← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Hugh Lincoln

O'Reilly Latest to Doubt Bush

Thread ID: 12251 | Posts: 19 | Started: 2004-02-10

Wayback Archive


Hugh Lincoln [OP]

2004-02-10 18:03 | User Profile

[url]http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20040210/people_nm/campaign_bush_oreilly_dc_3[/url]

Amusing turn of events here. I don't normally put much stock in the "white proms are evil" Bill O'Reilly, but that's why this news is significant. He hovers around a sort of Fox/New York Post/Weekly Standard thingy.


il ragno

2004-02-10 18:09 | User Profile

Ride's almost over, Dubya - the Jews are beginning to bail. And just like the [B]Romans [/B] killed Jesus, history will remember [B]you [/B] as the would-be conquistador who ushered in a century of terrorism while bankrupting his own countrymen. The words "Jews" and "Israel" will barely rate a mention when the Goldhagens of tomorrow get through with you.....


xmetalhead

2004-02-10 18:29 | User Profile

Blowhard O'Reilly should eat shit instead of crow. Any rational, sensible person knows that there's at least two sides to almost all stories and Bill shouldn't have shouted down the anti-war people on his shows. Furthermore, he should also apologize to Jacques Chirac for spewing so much hate against [I]la belle France [/I] during the war build up. Do you know how many moronic, idiotic Americans led by O'Reilly deprived themselves of the best wine in the world while also hurting the economy of our oldest ally?!?!?!?! O'Reilly should pay the difference. And, of course, the deaths of so many people lay squarely on people like O'Reilly who pied-pipered the masses to commit mass death.

In any case, the sad, predictable scenario plays itself out again, with hapless goyim like Bush, Tenet, Kay, Powell taking 2000F heat in the press whilst the hideous cockaroaches Wolfewitz, Perle, Frum, Feith, Kristol, Safire, et al, all scurry so quickly under stove!! What a disappearing act! Who? What? Where???


il ragno

2004-02-10 19:06 | User Profile

Forget Chirac. Remember the antiwar son of the guy who died at the WTC whom O'Reilly badgered and degraded on air? "You're a disgrace to your father's memory, your dad would have wanted this war, CUT HIS MIKE! CUT HIS MIKE!"

A public apology to that fellow, in prime time, is more than called for. Don't hold your breath.


Marlowe

2004-02-10 19:25 | User Profile

[QUOTE=AntiYuppie]The most visible scapegoat at the moment seems to be Colin Powell, which is rather strange considering that Powell probably had more reservations about the war than anyone else in the Bush administration. That makes him a perfect choice for a scapegoat - [/QUOTE]

[URL=http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/10/14/60II/main577975.shtml]C H U M P ![/URL]


Walter Yannis

2004-02-10 19:43 | User Profile

[QUOTE]we all know that those who actually engineered the lie (Wolfowitz, Frum, Perle, and Ledeen, all on cue from Weekly Standard think-tank ideologues) will never take the fall for it. [/QUOTE]

We'll get those scumbags, Antiyuppie.

Just give it time. History will repeat itself, and the mob will turn on them too.

Walter


il ragno

2004-02-10 20:40 | User Profile

[QUOTE]O'Reilly said he was "much more skeptical about the Bush administration now" since former weapons inspector David Kay said he did not think Saddam had any weapons of mass destruction.

While critical of President Bush, O'Reilly said he did not think the president intentionally lied. [B]Rather, O'Reilly blamed CIA Director George Tenet, who was appointed by former President Bill Clinton. "I don't know why Tenet still has his job." [/B]

He added: "I think every American should be very concerned for themselves that our intelligence is not as good as it should be."[/QUOTE]

Yeah...I shoulda known. [I]Clinton did it[/I]....again.A totally bogus 'apology' from a totally bogus 'journalist'. And why in perdition is O'Reilly 'apologizing' to Joe Sixpack when his apologies ought to be directed to

a) the US servicemen who have now, sadly, fought & died for nothing; and

b) the 10,000+ plus dead Iraqis who also died for nothing - whose far-away, sponsored-by-Burger King death agonies scuttling thing O'Reilly pep-rallied the country into jeering at with no pangs of conscience whatsoever.

On the other hand, perhaps this augurs well. Usually the default setting for neos and their shabs is [I]so what if there were never any WMDs? We liberated a benighted populace from a tyrannical madman, the better to civilize them with democracy's blessings, such as GIRLS GONE WILD tapes and PlayStations [/I]. Suddenly, I'm not hearing that...as if there are more damning revelations in the wings and the co-conspirators are arranging their alibis now.

Heck, we don't even need to speculate what might be in the offing; it's sure to be something that was public knowledge for years but willfully ignored. Like for instance the curious findings - and still curiouser chronological timeline - of the Project For A New American Century, a year and change [I]before [/I] 9/11.

Sure, [B]we [/B] all knew (and squawked) about it then - but that's not how Our Free Press works any longer. If/when that tidbit breaks, it will be treated as though it is only now being brought to light.

Whichever way they spin it, Bush and the Jews who wound him up - and their goyishe tools - are all guilty of mass murder. Since Dubya never had a problem signing an execution order before, one wonders what born-again Christian epiphany will stay his executive pen should the shit [B]really [/B] hit the fan on this.

JAIL TO THE CHIEF!


Buster

2004-02-10 20:55 | User Profile

[QUOTE=xmetalhead]Blowhard O'Reilly should eat shit instead of crow. ...

In any case, the sad, predictable scenario plays itself out again, with hapless goyim like Bush, Tenet, Kay, Powell taking 2000F heat in the press whilst the hideous cockaroaches Wolfewitz, Perle, Frum, Feith, Kristol, Safire, et al, all scurry so quickly under stove!! What a disappearing act! Who? What? Where???[/QUOTE]

Pace, X-man, I believe Tenet is part of the tribe also. And to be fair, he stepped up to the plate the other day.

It was these scummy pols who knew what they wanted to believe and figured they were safe based on past performance. They heard what they wanted to hear.

Chirac and the Krauts and the European left should be crowing in triumph and rage.

Bush would be in worse trouble if Kerrey hadn't supported the war also.

As for Bill O, he beat the tom-toms for war more than anyone but Limbaugh, I presume at the behest of Rupert. He cannot apologize enough for me.


madrussian

2004-02-10 20:57 | User Profile

[QUOTE=xmetalhead]hideous cockaroaches Wolfewitz, Perle, Frum, Feith, Kristol, Safire, et al, all scurry so quickly under stove!! What a disappearing act! Who? What? Where???[/QUOTE]

Should have read "Vhat? Vhere?"


Hugh Lincoln

2004-02-10 22:53 | User Profile

Rest assured Jews will face no justice, as usual. The depressing thing is that the Gentiles who've had the tail pinned on them are typically too dense to figure out what hit 'em.


jay

2004-02-11 01:03 | User Profile

[QUOTE=il ragno]Since Dubya never had a problem signing an execution order before, one wonders what born-again Christian epiphany will stay his executive pen should the shit [B]really [/B] hit the fan on this.

JAIL TO THE CHIEF![/QUOTE]

Actually, I kinda like his fervent support of the death penalty.

In 2000, when I was wavering, he fried that dude down in Texas, and that got my vote.

-Jay


il ragno

2004-02-11 03:29 | User Profile

Well, Bush and his cronies have now killed more people than ALL the crackheads in Texas. Let him char-broil on Ol' Sparky.

And I'm not joking about seeking the death penalty for Dubya and Co. These guys don't fear censure, or fine, or a telechiding from Chris Mathews - would you? Jail is a joke, since they either all skate or get sent to country clubs; no hulking black rapists lie in wait for disgraced members of the legislative, judicial or executive branches.

For everyone who ever wanted [I]meaningful [/I] "change" in Washington, not all the checks and balances on Earth will put the fear of God into the Beltway elect who rule us like kings like a little itty-bitty [I]lethal injection[/I] or two. Guarantee the rest of em - those who choose to remain in politics - would tread very very carefully for the next 50 years. And fewer of them would retire multi-millionaires after a career in "public service", too.


Sertorius

2004-02-11 04:37 | User Profile

[QUOTE]"I don't know why Tenet still has his job."

