← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · travis

Working censored forums

Thread ID: 12450 | Posts: 8 | Started: 2004-02-22

Wayback Archive


travis [OP]

2004-02-22 13:57 | User Profile

There are perhaps dozens of forums out there that are censored for racial content in varying degrees. Virtually all of them are infiltrated by Jews and perhaps many owned by them. They can do a lot of damage because the gullible participants think they are subjecting their ideas and those of others to the scrutiny of debate on a "public" forum when in fact they are not.

There is much we can do about this and I need some help.

It's not that hard to point scrutiny at the Jews without using the "J" word. Just stay in peripheral zones just outside of the taboo. The Jews on board will know instantly who you are. Keep them busy and don't let them get a hook in your mouth. Discuss methods and actions of Jews without mentioning their name. Talk about "fiat money" "Federal Reserve" "international bankers" "debasement" and start threads on these subjects. Even if you don't understand the details, someone else will unwittingly help you. Post links like:

[url]http://www.freedomdomain.com/bankquot.html[/url]

[url]http://www.bankhonesty.com/[/url]

[url]http://www.fame.org/[/url]

This will keep the yids busy as hell. They hate to see this topic being discussed. Leave links with every post, there are many good ones on this subject.

Post replies at intervals that keep putting the topic on the top of the page, you will see the Jews will never reply to an inconvenient topic as it falls from visibility, instead they all chime in at once with insults and outrage, then ignore it.

Use language like "hollywood/mass media" to imply that it's monolithic. Refer to the media as "the monolithic media". When the Israel - Palestinian conflict arises, post articles by Jews that are critical of Jews in general, like this one:

[url]http://globalfire.tv/nj/03en/jews/warmongers1.htm[/url]

You can't be an anti-Semite for posting a Jewish author.

Discuss the secret societies, espescially the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderbergers and the Trilateral Commission. Talk about the New World Odor (how it really smells) and the patriot act tyranny. You may even learn a lot about these subjects yourself. When they call you paranoid (they will) tell them one man's vigilance is another man's paranoia, and "the price of liberty is eternal vigilance". Refer to the public as "the TV addled masses" thus minimizing it's popularity.

It's a war of ideas, SHOOT BACK.


Walter Yannis

2004-02-22 15:21 | User Profile

Great post, Travis.

The thing to keep in mind when debating Tribalists is that they're not honest interlocutors who are searching for the Truth with a capital "T." Objectivity is not what this is about.

It is about ADVOCACY. They're lawyers pleading a case in the court of public opinion, they're not students searching reading the Greeks and searching for Wisdom.

They're not good citizens trying through reasoned debate to arrive at good policy choices, they're ethnic partisans using the public square to advance their narrow Tribal interests. The very premises of the debate are false - they're not looking for the truth, they're just trying to win.

I think that this is the hardest point for most conservatives. Every conversation with the kosher-friendly ends up with them throwing up their hands in frustration and exclaiming "why can't they see it, it's so obvious?!" The answer, of course, is that they do see it but they're trying to obscure the point, lawyer-like, in the interest of their client. I've done that plenty of times. Just imagine yourself arguing a case in court against a lawyer for the other side who knows and is prepared to use every conniving trick in the great book of rhetoric, and you'll be fine.

We need to adopt the same tactics, as you rightly suggest.

Walter


travis

2004-02-22 15:49 | User Profile

The purpose of debating on these forums is to convince the jury, not the lawyers, and posts should be phrased with the jury's ears in mind. The Jews often try to redefine the terms and re-draw the lines of demarcation to avoid the truth. I'm always prepared for such tactics and expose them as tactics when expedient to do so.

I never get aggravated by the Jews not seeing the truth, nor do I get demoralized by the ridicule and insults of the herd. They are our herd and their lesser intelligence compels them to protect their long-held beliefs/values with such defense mechanisms. They will learn by repetition, eventually the truth will make more sense than the lies even if they heard the lies 100 times and the truth 10 times.

