← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Texas Dissident
Thread ID: 12714 | Posts: 11 | Started: 2004-03-12
2004-03-12 08:49 | User Profile
[url=http://reformedtheology.blogspot.com/]Benjamin Shapiro and His Final Solution[/url]
by FJ De Angelis
Harry Seabrook of [url=http://littlegeneva.com/mt/index.html]Little Geneva[/url] previously documented the following from Daniel Goldhagen:
"Gibson's film takes the fetishizing of horror and death that exists within Christianity to some sort of of sickly logical conclusion." Daniel Goldhagen (emphasis mine).
Can anyone imagine the outrage if that were stated concerning Jews or sodomites? These types of statements speak quite bluntly to a hate against Christian theology -- and thereby Christians -- that is palpable; indeed, Goldhagen even goes so far as to essentially call the atonement of Christ something that is sickly.
Get it? Christians are sick. There is something wrong with them. A "sickness" needs to be "cured." Christianity has been called "anti-semitic" quite forcefully by a number of Jews during the recent media fuss about Gibson's The Passion of the Christ. How do you "cure" such a thing?
It isn't with chicken soup.
To the point, the recent "WorldNetDaily" piece by a 20-year-old Jew named [url=http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=37536]Benjamin Shapiro[/url] is quite chilling. If one were to substitute the references in Shapiro's piece, with all references to Jews to be "Germans" and all references to "anti-semites" to be "Jews" it would be telling.
Shapiro is advocating (quite literally) the singling-out and systematic killing of any and all deemed to be "anti-Semitic," which of course includes the "dealing with" those that are strongly opposed to the socialist, anti-christ state of Israel. Are you against Israel due to principled reasons related to their policy of mistreating the Palestinians? You are "anti-semitic"; you need to be killed.
It reeks of a call to a "final solution" that should make careful readers sit up and take notice. He not only is claiming that anyone (including entire nations) deemed to be "anti-Semitic" be put to death (and in the case of nations, that means genocide, folks), he is even claiming God's divine sanction for it!
This should make every thinking person take pause to consider what this kid is literally advocating, and then to further ponder that he is not alone.
Shapiro's piece includes the following gems (bold emphasis mine throughout):
"Ahasuerus issued a decree allowing Jews to kill any anti-Semite seeking to destroy them, and the Jews did so. During a two-day period, Jews killed over 75,000 Jew haters throughout the Persian Empire, 800 in the capital city of Shushan alone." (note: can the reader imagine the outrage if the phrase "Christ haters" was used in advocating the physical death of any group?).
"Judaism recognizes that it is the job of all good people to stand up and fight evil. The focus must be on removing evil, both spiritual and physical, from this world. God approves of such action and facilitates its success in hidden ways."
Think of it as a sort of Messianic mission with M1A1 main battle tanks and F-18 Hornets as the holy instruments of purification. Oy vey!
Shapiro continues:
"Who is Amalek? Amalek refers to spiritual evil, but it also refers to a real, physical nation. Jews are enjoined to kill descendants of that nation. Haman was an Amalekite. Hitler was an Amalekite. An Amalekite is someone who fears neither man nor God, who destroys the world through moral degradation, who wishes to exterminate every last Jew."
Essentially, an "Amalekite" is anyone Shapiro says is an Amalekite. Well, Shapiro's definition of what is an "Amalekite" is somewhat creative (and of course, arbitrary), but 2 of his 3 examples would make the Jews fit quite nicely (to play his game):
Shapiro states that an "Amalekite is someone who fears neither man nor God."
The first identifying trait of an "Amalekite" fits quite well with the following from God's inspired word:
"For you, brothers, became imitators of God's churches in Judea, which are in Christ Jesus: You suffered from your own countrymen the same things those churches suffered from the Jews, who killed the Lord Jesus and the prophets and also drove us out. They displease God and are hostile to all men in their effort to keep us from speaking to the Gentiles so that they may be saved. In this way they always heap up their sins to the limit. The wrath of God has come upon them at last." (1 Thess. 2:14-16)
Shapiro continues with his definition of what identifies an "Amalekite," and states it is one "who destroys the world through moral degradation."
It may have escaped Shapiro's notice (but I doubt it) that the leading force in Western civilization, and particularly the United States, that is at the vanguard of our "moral degradation" is (can you guess?) the Jews. This is a fact.
Hollywood and the sewage it pumps out, network TV, MTV, the world pornography market, the push for mainstreaming sodomy, all of it is the enterprise of Jewish media power brokers.
Michael Eisner, Gerald Levin, Norman Pearlstein, Bob and Harvey Weinstein, George Bodenheimer, Sumner Redstone (real name, Murray Rothstein), Sherry Lansing (real name, Sherry Heimann), Les Moonves, Mark Rosenthal, Melvin Karmazin, Edgar Bronfman, Peter Chernin (President and CEO of Fox), Mitchell Stern, Samuel Newhouse, as a brief sampling, aren't Scots. Or Norwegian. They're not even Palestinians! They are all Jews. What do they control that contributes to the "destruction of the world through moral degradation"?
Disney, Warner Brothers, Paramount (Viacom), 20th Century Fox, Dreamworks, Columbia/Sony, NBC News, NBC Entertainment, CBS, the publication of The New Yorker, etc., etc., are all owned and controlled by Jews.
The following determine what is and what is not news -- what you will see as the "important issues" either on the nightly news or in the daily newspaper. The following will shape national policy, elections, and military adventures, what you are "supposed to think" about homosexual "marriages," welfare, and race issues: The New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post, the Boston Globe, the International Herald Tribune, ABCNEWS.com, and the Associated Press. They all have in common that they are owned and controlled by Jews.
So, the Amalekites are quite nicely identified as the Jews, if Shapiro's novel criteria is the measure.
His last definition is rather self-serving to his entire position as a Jew. "Who are the bad guys in the world? Why anyone that is against the Jews, of course." Neat.
Shapiro goes on:
"The Jews -- and their national manifestation, the state of Israel -- are accused of living by their own law, of refusing to bow to the sanctity of world opinion."
But isn't that essentially what the Germans were charged with at Nuremberg? The Germans on trial were, in fact, "living by their own law" as they were following the lawful orders of their duly constitued government, and therefore were guilty of "refusing to bow to the sanctity of world opinion."
"Yes, but the Germans were persecuting the Jews!" Well, isn't much of the world opinion against the secular state of Israel due in large measure to Israel's brutal and unjust treatment of the Palestinian people? "But the Jews are defending their 'homeland'!" Right -- that is exactly what the Germans claimed. The only difference is that the land in question was Germany, while the land occupied by the secular state of Israel was lived in by the Palestinians for centuries. It wasn't called Palestine for nothing.
Remember, "Amalekites" is code for "anti-semtic." The response is to physically kill ("obliterate") the "Amalekites" and "their descendants" with God's sanction, no less. So says Shapiro at the judeochristian WorldNetDaily.
2004-03-12 14:17 | User Profile
This brilliant piece by FJ DeAngelis A. totally deconstructs the Jewish/Nazi reversal of position (Jews becoming what they most despise -- repeating the pattern of abused children identifying with their abusers (real or in their head)); while B. exposing the fundamental difference between the genocidal "God" of Benjamin Shapiro, neocon Townhall columnist, who mercilessly kills all "Amalekites" -- this being a spiritual (rabbinic) Book of Esther term for Hitlerites, supporters of Palestinians, or anti-Semites in general. Whoever opposes the delusions of today's Zionist Jews and dispensationalist hooters.
I would add a point raised by the post linked following the quote, on whether "God" "killed Jesus". It shows where pandering to the Jews leads to faulty Christology.
Comments (6) Sunday, February 22, 2004 James White on the Gibson Film Controversy James White of Alpha and Omega Ministries posted on his "blog" the answer to the question, "who killed Christ?" White's answer, "God did it."
He seriously misrepresents Reformed theology and the teaching of Scripture on this issue. The backflips contemporary Christians (more proof of my decided "non-relevance") make in appeasing one special class of anti-christs is amazing.
Considering the quality of White's work in opposing the errors of Romanism, it is surprising that he would fail at this point of the battle.
My response to Rev. White is found here:
The final, culminating moment of the Nazarene's humanity, in Archetypal terms, was his abandonment to death by both "Father", to whom he had expressed his desire not to die ("If possible, let this cup pass from me; neverthless...); and to his Mother's people, the Jews his "nation" or countrymen who rejected him. . The Father has left him to be crucified by a mob representing his mother's side of humanity. How could He?
This czn only be understood through the trinity, I think. In doing what he did, showing that each man and woman on earth dies alone, entirely alone with whatever they have done, said, been, He was completing the work of what God is, to humanity. This changes the meaning of the term, cutting off the Jewish YHWH understanding, and linking to The Spirit as signature of understanding in experience.
2004-03-13 05:39 | User Profile
Shapiro is advocating (quite literally) the singling-out and systematic killing of any and all deemed to be "anti-Semitic," which of course includes the "dealing with" those that are strongly opposed to the socialist, anti-christ state of Israel. Are you against Israel due to principled reasons related to their policy of mistreating the Palestinians? You are "anti-semitic"; you need to be killed. Bring it on! :gunsmilie
2004-03-13 05:45 | User Profile
I'm wagering the boy had one too many snootsful of Manishewitz at Purimfest...
Every Golem that the Tribe sets in motion eventually turns on its sinister makers. Do such a clever people truly believe that the scores of expulsions since the Diaspora are entirely the fault of non-Jews?
2004-03-14 13:29 | User Profile
TD:
Got a call (unlisted) on phone line that followed a JDL script.
Used the OD post on BATR News. Also the current Global Gulag column: [URL=http://batr.org/gulag/031204.html]Frank Rich vs Bill O'Reilly [/URL] is getting noticed.
SARTRE :thumbsup:
[QUOTE=Texas Dissident][url=http://reformedtheology.blogspot.com/]Benjamin Shapiro and His Final Solution[/url]
by FJ De Angelis
Harry Seabrook of [url=http://littlegeneva.com/mt/index.html]Little Geneva[/url] previously documented the following from Daniel Goldhagen:
"Gibson's film takes the fetishizing of horror and death that exists within Christianity to some sort of of sickly logical conclusion." Daniel Goldhagen (emphasis mine).
Can anyone imagine the outrage if that were stated concerning Jews or sodomites? These types of statements speak quite bluntly to a hate against Christian theology -- and thereby Christians -- that is palpable; indeed, Goldhagen even goes so far as to essentially call the atonement of Christ something that is sickly.
Get it? Christians are sick. There is something wrong with them. A "sickness" needs to be "cured." Christianity has been called "anti-semitic" quite forcefully by a number of Jews during the recent media fuss about Gibson's The Passion of the Christ. How do you "cure" such a thing?
It isn't with chicken soup.
To the point, the recent "WorldNetDaily" piece by a 20-year-old Jew named [url=http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=37536]Benjamin Shapiro[/url] is quite chilling. If one were to substitute the references in Shapiro's piece, with all references to Jews to be "Germans" and all references to "anti-semites" to be "Jews" it would be telling.
Shapiro is advocating (quite literally) the singling-out and systematic killing of any and all deemed to be "anti-Semitic," which of course includes the "dealing with" those that are strongly opposed to the socialist, anti-christ state of Israel. Are you against Israel due to principled reasons related to their policy of mistreating the Palestinians? You are "anti-semitic"; you need to be killed.
It reeks of a call to a "final solution" that should make careful readers sit up and take notice. He not only is claiming that anyone (including entire nations) deemed to be "anti-Semitic" be put to death (and in the case of nations, that means genocide, folks), he is even claiming God's divine sanction for it!
This should make every thinking person take pause to consider what this kid is literally advocating, and then to further ponder that he is not alone.
Shapiro's piece includes the following gems (bold emphasis mine throughout):
"Ahasuerus issued a decree allowing Jews to kill any anti-Semite seeking to destroy them, and the Jews did so. During a two-day period, Jews killed over 75,000 Jew haters throughout the Persian Empire, 800 in the capital city of Shushan alone." (note: can the reader imagine the outrage if the phrase "Christ haters" was used in advocating the physical death of any group?).
"Judaism recognizes that it is the job of all good people to stand up and fight evil. The focus must be on removing evil, both spiritual and physical, from this world. God approves of such action and facilitates its success in hidden ways."
Think of it as a sort of Messianic mission with M1A1 main battle tanks and F-18 Hornets as the holy instruments of purification. Oy vey!
Shapiro continues:
"Who is Amalek? Amalek refers to spiritual evil, but it also refers to a real, physical nation. Jews are enjoined to kill descendants of that nation. Haman was an Amalekite. Hitler was an Amalekite. An Amalekite is someone who fears neither man nor God, who destroys the world through moral degradation, who wishes to exterminate every last Jew."
Essentially, an "Amalekite" is anyone Shapiro says is an Amalekite. Well, Shapiro's definition of what is an "Amalekite" is somewhat creative (and of course, arbitrary), but 2 of his 3 examples would make the Jews fit quite nicely (to play his game):
Shapiro states that an "Amalekite is someone who fears neither man nor God."
The first identifying trait of an "Amalekite" fits quite well with the following from God's inspired word:
"For you, brothers, became imitators of God's churches in Judea, which are in Christ Jesus: You suffered from your own countrymen the same things those churches suffered from the Jews, who killed the Lord Jesus and the prophets and also drove us out. They displease God and are hostile to all men in their effort to keep us from speaking to the Gentiles so that they may be saved. In this way they always heap up their sins to the limit. The wrath of God has come upon them at last." (1 Thess. 2:14-16)
Shapiro continues with his definition of what identifies an "Amalekite," and states it is one "who destroys the world through moral degradation."
It may have escaped Shapiro's notice (but I doubt it) that the leading force in Western civilization, and particularly the United States, that is at the vanguard of our "moral degradation" is (can you guess?) the Jews. This is a fact.
Hollywood and the sewage it pumps out, network TV, MTV, the world pornography market, the push for mainstreaming sodomy, all of it is the enterprise of Jewish media power brokers.
Michael Eisner, Gerald Levin, Norman Pearlstein, Bob and Harvey Weinstein, George Bodenheimer, Sumner Redstone (real name, Murray Rothstein), Sherry Lansing (real name, Sherry Heimann), Les Moonves, Mark Rosenthal, Melvin Karmazin, Edgar Bronfman, Peter Chernin (President and CEO of Fox), Mitchell Stern, Samuel Newhouse, as a brief sampling, aren't Scots. Or Norwegian. They're not even Palestinians! They are all Jews. What do they control that contributes to the "destruction of the world through moral degradation"?
Disney, Warner Brothers, Paramount (Viacom), 20th Century Fox, Dreamworks, Columbia/Sony, NBC News, NBC Entertainment, CBS, the publication of The New Yorker, etc., etc., are all owned and controlled by Jews.
The following determine what is and what is not news -- what you will see as the "important issues" either on the nightly news or in the daily newspaper. The following will shape national policy, elections, and military adventures, what you are "supposed to think" about homosexual "marriages," welfare, and race issues: The New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post, the Boston Globe, the International Herald Tribune, ABCNEWS.com, and the Associated Press. They all have in common that they are owned and controlled by Jews.
So, the Amalekites are quite nicely identified as the Jews, if Shapiro's novel criteria is the measure.
His last definition is rather self-serving to his entire position as a Jew. "Who are the bad guys in the world? Why anyone that is against the Jews, of course." Neat.
Shapiro goes on:
"The Jews -- and their national manifestation, the state of Israel -- are accused of living by their own law, of refusing to bow to the sanctity of world opinion."
But isn't that essentially what the Germans were charged with at Nuremberg? The Germans on trial were, in fact, "living by their own law" as they were following the lawful orders of their duly constitued government, and therefore were guilty of "refusing to bow to the sanctity of world opinion."
"Yes, but the Germans were persecuting the Jews!" Well, isn't much of the world opinion against the secular state of Israel due in large measure to Israel's brutal and unjust treatment of the Palestinian people? "But the Jews are defending their 'homeland'!" Right -- that is exactly what the Germans claimed. The only difference is that the land in question was Germany, while the land occupied by the secular state of Israel was lived in by the Palestinians for centuries. It wasn't called Palestine for nothing.
Remember, "Amalekites" is code for "anti-semtic." The response is to physically kill ("obliterate") the "Amalekites" and "their descendants" with God's sanction, no less. So says Shapiro at the judeochristian WorldNetDaily.[/QUOTE]
2004-03-14 18:15 | User Profile
So the pimply li'l jewpunk wants to get frisky, does he? Well, grab an Uzi 'n' git da party started, bitch! Let's see runty yid scumbags like him charge right out there and "exterminate" with their own rather hirsute paws all them modern-day Haman Juniors who dare to commit the ultimate blasphemy of hating the stench that emanates from Gawd's Special Blend. That'd be an astonishing departure from their traditional scam of manipulating the schtupid goyim into doing all the dying for them.
Call me a cynic, but I don't think the bloviating chickenshit'll be leaving his keyboard any time soon.
2005-06-08 21:37 | User Profile
Shapiro, being young and naive, serves a useful purpose. Most neocons are too savy to openly cite the hateful invectives of the Talmud, preferring to instead sugar-coat their Zionism with blather about "Democracy" and the like. If more neos wrote like Shapiro, their true agenda and its ideological/religious core would be much more in the open and much easier for people to identify.
Clowns like Shapiro and Comrade Sandalio aren't the real threat. If that's where neoism was from the very get-go, it would be as marginal today as Kahana's movement and Trotskyism. It's double-talk about "Americanism," "Freedom" and "Democracy" (all in the name of selling the same agenda as Shapiro's) from masters of the deceit like Perle, Feith, Frum, and Kristol that swindles the widest audience.
2005-06-09 02:38 | User Profile
OK, so like, I've been sitting in the back of the class 'n stuff, but uh, it seems to me that Jews define evil as "that which is against the Jews" and good as "that which is for the Jews." So, um, is that, like, right?
2005-06-11 14:56 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Hugh Lincoln]OK, so like, I've been sitting in the back of the class 'n stuff, but uh, it seems to me that Jews define evil as "that which is against the Jews" and good as "that which is for the Jews." So, um, is that, like, right?[/QUOTE] You get at least a B+ for that answer. :cool:
The whole "tell my story the loudest, maybe it is all anyone will hear" is a well worn PR tool.
2005-06-11 16:23 | User Profile
Whenever I begin to feel a little wimpy and start giving the kikes the benefit of the doubt, along comes a yid like Shapiro and I become proud of being an old timey anti-Semite again.
2005-06-11 16:35 | User Profile
White folks are too forgiving and have too short memory. Otherwise, the kikes would have been picking coconuts in Madagaskar right now. Or worse.
Never forget and never forgive is the only motto worth pursuing when dealing with kikes.