← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · TexasAnarch

On The Way Jews Use Signs

Thread ID: 13080 | Posts: 10 | Started: 2004-04-08

Wayback Archive

TexasAnarch [OP]

2004-04-08 16:04 | User Profile

(my work) On The Way Jews Use Signs: Deconstructing The Unconscious in appeals to “Equality”, “anti-Semitic”, “Suicide bombers”, “holocaust”

Preliminary. Sketch of de-construction process

HOW THEY PROCESS 1. Predicating on a single word or idea applied with opposite meanings.

Example: Use of the term “Equality” (as in the French Revolution phrase: “Liberty! Equality! Fraternity!”). “Equality” only applies with respect to some assumed characteristic, e.g., height, weight (applied to bodies); “under the law”, and “by genetic inheritance” (applied to persons). Specification of the characteristic under which the given use is intended is required before a considered “pro-” or “con-“ stand in regard to “equality” is possible. To say “I believe in equality” without specifying with respect to what is logically absurd, becoming politically provocative, if….(accompanied by)

2 Attaching a pre-planned positive or negative attitude to the opposites, when the difference is made explicit.

Equality under the law is one thing. Equality of entitlement to social security payments is another. Equality as peerhood on the scale of being human – spiritual quality, assuming an inner gradient for what being human is….would be something else.. When the single word is split open, as it were, and the opposites in communicated meaning are made clear, then, powerful opposites emerge to polarize the psyche. Deep conflicts latent within being, itself, glossed over by the ambiguity, emerge into the open.

1. Thus (1 + 2: a speaker predicating on a single word, with opposing pre-judged attitudes emerging when its different senses are made explicit) …Requiring anyone who communicates to confront the speaker, personally, as at fault in the way they are using signs. This is necessary because to assent to discussion of such sentences entails, by logic, assent to the existence of the subject term of predication given by the single word as if on one side or the other of a pre-determined set of opposites.. (“Fa entails (Ex)Fx” – John is 7’ tall entails something is 7’tall) Thus, in order to avoid falling into the logical error of self-contradiction, and predicating on a side of the opposites tacitly specified in the speaker’s favor, it becomes necessary to NOT agree or disagree with anything they say. .

This sketch (1-3) deconstructs the steps in the process of criticizing use of signs in sentences. It sketches how the transition from a (heard) sentence structured as predicate-of-subject; to response to the assertion, in an act of communication. This illustrates the steps in processing* -- asterisk to mean “psychosemiotic”: psyche in sign-use – that passes through assumed anatomical enabling systems, such as tongues and memories. Among these is to be found what Freud and Jung called “:The Unconscious. It may be said, then, that the steps trace the processing of signs used in communication through The Unconscious.

Identified in this manner, as an intra-anatomical (un-sited, but brain-nervous system dependent) determinant of sign-use, The Unconscious is referred to in the sketch a second way:  through the example. Processing “Equality” invokes The Unconscious, as illustrated by the elaborations. The “concept”, as cognitive psychologists like to call it* (*what “equality” communicates – among themselves) is evoked in the example through what is called the sign’s text.  The sign “equality” as text is its use in such sentences as “2 plus 2 equals 4”; “equals added to equals equal equals”.  Given its own sign as token of its ontological primacy, “=” goes over to “identity”, and arithmetic becomes symbolized:  “2 + 2 = 4”.  Given “the same” as synonym (two things said to be equal in a certain respect are also said to be the same in that respect), two things truly called by the same name ought to be the same…

And would be, unless consciousness, with its purely textualist metaphysics, were not interrupted by its opposite.

It is at this point that text goes over into token.  Among those communicating, “Equality” applies to themselves, and to each other, through inner, not outer criteria; and, what the Unconscious of persons’ share on the inner side, as persons, is Birth.  Including all that the powerfully affected  primary-process memory system associates with that. (Form of all anxiety-flashbacks.)  At the Unconscious level, one polarity evokes its opposite:  EQUALITY  evokes DIFFERENCE.  These are the metaphysical, as well as ultimate psychological opposites.

