← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Buster
Thread ID: 12267 | Posts: 6 | Started: 2004-02-11
2004-02-11 18:58 | User Profile
Whose head is going to roll over no Iraqi WMD's?
They tried to dump Tenet. He didn't go down so easy. They tried to blame Clinton and his CIA budget cutbacks. No good. No one at the cabinet level is going. Even something symbolic would be better than nothing. Otherwise, Bush is saying, "Yeah, we're incompetent. That's OK by me!"
Predictions please.
2004-02-12 08:26 | User Profile
I would not be surprised if Vice President Cheney goes down.
Jorge Boosh seems to be obsessed with courting minority votes this time around (read: immigration plan) and getting rid of the stereotypical Evil White Man Cheney ("he fooled me on those weapons", Jorge will say) will allow Jorge Boosh to bring in Condi Rice. Booshes America is a diverse America will be the campaign slogan.
Although Cheney is a powerful ally of the neo-con establishment, in a second term will they really miss him? All those OSP guys and other jews will be back.
Also take into consideration that Cheney is already hella old and has a history of health problems.
2004-02-12 09:04 | User Profile
Forgive my mawkish sentimentality but there is no surer sign of America's utter decline than the total lack of personal honor in the scum we routinely elect to office.
Once, such a scandal as this would result in shame-faced resignations. (Actually, we should've already witnessed a series of them leading [I]up [/I] to this.) But I suppose that when you have no honor, then the word "disgrace" has no meaning whatsoever, and betraying your country for personal gain & foreign interests is nothing more than a minor embarrassment: a thorny position to wiggle out of; a litmus test for your capacities for guile and cleverness.
2004-02-12 10:01 | User Profile
Buster,
No telling. I figure that they will hang all of this on Tenet. I hear people in the neo-con media hollering for his neck now while completely overlooking the O.S.P. Tenet will probably take the 30 pieces of silver and be happy, unless they really go overboard with the blame. Il Ragno is correct. The people who hold office today are the worst in American history, in my opinion. Beliefs like courage, honor and integrity are something only to be paid lip service to. For most of them the important thing is to amass as much money as possible and run with it to some position on the board of a multinational corporation where they will have their asses kissed by those who wish to emulate them. The sense of values today is exactly 180 degrees from what it should be. The only way I can see more people getting in trouble over this is if there are indictments of the Jews (yes, this sounds like one of their tricks) who leaked the information about Amb. Wilson's wife. Then it could get interesting.
2004-02-12 10:19 | User Profile
I totally agree, il ragno. And the fact that Americans tolerate this sort of crap from "their" government reflects very badly on this nation.
We all know which Tribe is to blame, but there's a bit more too it than that. We have to ask: What vulnerabilities did the Jews exploit? Well, here's an important one: From the very beginning, there should have been provisions in the US Constitution for the prosecution of any politician who breaks his or her oath of office or violates the public trust. Every single member of Congress who voted to delegate the powers of war declaration to the president should be on trial right now. The president and his officials should be under indictment for lying to the nation. If we Americans wish to refer to "our" government officials as "public servants," then it makes sense for us to treat them correspondingly: as our servants, not our masters.
Come to think of it, such provision for criminal proceedings against oath-violaters would likely have at least slowed the decline of the American republic into a mob-ruled, multicultural timebomb. Each time Congressmen tried to authorize aid to Israel, they would have had to worry about prosecution. Each time Schumer or Feinstein tried to push a gun-control bill, they'd end up in front of a grand jury. This wouldn't be a panacea for our ills, but if nothing else, it would have eliminated the veneer of legitimacy that allows the Jew-controlled federal government to get away with so many abuses. (Ideally, of course, there would be no Jews in the nation in the first place, let alone in office!)
2004-02-12 11:27 | User Profile
"Whose head is going to roll over no Iraqi WMD's?"
In a sane world, they'd dump Wolfowitz and the whole Office of Special Plans cabal that actually ARE largely to blame for this fiasco. Obviously, that won't happen. Instead, I believe the heads Bush & Cheney themselves will roll, come November....