← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Franco
Thread ID: 12442 | Posts: 4 | Started: 2004-02-22
2004-02-22 04:33 | User Profile
Neo-Nazis and Reds and Arabs connected? Could it be? Golly.....if so, would that mean that some of the people here at OD are c-c-c-c-c-commies?
[url]http://www.thenewamerican.com/tna/1998/vo14no19/vo14no19_blackred.htm[/url]
edited
2004-02-22 05:54 | User Profile
[QUOTE=AntiYuppie]The Arabs in question are allies in the fight against this globalist ideology, and the NewAmerican should be supporting them rather than parroting the agenda of The Weekly Standard. What's next on the agenda, more talk of "Islamofascism?"[/QUOTE]
I've heard mention that quite a few Birchers are dispensationalists. Perhaps this accounts for the JBS's reluctance to criticize Israel.
What's interesting is that in this past 18 months or so of lead-up and prosecution of the Iraq mess, TNA has constantly railed against the UN boogeyman and all but avoided the neocon/zionist/dispensationalist angle. Heck, even lukewarm TAC--which is sold on newsstands--has had the balls to name the Likudniks and their tools.
2004-02-22 08:54 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Centinel]I've heard mention that quite a few Birchers are dispensationalists. Perhaps this accounts for the JBS's reluctance to criticize Israel.[/QUOTE]
Birchers state that their main goal is battle communism. Since Israel is not a communist state Birchers technically do not care about it at all. (I liken Israels form of goverance to jewish national socialism).
I guess Birchers could get involved in anti-zionism, but they would have to change the goals of their organization to do so.
2004-02-22 09:01 | User Profile
[QUOTE=FightinWhitey#2]Birchers state that their main goal is battle communism. Since Israel is not a communist state Birchers technically do not care about it at all. (I liken Israels form of goverance to jewish national socialism).
I guess Birchers could get involved in anti-zionism, but they would have to change the goals of their organization to do so.[/QUOTE]
Considering that zionist forces have hijacked American foreign policy and gotten us involved all over the world on interventionist missions that benefit a foreign country, it's a legit issue to tackle. Especially considering the large defense industry that benefits from this at taxpayer expense. Neocons are loathe to be called socialists when defense contractors feed at the government trough, but that's what they are. Murry Rothbard called it the "welfare-warfare state."