist Egalitarians, are the ones who will tell you the sick lies that poverty is the cause of the brutal crimes, and that is an insult against against millions of hard "WORKING POOR" 100 years of marxism has devasted white NATIONS, and the Egalitarian farxtist will never back down, no matter how many whites suffer.
2004-05-07 21:08 | User Profile
[QUOTE=grep14w]
Yes, Alex Jones is part of the problem, not part of the solution. No surprises there. Half a truth can be just as bad as a lie, because it sends you down false paths.[/QUOTE] I was not surprized to find out that yet another person with influence is connected to the Jews. But let's look at this from another angle; There are lots of secret societies and conspiraciesbut they all lead back to the Jews. The Jewsmedia has little to say about the half-dozen or so main secret societies because they benefit by the situation. Anyone who studies this and traces out the obvious power flow to the media can figure out who is in command unless they have some kind of mental block preventing them from scrutinizing the Jews.
Because of this, it benefits us when anyone speaks of secret societies and conspiracies because it primes the dull minds of the goyim for the whole truth. Alex Jones is doing us a service when his message is going out to the general population. When his program is directed at a target audience, it does not help. Let me remind you that we are all conspiracy theorists. When secret societies and conspiracies are discussed on internet forums, the Jewish posters are the first to downplay it with ridicule because they know where it leads....to them!
2004-05-07 22:48 | User Profile
Travis, your post is full of clarity on the the Alex Jone's topic, he is doing and has done allot of good for U.S...He may not be for me or others, but he is an important asset to waking our brothers who watch TV Ball throwing savage beasts who can't behave themselves with millions in salary... So, your post gets my Salute!
2004-05-11 03:22 | User Profile
you want to talk shht
Talk it to Alex call him I dare you
He is a Patriot and has done more than all the white nationalists ever did in waking America up to the REAL PROBLEM. He is totally white, if that makes you feel better... go ahead call him. You don't have the balls.
The Larger Picture............the real problem. the real control.
I dont need or want your idiot view.
Racial line idiots ..
Evil has no boundaries.. NONE. The Englishman is more responsible than the so called Jew for creating Modern Israel.
[url]http://www.prisonplanet[/url]
.com
2004-05-11 04:34 | User Profile
We suffer from the British prime minister's so called "The Balfour Agreement" Mr. Balfour, if I spelled the name correctly was jewish..... Hey, maybe we can have U.S.S.R. N.K.V.D. laws like capital punishment for being a so called anti-uncle jewey. Alexander Solzhenitsyn's speech at Harvard in 1978 titled "A World Torn Apart" is still to be considered today.. WW 1 could have ended in April 1916 or earlier with out the scheme of using U.S. by having BLACK MAILED Woodrow Wilson. 9.5 million white men lost in war. plus 35 million whites lost to the so called Spanish flu in 13 months? All of this led to the leftist communist anti Christian, anti white take over of U.S. today, with Millions of whites have suffered all types of daily terror of violence, rape, assault, emotional brow beating, murder, and daily B.S. by integration...WW 1 led U.S. to today.
2004-05-11 06:28 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Exelsis_Deo]Is that so ? I will ask Alex myself. Let me tell you something. I dated some hot Jewish girls in my life. And I would marry one if I wanted to ..
Yes, well, I too have dated some very hot Jewish girls, as well as some very hot Black (mulatto, really), Hispanic and Asian ones (White women are very much the minority among the younger demographic here in California, after all, and I wasn't born a White Nationalist), but that proves nothing, other than that you and I are not infallible (which I had thought was something of a given). Even if one is not a White Nationalist, it should be obvious to all that creating half-breed children with people outside one's traditional national stock is not a very good idea for the future of our civilization. And there are more important considerations than your own personal desires....
[QUOTE]the Jews have a pervasive network and its the elements within who are evil, the same way the British, French, Italian, Irish, ALL evil IS evil. I have no problem if Alex lovves a Jewish wife. This is where the line is drawn. If you think all Jews are bad then you are an ignorant basstard.[/QUOTE]
Technically, it is true that not all Jews are evil, although I wouldn't hesitate to say that most are evil, which perhaps makes them different from any other identifiable ethnic group (other than Gypsies). But one blanket statement I will make about Jews is that NO JEW, no matter how good-hearted (let alone "hot") has any place being married into a White family. No Jew should be bred with.
[QUOTE]The Anglo-Saxons are responssible for creating Israel.[/QUOTE]
Um, I suppose, much in the way that Americans are responsible for the invasion of Iraq or the subversion of our media & academe. I mean, yeah, we should have stopped it from happening, but we weren't exactly the ones taking the lead role in perpetrating such crimes, now were we?
[QUOTE]As long as Alex loves his wife .. isn;t that the point ?[/QUOTE]
No. The point is that he married the wrong woman, by virtue of her belonging to an alien, parasitical tribe.
