← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Hugh Lincoln
Thread ID: 12709 | Posts: 3 | Started: 2004-03-11
2004-03-11 16:22 | User Profile
[url]http://www.washtimes.com/national/20040310-115506-8528r.htm[/url]
2004-03-12 08:59 | User Profile
[url=http://www.theknave.net/]Scholarship Confronting Lies: the Perpetual Guilt of White Christians[/url]
the knave
White Christians are the cancer of the planet, or so says modern American academia. The gamut of cultural, national sins are their invention or perfection: slavery, colonialism, "predatory" capitalism, rape of the environment, and so on. Most damning, they claim, is the intolerance of white Christians. This is a picture that must be maintained. Whites cannot be victims of the savagery of another ethno-racial group, since such a view does not integrate well with the authorized weltanshauung in our tax-funded radicalized centers for historical erasure. Some inconvenient historical facts occasionally escape systematic relegation to the memory hole. Some men refuse to join the bristling phalanx of academic uniformity that prevails in historical studies. Gary North was one. His service to the cause of retrieving unauthorized history from the incinerator is nearly singular among Christian writers. Another such figure was Otto Scott, who pulled back the curtain on the real French Revolution, to display the utter contempt of the levelers of equality for justice, and truth, and peace. Most recently, we have the work of historian Dr. Robert Davis of Ohio State University, who reveals the massive and systematic enslavement of white Europeans by Muslim North African slave traders. Between 1530 and 1780 he estimates that up to 1.25 million were abducted from Mediterranean and Atlantic coastal cities. Most inconvenient for the historical facade of the sole and unique victimization of Africans.
There is a silent conspiracy in American academia. One that has continued since the capture of the majority of the nations public and private universities by socialists. It is the expunging or occlusion of the suffering and victimization of white Christians from the pedagogical treatments of historical annals. You will not find such embarrassing tales in the typical college level Western Civilization textbook. That is not accidental.
The religion of tolerance is not a new one. It flourished with great vigor in the Roman Empire during the first three centuries of the Christian Era. Even then, the exclusive claims of Christ, and the fidelity of early Christians to those claims placed them afoul of the inviolable doctrine of "everything is permitted". Permitted as long as it is "orderly" that is. As long as it pays homage to the official myths and shibboleths of the almighty state. When such obeisance is rejected, it is then that Christians are seen to be a threat to the stability of cosmopolitan empire, both ancient and current. In fact, it is this appeal to civil "order" that is the basis for modern anti-Christian apologia for the vicious persecution of the church. Nineteenth century historian William Leckey (1838-1903) was just such a Roman apologist. In his book The History of European Morals (1877) he writes:
Proselytizing with an untiring energy, pouring a fierce stream of invective and ridicule upon the gods on whose favor the multitude believe all national prosperity to depend, not infrequently insulting worshippers, and defacing the idols, the soon stung the pagan worshippers to madness, and convinced them that every calamity that fell upon the empire was the righteous vengeance of the gods. Nor was the skeptical politician more likely to regard with favor a religion whose development was plainly incompatible with the whole religious policy of the empire. The new church, as it was then organized, must have appeared to him essentially and fundamentally intolerant. To permit it to triumph was to permit the extinction of religious liberty in an empire which comprised all the leading nations of the world, and tolerated all their creeds.[1]
So we see that Christians are guilty, in terms echoed by today's polemicists of "equality", guilty as charged of the one sin in the humanist (read satanic) book of law. That sin is the sin of intolerance and its' corollary, proselytizing. The persecution of the church is historically undeniable, so it must be excused, similar to the excuse of Stalin's crimes by American socialist academics. When such facts do receive a public hearing, they are immediately minimized, obscured by comparison with the (supposed) enormity of Black enslavement. It is the height of irony that in the Africa of the mid-nineteenth century, the coin of the realm, the very medium of exchange was the black slave. This is well know by historians, as is recent evidence that man-stealing was almost entirely an African-on-African crime. For millennia, black tribes had taken slaves in battle and employed them as an economic commodity.
If millions of Black Americans can accept the incredible fable put forth by Nation of Islam's Louis Farrakhan of the raising of sea levels in the Atlantic by the bodies of black slaves tossed overboard on slave ships, then there is almost no ludicrous impossibility that a credulous population, eager to nurture grievance, eager to make excuse will not embrace with uncritical enthusiasm. American academics have spoken with one voice that slavery is the peculiar cataclysm of the Black race, that this historical suffering was unique to them. A further irony is that Black intellectuals cannot simultaneously take credit for the accomplishments of Northern African Islamic culture, while disclaiming responsibility for the widely prevalent man-stealing that Dr. Davis reveals in his important research. Unfortunately the social price he will have to pay for his discoveries of verboten facts will be staggering.
There is no crime of slavery, there are only the crimes of man-stealing and mistreatment of slaves with repect to that institution. Far from condemning slavery, the Scriptures sanctify it and bless it. The spilled ink and fetid breath of a million white-hating academics cannot, and will not alter this blessed fact. Crime and punishment are defined exclusively by Jesus Christ in the Holy Scripture of the Old and New Testaments, of which He is the embodiment and fruition, not the apprehensions of each man's fallen intuition. Any other law is a law of Satan. Jesus gave his people 2 Laws, as explicated in 10 principles and 600 odd statutory examples of those 2 laws. Innumerable are the false laws of Satanic Humanism.
There is real slavery going on the United States right now...the enslavement of the conscience of an entire people for the so-called "sins" of their forebears. This enslavement is unique to the white Christian, the historical martyr who will bear the sins of humanity for eternity (even the "sins" of the Black tribal slave trader and the Muslim (black) corsair, and pay a perpetual cost for the historical ascendancy that was theirs by the grace of God. There has been no peace; there can be no permanent peace between covenant breakers and covenant keepers. The kulturkampf between Herr Settembrini and Herr Naphta [2] will continue until Christ?s enemies are put under His feet.
2004-03-12 16:35 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Texas Dissident]White Christians are the cancer of the planet, or so says modern American academia. The gamut of cultural, national sins are their invention or perfection: slavery, colonialism, "predatory" capitalism, rape of the environment, and so on. Most damning, they claim, is the intolerance of white Christians. This is a picture that must be maintained. Whites cannot be victims of the savagery of another ethno-racial group, since such a view does not integrate well with the authorized weltanshauung in our tax-funded radicalized centers for historical erasure.[/QUOTE]
Being a survivor of a large, extremely leftist university myself, I can vouche for the sacrosanctity of the author's observations.
Whether you study literature, history, art, etc., white students cannot escape the stereotypes that do so much damage to the collective psyche of our race. White students are reminded daily on campuses that non-whites have been and continue to be victims at the hand of "agressive" and "intolerant" "Eurocentric" conquerors. They hear endless tales of woe concerning the American Indians, the black slaves and segregation, and those perpetual profiteers of victimhood, the poor Jews who have suffered constantly through pograms and Holocausts.
Moreover, it is nearly unheard of for there to be any type of ethnic celebration of European heritage on college campuses. Of course, there is no shortage of Latino Heritage, Black Unity, Gay Pride, and Holocaust Remembrance events. Yet, as soon as there was a "whites only" scholarship fund offered by the College Republicans at Roger Williams Univeristy, the politically correct powers that be coiled, hissed, and bit as if taken over by a frenzy.
Both of the phenomenons above have had devastating effects on any white racial consciousness that may have existed previously in America.
Want to start an uproar? Pass out pro-white fliers on a college campus. In doing so, you will be striking at the base of all that academia holds dear.
[url]http://www.natall.com/leaflets/[/url]