← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Franco
Thread ID: 12461 | Posts: 8 | Started: 2004-02-23
2004-02-23 01:37 | User Profile
2-22-04
Sandwich-Spread and Mel Gibson
Well, now that even mainstream American movie critics are praising Mel Gibson's new movie "The Passion of Christ," you can bet that that movie contains absolutely no Anti-Sandwich-Spread [tm, the Jewish community; used daily as a cultural weapon]. In fact, it is our understanding that Gibson actually toned down his movie so as not to anger God's Special Lapdogs with any Anti-Sandwich-Spread -- verbal or otherwise.
Isn't it great to live in a non-Jewish country where a tiny racial group -- Jews again -- decides what-is-and-what-is-not acceptable for public viewing? Nifty, itz. Yes, even though official, historic Christian narrative says that Jews are indeed responsible for Christ's death, God's Special Lapdogs say that no one will mention that fact publicly in 2004, and so, goddamnit, no one will! Get it? Good gentile.
So thank God, it's official: Mel Gibson's new film contains absolutely no Anti-Sandwich-Spread. It's safe for the Jews -- as usual.
2004-02-23 01:51 | User Profile
Now that Mel change it no one will see it,,,,, the fun part was to see someone finally going against the Jews in the open,,,,,, oh well, maybe next time.
2004-02-23 02:07 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Ponce]Now that Mel change it no one will see it,,,,, the fun part was to see someone finally going against the Jews in the open,,,,,, oh well, maybe next time.[/QUOTE]
Don't write-off Mel so fast. I listen to his father and if you parse Mel's comments, its obvious that his old man and he know the Jew.
-
2004-02-23 04:19 | User Profile
Let's wait until it comes out before you criticize it. The movie has gone through many versions and no one knows for sure what exactly will be in it or not.
2004-02-23 07:27 | User Profile
[QUOTE=heritagelost]Let's wait until it comes out before you criticize it. The movie has gone through many versions and no one knows for sure what exactly will be in it or not.[/QUOTE]
Society has been dumbed down to such an extent that I doubt the Average Joe realizes the zealots are attacking Christianity. 15 mil Jews questioning 2 bil Christians. Go figure.
It's doubtful Mel changed anything of significant importance and it was a good PR move. Obviously FrankenStein was still irritated, otherwise he wouldn't have made a visit to the vatican. Although, that could have been an excuse to eye the gold and claim it as belonging to Israel. Watch for a legal suit in the near future. heh
2004-02-25 05:43 | User Profile
If the jews were really scared of this film, it never would've seen the light of day, yet it's been getting lots of promotion, great reviews, and ticket sales have been huge.
Or maybe the jews don't really control the media.
2004-02-25 06:06 | User Profile
This is the most depressing thread I've ever read.
I don't even believe in this fairy tale (though I admire some of its allegorical properties) and even [I]my[/I] pagan/Nazi ass knows that Mel Gibson is a hero for doing this, no matter what penny-ante cuts or concessions had to be made. He put his face, his name, his money and his family in harm's way to propagate a message more important to him than all the buddy-cop movies in creation, in [I]open defiance [/I] of the Jewish machine, and the only reason he could even get this in theaters was that [I]he is the biggest movie star in the #$!&^% world[/I].
[I]Think[/I] about that the next time anyone one-tenth as prominent as Gibson rushes to the first open mike to grovel in abject apology to the name-changing vulgarian oligarchs that sign his checks, whom he might [I]conceivably [/I] have offended by forgetting where he was for one perilous minute and accidentally speaking the plain, bloody-obvious truth.
That a bunch of Internet anonymities (and I [I]like [/I] you guys, but let's face it, none of us - me most definitely included - are exactly eager for public recognition) could [I]pick friggin' nits [/I] at him, and write him off as a coward and a sellout [I]before viewing a frame of this movie [/I] is ghastly testimony to the current intellectual inferiority of gentiles compared to the Zionists who own us.
Don't tell me about Shakespeare and Galileo and Malthus and Mozart and Nietzsche -don't rest on dead men's laurels the way too many WNs do, as if [I]we [/I] are simply recombinants of [I]them[/I], when it's painfully obvious that we currently don't remotely have sufficient common sense to [I]deserve [/I] to control our own destinies.
2004-02-26 09:21 | User Profile
il ragno "This is the most depressing thread I've ever read."
Always with the right words, no extra. ditto, in spades
Its obviously a political stunt pulled off by ZOG central. As ir points out, it takes the wind entirely out of the sails of any future anti-anti-semitism movement. If killing Christ isn't anti-Semitic, and 99% who see it seem to agree it isn't, nothing they could do could ever be wrong. Semitism wins forever, thanx to Mel. One rabbit was complaining that the Jews who weren't followers of Jesus weren't properly represented by him. He could have tried harder.
David Letterman's comment tonight, related by his mother after seeing "The Passion of The Christ" was "Where's Yoda?" No one laughed. He didn't smirk. It was justified and it put the religion of Christianity lower than the torah.
This is where the line has been drawn for eternity. You have to be at least as anti-Jew as Jesus was, who had to actually look down on that crowd of faces from where he was situated, if you want to get down to that. Or what was it all about? It is a metaphysical gulf, an abyss that cleaves what-it-is-to-be, or being itself. On the other side are all those who kill Christ, along with Mel Gibson and the Jews. Final answer... 15 seconds ago