← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Hilaire Belloc

Christianity: Good for Whites

Thread ID: 12578 | Posts: 2 | Started: 2004-02-29

Wayback Archive

Hilaire Belloc [OP]

2004-02-29 19:34 | User Profile

[url]http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/...ptchristian.htm[/url]

Christianity: Good for Whites

by P.T.

16 February 2004

TAKE A TIP FROM YELLOW MEN, WHITEYS: CHRISTIANITY DID (AND DOES, AND WILL AGAIN) DO GOOD FOR THE WESTERN CIVILIZATION - WHILE PAGANISM WILL NOT, NEVER AGAIN, EVEN IF IT ONCE SOMEHOW DID

I find the anti-Christian White Nationalists a disturbing phenomenon.

(By this I mean openly & venomously anti-Christian; every person has a “right” to his opinion on religious matters, at least in this life – I have always believed that forced sword-point conversions are a business of inferior doctrines like Islam that cannot compete on non-martial arenas.)

These guys really don’t know what is good for their people. They are really unable to see the almost direct connection between the de-Christianization and the corruption of European cultural and spiritual life - the elites first, then spreading downwards to lower classes.

This whole suicidally selfish, “deluge after us” mentality was really born along with the 18th century (incidentally anti-Christian…) Endarkenment with its shallow rationalism, that among other things atomized human relationships, as well in class as in gender, religion and race.

Human relationships (in the sense that we know them) really can’t be based upon “reason”, au contraire, the modern “enlightened” Cartesian concept of “ autonomous human reason” that can be sure only of its own existence, “cogito ergo sum”, is a perfect vehicle to encourage sociopathic selfishness.

I mean, while I may generally succeed better by acting as a part of my group rather than as an individual, why couldn’t I personally succeed even more by betraying my own community for other, wealthier and/or more powerful one, should the opportunity ever make itself available?

You say that my grandchildren will live in a sewer? Who cares, I won’t be there to see it, and I probably won’t bother to have (biological) children anyway, if I’m just wealthy enough to maintain myself in my elderly years.

This isn’t just a theoretical babbling, you know. I have just summarized the basic ideology of our traitorous, secularised White elite that has sold us out.

I once again recommend generally deep-thinking Francis Parker Yockey’s essay on “Liberalism”, the true child of the anti-Christian “Enlightenment”.

[url]http://www.alphalink.com.au/~radnat...liberalism.html[/url]

Almost all issues that bother pagan Nazis about the Christianity are really results of liberal, modernist decay spreading into churches – even the dispensational pro-Israel phenomenon was born just in the 19th century, and really took off only after the Second World War. Nothing that couldn’t be reversed, really.

////////////////////////////////////////////////

In sense, I feel certain sympathy for these anti-Christian pro-White activists. They remind me of those shell-shocked World War I soldiers that after artillery pounding happened to shoot their own retreating frontline men, mistaking them as enemies.

In a sense, these poor heathen have been so shell-shocked by the Judeo-Masonic assault on the Western civilization that they desperately want to blame someone for this mess, superstitiously believing (as men in crisis react) that abolishing Christianity will somehow make Whites awaken from their stupor and basically make everything all right again.

It is pathetic to see anti-Christian heathen Nazis crowing with joy that Western European White youth hardly pays attention to (Christian) religion (I actually saw this on Tom Metzger’s website). Yes indeed, and can’t we all see just what magnificent shape the modern White youth generally speaking nowadays is in? I mean, if there are places even more deserted than churches “over here”, then they are maternity wards.

///////////////////////////////////////////

But heck, it wasn’t my original intention to just pound the philosophical pulpit! Take a witness statements from bona fide upward Mongoloids on the benevolent impact of true Christianity! It is always “enlightening” to know how outsiders see you and your issues!

///////////////

[url]http://www.thbookservice.com/BookPage.asp?prod_cd=c6386[/url]

“Aikman, Time magazine's former bureau chief in Beijing, reveals that even top Chinese officials -- including former President Jiang Zemin -- have identified Christianity as the secret of the West's success, and want to bring that success to China.”

"I would make Christianity the official religion of China" -- China's former President, Jiang Zemin

“David Aikman demonstrates that what is happening in China today is what happened to the Roman Empire nearly two thousand years ago -- nothing less than the Christianization of one of the greatest nations in the world.”

///////////////

This is even more interesting:

“Buddhists are battling Christians for market share in post-communist Mongolia”

Here: [url]http://www.tibet.ca/wtnarchive/1999/12/4_2.html[/url]

'CHRISTIANITY brings values to our country that Buddhism never did and never will," says Javklan, 41, a local businessman who, like many Mongolians, uses just one name.

"The traditions of Christianity are what have helped make Western civilisation so dominant. The values of mutual respect, of caring for others, of bringing progress and good to society are all necessary for Mongolia to develop," he says.

Javklan's father was a Buddhist monk until, aged 40, he was forced by the communist government to leave his monastery and adopt a secular life.