But they have to hear it for this to happen.


Angler

2004-02-22 18:28 | User Profile

Good stuff, travis. I would also add that it's a good precaution to use a different user ID on each board -- certainly different from anything one uses on "anti-Semitic" boards like this one! That makes it more difficult for the zhids to trace us back to OD, VNN, etc. :ninja:


travis

2004-02-22 18:52 | User Profile

Thanks, Angler, I forgot to mention that.

Once you are set up on several censored forums, whenever you get a good article to post, do so on all of them. Some Jews post articles constantly as this is easier than engaging in discussion and they have more ammo in this area. Keep an eye open for any articles with potential for multiple posting.

Also, take note of any participants that might be receptive to our ideas and make note of them for later. If ever you find yourself ready to move or change ISP for some reason, send these prospects PM's. Just before moving on, expose the Jews and get kicked off. After you get the new address, re-register in another name and start over. Use different tactics and wording so they won't accuse you of being the same person they banned.

Try to distinguish which gentiles are most intelligent and engage them in private offline tactful polite coversation about Jews. Let them back out when they are ready, they need time to reflect.

Establishing rapport on a forum is helpful. I've been on one forum for almost a year without "coming out", I just talk about one-worlders instead of Jews.


Okiereddust

2004-02-22 21:06 | User Profile

[QUOTE=travis]It's not that hard to point scrutiny at the Jews without using the "J" word. This of course flys in the face of the Linderite/VNN "name the jew" mantra.

If the strategy wasn't so dumb, I'd suspect it at some level was the work of provocaetuers.

Just stay in peripheral zones just outside of the taboo. The Jews on board will know instantly who you are. Keep them busy and don't let them get a hook in your mouth.

No doubt Travis - this is exactly the way so many of us tried to work FR for years. Over there though JR and Co. eventually got though to where the slightest beep against the Jews would get the attention of "Cachelot" "nopardons" etc, put you on the watch list, and get you thrown off shortly.

Some people still have the energy for it - I and others tire of it. I don't agree with Kurt on everything but he is right that "Conservatives" put up with charades too long. People have to have some wariness about when the wool is bein pulled over their eyes.

You can't be an anti-Semite for posting a Jewish author.

Oh yeah? Chomsky, Shamir, Finklestein - they won't get you thrown off as fast as Linder, but they eventually it ends up the same place.

Discuss the secret societies, espescially the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderbergers and the Trilateral Commission. Talk about the New World Odor (how it really smells) and the patriot act tyranny. You may even learn a lot about these subjects yourself. When they call you paranoid (they will) tell them one man's vigilance is another man's paranoia, and "the price of liberty is eternal vigilance". Refer to the public as "the TV addled masses" thus minimizing it's popularity. It's a war of ideas, SHOOT BACK.[/QUOTE]This of course is the mantra of the Spotlight, which is almost exactly the same as that of the John Birch Society.

Franco of course will tell you his opinion of Birchers :lol:


travis

2004-02-22 21:22 | User Profile

Okiereddust,

I understand the frustration, but most uncensored forums are not as you describe. You can in fact discuss one-worlders, neocons (thanks, AY), Bilderbergers, Chomsky, Shamir, Finkelstein etc.. without getting banned. I got banned from free republic, too and agree they are about the worst, but there are dozens of others and nobody is working them. Persistence against persistence, the Jews aren't going to stop. We are lucky we can fight this way and not in a muddy trench dodgin' hot lead.

Drain the pond, one pint at a time if necessary, and expose the alligators. It's OK, they won't bite. Please help.


Franco

2004-02-23 02:41 | User Profile

  1. This post makes good points.

--

  1. Okie wrote:

Franco of course will tell you his opinion of Birchers

Heh, heh...I was friends with a Bircher once. I tried to recruit him, to get him to see my way of thinking. No dice. He was just a conservative. We are no longer friends. In fact, he called me a "racist." Can you imagine that?