← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Julian the Apostate
Thread ID: 12247 | Posts: 10 | Started: 2004-02-10
2004-02-10 09:24 | User Profile
[url]http://www.peterboroughtoday.co.uk/ViewArticlemore2.aspx?SectionID=845&ArticleID=736856[/url]
In the English city of Peterborough a planned march in memory of a young white man killed in an unprovoked attack by a 'pack of Asians' is likely to be banned says the local police chief. This didn't surprise me. Marches by the National Front have been banned in the past and this generates little adverse comment by the British media. What did shock me was the response of the father of the murdered youth is condemning the march arguing that it is wrong to cash in on his son's name. All rather ironical given that his son might very well be alive today if the NF had of had their way a few years back...Perhaps blood isn't as thick as it once was...
NATIONAL FRONT: March not acceptable, says police chief
The right-wing extremist group claimed a march and wreath-laying ceremony on March 6 would be in ''honour'' of the dead 17-year-old. Ross was murdered by three Asian men in a frenzied attack in Bourges Boulevard, Peterborough, in September 2001.
[B]But his father, Tony, of Bozeat Way, Westwood, accused the National Front of trying to cash in on Ross's death.
Mr Parker said: "I think it is wrong to use his name for their political gains.
"It is fair enough to do something in memory of Ross, but they will use it for their political gains ââ¬â to me that's wrong[/B] "I wouldn't have thought the police would be too happy and it is down to them at the end of the day."
But Superintendent Mick Gipp said so far no application had been made for permission. He added: "It is extremely unlikely we would condone that sort of behaviour.
"If they did apply it is more than likely that we would go to the Home Secretary in an effort to get him to ban it.
City MP Helen Clark, said: "[B]We're a very happy city in Peterborough. There are 42 different nationalities living here and we have lived together in happy harmony. We are very welcoming to new nationalities and we do not want these people in our city.'' [/B]
2004-02-10 09:56 | User Profile
Who cares. The NF (note: no connection to the NF which enjoyed popular success in the 1970s) are morons.
2004-02-11 06:29 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Jim]Who cares. The NF (note: no connection to the NF which enjoyed popular success in the 1970s) are morons.[/QUOTE] If they're morons what does this say about the rest?
2004-02-15 06:22 | User Profile
Teenager Ross Parker was the victim of a 'hunting party' of violent immigrant Asians seeking out a defenceless white youngster to attack and murder.
The victim, innocently walking home with his girlfriend, was confronted by this Asian gang and sprayed in the face with CS gas, stabbed three times on the head and shoulder and viciously beaten with a hammer. He was unknown to his killers but his murder was premeditated. He was murdered in his own country for being white - by a gang of cowardly degenerates. Three of those murderers are now jailed in the liberal British penal system. Others remain at large. Their punishment does not fit their crimes or reflect their inherent criminality.
If those immigrants and their holier-than-thou families had been prevented entry to the United Kingdom, Ross Parker would still be alive today - that is the irrefutable truth of the matter. Ouite simply he was denied his lawful right to life; and the right to live safely in one's own country is of greater importance than any supposed right(s) of economic migrants or so-called asylum seekers with their encumbering entourage of selfish relatives.
For make no mistake: they hate the English, the British, the European. And they will kill and kill again - given the opportunity. The graffiti placed near to the murder scene proclaiming "Death to Whites" should indicate something, even to the most stupid and fearful of liberals that are allowed to predominate contemporary British politics and social policy.
It is the first duty of the British to protect their own. The vast majority strongly oppose the imposition of immigration onto their homeland. The majority should have no fear in voting for a party that will represent their views and organize and initiate peaceful protest. It is perfectly correct and honourable to care about one's people and be concerned about the state of one's country. Those that shout the loudest and the most often are the ones that are heard. It is therefore important not to be passively silent or be content to allow an unrepresentative minority of careerist bureaucrats to impose silence upon an increasingly restless and angry electorate.
My regards.
2004-02-15 06:34 | User Profile
Alas, most of the English have turned in their firearms, so any White man there who wants to take any serious action will have to settle for fighting with both hands tied behind his back. The government is obviously on the side of the anti-Whites, and they have all the guns they need. The tyranny will only get worse over there.
2004-02-16 16:12 | User Profile
The USA might have been born out of violence and treachery towards the crown but don't suppose that armed resistance will find favour or be particularly useful this side of the Atlantic.
Attitudes have changed very fast in the past few years in the UK. We have a respected, non-political organisation MigrationWatch getting good media exposure, a popular populist newspaper in the Daily Mail which lists our ills (if they won't quite admit that the solution is to be rid of the LibLabCon party), and the BNP finally hinting that they might realise some of their potential.
Immigration is finally the number one topic for the man in the street and most are against any more of it. 'Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells', 'Mondeo Man' and 'Worcester Woman' is more radical on the race issue than Joe Sixpack, Suzie Soccermom and Debbie DayCareCentre.
More will become apparent after this June's Euro elections, whether the BNP can win any seats and then move on to become something other than a vehicle for protest votes remains to be seen.
Ross Parker (and many others) is a horrible case but its out there and being taken in by the public at large.
BTW - A proper political party (more or less) staging a proper protest:
[url]http://www.bnp.org.uk/news/2004_feb/news_feb12.htm[/url]
[url]http://www.bnp.org.uk[/url]
2004-02-17 01:57 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Julian the Apostate]
City MP Helen Clark, said: "[B]We're a very happy city in Peterborough. There are 42 different nationalities living here and we have lived together in happy harmony. We are very welcoming to new nationalities and we do not want these people in our city.'' [/B][/QUOTE]
What she really meant was, "Ross Parkers' death was justice for the Asians in this happy, harmonius community. Asians, and other peoples of colour, have been oppressed by the majority for hundreds of years. Parker's death will not disrupt this community but make it even more happier and prosperous when we await even more different nationalities that will become a part of our happy family. These Asian youths are heroes to many here, and we do not want that reputation to be tarnished. Unfortunately, Parker was at the wrong place at the wrong time. What more can be said?"
2004-02-17 20:39 | User Profile
If you're white and your son is killed by racist attackers, you might object to a march on your son's behalf. He been a victim once by racist immigrants, next he would be a victim against by the anti-white society. He would be branded a racist himself for "exploiting" his son's death to spread "hate." His son's death is probably all he can handle.
Or, like many whites, his brain has been turned into mush and molded by the state. He may blame white racism for his son's death... "If only whites were more tolerant of non-whites, my son would be still alive."
2004-02-20 07:20 | User Profile
Naturally I have little interest in the views of Ross Parker's father but I consider his comments unmanly and without courage. A weak individual. Of course there may be an alterior reasoning with regard to his statements to the press. So be it.
But now in Britain there is the spectacle of a Conservative Leader further attempting to marginalise a vast section of the electorate. He calls British nationalists 'ignorant' and 'thugs'. He is spiteful and malicious in his rhetoric and has thus alienated many voters. He has marked his card and it is noted.
But his vilification and invective directed against a substantial proportion of the British voting public will reflect his fundamental error of judgement and result in failure.
For this Conservative Leader (M. Howard) is the son of Romanian-Jewish immigrants. A lawyer, of course, and a mouth-piece for his own kind. The British Conservative Party has committed suicide.
2004-02-20 14:01 | User Profile
The conservative party has always been useless.
They isolated Enoch Powell for the crime of immigration opposition when he had around 80% public support - including union support.
They passed the race relations act, from which derives all the power of ethnic lobbies and the destruction of old common law liberties like freedom of speech and association, which they otherwise claim to stand for.
They oversaw UK accession into the EU (the EEC as it was at the time).
They've done more than anyone else to centralise political power in the UK.
There's nothing as contemptible as a modern "conservative".