"Choibalsan, like Stalin, spent some time as a monk and so he understood the hold that it can have and the way it can insidiously destroy a society.

"If my father had not been forced out of the monastery, I would never have been born. If Mongolia had not been a nation of celibate monks, following a religion forced on us by the Manchus to keep us weak, we would be a strong nation of 40 million people today," says Javklan.

... Take THAT, you WCOTC amateur “historians”, and your fellow-thinkers! THIS is what happens when one race really imposes defective religion on another one in order to suck life out of it – they encourage them not to “Be fruitful, and multiply”.

If there was one secular issue that early Christians were really unanimous about, it was the condemnation of, to put it nicely, “the birth control” practised almost universally by all ancient pagan nations.

Nice bunch of quotations here: “What did early Christians believe about abortion”

[url]http://www.bible.ca/H-Abortion.htm[/url]

(Few nutty Gnostic pseudo-Christian sects that advocated alternatively total celibacy and open debauchery don’t count – they didn’t represent the true essence of Christianity any more than some modern congregations that prefer dumping African refugees into totally alien locations instead of, say, helping them to rebuild their own country…)

///////////////////////////////////////////

Many Nazi pagans enjoy repeating the charges of barbarous habits among ancient Hebrews by Roman historian Tacitus, but I‘ve noticed that they don’t like to mention that among these strange, unusual habits that Tacitus lists, is this:

“It is a crime among them to kill any newly-born infant.”

[url]http://www.us-israel.org/jsource/History/tacitus.html[/url]

Yes, Tacitus considered this to be STRANGE, UNUSUAL practice – which incidentally was inherited by the Christian church.

Likewise, in his classic “Germania”, Tacitus makes it clear that among them

“To limit the number of children or to destroy any of their subsequent offspring is accounted infamous”

It was again a practice of alien, barbarous people.

[url]http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/tacitus1.html[/url]

This Germanic exception was probably because these tribes were still on so primitive level – as a basic rule, the more “civilized” ancient pagans became, more enthusiastically they exterminated their offspring.

The historian Polybius (204-122 BC) wrote:

"One remarks nowadays all over Greece such a diminution in natality and in general manner such a depopulation that the towns are deserted and the fields lie fallow. Although this country has not been ravaged by wars or epidemics, the cause of the harm is evident: by avarice or cowardice the people, if they marry, will not bring up the children they ought to have. At most they bring up one or two. It is in this way that the scourge before it is noticed is rapidly developed. The remedy is in ourselves; we have but to change our morals."

This change was brought by the Holy Spirit that saved the soul of the ancient world from itself – and can still do the same for this rotten world, even for White race!

As Kevin MacDonald himself can testify, here:

[url]http://www.csulb.edu/~kmacd/dswrev.htm[/url]

“The adaptiveness of Christianity also stemmed from its emphasis on several attitudes that were notably lacking in the Roman Empire: encouragement of large families, conjugal fidelity, high-investment parenting, and outlawing of abortion, infanticide, and non-reproductive sexual behavior. The bottom line is that Christian women did indeed out-reproduce Pagan women.”

The emphasis on pagan fertility cults and Christian emphasis on chastity can be very misleading – the former very often produces just unfruitful “jerk-offs” (See Genesis 38:9), while latter has paradoxically most often produced high birthrates.

////////////////////////////////////

Naïve neo-pagans may want to argue that ancients killed only their deformed, defective children. In fact they were killing themselves off almost as frantically as our present-day de facto neo-heathen majority populations - the Latin nobility was the first to die off in Rome, in spite of emperor Augustus’ desperate legal measures.

Not one pagan nation practised brutal, “pagan” eugenics more consistently than ancient Sparta, but look what happened to them:

“The 9,000 Spartan families that held land in the time of Lycurgus (a Spartan leader in the ninth century B.C.E.) had dwindled to 5,000 by the fifth century B.C.E., to 1,500 by the fourth century B.C.E., and to 711 by the third century B.C.E.”

[url]http://www.humanlifereview.com/demarcellus.html[/url]

/////////////////////////////////////////////////

Once again, dear heathens: focus on badmouthing ZOG and NWO, if you really want just the best for your own people, and not just settle some personal scores. Leave the body of Christ alone, unless some of its silly members bother you with some un-biblical, pro-race-mixing foolishness, and even then, “DO NOT GENERALIZE”.

P.T.

Ragnar

2004-02-29 20:35 | User Profile

[QUOTE=perun1201]Once again, dear heathens: focus on badmouthing ZOG and NWO, if you really want just the best for your own people, and not just settle some personal scores. Leave the body of Christ alone, unless some of its silly members bother you with some un-biblical, pro-race-mixing foolishness, and even then, “DO NOT GENERALIZE”. [/QUOTE]

Right, as if this article don't generalize about heathens? Come on, people have (and will again I'm sure) focused on only what was bad about monotheism, why is focusing on the bad side of European paganism -- which created our great forerunner civilizations -- supposed to be better?

"DO NOT GENERALIZE"? Well, okay, except this once: Generally, this subject goes nowhere fast.