2004-05-11 06:47 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Valley Forge]Although I am not nearly as committed to libertarian ideas as I used to be, I don't think we should abandon the Constitutional Republic form of government just yet. It seems to me that the real problem with the Constitution is that it extends the franchise to people who shouldn't have it, namely women and non-Whites. Orginally, the right to vote and participate in the Republic was limited to White men who owned property, and if things has stayed that way, and perhaps if Jews had been legally barred from holding office, we probably wouldn't be in the fix we're in now -- or at least things wouldn't be as bad as they are now. So it seems to me the real culprit in the degeneration of the Republic is not the influence of individualism, but rather the influence of egalitarianism and flawed notions of equality. Taking away the right to vote form everyone but White men would be a step in the right direction.[/QUOTE]
It should be noted that a quick repeal of the 15th and (I believe) 19th Amendments would be quite sufficient to limit the franchise to just White men (although Congress and the various state legislatures would obviously have to take positive action in order to take advantage of these powers). After a coup or whatnot, an appointed Congress and a series of appointed legislatures could properly amend the Constitution in such a way as it could never be amended back (such as due to the fact that with women & minorities unable to vote, it would be safe to hold free & fair elections again). A couple other amendments could be repealed, such as the one banning the poll tax (elections should cost the state nothing via poll tax revenues, and anyone unwilling to pay the poll tax shouldn't be voting anyway - it'd only be like $5 per elector at the most, after all) and literacy tests (again, until you can write an essay explaining the meaning behind each of the 10 Amendments of the Bill of Rights, with no other data but a copy of said Bill, plus a piece of paper and a pencil, you don't need to be voting). We'd also want to add a couple of amendments, such as one stating that only a White Gentile born of two White Gentile parents is automatically entitled to U.S. citizenship simply by virtue of being born here, or another defining marriage as a union between a White Gentile man and a White Gentile woman (this would allow, unfortunately, women to marry other "women" who were born male but consider themselves "transgendered," as obviously no sane regime would recognize, or hesitate to ban, a travesty like "gender reassigment surgery," and hence we'd have to view that as a man-woman couple, but hey, nothing's perfect).
The Constitution is deeply flawed, but its still potentially very useful as a symbol of national unification & legitimacy and hence should not be dispensed with too casually.
2004-05-14 09:16 | User Profile
[url]http://www.firebaseskull.com/Jones.html[/url] I had completley forgotten about his.. Only a light weight gives a fece what Jones does or sayz....
2004-05-15 02:39 | User Profile
good. Some ingight, some understandiing FINALLY from an obviously British Man.
2004-05-15 03:27 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Kevin_O'Keeffe]The Constitution is deeply flawed, but its still potentially very useful as a symbol of national unification & legitimacy and hence should not be dispensed with too casually.[/QUOTE]
While it is true the Constitutution is deeply flawed, I don't think you can blame the original founders for that. The founders never imagined women participating in the American experiment -- let alone millions of 60-90 IQ Blacks and Mestizos. The founders were genuises, but they couldn't see that far ahead, and even if they could have, they probably couldn't have imagined even in their wildest dreams that White men would ever be foolish enough to give the vote to women and negroes. In the entire history of political thought in the West, from Plato forward, I can't think single figure that supported giving women a say in running things (until Mary Wollstonecraft in the late 1700s).
Even as late as the 1860s, it was probably not too late to turn things around in the United States -- Lincoln did have a plan on the table to send Blacks back to Africa, after all. For whatever reason, it didn't go through -- but thanks to segregation the Negro was at least contained.
American society was still pretty sane even by the 1890s -- sane enough to put justices on the Supreme Court that upheld the Constitutionality of the "separate but equal" doctrine in Plessy versus Ferguson. That lasted another 60 years, roughly, until the bottom really fell out with Brown v. Board of Education and the ensuing era of forced integration.
Jews were of course instrumental in helping Thurgood Marshall win the Brown case. Off the top of my head, I don't remember the year Plessy was decided (sometime in the 1890s), but it wasn't too long afterwards that the ADL was founded in the United States. And it wasn't too long after that that the NAACP was founded -- also as a result of the efforts of Jews. It's interesting. If you look at the historical record, Jews always seem to be involved in anything and everything harmful to the interests of White Gentiles.
2004-05-15 07:02 | User Profile
Er, actually you can do this with full consistency, so long as you don't in fact violate their right of free association by using violence to control them. Even there, one might distinguish between the bonds of free association between families, and the need to control those within the family.
[QUOTE=il ragno]I have no idea who Alex Jones is - but you can't whine about governmental curtailment of the right of free association, and then condemn a person for freely loving/marrying someone of their own choosing.[/QUOTE]