← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · heritagelost
Thread ID: 13377 | Posts: 10 | Started: 2004-04-26
2004-04-26 17:39 | User Profile
This really make the US army look foolish. The troops got a hot tip about chemical weapons (OY VAT!) inside a Bagdad building.
Now, If I was in charge. It would seem like requirement that if I actually suspect real chemical weapons were in the building I would,
A) Evacuate and Quarantine the surounding area. B) Fly in specialists with bomb sniffing and chemical sniffing robots, dogs, devices, ect. C) Proceed with extreme caution as there could be potential chemical leaks, live ordinance, or a body trap.
Instead, four Humvees full of troops full up and storm the building. Big Surprise. The building explodes killing two and wounding five.
Outside, Iraqi school children dance on the vehicles while residents loot body armour, machine guns, ammo, communications equipment, ect before torching them.
The really disgusting part is that the AP lised one of the dead soldiers as a woman. Which means that the US Army sent a women, most likely a teenage girl, on a dangerous mission into a dangerous combat zone.
A little reported fact is that a growing number of hostile-related Iraqi War deaths are women, most of whom are only 18 or 19 years old.
Makes me sick.
2004-04-26 18:46 | User Profile
[QUOTE=heritagelost]This really make the US army look foolish. The troops got a hot tip about chemical weapons (OY VAT!) inside a Bagdad building.
Now, If I was in charge. It would seem like requirement that if I actually suspect real chemical weapons were in the building I would,
A) Evacuate and Quarantine the surounding area. B) Fly in specialists with bomb sniffing and chemical sniffing robots, dogs, devices, ect. C) Proceed with extreme caution as there could be potential chemical leaks, live ordinance, or a body trap.
Instead, four Humvees full of troops full up and storm the building. Big Surprise. The building explodes killing two and wounding five.
Outside, Iraqi school children dance on the vehicles while residents loot body armour, machine guns, ammo, communications equipment, ect before torching them.
The really disgusting part is that the AP lised one of the dead soldiers as a woman. Which means that the US Army sent a women, most likely a teenage girl, on a dangerous mission into a dangerous combat zone.
A little reported fact is that a growing number of hostile-related Iraqi War deaths are women, most of whom are only 18 or 19 years old.
Makes me sick.[/QUOTE]
I thought modern wimmins are tougher than men and can do whatever a man could do, but only better??? You know, equality for the modern feminists who want to be men in battle. There's no such thing as "man" or "woman", just robotic consumer-units and androdynous soldiers. No wonder the Arabs hate us.
2004-04-26 18:52 | User Profile
"A nation that sends its women to fight its wars is not worth defending." ~ Pat Buchanan
2004-04-26 21:40 | User Profile
"A nation that sends its women to fight its wars is not worth defending." ~ Pat Buchanan
Exactamundo and worth repeating.
2004-04-26 21:44 | User Profile
Pat sure had that one right. Obviously the US is not only not worth defending, it's arguably one the most evil regimes that's ever existed (and therefore at the top of my list for destruction). Apart from regimes that have openly practiced largescale genocide, such as Mao's, Stalin's, Pol Pot's, ect., I can't think of a more evil regime than the present day USA-Jewry regime.
2004-04-27 01:41 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Valley Forge]Pat sure had that one right. Obviously the US is not only not worth defending, it's arguably one the most evil regimes that's ever existed (and therefore at the top of my list for destruction). Apart from regimes that have openly practiced largescale genocide, such as Mao's, Stalin's, Pol Pot's, ect., I can't think of a more evil regime than the present day USA-Jewry regime.[/QUOTE]Agreed. I consider myself a patriot, but ONLY in the sense of strong belief in the founding principles of the USA. We sure as hell aren't following those princples now. The nation we're living in now is the USA in name and geography only.
2004-04-27 01:44 | User Profile
[QUOTE=heritagelost]This really make the US army look foolish. The troops got a hot tip about chemical weapons (OY VAT!) inside a Bagdad building.
Now, If I was in charge. It would seem like requirement that if I actually suspect real chemical weapons were in the building I would,
A) Evacuate and Quarantine the surounding area. B) Fly in specialists with bomb sniffing and chemical sniffing robots, dogs, devices, ect. C) Proceed with extreme caution as there could be potential chemical leaks, live ordinance, or a body trap.
Instead, four Humvees full of troops full up and storm the building. Big Surprise. The building explodes killing two and wounding five.[/QUOTE] I also want to add that I don't think the US military really suspected that chemical weapons were being manufactured in that building. That claim smells like propaganda intended to make the sheeple think that maybe the "WMD" issue is still alive and that the search is still taking place.
2004-04-27 10:57 | User Profile
The woman who was killed was probably an MP or NBC(Nuclear, Biological, Chemical) or EOD(explosive ordnance demolition) specialist. Even in the woman friendly Army, there are - as yet - no women in the infantry, armor, cannon field artillery or combat engineers. Ditto for Special Ops/Forces, with the exception of psyops(which doesn't seem to have been particularly effective in Iraq, eh?).
Of course, deliberately putting any female in harm's way is an abomination. That none of our elected representatives has had the nerve to denounce this practice is an example of how degenerate our society has become.
2004-04-27 13:50 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Ruffin]"A nation that sends its women to fight its wars is not worth defending." ~ Pat Buchanan[/QUOTE]
Well quoth.
My time in the service taught me that not only should women be excluded from combat units, they should be excluded from the military altogether. The Pentagon keeps secret the true cost of all the pregnancy-based medical costs and discharges the presence of females incurs. This doesn't include of course the unquantifiable damage done to the chain of command, as attractive female enlisteds wind up in the sack with senior enlisted men and officers. Add to this the whole faggot issue, and you have a very damaged chain of command.
It's really NOT worth defending, Ruffin my friend.
Let it fall, I say. All we have to do is to withdraw our support.
Worse is better.
Walter
2004-04-27 15:52 | User Profile
What are you talking about guys? I just watched Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Tomb Raider, and they show that women are exactly equal to men in butt-kicking, only excepting when they are better than men.
I would be glad to die in battle next to a woman who did not have the strength to drag my wounded body back to the trench, just so I could be a martyr for equal rights! :wink: