← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Valley Forge
Thread ID: 12607 | Posts: 20 | Started: 2004-03-02
2004-03-02 03:26 | User Profile
I agree with almost every policy on this list, especially number 3.
[url]http://www.white.org.uk/policies.html[/url]
THE POLICIES OF THE WHITE NATIONALIST PARTY
The creation of a Co-operative State based on authority, duty and responsibility
The introduction of a proper Constitution and Bill Of Rights for the freedom and security of the British people
The ending of all non-European immigration and the introduction of a phased, humane policy of repatriation
The rebuilding of British capital industries by putting British industry first and ending cheap imports that undermine our British manufacturing base
The nationalisation of the banking system. All banks and financial institutions to be placed in State rather than private hands
The dismantling of our enforced multi-racial society in a lawful and orderly fashion
The re-introduction of capital punishment for murder, treason and terrorism
A major crack down on all types of crime especially those involving drugs
The abolition of all types of usury and financial speculation for profit without work
The abolition of Public Order Acts and Race Laws. The restoration of freedom of speech, thought and action
The guarantee that Ulster shall remain forever a part of Great Britain
The outlawing of the IRA and other anti-British terror organisations
The protection of the unborn by stopping abortion on demand and allowing only it only in extreme and special circumstances
The withdrawal of Great Britain from the European Union, NATO, the United Nations and all the other arms of the New World Order
The rebuilding of our pride in our racial and national heritage
The education of our young folk into being dutiful members of society through a re-organised educational system and the building of a national youth movement
The restructuring of the National Health Service by training and employing British doctors and nurses as opposed to importing cheap labour from abroad. The goal of making the National Health Service the best in the world
The immediate stopping of all foreign aid to so-called "Third World" countries
The revocation of Community Tax on small businesses. The abolition of Value Added Tax. The promotion of Britain's small independent businesses and the dismantling of multi-national ones
The ending of all monopolies and the breaking of the stranglehold that the International Bankers have on the United Kingdom
The establishment of a British Labour Front guaranteeing real worker's rights and replacing the now helpless and un-representative Trades Unions
The encouragement of the stable family unit as the basic building block of a healthy and resurgent nation
Complete opposition to Zionism and the State of Israel as weapons of the New World Order
The replacement of all multi-cultural and alien art with natural, traditional British art forms
The building of a powerful Army, Navy and Air Force so that our country does not rely on NATO and can truly defend the national interests of Great Britain
The outlawing of homosexualism and gross pornography and the creation of a morally correct society where our children and safe from vileness and perversion
The encouragement of British agriculture and an emphasis on our rural heritage as opposed to International Cosmopolitanism
The reduction of unemployment by boosting Britain's industry to create real jobs and not fake "job creation schemes"
The creation of a national media which puts the interests of Great Britain first
The ending of allowing fake "asylum seekers" into Britain and the immediate expulsion of those already here, together with all other illegal immigrants
A moral, spiritual and physical revolution in the hearts and minds of the masses so that all become part of a healthy, clean and energetic folk state
We will secure the existence of our people and a future for White children
2004-03-02 03:28 | User Profile
Another party? I thought Britain had the BNP.
2004-03-02 03:34 | User Profile
Apparently from reading the WNP web site I gather that there are a few Nationalist parties in Britian. It appears that the WNP was formed because the BNP is going soft on some key issues. For example, the WNP web site alleges that the BNP no longer supports expulsion and repatriation for non-White immigrants. If that's true, I think it's a shame. Moderation and working with the enemy will get the BNP no where fast.
2004-03-02 08:21 | User Profile
[QUOTE]32. We will secure the existence of our people and a future for White children[/QUOTE]
Isn't this some quote from a WN "terrorist" serving life in prison here in the States? Its intriguing to see that a party using such unambiguous rhetoric can capture, on its first time out, 1/6th of the vote in a councillor's race. That's frequently about how well the BNP does. Is it too much to hope for such unapologetic WNs will perhaps be elected to British councillorships in the nearish future? For a party like BNP, that leans on British nationalism to score some victories is one thing, but for such a blatantly, White racist party to have substantial support in a given electoral constituency? That's really something. Fantastic.
2004-03-02 13:53 | User Profile
Just so long as they work with the BNP and don't split the WN vote.
2004-03-02 15:20 | User Profile
"Working with the enemy" or playing politics?
2004-03-02 22:24 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Kevin_O'Keeffe]Isn't this some quote from a WN "terrorist" serving life in prison here in the States? Its intriguing to see that a party using such unambiguous rhetoric can capture, on its first time out, 1/6th of the vote in a councillor's race. That's frequently about how well the BNP does. Is it too much to hope for such unapologetic WNs will perhaps be elected to British councillorships in the nearish future? For a party like BNP, that leans on British nationalism to score some victories is one thing, but for such a blatantly, White racist party to have substantial support in a given electoral constituency? That's really something. Fantastic.[/QUOTE]
Kevin, I think there's a misunderstanding here. The BNP, and the WNP whose policies are quoted above, are two different Nationalist parties. As far as I can tell, the WNP has been formed by a group of disaffected British Nationalists who feel that the BNP is making too many concessions to the enemy.
2004-03-02 23:28 | User Profile
Do you think splintering will get anyone anywhere?
2004-03-02 23:42 | User Profile
Some splintering is inevitable. Under these circumstances, I think the best that Nationalists can do is refrain from attacking each other and then when election time rolls around support whichever Nationalist party has the best chance of winning.
2004-03-03 01:08 | User Profile
Our ancestors did not " vote " their way into world dominance and obvious superiority, what makes you think you can " vote " our way into any relevance ? No changes in history have ever been made without bloodshed. Are your perceptions that strong ? Can you take it to the level ?
2004-03-03 01:36 | User Profile
If you're addressing me, I don't disagree with you. However, there is a time and place for everything. And now isn't the time for bloodshed. But I have no illusions about what may be necessary in the future.
2004-03-03 01:47 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Valley Forge]If you're addressing me, I don't disagree with you. However, there is a time and place for everything. And now isn't the time for bloodshed. But I have no illusions about what may be necessary in the future.[/QUOTE] the future is now.
where is the future for Princess Diana ? Ron Brown ? Vincent Foster ? John F. Kennedy ? Robert Kennedy ? David Koresh ? Timothy McVeigh ? where is their future ?
2004-03-03 02:00 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Exelsis_Deo]the future is now.
where is the future for Princess Diana ? Ron Brown ? Vincent Foster ? John F. Kennedy ? Robert Kennedy ? David Koresh ? Timothy McVeigh ? where is their future ?[/QUOTE]
Are you suggesting that now is the time to take up arms against ZOG?
What would that accomplish apart from a trip to prison or the gallows?
2004-03-03 02:09 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Valley Forge]Are you suggesting that now is the time to take up arms against ZOG?
What would that accomplish apart from a trip to prison or the gallows?[/QUOTE] I cannot share with you whom I am thinking of Let it be said that every war won was won in death. Maybe a movie produced come to reality could scare anyone. There are always OPTIONS. Think about IT. Wake Up Call
2004-03-03 21:12 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Valley Forge]Some splintering is inevitable. Under these circumstances, I think the best that Nationalists can do is refrain from attacking each other and then when election time rolls around support whichever Nationalist party has the best chance of winning.[/QUOTE]
The UK Independence Party (an anti-EU party) has already agreed never to contest seats being sought by the BNP. As long as the WNs and the BNP can usefully co-exist, great; if they run against each other, they do nothing but ensure their mutual defeat. For now, its clear the BNP is going to be ready to run in a national election long before the WNP. However, perhaps the BNP will merely pave the way for the more radical WNP. One can only hope....
2004-03-03 21:23 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Exelsis_Deo]Our ancestors did not " vote " their way into world dominance and obvious superiority, what makes you think you can " vote " our way into any relevance ? No changes in history have ever been made without bloodshed. Are your perceptions that strong ? Can you take it to the level ?[/QUOTE]
Electoral politics won't solve the problem, but it will be part of any successful strategy. Look at the Netherlands: Pim Fortuyn (not exactly one of us, but still worth supporting) was going to win, so they got one of their college leftoids to murder him. Or take France back in the 1980s, when the National Front won a whole bunch of seats proportionately, so the other parties got rid of France's proportional representation and adopted the hated "Anglo-Saxon" system of winner-take-all district elections. The people need to have it really rubbed in their faces that electoral politics won't work, before they will take up arms. Politics also provides a potentially excellent forum for the dissemination of our viewpoint. Our involvement in electoral politics will prove this is no "democracy" in any sense of the term, but merely a rigged oligarchy. That realizaton is already fueling the fires of revolutionary fervor, albeit not yet to the extent we need (although it could be argued that things have started to come along nicely since Dumbya took office).
We're not going to vote our way out of this mess, but neither are we likely to fight our way out of it until we've proven to our people that they won't be permitted to vote their way into security & prosperity. They will have to fight for those things. Once they realize that, its over for the Jews, after a few months of intense suffering for all parties (particularly those on the other side). Electoral politics, and the way the rules will ALWAYS be changed after the fact in order to ensure our defeat, even to the extent of gunning our candidates down or locking them up in prison for ordinary political practices that aren't typically regarded as "illegal," is one of the best educational tools we can utilize.
2004-03-03 21:29 | User Profile
As long as the WNs and the BNP can usefully co-exist, great; if they run against each other, they do nothing but ensure their mutual defeat.
Exactly.
2004-03-07 04:50 | User Profile
The WNP is just going to make things harder for Nationalists.
Why should the BNP have to give out it's full agenda. The leftists don't.
The leftists, communists, faggots, and other degenerates never tell you their true agendas. Why is it that you think White Nationalists should have to broadcast their true agendas.
The BNP has no power to expatriate non-whites, so why bother saying it when it's more practical to take a softer stance. Once they actually gain serious power and have broad support, then they can start talking about expatriating non-whites.
The WNP is coming in at a time when they are just hurting nationalists. They should support the BNP and want until the time is right for more hardline stances.
[QUOTE=Valley Forge]Apparently from reading the WNP web site I gather that there are a few Nationalist parties in Britian. It appears that the WNP was formed because the BNP is going soft on some key issues. For example, the WNP web site alleges that the BNP no longer supports expulsion and repatriation for non-White immigrants. If that's true, I think it's a shame. Moderation and working with the enemy will get the BNP no where fast.[/QUOTE]
2004-03-07 05:51 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Valley Forge]THE POLICIES OF THE WHITE NATIONALIST PARTY[/QUOTE]
Every successful liberal group uses euphemistic names. Why do conservatives and WNs use non-euphemistic names (in regards to Politically Correct standards)?
British Preservation Party British Reform Party British National Party British Labour Party (not? to be confused with The Labour Party) Etc.
2004-03-07 06:06 | User Profile
We're not sneaky and devious enough... and are as politically savvy as a bludgeoning hammer.