It should be added for purposes of clarity and completeness, that every sign-use, S*, in context, consists essentially of two sides, or under two determinations:  text  and token  As an empirical particular (qua token), and as a cognitively grasped meaning (qua text).  The grammar is either that of ordinary languages, or logically articulated (as division of a sentence into subject and predicate to determined its truth conditions—what makes it true or false) symbolic artificial languages.  In order to communicate inner content, tokens include not just written and spoken words, but pictures.  These communicate by primary-process memory, and pass over into textual cotent as metaphors.  A sentence whose subject terms are metaphors depends for truth value upon the evocation of some Unconscious template.

“Anti-Semitism”, “suicide bombers”, “the holocaust”

As text, the denominatae of these terms – that is, the class of actual individuals identified by name – hardly matters.  They are “nasty” – super-nasty – predicates, and predication on THEM (see 1, above) becomes a metaphysical criterion of good-guy/bad guy.

A Bad guy, for instance, is one who predicates on ‘the holocaust” in non-sacral terms – printing small case “H”, for example, as if that were a token-criterion for showing disrespect. The route of transition through The Unconscious in processing such communications as refer to The Holocaust involves, of course, evocation of piles of skeletons at Aushwitz, or other alleged Nazi death camps. (One is not supposed to say “alleged” here, not for grammatical, but for pre-linguistic – template – constraint.)

The suicide bomb kids are the ultimate indictment of Jewishness as a way of being. Utter humiliation of being. They represent the fulfillment of every wish any antiSemite ever had to kill Jews; the return of the repressed (denied, split-off side of sign-use). Thus, anyone communicating with them cannot even hint at approving. Not to properly condemn Palestinian suicide bomber kids is to be guilty, not just of heresy, but of Nazi slaughterhouse mind. The entire world chorus is expected to sound off in wild crescendo, in unison, at the mention of suicide bombers and The Holocaust. It is as if the rest of the world were required for their Unconscious to affirm the right to exist… but was withholding it, as a mother refusing suckle. (template: Laci Peterson & Unborn Son Connor; now sealed under law as the Laci Patterson bill extending states’ rights over “the unborn” – to displace, without facing up to, the guilt anxiety aroused by raving unconscious sexual desire, converted into a need to act out birth/to be reborn.) That is the old old, but ever newly recurring compulsion: to be secure in the right to be. To know it is settled, once for all: born forever! As a fantasy, this has been provided for in the events of 0 a.d., remembered as the gospel of Jesus Christ, for all who have ears to hear.

“Anti-Semitism”, as a single term of predication, is perhaps the most cunningly constructed self-vilifiers, assent or dissent, ever designed for historical sign-use. (continued)

Ponce

2004-04-08 16:22 | User Profile

All this is wayyyyyy above my poor little old brain,,,,,,,, but, it comes to only one thing,,,,,,, a Jew is a Jew.

TexasAnarch

2004-04-08 18:18 | User Profile

[QUOTE=Ponce]All this is wayyyyyy above my poor little old brain,,,,,,,, but, it comes to only one thing,,,,,,, a Jew is a Jew.[/QUOTE] Hey! Thanks for the read.
Yes, but as Pat said to Mike, "What's that in it?" (old Pat and Mike Joke -- not meant to be anti-Irish, but Pat says to Mike, "What's that?", points to a pile of something. Mike replies "Looks like sh*t". Pat wops him upside the head, says "That's obvious....but....what's that in it?")

TexasAnarch

2004-04-25 18:33 | User Profile

Based on what can be established from use of this word "Judenhass", assumed to connote the heinously abominable attitude toward Jews that lead to Hitler's Germany's holocaust,...

plus, a look at what this president has got the U.S. into, by schmoozing with Sharon's Likudniks in Gaza and Fallujah, and the political use made of it by those who glorify murder without telling the other side (Joel Mobray, above) -- [B]AND DARING ANYONE TO DEFEND THE OTHER SIDE, FOR EXAMPLE, THE RIGHT OF YASSIR ARAFAT TO EXIST[/B] ....

Justifies use of this term as in the title.