O'Reilly knows better than this. Like the rest of FOX News' talking heads he is aware of the Office of Special Plans and who is involved with it.

He added: "I think every American should be very concerned for themselves that our intelligence is not as good as it should be."[/QUOTE]

Some of us are and go to great lengths to get folks like O'Reilly to do their jobs and report this stuff. I love how he can sit there and keep a straight face while he runs his mouth ignoring not the man behind the curtin, the s.o.b. is standing out there in full view for those who will see.

That's right, everything is the fault of Clinton with the neo-cons. For their readers and listeners all history (except slavery and the "holocaust", of course) begins with Clinton and nothing that occurred previously is worth studying. (except the "holocaust") While I am not absolving Clinton for a moment I recognize the real reason they dislike him so much is because he wasn't as docile as Bush when it came to Israel. If Clinton had adopted their policies they would have supported him and praised him the same why they do Bush despite Clinton's trangressions.

O'Reilly's statement doesn't go anywhere near wiping the slate clean of the blood he and his fellow neo-cons have all over themselves and the disgrace and dishonor they have brought to America. That can only come about when they are held accountable in a court of law for at the very least, sedition.


Angler

2004-02-11 06:01 | User Profile

[QUOTE=il ragno]Forget Chirac. Remember the antiwar son of the guy who died at the WTC whom O'Reilly badgered and degraded on air? "You're a disgrace to your father's memory, your dad would have wanted this war, CUT HIS MIKE! CUT HIS MIKE!"

A public apology to that fellow, in prime time, is more than called for. Don't hold your breath.[/QUOTE] That guy should have beaten the living dog crap out of O'Reilly right then and there.


Wayland

2004-02-11 06:48 | User Profile

[QUOTE=il ragno]a) the US servicemen who have now, sadly, fought & died for nothing[/QUOTE] [IMG]http://www.cartoonistgroup.com/properties/peters/art_images/MP092403.jpg[/IMG]


Walter Yannis

2004-02-11 16:38 | User Profile

[QUOTE]"I don't know why Tenet still has his job." [/QUOTE]

He not only has his job, but he got a huge promotion in the form of an enormous budget increase.

That went for the FBI, too.

So, in 9-11 we have the spectacle of at least a massive failure on the part of both the FBI and the CIA, but instead of responsible people getting fired, they get rewarded. Absurd. The world doesn't work that way. They got awarded because they brought their mission to success - it's just that they don't admit what their real mission was.

Heck, there were admissions that they knew about this, but the failure to act is chalked up to "miscommunications." Remember that woman FBI agent from Minnesota (I think?). She and her report have gone down the memory hole. Along with that Fox News report about Israel controlling our phone records and the stories about the Izzy art students slapping each other high fives as the towers collapsed.

There's litte doubt in my mind that 9-11 was a MOSSAD/CIA operation. In fact, that's the only theory that explains facts like people who admit f*ckups that resulted in 3,000 American deaths not only avoid the chopping block but actually get promoted.

Walter


madrussian

2004-02-11 17:41 | User Profile

Are the parents of those who've died going to make some noise after the realization, however hard it will be to accept, that their children died in vain, while killing innocent Iraqis in a criminal war?


il ragno

2004-02-11 20:24 | User Profile

At least the parents of those who died [I]in combat [/I] can take some succor in that fact, however bitter.

But what of all the parents of Iraq-war suicides?

[url]http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/01/29/eveningnews/main596755.shtml[/url]


jay

2004-02-12 03:49 | User Profile

[QUOTE=il ragno]At least the parents of those who died [I]in combat [/I] can take some succor in that fact, however bitter.

But what of all the parents of Iraq-war suicides?

[url]http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/01/29/eveningnews/main596755.shtml[/url][/QUOTE]

Il, that's certainly a tragedy, but I don't feel the same sympathy for them that I do the combat deaths.

Suicide is NEVER an option, unless perhaps you are paralyzed or have terminal illness. Most of these troops are volunteers (I could be wrong)....and if you volunteer for the US army, you have to know that these scumbags in D.C. will send you wherever they want you for whatever bullshit war they deem necessary.

Killing oneself is not o.k. They bear some responsibility. Combat deaths, bare far less.

-Jay