← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Hugh Lincoln

Social anarchy and zero tolerance

Thread ID: 12313 | Posts: 24 | Started: 2004-02-13

Wayback Archive


Hugh Lincoln [OP]

2004-02-13 20:55 | User Profile

Calling on ODers to help me out here.

There's this bifurcation happening in America, related obviously to the racial mess, in which we observe on the one hand a slide into the moral abyss and on the other a severe ratcheting of rules and laws and behavior. Some places experience the former (sexual behavior) and other the latter (mentions of sex around the office). You can screw a toaster and film yourself doing it, but mention to your female co-worker that she looks nice, and you're busted.

In our schools we have zero tolerance, but on TV we tolerate everything.

Howard Stern makes the crudest of comments on the radio, but if I smoke a cigarette in NYC I'm busted.

We can flap our jaws all day long about penises and vaginas and puppetry and monologues, but mention race and you're busted.

What's the pattern here? Is there one? Who's written about this? I have some thoughts but I'd like to hear y'alls.

One possible explanation: Jews love the sex stuff and hate the race stuff, therefore, here we are. But perhaps the thing I'm seeing is part of a bigger pattern: there's a sort of zero-sum nature to social misbehavior or a society's need to act out, and when you put the crimper on one part, it swells elsewhere. Or, the net total of misbehavior is just bigger.

Thanks in advance for your feedback and assistance in helping me to solidify my inchoate thought.


mwdallas

2004-02-14 18:03 | User Profile

[QUOTE]What's the pattern here? Is there one? [/QUOTE] The pattern is that there's an inconsistency in principle. But, as you recognize, principles are adhered to only insofar as they benefit the Tribe.


Hugh Lincoln

2004-02-14 19:41 | User Profile

Which would explain for the odd squeezes we witness. It's like we're trying to lasso moral entropy, and in frustration we pulled real tight on the stray calf we did manage to snag, but the rest of the herd is running rampant.

That David Wilson quote --- where's that from? A book he wrote?


il ragno

2004-02-15 01:51 | User Profile

[QUOTE]There's this bifurcation happening in America, related obviously to the racial mess...[/QUOTE]

Damn skippy. It's all about prioritizing the comfort of our eventual replacements.

Think for a minute of black anything: black behavior, black fashion, black lingo, black music and movies- in short, black culture. In no way would any of that be celebrated and encouraged if it were [I]whites [/I] doing it. On the contrary - they would be relentlessly attacked for doing the exact same things blacks get taken (and paid) seriously for doing. Animalistic behavior is rewarded: with fact-finding commissions seeking to fob off the responsibility on society, followed by torrents of federal monies - for 'enterprise zones', midnight basketball, and just about everything else under the sun short of bulk purchases of Cheez Doodles and Sunny Delight. Think of LA; think of Cincinnatti. Think of the NY Times' Pulitzer-winning RACE IN AMERICA series that never [I]once [/I] alluded to Wichita or Kris Kime or black-on-white prison rape. South Africa & Zimbabwe are [I]never [/I] in the news - unless the parents of a murdered white have magnanimously decided to "forgive" the murderers. Then the story will get a little play at least: it sends the right message ("resistance is futile").

Think of every incompetent boolie socially-promoted to a higher pay grade than you (that [I]you [/I] had to teach how to do his job!) and ask yourself if that could possibly happen with a white person, nepotism excepted. It's unthinkable. Object out loud, and you're in for a sensitivity seminar or twelve reminding you that what only seems like suicidally unjust favoritism towards clueless parasites is [I]fair and just [/I] because somebody in 1850 or 1890 or 1935 [I]who wasn't you [/I] was mean to black people and refused to give a barefoot illiterate who would f**k a turkey sandwich if he happened to find himself with an erection while at a lunch counter the key to the executive washroom and a date with his daughter.

The other day I happened to be watching a rap video (I forget which mushmouthed felon it was). A multiracial assortment of scantily-clad nubiles were lined up in a row, bent wayyy over and wiggling their heinies for the amusement of Kingfish and his dawgz, all of whom wore ostentatious displays of gold the way a jungle nog would wear bones and feathers to indicate he was the boss giraffe-chaser in the tribe. Lots of Benzes on display, too. The point of the 'lyric' was how Kingfish was the supreme of all time, rolling in wealth, with hot and cold running punanni at his beck and call - and he got it all by being unafraid - hell, [B]eager [/B] - to pull out a gun and murder anyone who displeased him in any way, with a hundred-ape posse for backup in case he ran out of bullets. Anyone who's seen rap videos knows this describes - [I]ohhh[/I]- say, about..... 90% of them.

Now ask yourself what would the reaction be if these were whites instead - and not just whites, but hostile, race-conscious whites. (Did I mention one of the few words not bleeped out of that video was 'devil'?) Nigga [I]pleez[/I]: poor ol' Robert Palmer took [I]years [/I] of abuse in the media simply for having sexy girls playing musical instruments (who [I]didn't [/I] bend over and rub up against his crotch) in his videos.

This is the kind of thing schoolyard bullies engage in: you step up the abuse and use the level of resistance you're finding as a gauge to guide how much further you can ratchet it up the next time. Unless you turn around - no talking, no pushing, no threats, just BAM! - and loosen a few teeth in the punk's head, you're a goner. And the longer you wait to hit back, the harder you're gonna have to hit him. Right now we're at the stage where Brazilian-style paramilitary death squads are about the only viable measure left to put the fear of God into them and send the message [I]the party's over; get back in your ratholes and behave.[/I]

I understand the role Jews play in all this but blacks and ese's are like the Dobermans they ring their compound with. Until you neutralize those dogs, you're [I]never [/I] getting inside that house. All the VNN spintros in the world won't change that single immutable fact.


Robbie

2004-02-15 02:14 | User Profile

[QUOTE=il ragno]Nigga [I]pleez[/I]: poor ol' Robert Palmer took [I]years [/I] of abuse in the media simply for having sexy girls playing musical instruments (who [I]didn't [/I] bend over and rub up against his crotch) in his videos.[/QUOTE]

Of course, it was considered "genderist" to have those sexy models playing the instruments in Robert Palmer's videos, yet when faux-Injun Shania Twain used that exact formula in one of her videos using men instead, nobody said a word about it.


Ponce

2004-02-15 02:28 | User Profile

Now that I have learned how to do it I'll be posting many of these links. This is a letter from the Sematic Jews to Bush about the Zionist Jews [url]http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com/Newsletters/063003Bush.htm[/url]

This one what Shoron told Peres about who is the boss in the USA. .[url]http://www.rense.com/general45/sharonsinfamouscomment.htm[/url]

What is going on in the Zionist state of Israel. [url]http://www.ifamericansknew.org/[/url]

Zionist Jews are not real Jews, but Khazards from Central Asia. [url]http://www.stormfront.org/whitehistory/hwr61.htm[/url]

The Protocol of the Learned Elders of Zion,,,,Master plan of the Zionists. Long version. [url]http://www.aztlan.net/protocols.htm[/url]

Another Potocol, I like this one better. [url]http://www.endtimeprophecy.net/~tttbbs/EPN-1/GroupPages/grupcnsp.html[/url]

Jews against Zionism [url]http://www.rense.com/Datapages/zionismdata.htm[/url]

I do have many more links, including the ones that give names of every Jew that were incharge of the Comminism Party ........


N.B. Forrest

2004-02-15 03:32 | User Profile

A great post, IR, as usual. No one has a sharper rhetorical scalpel than you do, my friend. Your stuff never fails to please.

As a hopeless sneer addict, I too sneak a daily peek at da bling-bling brillos pimp-rollin' on BET & MurrayVision. It's always - always - the same ol' shit. It's either the troops of gold-toof Cheetahs looking like tattooed two year-olds in their billowing sports jerseys making alpha monkey gesticulations, or it's the nigsuited Smooth Playa with the patented cocked-homburg-on-the-do-rag blowin' cigar smoke through pillowy lips as hoes of various hue snuggle up nice 'n' close. And always the in-yer-face displays of outrageous numbers of "Benjamins" being pissed away on the tackiest crap imaginable. It's fun-loving Shecky's way of taunting head-barely-above-water Whitey and reminding him just who's the boss now: "See all those Lamborghinis & Bentleys, schmuck? And that McMansion with the walk-in closets and the cushy home movie theater? We gave all that to those ugly, stupid, murdering schvartzes - but you'll nevah have any of it, will ya?"

In the end, the gutter coons, the speeks and their tapir enablers will all have to be driven out or composted. That simple


il ragno

2004-02-15 03:55 | User Profile

Ever see THE MAN WHO WOULD BE KING, N.B.?

Rhetoric-wise, if I'm Danny, then you're Peachy.


N.B. Forrest

2004-02-15 04:11 | User Profile

[QUOTE=il ragno]Ever see THE MAN WHO WOULD BE KING, N.B.?

Rhetoric-wise, if I'm Danny, then you're Peachy.[/QUOTE]

Selah, Bruvvuh Dravott.


FightinWhitey#2

2004-02-15 09:28 | User Profile

[QUOTE]One possible explanation: Jews love the sex stuff and hate the race stuff, therefore, here we are. [/QUOTE]

If one wanted to play up the jew angle they could observe that the Talmud and myriad other jewish sacred texts are [B]filled with all sorts of descriptions of perverse sex acts and sexual matters.[/B]

Some are so gross that I will not offend readers here by posting any examples (Lots of Paleo-Con Christians on this board, right?), they are available all over the internet though...


Recluse

2004-02-15 09:47 | User Profile

[QUOTE=N.B. Forrest]As a hopeless sneer addict, I too sneak a daily peek at da bling-bling brillos pimp-rollin' on BET & MurrayVision[/QUOTE]

When I watch, two things always come to mind - accelerating devolution and where that will eventually lead, followed a sudden urge to get a shot of penicillin. To me, every shake of that steatopygian rear end translates into another White tax dollar being wasted in an inner city STD clinic. :wallbash:


Hugh Lincoln

2004-02-16 00:06 | User Profile

IR, you've mentioned your blacks-before-Jews theory before, and I'm intrigued. Are you sure about this? I mean, I've come to think of blacks as so much chattel, none of whom would have much animation were it not for the Jewish hand on the journalistic, legal, government and academic mind-levers. Seems to me that this is what needs neutralizing first, and the rest will fall off like a big, dead, black and brown tumor robbed of its Jewish blood flow. Whites + blacks historically has meant for decent separation, established boundaries and an intuitive knowledge of place. Whites + blacks + Jews = disaster. I almost wonder if an America of only blacks and whites wouldn't be preferable even to an America of only whites and Jews. Seriously.


il ragno

2004-02-16 01:26 | User Profile

Where the rubber hits the road is quality of life and personal safety. Jews don't do Wichita; even if you think they set the gears in motion to allow such to happen. You still require a conscienceless animal who can summon the will to kill with an eyeblink to enact the atrocity. Hey, you live in the same pesthole [I]I [/I] do - whose sudden appearance in your 10pm subway car involuntarily tightens your sphincter and puts you in combat-ready mode: five brillos or five Hasidim?

Jews' plots inevitably backfire on them; we all know this. But before the blowback touches them, we're already long mired in it. Anybody who seriously thinks disappearing a few hundred thousand Jews is going to convince a mad-dog underclass, armed to the teeth and now irrevocably devolved closer to savagery than ever before in American history, to put down the uzi and the crackpipe and return quietly to the back of the bus is kidding themselves.

Where we are is where we are; you don't let your house burn down passively, and leave the arsonist be to think about what he did, so you can drive across town to accost the guy who sold him the matches.


N.B. Forrest

2004-02-16 02:50 | User Profile

Yes, the knuckledraggers urgently need to be dealt with, but of course the thing standing in the way of the proven old school "kill/rape Whitey this afternoon-hang/roast tonight" immediate justice that alone can strike the essential impulse-controlling terror in the hearts of these dimwitted beasts is a jeww-brainwashed Johnny Law equipped all the most sophisticated investigative tools White science can devise.

That is one hell of a formidable obstacle - and one that should give any righteously enraged White man considering a little free-lance retribution serious pause.


mwdallas

2004-02-16 02:52 | User Profile

[QUOTE=il ragno]Where the rubber hits the road is quality of life and personal safety. Jews don't do Wichita; even if you think they set the gears in motion to allow such to happen. You still require a conscienceless animal who can summon the will to kill with an eyeblink to enact the atrocity. [/QUOTE] Lazar Kaganovich, perhaps?


il ragno

2004-02-16 03:07 | User Profile

[QUOTE]Lazar Kaganovich, perhaps?[/QUOTE]

Ouch! [I]Touche[/I], my nigga.


Franco

2004-02-16 03:46 | User Profile

Il Ragno wrote:

Where the rubber hits the road is quality of life and personal safety. .

Wow. Great quote. Someone should write that down....wait a second...



MadScienceType

2004-02-16 16:22 | User Profile

That is one hell of a formidable obstacle - and one that should give any righteously enraged White man considering a little free-lance retribution serious pause.

True, but I think a lot of that "they always get their (White) man" boilerplate is sheer propaganda for public consumption designed to make the cattle stay in the pen, no matter how great the restlessness. In actuality, affirmative action has had negative consequences for "law enforcement" of even greater proportion than society overall. I mean, they still can't catch that idiot potshotting cars in Ohio, and all these "terror attacks" by mail draw thunderous denunciations but mostly a whole lotta question marks, and need I lay odds on whether or not Mongomery County's Finest would still be dilligently cavity-searching every White driver of a delivery van to this day had not the Mohammed/Malvo duo gotten a case of the stupid braggodocios? (granted, they're monkeys, so they couldn't help demanding "props" from the Man, but still, you see my point?) In a lot of cases, with the exception of lucky breaks, it seems that perps are caught by simply being too stupid to keep their mouths shut or knowing when to quit. The latter is what's gonna burn the Ohio guy.

Totally not recommending that you run out and test this hypothesis or do anything remotely illegal, but I sense a real "man behind the curtain" feeling in all the propaganda designed to shore up the omnipotence of your friendly neighborhood ZOG-trooper. If you can get the "enemy" to quit without fighting by simply intimidating him, all the cheaper!


N.B. Forrest

2004-02-17 08:43 | User Profile

What you say is correct, MST. Yes, I understand that all these FBI Files-type investigation shows we see on Court TV and so on are a type of goy control propaganda aimed particularly at spooking disgruntled White men who might be itching to get frisky. And I also understand that these coppers are far from all-seeing (they don't make shows about their many failures, eh?) I just meant that making the Big Jump from rhetoric to bloodshed is definately not one to be taken lightly, since it could well mean a dose of the Hot Juice, or at least spending the rest of ones life locked in a living tomb with amorous D'Quincios.

You're also correct about the fact that most crooks get caught because they become reckless, or they're just too stoopid to keep their tater traps shut. That Ohio sniper loon is a classic case of one who doesn't know when to stop when he's "ahead", if you will.


MadScienceType

2004-02-17 18:21 | User Profile

I just meant that making the Big Jump from rhetoric to bloodshed is definately not one to be taken lightly, since it could well mean a dose of the Hot Juice, or at least spending the rest of ones life locked in a living tomb with amorous D'Quincios.

Amen! Nothing triggers buyer's remorse like a shootin' war that nobody thought out beforehand, to paraphrase IR from somewhere.

I think it behooves "us" to neither overinflate nor despise our enemies. The former leads to paralysis, while the latter leads to the "victory disease" that the Japs paid dearly for and that Bush and the Freeper cheerleaders have in abundance, so long as they're not the ones getting shot. I think we're all gonna pay dearly for it in this case.


Marlowe

2004-02-23 20:14 | User Profile

[QUOTE=N.B. Forrest] but of course the thing standing in the way ...is a jeww-brainwashed Johnny Law equipped all the most sophisticated investigative tools White science can devise.