Moreover: (a separate, but directly relevant point taken from sign-use research) [B]Rather than the vileness this term evokes falling on objecdts it belongs to, it is misdirected to George Will, as critic of Israel! -- follow google to [/B] [url]http://andrewiandodge.com/archives/001527.html[/url]

February 25, 2004 Will on judenhass "It used to be said that anti-Catholicism was the anti-Semitism of the intellectuals. Today, anti-Semitism is the anti-Semitism of the intellectuals. ... Here the term intellectual is used loosely, to denote not only people who think about ideas -- about thinking -- but also people who think they do. The term anti-Semitism is used precisely, to denote people who dislike Jews. These people include those who say: We do not dislike Jews, we only dislike Zionists -- although to live in Israel is to endorse the Zionist enterprise, and all Jews are implicated, as sympathizers, in the crime that is Israel." (02/25/04)

Via: Rational Review

This last entry is under the avatar DODGEBLOGIUM, with a logo "Legalizing cannabis would free up police", finding none other than neocon clown George Will guilty of the most heinous sin that pot smoking Jewish boys -- fine lads, I'm sure, all of them -- can think of, and, by God, they will just go online and call him that.

Then, to round off the conversation going nowhere and everywhere, what was this figure, Geoarge Will saying today, Sunday, on ABC TV, righ there in front of George Stephanopolis and the world audience? "There is NO connection (emphasis his) between what is happening in Fallujaha and Gaza."

But NY Times' reporter Gettleman specifically relates that those connected with the body mutilations in Fallujah were doing so partly in reaction to the shooting of Sheik Yassin in Gaza. Therefore, George Will was contradicting, on national TV, reported facts, with clear motive of political deception and manipuilation by "splitting", in rhetoric, what is connected, in reality. [B]Then, for HIM to be accused of being the worst toward Jews that there can be....[/B] is for him, and those linked through him by attitude and way of being, to fit the description applied, from both sides. President Judenhass. Judenhassen for Bush.

Kosmos Luftwaffe

2004-05-11 16:21 | User Profile

Yes, I read these posts a little too fast maybe. And I see them as bringing up some interesting and important isues.

Still, only half the work is done when one has de-crypted these advanced signs, the other half of the job is to make this insight enjoyable for ordinary people, using more examples, parabels and stuff. This should be the easy part.

Furthermore, adding to a popular conspiracy-theory concerning the power of the Jews:

If, they're so smart and has had all so much power ower so long a time. Then they maybe has created a world to their liking. Holding key-positions, also maybe have they had a great deal to say concerning creating the wery language that we speak.

Let's play the Jewish word game. I'll start with a few, and we'll see how many of these we'll come up with..

JewSA (USA), (JEWdiciary) ..

Buster

2004-05-11 16:47 | User Profile

Jews Media (vs. News)

Jew York Times

Yuk, yuk, yuk

Kosmos Luftwaffe

2004-05-11 23:59 | User Profile

...edJEWcation.

TexasAnarch

2004-05-12 02:46 | User Profile

[QUOTE=Kosmos Luftwaffe]Yes, I read these posts a little too fast maybe. And I see them as bringing up some interesting and important isues.

Still, only half the work is done when one has de-crypted these advanced signs, the other half of the job is to make this insight enjoyable for ordinary people, using more examples, parabels and stuff. This should be the easy part.

Furthermore, adding to a popular conspiracy-theory concerning the power of the Jews:

.[/QUOTE]

You are right about the work just being half-done. Did you see the connections in the "John Israel" post? (OD current events) -- connecting Al Franken :pimp: ("kidding on the square") plus "hiding in the open" (came in with Muhammad and Malvo -- to cover their patsy asses; since used in depth metaphors many places), and "kathaksung"'s Chinese proverb, "Not 300 taels of silver buried here!', which captures the essence best, perhaps. (People probably wouldn't actually look! -- there is a kind of blatancy, arrogance, sadism shown in use of the formula, that came in with the late 60's, "in your faceness", T-shirt campaigns, all that.

I try to expose living examples in media. The chief philosophical idea is that we are what we communicate. The times now call for deconstructing the way of being the tribe has crystalized for itself (having word or phrase for every possible situation a threatened person might find themselves in, like some eskimo tongues have 16 words for snow) as MacDonald's work has anticipated. Carl Jung remarked that the Jews had a very "old" psychology, partly explaining resentment by the "younger" German one. Like living with people who always think they know more about you than you do about yourself but not getting it quite right. The typical sign-use gestures learned at grandmother's knee, required to sustain a lifetime of unfolding individuality get absorbed into "multicultural" argot.

(what about "Jew jitsu"? -- all I can come up with without context. )

But this is required to retain a degree of mastery over our inner life. I am trying to acculumate more examples. Everytime one becomes clear, it helps establish a grammatical counterposition. They have raped our souls.

Kosmos Luftwaffe

2004-05-23 03:35 | User Profile

WAR OF THE WORDS

Hitler wrote that the Jews infiltrated the European upper class, through Jewish gold. If this is the case, then Jews would have had centuries to mold the very language we speak into something they could use to their advantage. A nomad would be very conscious in dealing with the various languages he encounters.

If so. The psychology of words, newspeak, would be interesting. Let's start with looking at the word "Jew". It's just three letters, and they depict the meaning Semite, it's easy. It resembles the word Bolshevic, meaning "The majority". The party name was made while the party only had three members, located in France. Still it was a winning name and it proved, along with contributing factors to serve for victory in Russia.

"Jew", when you read it you make out "Semite", still as the letters echo through your head, the innate logic of sound make the meaning "You". It's like the invisibilllity cape of some evil wizard in a Grimm fairytail. It's a psychological "downer" when a person talks to his friend about attacking "You". It 'kinda' brings the sentiments down a notch..

If the yyoouu part is a first piece of what has so far been a semingly brilliant group-self-defence strategy, the depth of this word-language-psychology game has to be uncowered. And the whole Jew-culture made to shame and riddiculed. This research should be transformed into amusing little stories and joke lines for the people, directly. Broadcast through any all media.

The powerful position is redefining language, and keeping an eye on the respectable art of sports-psychology also this time. Bring the poets together, a seminar of the new world, or rather a rescue of the world itself.

If they have used a coupple of centuries to hypnotize and blindfold us, we should atleast have ourselves a weekend and turn it all around. Because it does'ent have to be more complicated than that, there is a lot of good people out there, and all that needs to be done is to bring all the views, pices of knowledge together and we'll have the document of trouth, freedom of the mind and the future.

It's just word hypnosis (off course) among other things. Most probably this is a wonderful game and it can be turned around and be used against THEM, as effectively as any weapon or club ever invented.

It's an OPPORTUNITY and we must use it to enrichen our lives and paths.

TexasAnarch

2004-05-23 06:44 | User Profile

[QUOTE=Kosmos Luftwaffe]WAR OF THE WORDS

Hitler wrote that the Jews infiltrated the European upper class, through Jewish gold. If this is the case, then Jews would have had centuries to mold the very language we speak into something they could use to their advantage. A nomad would be very conscious in dealing with the various languages he encounters.

If so. The psychology of words, newspeak, would be interesting. Let's start with looking at the word "Jew". It's just three letters, and they depict the meaning Semite, it's easy. It resembles the word Bolshevic, meaning "The majority". The party name was made while the party only had three members, located in France. Still it was a winning name and it proved, along with contributing factors to serve for victory in Russia.,[B]4[/B]

If they have used a coupple of centuries to hypnotize and blindfold us, we should atleast have ourselves a weekend and turn it all around. Because it does'ent have to be more complicated than that, there is a lot of good people out there [B]3[/B] , and all that needs to be done is to bring all the views, pices of knowledge together and we'll have the document of trouth, freedom of the mind and the future.

It's just word hypnosis (off course) among other things [B]2[/B] . Most probably this is a wonderful game and it can be turned around and be used against THEM, as effectively as any weapon or club ever invented. [B]1[/B]

It's an OPPORTUNITY and we must use it to enrichen our lives and paths.[/QUOTE]

I'll do it, if AY, WY, TD, Xm, il ragno, faust, franco, Sertorius, Okie, others will buy in at some level. We could do it through this board. You are so dead-on the spot.

Can't wait to start. [B]4[/B] I didn't know, [B]but could well surmise![/B] The few times I have ventured forth ('69 - 0ne of four guys, essentially, who shut down the university one day, because we controlled the language so neither the faculty senate nor the president could say squat without squating. Changed the name of the student newspaper, coordinated logistcs with fliers (no longer necessary), ran off editors, won. (even at that time there were right-wing Jewish Studies professors organizing counter-demonstrations, a fact I did not appreciate until recently) -- it has actually proven to be pretty easy. Where there's a will ....

[B]3[/B] "Hypnotize and blindfold". Yes: induction of altered state of group-consciousness (Each individual's "we", given as our right-to-use by the constitution and be heard as citizens. I call this the "delegate position" of consciousness under sign-use -- speaking only among ourselves here. Each one has the capacity of speaking and acting for all, which must be honored when expressed in extremis, as in the case of the prisoner who begged "Shoot me right here".. pointing between his eyes .. "but don't do this thing to us." The use of language can cancel the very human being-ness of people when this is abrogated. [B]SHOCK![/B] is the moment of opening the public mind to altered state, for anyone who choses to address it. [B]AWE[/B] is the moment of [B]imprinting the post hypnotic suggestion.[/B] [B]BAM BAM BAM....WE'RE YOUR LIBERATORS ! [/B] The imprinting that follows the softening up is also the implanting of the signal to act out/associate later when revived. This is basic Manchurian candidate stuff, at a group-level "they" have mastered. (This is the paranoids "they" in re how the tribesmen have learned control by sign-use. I call this "Psychosemiotic", incidentally; recognize Wittgensten, Vygotsky as unheard voices (there were some really smart soviet professors, at least early on, and even continuing, according to my Oxford friend). Also: I speak of "the YHWY caper", in connection with the double-reverse negative [B]S*[/B] format, which is the degenerate-condition case. The Hebrew alphabet letters have always been taken as a formula, I think, probably in various ways, but now in one we may be living through and required to decode in order to survive. Don't I know there are a lot of good people out there. There is still America in them.

[B]2. [/B] NOT OFF COURSE! It goes directly to metaphysics -- the structure and dynamics of processes leading to and mirrored in the signs used in actual communication. I can ground this philosophically, in the history of science and, especially, axiomatics (hypethico-deductive systems). (Everything that has been superceded by Bill Gates' soft-ware). And, depth-psychologically, in Freud (ch. 7 of 1900), Jung (works), Reich and Adler (less fluent); plus, L. deMause's psychohistory, which connected proof or pre-birth (in untero) consciousness (previously thought to be non-remembered due to lack of cell-mylenization, now accepted), and its effects on history as the story of how groups re-birth themselves by sacrifice of their children. So many things go into the theory of the psychological basis of sign-use it has been impossible for academics to comprehend it -- much less relate it to the ongoing reality. I regard myself as among the most fortunate of individuals to have had this word to do after retiring in '99, and think, yes, it could have an immediate impact, for instanct, by establishing certain things about "God"-use by politicians. Just as laws become effective immediately upon becoming enacted, so a unified linaguistic front suddently unfolding to confront the neo-con rhetoric with -- or to make it confront itself with, verytime they use what we define" "pissing in the wind" I believe was the way one administrater said their words accomplished. I think Bush may have been grought to that point just the last few days. Its excruciating, but...one must watch. (Please check out the movie Dogville, if you haven't; and try to watch it all the way through - 3 hrs.)

[B]1,. [/B] We've got to be so good we get that two-edged sword against which all attempts defense are self-defeating in the right hands, through the right heads, immediately. There is an entire body of formally articulate doctrin built around the distinction betweeen text and token (meaning and icon), two loops of processing systems corresponding to primary vs. secondary, connative-cognitive signs, amygdalan vs. hippocampal memory, plus a schema correlating all, unpublished. :thumbsup: It could be brought out quickly, as a companion to the Protocols of Walter Yannis, if he heeds the call.