← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Valley Forge
Thread ID: 12606 | Posts: 9 | Started: 2004-03-02
2004-03-02 02:56 | User Profile
Among other destructive images, [Heeb] magazine's "Crimes of Passion" photo display portrays Jesus as a sex object with his genitalia wrapped in a Jewish prayer shawl. The Virgin Mary is shown as a seductress with exposed breasts and body piercings.
[url]http://www.adl.org/PresRele/Mise_00/4460_00.htm[/url]
[url]http://www.heebmagazine.com/magazine/mag_5_feat_3.php[/url]
2004-03-03 01:00 | User Profile
Even the ADL spoke out against that... Which begs the question, why would they ? As bad as they are, there are still lines in the sand even they adhere to.
2004-03-03 01:28 | User Profile
Picture, if you can, the goyim screaming for blood.
"Oy, vat anti-Christian demaogoguery. Is there no sacredness in the world today? The suffering of our people continues in a world full of hate and fear and intolerance!"
Unfortunately, the Christians are too scared to defiantly take a stand against such things.
2004-03-03 01:40 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Robbie]Picture, if you can, the goyim screaming for blood.
"Oy, vat anti-Christian demaogoguery. Is there no sacredness in the world today? The suffering of our people continues in a world full of hate and fear and intolerance!"
Unfortunately, the Christians are too scared to defiantly take a stand against such things.[/QUOTE] Your point makes no sense and is totally irrelevant. Fact is that the ADL spoke out against portraying the Blessed Mother and Jesus as whores.. give credit where credit is due.
2004-03-03 01:48 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Exelsis_Deo]Your point makes no sense and is totally irrelevant. Fact is that the ADL spoke out against portraying the Blessed Mother and Jesus as whores.. give credit where credit is due.[/QUOTE]
The ADL spoke out purely to cover their Jew *sses.
Now they can dupe the gullible again by saying, in effect, see "we oppose anti-Christian bigotry as much as anti-Semitism."
Don't fall for it.
2004-03-03 01:55 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Valley Forge]The ADL spoke out purely to cover their Jew *sses.
Now they can dupe the gullible again by saying, in effect, see "we oppose anti-Christian bigotry as much as anti-Semitism."
Don't fall for it.[/QUOTE] I'm not " falling for it " and I know how despicable they are. I detest them. But in this regard, they stuck their neck out why I do not know to defend the sanctity of Our Lord.. strange indeed.... maybe there are mechanizations we are not yet aware of ... still, we must admit that this is surprising.. and maybe there are moves in the making. Very uncharacteristical of them indeed.
2004-03-03 02:43 | User Profile
I think VF nailed it. It's a deliberately staged stunt that gives their public denunciation of it a moral platform from which to shame righteous Gentiles into denouncing (even more) things deemed (by them) anti-semitic. With the worldwide awakening and with things like Gibson's film on their mind, they need something like this to point to as a model for the goyim. "See, we denounce our bad boys, now it's your turn."
2004-03-03 03:24 | User Profile
If I'm not mistaken, [B]Heeb[/B] magazine was denounced by some Chosen because of its name. Apparently, "heeb" (sometimes spelled as "hebe") is a slur against you-know-who, and is henceforth "anti-Sem...." (you get the idea).
Face the fact: only the Chosen can mock themselves and mock others simultaneously.
2004-03-15 00:49 | User Profile
Did the ADL condemn the exhibit sponsored by the Saatchi brothers at the Brooklyn Museum of Art several years ago, where the Virgin Mary and Christ were both denigrated by some pseudo-artists by having dung smeared over one while the other was hung upside down in a vat of urine? As I recall, the leftist elites decried NYC's Mayor Giuliani's attempts to get funding pulled from the museum and posed it as a freedom of expression issue. Clever.
Did they also condemn gay activists who blasphemed in St. Patrick's Cathedral during their Gay Pride Day parade? How about when The Last Temptation of Christ portrayed sex between Christ and Mary Magdalene based on no source other than a sex-obsessed writer's, replete with all those Brooklyn accents put together by that second-rate director, Martin Scorcese? Were they front and center then?
Or how about the Magdalene Sisters, a heavy-duty anti-Catholic movie depicting sado-masochistic, sexually repressed nuns who run a reform school shilling as a laundry and the 3 teenage Irish girls who are put in their charge. Hear anything from them on that one? Yet Catholics as well as others were quick to jump all over Leni Reifenstahl, Hitler's director of choice just for showing a compelling and sympathetic view of Germany's chivalric history. Just curious.