That is one hell of a formidable obstacle - and one that should give any righteously enraged White man considering a little free-lance retribution serious pause.[/QUOTE]

Ever watch the program "Cops?" I must admit, those fools SCARE me. Maybe that's by design, in which case, I should stop watching. Still, each program provides an example of unrestrained violence, often with the camera centered so that a brutal joint lock is juuussst out of sight.

Four or five 200+lb men will pile on a perp with the full weight of their bodies focused, via the patella, on the kidney, the neck, the coccyx. During the pile-up, they are told to "relax!", and to "quit resisting!". Perps are told to 'get up!' after being nigger-piled. When they can't, they are lifted bodily by the cuffs, which are behind the back. All of this hurts.

And to think, they're being escorted to a filthy cell with a high incidence of black on white rape...not to mention the open advocacy of torture/interrogation methods...f**k! (This is known as being "processed")

It gives me serious pause to even post a quick note at OD. I suppose I'm a little paranoid, but "Cops" shows how easily these guys (and gals...sh*t, don't get me started here) will bust down a door with an iron battering ram (soon they'll be decorated like in Return of the King), screaming "relax".

Cops. "we serve and protect"?
THe slogan should be changed to "Relax! Quit Resisting and Be Processed!"


il ragno

2004-02-23 21:25 | User Profile

All cop shows scare me, and they have ever since the Cop replaced the Cowboy in American mythology. COPS - the show - is simply unbelievable in its dead-on depiction of how venal, clueless and robotic the average cop is these days...not unlike real life pix of riot cops at any large protest, all decked out like Darth Vader's Praetorian Guard with tinted visors to boot. I watched one episode where a half-dozen carabinieri dogpiled a drunk who was 65 years old, minimum. Guns drawn, hoarse shouts of "don't move!" and "stay down!" yelled into the face of an old rummy who'd probably broken a bone or two in the fall. Of course, regardless of the perp's old age, they cuffed him in front of the gathering crowd of onlookers. Then again, they'd cuff your grandma if she failed a breathalyzer. It's all about playing to that crowd and sending the right message: [I]obey the law [/I] even - especially - if we add a few hundred new laws to the books every damn year. And remember that ignorance of the law is no excuse - shucks, that's half the fun!

But the show that really scares the bejeezus out of me are the various LAW & ORDER clones. Every week, we get to watch self-righteous social engineers-in-blue champing at the bit, hanging on pins and needles waiting for the slimmest official ok by a superior to begin eagerly plowing through bank records, medical histories, phone logs, lugging out computers and file cabinets, looking for anything that might yield dirt of any kind, whether germane to the case or not, sio they can begin their 'interrogations' [mostly consisting of painting grinning scenarios of prison rape awaiting the suspect who doesn't come clean or turn rat].

It reminds me of what I once heard an old timer say when he first saw the checkmark on a NY State tax form by which the taxpayer could add an extra dollar to his taxes towards a fund to buy cops bulletproof vests. "On top of everything else, they want a buck [I]more[/I], for bulletproof vests! Yeah, I'll give em the dollar - if I can donate $1.50 extra so crooks can buy armor-piercing shells!"


Hugh Lincoln

2004-02-23 21:51 | User Profile

They're venal, clueless and robotic, but they're usually white and aren't confused about what the do-raggers think of them. That said, my personal knowledge of cops tells me that it's a lesser percentage of them who are good characters. A lot --- including whites --- are just overgrown boys who see no problem with lying, stealing or cheating, because "the system" is against them, too. Which it may be. Who'd want to be a cop these days when your best efforts are rewarded with a citizen complaint, a newspaper story portraying you as evil and a civil suit by Stuart Goldstein, Esq.?

"Hey, you live in the same pesthole I do - whose sudden appearance in your 10pm subway car involuntarily tightens your sphincter and puts you in combat-ready mode: five brillos or five Hasidim?"

The brillos, to be sure, but I also experience sphincter-constriction upon flipping open the A Section of the NYT to read that Marc Moran, a New Jersey councilman, is a member of a "white supremacist group." Whereas, in a just world, the story would say, "Marc Moran, a brave white man willing to buck the odds to save his race, announced his membership in the National Alliance, a highly patriotic group currently fighting to spread the word about Jewish corrpution of America."


Hugh Lincoln

2004-02-26 14:29 | User Profile

OK, back to topic. Gentlemen, here is an example of what I'm talking about. See how Stern's sex was OK, but mix it with race, and kaboom.

Feb 25, 11:53 PM (ET)

By Steve Gorman LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Radio station giant Clear Channel Communications Inc. said on Wednesday it was dumping nationally syndicated shock jock Howard Stern from its stations under a new "zero tolerance" policy toward indecency.

In dropping Stern from its six radio outlets that carry his show, Clear Channel cited his interview on Tuesday with Rick Salomon, the man who was filmed having sex with hotel heiress and TV reality star Paris Hilton in a video widely distributed on Internet porn sites.

According to a transcript of the show released by San Antonio, Texas-based Clear Channel, Stern asked Salomon if he engaged in anal sex and referred to the size of his penis. Using a racist term, a caller to the show asked Solomon if he had ever had sex with any famous black women.

The action against Stern came a day after Clear Channel fired Florida radio personality "Bubba the Love Sponge," after federal regulators accused him of airing sexually graphic material on Tampa's WXTB-FM and three other Florida stations.

Stern's New York-based show is syndicated by Infinity Broadcasting, a unit of Viacom Inc., which also owns television networks CBS and MTV. Infinity operates 185 radio stations nationwide.

A spokesman for Infinity was not immediately available for comment and a Viacom spokesman declined comment. Neither Stern's agent nor producers of his show were immediately available for comment.

Viacom president Mel Karmazin reportedly has imposed a crackdown on sexually explicit material on Infinity stations, declaring in a recent company-wide conference call: "This company won't be a poster child for indecency."

But it was unclear what impact, if any, such an admonition would have on Stern, who has long defied federal regulators and spawned countless imitators with a ribald show featuring porn stars and strippers and bits like "Lesbian Dial-a-Date."

'ZERO TOLERANCE'

The action against the self-proclaimed "King of All Media" came after Clear Channel announced what Chief Operating Officer Mark Mays called a "zero tolerance" policy toward material deemed in violation of federal broadcast decency standards.

"Clear Channel drew a line in the sand today with regard to protecting our listeners from indecent content, and Howard Stern's show blew right through it," Clear Channel Radio president John Hogan said in a statement.

"It was vulgar, offensive and insulting, not just to women and African Americans but to anyone with a sense of common decency."

The San Antonio-based company, the largest U.S. radio station operator with more than 1,200 outlets, said it will amend contracts with all on-air personalities to hold disc jockeys financially responsible for indecent comments on-air.

The Stern show was carried by Clear Channel stations in six markets -- Fort Lauderdale, Rochester, Orlando, San Diego, Pittsburgh, and Louisville.

The policy changes are the latest taken by broadcasters to address decency concerns following the Feb. 1 CBS telecast of the Super Bowl half-time show, when pop diva Janet Jackson's right breast was exposed on live television.

Said Hogan: "If a DJ is found to be in violation of FCC rules, there will be no appeals and no intermediate steps. If they break the law by broadcasting indecent material, they will not work for Clear Channel."

Hogan and other broadcast executives are slated to testify Thursday before Congress about broadcast standards.

Gordon Hodge, a media analyst with Thomas Weisel, said he doubted the move would have much financial impact on Clear Channel, given that it carried Stern's show in just six markets, and added "He's obviously a very popular personality. I can't image that Infinity would take him off the air."

He predicted that other stations in the six markets would pick up Stern's program. "It would be quite profitable (for a smaller company), he said.

Clear Channel's share price closed on Wednesday 52 cents higher on the New York Stock Exchange AT $43.44.

(Additional reporting by Jonathan Stempel and Jeremy Pelofsky in New York and Sue Zeidler in Los Angeles)