← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Texas Dissident
Thread ID: 12807 | Posts: 2 | Started: 2004-03-20
2004-03-20 09:38 | User Profile
Confrontational commentary from blog Badlands:
[url=http://badonicus.blogspot.com/2004_03_01_badonicus_archive.html#107942588250799550]Marilyn Manson Is Our Generation's Isaiah[/url]
I've been saying for some time now that Christians have traded the Christian Faith for the religion of Equality. We're in the last stages of a transitional phase right now, so Judeochristians haven't fully worked out all the implications of the switch. But for the most part, they get it. While we give lip service to the belief that sin is any transgression of, or want of conformity to, God's Law, we don't really mean it. The only real sins are recognizing any distinctions among mankind, except the few authorized by the givers of the faith-Jews are "special", and Whites and Arabs are especially evil. Any other distinctions are hateful, wicked sins...
2004-03-20 11:35 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Texas Dissident]Confrontational commentary from blog Badlands:
[url=http://badonicus.blogspot.com/2004_03_01_badonicus_archive.html#107942588250799550]Marilyn Manson Is Our Generation's Isaiah[/url][/QUOTE]
"This validates the view that worshiping Jesus Christ and hating Him are equal, and furthers the Equality doctrine that Jews are "special", and don't need Jesus. And Razormouth itself does the same thing when it publishes articles like this one by John Whitehead, about "the Judeo-Christian system of belief", and this one where he equates churches and synagogues. Equality is all the rage at Razormouth. That's how they can publish this article by Andrew Sandlin, which rejects the Law of God as our ethical standard by condemning the sins of "racism" and "anti-semitism", which are nowhere named, described, defined, or prohibited in the Bible, but are the two unpardonable sins in the religion of Equality...."
This is incredible stuff you have come up with once again, TD. Now: expressing very, very strong agreement. Arguing that it is for the reason illustrated -- by "the grammar of reversal to get reality" -- to assume for "ourselves" -- the Next Age True Americans (developing) -- the terms of "racists" and "anti-Semite', openly, up-front, unrelentingly, on grounds of constitutional orthodoxy (No 2 Flag loyalists can be True American patriots).
The idea of a Native American Nationalist Racial Alliance (you know the rap) is no more radical than the idea that "ideology", when it is based on spirit, reason, knowledge and truth, breeds a kind of truth-in-being that this nation was founded on. I think it is demonstrably true (new 'races' can appear almost overnight that breed true -- illustrated in West Texas by pig-latin talking chicano foremen, etc. ("Yo no habla espanol?") (Ebonics ethonics) Where there is a Will, in Fichte's sense, there is a Way. (Empirical Will creates the transcendental unity of apperception, and the form of the higher is reproduced in the functions of the lower -- telos calling to materiality, as it were; the Christ of Mind supported by arousal of bood in the Body as soul.)
This is the metaphysical basis for constructing anti-Ahriman politics. The mansons, Charlie or Marlyn, are Ahriman creations. This is the spirit of materialistic science, commercialism, hi-tech/drug based theory of actual disease, a mind-set that affects the judgment of even men such as the good Bishop who thinks racism and anti-Semitism are metaphorical "cancers" -- because they "threaten" to "spread" by mental contagion of truth, which supports racial inequality.
We have 11,000,000-and-counting Spaniards demonstrably on our side, against Bush, LandRovers and Bowtie Aznars.
There is a big hole in the dike. I once actually had my thumb in it, but pulled out in l998, when Ahriman came in. Something in me knew it was Him. (3 x 666 = 1998: assumed a personal presence on earth for third time since 0 a.d. What do you think? Several amazing events occurred that year, among the most interesting, to me, being deNiro's role in Wag The Dog. It was a reversal, as I have bored the board with insisting on. It wasn't fake war being staged on/in the media to divert attention from presidential sexcapades. What was happening was Republican/political/FBI use of Clinton's sexcapades, Monca's blue dress, general revulsion at the entire mess, prodded by Hebraic-Puritanical/abolitionist yankee Lincoln bs cultists, to call distract attentin from the Balkan war. To protect Albanians from ethnic cleansing, wasn't it? Something went through the earth then, I vow. And it led to the neocon war on Iraq.
signing off: from the trenches of the Maginot lines of the religious cold war... ("Hey Porter! Hey Porter! Can you tell me the time? How much longer will it be 'till we cross that Mason-Dickson line..?")