← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Kevin_O'Keeffe
Thread ID: 12921 | Posts: 9 | Started: 2004-03-29
2004-03-29 06:43 | User Profile
I'm always on the hunt for a good place to promote a sane perspective on political affairs, so I thought I'd test the waters over at the New York Times forum (under the name Caractacus76). In case anyone would like to assist, I will be focusing my efforts in the Thomas Friedman discussion area (each op/ed dicussion area pertains to one of the New York Times columnists). Here is my first posting (which includes a brief quote from another poster). It will be interesting to see how the presumed "liberals" over there will react to it....
"When Sharon's critics force him out, it'll be Bibi's Back in Town.... which will work, by the way.
No love lost for Sharon here."
Netanyahu is ideologically identical to Sharon; they are both fascistic, genocidal warmongers devoted to an essentially Zionist National Socialist vision of Jewish Lebensraum and Greater Israel. Netanyahu, being a more smooth and sophisticated character, is thus more dangerous than the comical figure of Sharon.
In so far as the national interests of the United States are concerned (and that should really be the only relevant frame of reference for a discussion of Middle Eastern policy), Netanyahu is not only equivalent to Sharon, but also to Osama bin-Laden. After all, these three men want the same thing; a war of civilizations between Islam and the West, i.e. a Third World War. The fact that Sharon and Netanyahu want the West to win and bin-Laden wants the West to lose is irrelevant; avoiding the Third World War is the ONLY priority for our foreign policy elite (or would be, were it not for the neo-"conservative" cabal which has taken over the Bush administration's foreign policy).
The fact that we aren't pursuing a policy of trying to avoid a 'war of civilizations' between Islam and the West, and that our government will continue to pursue the suicidally insane policy of occupying Osama's Tar Baby/Iraq, irrespective of whomever wins the farcical pageant we call a "presidential election," means we need a new government to protect our interests (because John Kerry or some other lying, corporate hack spit out by the system will never pursue authentic U.S. national interests over those of militant Zionism, multinational corporate capital and other such "special" interests).
2004-03-29 07:32 | User Profile
I know from experience. The New York Timeââ¬â¢s fora are moderated by Jews and Homosexuals exclusively.
2004-03-30 06:32 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Polish Noble]I know from experience. The New York Time’s fora are moderated by Jews and Homosexuals exclusively.[/QUOTE]
I have little doubt you speak the truth in that (its practically a given at this stage in our decline). However, I have yet to encounter any resistance from the Moderators (its probably coming), in part perhaps because I've been very careful to post remarks that are harmful to Jewish interests without being objectively 'anti-Semitic.' In any event, I'm considering the project a limited success so far. I'm not the only persons with ideas unfriendly to Jewish interests in that forum and my extremism and verbosity has, I suspect, already begun to make others feel a little more bold and daring in their remarks. Or so I hope.
2004-03-30 22:54 | User Profile
Can you link us to the sign-up page? I've been having limited success on mainstream forums lately by staying cool. I want to keep up the roll.
2004-03-31 00:16 | User Profile
In no way form or shape can you say any thing against a Jew.
If you tell him that you don't like the color of his shoes he will call you a antisemite.
Those people carry the "anti-semite" bull to the extreme and as you know 90% of the so called Jews are not even Jews but Khazar Zionists who don't even belong in Palestine.
2004-03-31 22:53 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Hugh Lincoln]Can you link us to the sign-up page? I've been having limited success on mainstream forums lately by staying cool. I want to keep up the roll.[/QUOTE]
The New York Times can be accessed via NYTimes.com. From there, signing up as a member of the NYT is pretty easy (the same process essentially has to be repeated in order to gain access to their forum). The forum where I have been active is located here:
[url]http://forums.nytimes.com/top/opinion/readersopinions/forums/editorialsoped/opedcolumnists/thomaslfriedman/index.html?page=recent&anchor=1#5808[/url]
2004-04-01 17:25 | User Profile
They are always infiltrating our boards and disseminating disinformation about us. Maybe we should start playing there own dirty little game on them.
Why the Jew York Times?
Pick a male Jewish name i.e.
Reubon, Ber, Daniel, David, Doron, Eli, Hadar, Joel, Moshe, Shimon, Yoel and sign up at.
[url]http://www.israelforum.com/board/[/url]
2004-04-02 04:13 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Gregz]They are always infiltrating our boards and disseminating disinformation about us. Maybe we should start playing there own dirty little game on them.
Why the Jew York Times?
Pick a male Jewish name i.e.
Reubon, Ber, Daniel, David, Doron, Eli, Hadar, Joel, Moshe, Shimon, Yoel and sign up at.
[url]http://www.israelforum.com/board/[/url][/QUOTE]
At the NYT, I have some hope of reaching actual human beings, even if about 50% of the participants seems to be Jews instead. I doubt many human beings frequent IsraelForum.com, off the top of my head.
2004-04-03 05:40 | User Profile
point taken :wallbash: