← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Gabrielle
Thread ID: 12508 | Posts: 16 | Started: 2004-02-25
2004-02-25 00:48 | User Profile
THE VEXED SUBJECT
Dear Harold,
I hate to say this, but I am really having a problem with the christian views that I read on this forum. I said this before, and I guess it needs to be brought up again, and perhaps settled one way or the other. National Socialism draws it's philosophy of life heavily from Hegel and Nietzche. Nietzche especially has IN DETAIL pointed out the problems with Christian morality. I know many of you folks don't want to face these facts. I have heard the "Hilter was Christian" and all that baloney. Hitler was ready to march troops into the Vatican in 1943, and he should have. Lutheranism, with it's anti-semitic history used to be almost tolerable, but has now joined all the others with it's disease of Jewish ass-kissing. The roots of Christianity are JEWISH, Jesus was a JEW, the bible a book of Jewish folklore. Especially the Old testament with it's anti-gentile and Jewish supremacy attitude. Why do you people defend this ****? I really believe that some just cannot face it, because they would feel stupid for believing it all their lives. I had to face it, it's just like a little kid finding out there is no Santa Claus. Besides all that, these churches continue to contribute to the destruction of our Race. They now openly promote race mixing, and tolerate homosexuality. The few that don't soon will. I read in your emails about the crap going on in South Africa's Christian churches. Christianity quotes- "love thy neighbor as thyself" - what if your neighbors are apes who have no respect for you or anything? Christianity would have you "forgive and love them anyway". Real Christians would have you view homos as sick people who need help. National Socialists, real ones, would deal with them by locking them all up, if they were to remain alive. Christians have a weakness, they need religion to explain things to them that they don't understand, like death, or any other unknown. Nazis teach strength, and draw strength from others who have it, not 2,000 year old fairy tales. The whole NS philosophy is based on strength. There will always be unknowns, some things are unexplainable at the present time, but someday they may easily be understood.
I don't believe that we should openly assault Christianity or other religions (except Judaism) at this time, but definitely Christianity is not something for our people in the future, if we are to survive. Right now, some of our best people are Christians, as far as character goes. But, we could, over time, come up with something better for them, without the problems it brings. National Socialism did it before, it can do it again, if we stick to it, and don't water it down, and twist it to our own whims. Jews have succeeded in making it a totally unpopular ideology, because they know it could defeat them. But the Jews are fine with Christian religions of today because they know the philosophies will never be a threat to them, for the reasons above- in fact, they HELP the Jews achieve their goals.
I would like an answer on this from you, Harold. You have dodged the issue so far, but at least tell me honestly what you intend to do, or what you think should be done.
At least Pierce realizes the problems with this, I agree with what he says on the Christian issue, and he sticks more to a N.S. philosophy on it. I believe it is something that will drag us down- and that is the only reason I am against it. No personal vendetta, no faggot lifestyle that needs to be justified. Just looking out for us all, as I think and hope you are.
Scott
========================================
Dear Scott:
OK, I will respond, and I will retain this C-Gram as my official "canned answer", once and for all, on this subject. This is NOTan invitation to all the rest of you to weigh in; one thing I think we have all learned to our bitter cost is that this issue generates heat rather than light, and that any calm and rational discussion of the issue in what we laughingly refer to as a "Movement" is impossible. Any such discussion absolutely shatters what tattered, fragile fragments of unity we still have, and that is one reason, possibly the best, for simply avoiding the subject altogether. It is an issue which CANNOT get resolved. Not once in the past 28 years have I observed someone on one side of this argument convince someone on the other side. We simply end up screaming and cursing at one another, and we have more than enough excuses to do that already.
I am not going to go into my personal religious views because they are irrelevant and would simply add one more element of GUBU to the whole issue. Instead I am going to address this on the purely pragmatic grounds which should govern every decision that a revolutionary makes. Within the reality of this GUBU "Movement", the following facts stand out:
The Christians have the money and are far more willing to donate it than the neo-pagans. If that sounds crass and greedy, so be it. The implications here are obvious and you are all quite capable of understanding why this must be an extremely important consideration in everything we do from A to Z.
The Christians have what remains of the last, trickling reserves of personal, physical courage in the Movement. With the exception of David Lane and (some say) Robert Matthews, I never knew a neo-pagan who was worth a bucket of warm spit in the cojones department, and the majority---not all, but the majority---of the traitors and informers who have plagued us like maggots down through the years have been neo-pagan poseurs, while those who have stood up in prison and kept the faith have been Identity Christians. Please do not send me e-mails citing the few loathsome exceptions; I am aware of their existence. But this general pattern holds true. Please refrain from pointing out that one of my personal Movement heroes, Jost Turner, was a neo-pagan. Yes, I know that. He was also a brave and dedicated man whose mighty heart was broken by the destructive antics of his fellow "Heroic Vitalists" of the Koehl and Pierce sects. Again I say, this is not an invitation to a discussion. Scott asked a question and I am answering it here so I do not have to answer it again.
The Christians of all sects have the last remaining, dwindling reserve on this continent of White women of child bearing age who harbor at least some kind of traditional social and racial values, and within the Movement that goes quadruple for the Identity Christians. Please do not send me e-mails pointing out the few notable exceptions like Lisa Turner; I am aware of them and they are atypical and rare exceptions. If we ever do hope to find sane and stable mates, I strongly suggest we look in the Identity churches and beware of tattooed, punk-hair-cutted chicks who are temporarily drawn to the Movement out of their own neuroses. Remember that girl who ratted out the so-called "COTC" in Florida. I cannot think offhand of a single genuinely strong Identity woman who has ever betrayed her man, unless you want to count Zillah Craig but we won't get into that. Contrast that girl in Florida to the life of Sara Weaver after her mother and brother's murder.
There is another issue, and let me pick my words carefully here. We all know by now that the people who gravitate o our Movement have a certain tendency to what I will politely term dysfunctional personalities. This characteristic has always been extremely prominent in the anti-Christians. Frankly, I have always observed that the most violently anti-Christian among us are quite often the nuttiest. Their hatred of Christianity is more often than not visceral, not based on any genuine philosophy or alternate religious belief, and amounts to an obsession which eventually overrides every consideration of race, practicality, or sense of proportion. They are anti-Christians first and White racialists by a long second or third. It is no coincidence that the author of the vile "dev-nulls" which most of us have been pelted with at one time or another over the past few years is one Steve Kendall, who when he was editing the NSWPP publication PLEXUS I had to restrain every issue from publishing wild and hysterical attacks on Christianity, often to the exclusion of anything else.
You say that you like Dr. Pierce's position against Christianity. Pierce also does real estate and publishing deals with Jews, pays lawyers to file malicious and baseless lawsuits against those he views as his personal enemies, and runs what amounts to a bizarre racist version of Scientology. I used to say, some years ago, that I had a great deal of respect for Pierce no matter what he did to me personally. I no longer do; it is now my personal belief that The Great Man Himself no longer has all his oars in the water and hasn't had for a longer time than any of us suspect. Some of the things he has done and is doing right now, especially his GUBU attacks on Skinheads and The Order in his new toy Resistance Magazine, indicate to me that he is losing touch with reality. His hatred for Christianity is part and parcel of that.
Whether we like it or not, the overwhelming majority of White Americans at least verbally profess some kind of Christianity, and WILL NOT TOLERATE or support views they consider to be blasphemous. That is the reality and we had damned well better internalize that reality fast and counter it as best we can, or at least refrain from attacking Christianity ANYWHERE someone like Morris Dees or Mike Wallace can track it down and broadcast it.
The position of the Northwest Migration must be to have no position on religion insofar as we can get away with it, but to occasionally send a few signals to the Christians that we are not hostile to them on religious grounds and we represent no threat to them. Of course, silly me, I haven't yet given up hope that someday we may be able to build a real Movement instead of a Three Stooges farce.
You asked, Scott, and I have answered.
88! Harold A. Covington
2004-02-25 03:27 | User Profile
[QUOTE]6. There is a very distinct difference between the Christian religion as practiced by our forefathers for many centuries and the organized churches of today, and one of the marks of the obsessive anti-Christian is an absolute, manic refusal to acknowledge this clear fact under any circumstances. These liberal churches with women ministers and faggot weddings and money-raising activities for nigger murderers around the world are quite clearly in violation of the Bible and the tenets of their own supposed religion; they have simply elected to ignore the moral dictates of the religion they profess. Liberal Christianity consists of the Sermon on the Mount twisted and distorted into almost unrecognizable forms, and virtually nothing else. Many liberal churches use the Bible itself only sparingly and the Old Testament not at all. For them, Christianity is a buffet; they take what they like and leave the rest.[/QUOTE]
Plus ca change:
[url]http://www.thegreatestpuzzle.com/325j1.htm[/url]
In 325, Constantine the Great convened the council of Nicea to settle the Arian dispute concerning the nature of Jesus Christ. It was there that the doctrine of the Trinity was declared to be the orthodox Christian belief. Literature on what happened at this council is scant.
The Arian controversy lead to much discussion in the early part of the fourth century. Gregory of Nyssa writes:
"Every corner of Constantinople was full of their discussions: the streets, the market place, the shops of the money changers, the victuallers. Ask a tradesman how many obols he wants for some article in his shop, and he replies with the disquisition on generated and ungenerated being. Ask the price of bread today and the baker tells you: "The son is subordinate to the father." Ask your servant if the bath is ready and he makes an answer: "The son arose out of nothing." "Great is the only Begotten," declared the Catholics, and the Arians rejoined: "But greater is He that begot."
How many Gospels had to be scrutinized at the Council of Nicea? Some sources say 270 and others say there were as many as 4,000. If you have a reliable source of information regarding the number of gospels present at the council of Nicea, or any other relevant information, please contact us.
It was at the Council of Nicea, in 325 AD that the Roman Sun-day or day of the Sun was declared to be the Christian Sabbath along with the worship of the sun being the official state religion.
It was at the Council of Nicea, in 325 AD that the emblem of the Sun god, the cross of light, was adopted as the emblem of Christianity.
It was at the Council of Nicea, in 325 AD that the date of Easter was established.
It was at the Council of Nicea, in 325 AD that rules were framed that defined the authority of bishops, thereby paving the way for a concentration of power in ecclesiastical hands.
It was at the Council of Nicea, in 325 AD that, by vote, Jesus was declared a god, not a mortal prophet.
"...a year after the Council of Nicea, he (Constantine) sanctioned the confiscation and destruction of all works that challenged orthodox teachings - works by pagan authors that referred to Jesus, as well as works by "heretical" Christians. He also arranged for a fixed income to be allocated to the Church and installed the bishop of Rome in the Lateran Palace (It was not until 384 that the bishop of Rome called himself Pope for the first time). Then, in A.D. 331, he commissioned and financed new copies of the Bible. This constituted one of the single most decisive factors in the entire history of Christianity and provided Christian orthodoxy with an unparalleled opportunity. In A.D. 303, a quarter of a century earlier, the pagan emperor Diocletian had undertaken to destroy all Christian writings that could be found. As a result Christian documents - especially in Rome - all but vanished. When Constantine commissioned new versions of these documents, it enabled the custodians of orthodoxy to revise, edit, and rewrite their material as they saw fit, in accordance with their tenets. It was at this point that most of the crucial alterations in the New Testament were probably made. The importance of Constantine's commission must not be underestimated. Of the five thousand extant early manuscript versions of the New Testament, not one predates the fourth century. The New Testament as it exists today is essentially a product of fourth-century editors and writers."
2004-02-25 08:47 | User Profile
Still throwing that bile on the wall, eh NN?
Specific points in your post refuted [url=http://tektonics.org/davincicrude.htm]Here[/url].
Your...ahem...'authoritative' source, [u]Holy Blood, Holy Grail[/u] soundly exposed [url=http://anzwers.org/free/posmis/]Here[/url], [url=http://www.alpheus.org/html/articles/esoteric_history/richardson1.html]Here[/url] and [url=http://www.anzwers.org/free/posdebunking/]Here[/url].
Nice try though.
2004-02-25 12:18 | User Profile
American is no longer a Christian nation; how do you like it? Do you feel safe? Do you lock your doors? Does the future look bright for our nation?
2004-02-25 15:12 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Texas Dissident]Still throwing that bile on the wall, eh NN?
Specific points in your post refuted [url=http://tektonics.org/davincicrude.htm]Here[/url].
Your...ahem...'authoritative' source, [u]Holy Blood, Holy Grail[/u] soundly exposed [url=http://anzwers.org/free/posmis/]Here[/url], [url=http://www.alpheus.org/html/articles/esoteric_history/richardson1.html]Here[/url] and [url=http://www.anzwers.org/free/posdebunking/]Here[/url].
Nice try though.[/QUOTE]
I see, Tex,
So, when it suits you, we are going to investigate the matter and make a judgment based upon considerations of logic and evidence, eh? I presume that your references are to material that is to be held to these requirements for the support of your position, since you now boldly speak of "refutation". Of course, this offering of yours is a no-lose proposition for you, because, even were I to destroy it as was done to WB's defective material, you will simply retreat into silent irrationality.
Now, since your own credentials in terms of evaluating reference material in terms of logic and evidence - and of adhering thereto - are otherwise nonexistent, I'll let you go to the trouble of an attempt to acquire some, by pertinently quoting or summarizing your putative champions as against the material I reproduced, which reproduction was in no sense a "bilious" project, as you suggest.
In any case, Tex, we also share your family's joy in the ceremonial affirmation of your children.
Neo
2004-02-25 17:22 | User Profile
[QUOTE=NeoNietzsche]I see, Tex,
So, when it suits you, we are going to investigate the matter and make a judgment based upon considerations of logic and evidence, eh? I presume that your references are to material that is to be held to these requirements for the support of your position, since you now boldly speak of "refutation". Of course, this offering of yours is a no-lose proposition for you, because, even were I to destroy it as was done to WB's defective material, you will simply retreat into silent irrationality.
Now, since your own credentials in terms of evaluating reference material in terms of logic and evidence - and of adhering thereto - are otherwise nonexistent, I'll let you go to the trouble of an attempt to acquire some, by pertinently quoting or summarizing your putative champions as against the material I reproduced, which reproduction was in no sense a "bilious" project, as you suggest.
In any case, Tex, we also share your family's joy in the ceremonial affirmation of your children.
Neo[/QUOTE]
I think you are over reacting here, NN. :)
2004-02-25 20:59 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Gabrielle]I think you are over reacting here, NN. :)[/QUOTE]
I think you may be right, G., since Tex's "refutation" of the quoted material is somewhat beside the point which is not in dispute.
Tex didn't bother to register the comedy I was pointing out in that the Christians are not only unable to get their act together among themselves today as per H.C.'s quoted account, but they couldn't do it back then, either, ("plus ca change") without Constantine's initiation of the culling of the sects (disposing of Arian opposition to the Athanasians, principally) for the sake of Imperial order and unity.
2004-02-25 21:13 | User Profile
Oh, and I have a question for you, Gabrielle:
Suppose that Mr. Exphile has disappeared and you have the following accounts of how he got lost:
1) A UFO enthusiast claims that he was shot with a firearm and his body was taken away in a Spaceship that has gone home.
2) A believer in Bigfoot says that Mr. Exphile was stabbed and that Sasquatch carried him off and ate him, bones and all.
3) An avid Ann Rice fan testifies that no weapon at all was used in the demise of our victim, but he was bitten by a Vampire and has been unrecognizably transformed into one of the Living Dead.
If investigation tends to confirm that Mr. E. was shot, which of these Gosp...er, accounts would you accept in toto?
2004-02-26 00:53 | User Profile
The fact that any Biblical apologetics is necessary at all is itself a strong argument against the inspiration of the Bible. The argument can be broken down into premises and a conclusion as follows:
(1) If God is perfect, then all of His methods will be perfect and incapable of being improved upon. (A perfect being cannot make a mistake.)
(2) It is claimed that the Bible is God's method of communicating with mankind.
(3) It is obvious that the Bible could have been more clear and less confusing to men. As it stands, it is filled with apparent contradictions at best and genuine contradictions at worst -- hence the need for apologetics.
(4) From (1) and (3), we see that the claim in (2) cannot be correct.
It is also easy to demonstrate that the Bible was not divinely inspired (or was at least tampered with) by pointing out specific errors. For example, it can be demonstrated -- conclusively, I would say -- that hell cannot exist if God is infinitely just. Here's how:
A fallible, limited, finite being -- i.e., a person -- cannot be responsible for an infinite crime, and thus he cannot deserve infinite punishment in hell. Even if God is infinite, which is supposed to be the case, then human comprehension of him is extremely limited. No living person has seen God or understood him; even the Bible says so. But infinite culpability requires infinite comprehension of one's crime and resulting guilt! The human intellect is no closer to infinite comprehension than the intellect of an insect is, just as a trillion is no closer to infinity than the number 1 is (this is a mathematical fact). Hence, a human being can be no more capable than an insect of deserving infinite punishment. It follows that hell cannot exist, and thus the Bible errs by attributing threats of hell to God/Jesus.
2004-02-26 02:09 | User Profile
You're a mean, mean man Angler. I think all the contradictions of religion resolve themselves if one accepts that man created God and not vice versa. It is also easy to understand why this fact can never be admitted to the flock, altho the Jew comes close in the Talmud when they say things like, "God argued with the rabbis and God lost". But here in the solitude of the world wide web we can be honest. I don't think this view detracts from the splendor of God either. If you view man as a corporate being existing, at least semi-eternally, through time and space and call him [I]Christ[/I], that's no small thing. We are no small thing. Too bad it is connected so intimately with the Hate Hive.
2004-02-26 02:30 | User Profile
[QUOTE=NeoNietzsche] Of course, this offering of yours is a no-lose proposition for you, because, even were I to destroy it as was done to WB's defective material, you will simply retreat into silent irrationality.[/QUOTE]
ROTFLOL! I think people just get tired reading your tedious anti-Christ rhetoric. You're wasting your time here.
-
2004-02-26 02:45 | User Profile
[QUOTE=wild_bill] ROTFLOL! I think people just get tired reading your tedious anti-Christ rhetoric. You're wasting your time here.[/QUOTE]
Know any good jokes, WB?
2004-02-26 05:08 | User Profile
[QUOTE=NeoNietzsche]Oh, and I have a question for you, Gabrielle:
Suppose that Mr. Exphile has disappeared and you have the following accounts of how he got lost:
1) A UFO enthusiast claims that he was shot with a firearm and his body was taken away in a Spaceship that has gone home.
2) A believer in Bigfoot says that Mr. Exphile was stabbed and that Sasquatch carried him off and ate him, bones and all.
3) An avid Ann Rice fan testifies that no weapon at all was used in the demise of our victim, but he was bitten by a Vampire and has been unrecognizably transformed into one of the Living Dead.
If investigation tends to confirm that Mr. E. was shot, which of these Gosp...er, accounts would you accept in toto?[/QUOTE]
As your evidence would prove that he was shot, the third choice is ruled out (of course, were it not, we could rule it out because there are no such things as Vampires. But let's stick with the investigation's evidence). Secondly, there is no Bigfoot, nor are there aliens, so those choices are ruled out. My answer, then, is that I would believe none of these innacurate tales, nor would I find any credible, as they are absurd, and the tellers would have to be (slightly, at least) disturbed.
2004-02-28 17:26 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Gabrielle] My answer, then, is that I would believe none of these inaccurate tales, nor would I find any credible, as they are absurd, and the tellers would have to be (slightly, at least) disturbed.[/QUOTE]
Very Good, Gabrielle!
2004-02-28 23:21 | User Profile
I'd hope next time you take some effort to correct the format problem. It's really not asking too much. I did it in about a two minutes. Sheesh!!
THE VEXED SUBJECT
Dear Harold,
I hate to say this, but I am really having a problem with the christian views that I read on this forum. I said this before, and I guess it needs to be brought up again, and perhaps settled one way or the other. National Socialism draws it's philosophy of life heavily from Hegel and Nietzche.
Nietzche especially has IN DETAIL pointed out the problems with Christian morality. I know many of you folks don't want to face these facts. I have heard the "Hilter was Christian" and all that baloney. Hitler was ready to march troops into the Vatican in 1943, and he should have. Lutheranism, with it's anti-semitic history used to be almost tolerable, but has now joined all the others with it's disease of Jewish ass-kissing. The roots of Christianity are JEWISH, Jesus was a JEW, the bible a book of Jewish folklore. Especially the Old testament with it's anti-gentile and Jewish supremacy attitude. Why do you people defend this ****? I really believe that some just cannot face it, because they would feel stupid for believing it all their lives. I had to face it, it's just like a little kid finding out there is no Santa Claus.
Besides all that, these churches continue to contribute to the destruction of our Race. They now openly promote race mixing, and tolerate homosexuality. The few that don't soon will. I read in your emails about the crap going on in South Africa's Christian churches. Christianity quotes- "love thy neighbor as thyself" - what if your neighbors are apes who have no respect for you or anything? Christianity would have you "forgive and love them anyway". Real Christians would have you view homos as sick people who need help. National Socialists, real ones, would deal with them by locking them all up, if they were to remain alive. Christians have a weakness, they need religion to explain things to them that they don't understand, like death, or any other unknown. Nazis teach strength, and draw strength from others who have it, not 2,000 year old fairy tales. The whole NS philosophy is based on strength. There will always be unknowns, some things are unexplainable at the present time, but someday they may easily be understood.
I don't believe that we should openly assault Christianity or other religions (except Judaism) at this time, but definitely Christianity is not something for our people in the future, if we are to survive. Right now, some of our best people are Christians, as far as character goes. But, we could, over time, come up with something better for them, without the problems it brings. National Socialism did it before, it can do it again, if we stick to it, and don't water it down, and twist it to our own whims.
Jews have succeeded in making it a totally unpopular ideology, because they know it could defeat them. But the Jews are fine with Christian religions of today because they know the philosophies will never be a threat to them, for the reasons above- in fact, they HELP the Jews achieve their goals. I would like an answer on this from you, Harold. You have dodged the issue so far, but at least tell me honestly what you intend to do, or what you think should be done.
At least Pierce realizes the problems with this, I agree with what he says on the Christian issue, and he sticks more to a N.S. philosophy on it. I believe it is something that will drag us down- and that is the only reason I am against it. No personal vendetta, no faggot lifestyle that needs to be justified. Just looking out for us all, as I think and hope you are.
Scott
========================================
Dear Scott:
OK, I will respond, and I will retain this C-Gram as my official "canned answer", once and for all, on this subject. This is NOTan invitation to all the rest of you to weigh in; one thing I think we have all learned to our bitter cost is that this issue generates heat rather than light, and that any calm and rational discussion of the issue in what we laughingly refer to as a "Movement" is impossible. Any such discussion absolutely shatters what tattered, fragile fragments of unity we still have, and that is one reason, possibly the best, for simply avoiding the subject altogether. It is an issue which CANNOT get resolved. Not once in the past 28 years have I observed someone on one side of this argument convince someone on the other side. We simply end up screaming and cursing at one another, and we have more than enough excuses to do that already.
I am not going to go into my personal religious views because they are irrelevant and would simply add one more element of GUBU to the whole issue. Instead I am going to address this on the purely pragmatic grounds which should govern every decision that a revolutionary makes. Within the reality of this GUBU "Movement", the following facts stand out:
The Christians have the money and are far more willing to donate it than the neo-pagans. If that sounds crass and greedy, so be it. The implications here are obvious and you are all quite capable of understanding why this must be an extremely important consideration in everything we do from A to Z.
The Christians have what remains of the last, trickling reserves of personal, physical courage in the Movement. With the exception of David Lane and (some say) Robert Matthews, I never knew a neo-pagan who was worth a bucket of warm spit in the cojones department, and the majority---not all, but the majority---of the traitors and informers who have plagued us like maggots down through the years have been neo-pagan poseurs, while those who have stood up in prison and kept the faith have been Identity Christians. Please do not send me e-mails citing the few loathsome exceptions; I am aware of their existence. But this general pattern holds true. Please refrain from pointing out that one of my personal Movement heroes, Jost Turner, was a neo-pagan. Yes, I know that. He was also a brave and dedicated man whose mighty heart was broken by the destructive antics of his fellow "Heroic Vitalists" of the Koehl and Pierce sects. Again I say, this is not an invitation to a discussion. Scott asked a question and I am answering it here so I do not have to answer it again.
The Christians of all sects have the last remaining, dwindling reserve on this continent of White women of child bearing age who harbor at least some kind of traditional social and racial values, and within the Movement that goes quadruple for the Identity Christians. Please do not send me e-mails pointing out the few notable exceptions like Lisa Turner; I am aware of them and they are atypical and rare exceptions. If we ever do hope to find sane and stable mates, I strongly suggest we look in the Identity churches and beware of tattooed, punk-hair-cutted chicks who are temporarily drawn to the Movement out of their own neuroses. Remember that girl who ratted out the so-called "COTC" in Florida. I cannot think offhand of a single genuinely strong Identity woman who has ever betrayed her man, unless you want to count Zillah Craig but we won't get into that. Contrast that girl in Florida to the life of Sara Weaver after her mother and brother's murder.
There is another issue, and let me pick my words carefully here. We all know by now that the people who gravitate o our Movement have a certain tendency to what I will politely term dysfunctional personalities. This characteristic has always been extremely prominent in the anti-Christians. Frankly, I have always observed that the most violently anti-Christian among us are quite often the nuttiest. Their hatred of Christianity is more often than not visceral, not based on any genuine philosophy or alternate religious belief, and amounts to an obsession which eventually overrides every consideration of race, practicality, or sense of proportion. They are anti-Christians first and White racialists by a long second or third. It is no coincidence that the author of the vile "dev-nulls" which most of us have been pelted with at one time or another over the past few years is one Steve Kendall, who when he was editing the NSWPP publication PLEXUS I had to restrain every issue from publishing wild and hysterical attacks on Christianity, often to the exclusion of anything else.
You say that you like Dr. Pierce's position against Christianity. Pierce also does real estate and publishing deals with Jews, pays lawyers to file malicious and baseless lawsuits against those he views as his personal enemies, and runs what amounts to a bizarre racist version of Scientology. I used to say, some years ago, that I had a great deal of respect for Pierce no matter what he did to me personally. I no longer do; it is now my personal belief that The Great Man Himself no longer has all his oars in the water and hasn't had for a longer time than any of us suspect. Some of the things he has done and is doing right now, especially his GUBU attacks on Skinheads and The Order in his new toy Resistance Magazine, indicate to me that he is losing touch with reality. His hatred for Christianity is part and parcel of that.
Whether we like it or not, the overwhelming majority of White Americans at least verbally profess some kind of Christianity, and WILL NOT TOLERATE or support views they consider to be blasphemous. That is the reality and we had damned well better internalize that reality fast and counter it as best we can, or at least refrain from attacking Christianity ANYWHERE someone like Morris Dees or Mike Wallace can track it down and broadcast it.
The position of the Northwest Migration must be to have no position on religion insofar as we can get away with it, but to occasionally send a few signals to the Christians that we are not hostile to them on religious grounds and we represent no threat to them. Of course, silly me, I haven't yet given up hope that someday we may be able to build a real Movement instead of a Three Stooges farce.
You asked, Scott, and I have answered.
88! Harold A. Covington
2004-03-01 03:18 | User Profile
[QUOTE=All Old Right]I'd hope next time you take some effort to correct the format problem. It's really not asking too much. I did it in about a two minutes. Sheesh!![/QUOTE]
And you did a marvelous job too! Thank you so much, AOR. :thumbsup: