← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Buster
Thread ID: 12815 | Posts: 8 | Started: 2004-03-20
2004-03-20 18:51 | User Profile
[url]http://www.time.com/time/subscriber/covers/1101040322/story.html[/url]
2004-03-20 21:23 | User Profile
I can't see it. What is it?
2004-03-20 21:48 | User Profile
[IMG]http://i.timeinc.net/time/images/covers/1101040322cov_white.gif[/IMG]
Sexual preferences for women designed to keep women out of the home, and to keep children from being born to white women.
White women going out and working (unless the man is having trouble getting a good job) is stupid and selfish. It's trading the family for only a very small financial improvement.
2004-03-22 22:01 | User Profile
A white kid and a white mom, staying home. That, gentlemen, is what we're fighting for.
2004-03-22 22:05 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Hugh Lincoln]A white kid and a white mom, staying home. That, gentlemen, is what we're fighting for.[/QUOTE]
Strongly agree, Hugh. We get that right and alot of things start falling into place.
2004-03-22 22:25 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Hugh Lincoln]A white kid and a white mom, staying home. That, gentlemen, is what we're fighting for.[/QUOTE]
Imagine if they had a black child and a black woman on the cover. They probably considered it but it would have triggered thoughts of welfare queens.
2004-03-23 03:11 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Happy Hacker]Imagine if they had a black child and a black woman on the cover. They probably considered it but it would have triggered thoughts of welfare queens.[/QUOTE]
How about a blond white mother and a light brown child? I think the Sanhedren really dropped the ball on this one. :D
2004-03-23 20:34 | User Profile
Whites are beautiful. Self-preservation and reversing the turd world tide wave is the priority.
One people, one country, one leader :hitler: