← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Kurt

Michael Savage reviews The Passion

Thread ID: 12239 | Posts: 11 | Started: 2004-02-09

Wayback Archive


Kurt [OP]

2004-02-09 17:11 | User Profile

But ... but ... I thought all Jews hated Mel Gibson and The Passion? I thought Mel Gibson was going to be the "Great White Christian Hope" who was going to kick some Jew ass?

Savage's Review of 'The Passion'

(link: [url=http://www.homestead.com/prosites-prs/savagepassion.html]http://www.homestead.com/prosites-prs/savagepassion.html[/url])

The Capture of Jesus choreographed in Kurosawa-esque movements.

The ancient Hebrew, Aramaic, and Latin linguistics.

A must for every Christian and Jew; every rebel, independent, iconoclast who has felt the blunt steel of rejection, isolation, humiliation, or castigation.

As for portraying Jews in a negative light - a resounding NO! That is, for rational educated people. There is always the fear that bigots will use this film as they might use any pretext to advance their hateful agenda. The wild card question is: How will radical Muslims use this film? Will they seek to turn Christians against Jews?

During the trial of Jesus, two ancient Hebrew Judges who loudly claim the hearing biased are boldly thrown from the court. The biased judges do not want to hear the opinion that Jesus is innocent of the charges against him.

Good Jews. Fair Jews. Bad Jews. Biased Jews.

Good Romans. Bad Romans. Like today, in historical context.

A passion play about faith and fear, the blessed and the cursed.

The loyal and traitorous. For everyone who has craved a portrait of living biblical history, there has never been a more accurate portrayal.

The Judas-tree scene alone is worth the price of admission. Both for its dramatic content as for its moral imperative.

For every parent wanting to instill moral values in a child, The Passion can be a good teacher.

But we mustn't run from the most pregnant question. Some Jewish organizations have legitimate fears that this remarkable work of art might instigate hatred against the Jewish people. We cannot predict what demented bigots might do nor should we permit them to dictate the terms of our civilization and its artistic creations.

How is it that the most vile films imaginable are being made with little or no protest from the very same organizations attacking Gibson's artistic creation. Murder, Rape, Drug Usage - all standard fair in a theater near you. No protest about these vile works from these organizations who object to what appears to be 100% biblically correct.

Following the screening of his controversial film, Mr. Gibson asked me what I thought of it. I said, "Of course there are going to be those who are going to look to blame the Jewish people, but it is the Romans who flay Jesus nearly to death and who actually crucify him." I added, "Mel, what are people going to do, stop eating pasta!" There was then much laughter all around the boardroom. But I repeat, are people to stop eating Italian food because of Pontius Pilate and the Roman sadists? It would be foolish to think so.

[img]http://www.homestead.com/prosites-prs/files/savagegibsontheone.jpg[/img]

--

This is one White man who will not be wasting his money on this film.

I never did care for Gibson anyway.

[u]The anti-White crimes of Mel Gibson:[/u]

Starred in the anti-White Lethal Weapon series (the [url=http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0097733/]second one[/url] was particularly vile) with the negro Danny "I-can't-get-a-cab-in-NYC-due-to-the-evil-White-man-and-his-racism (even though 99% of cab drivers aren't White)" Glover. And for all of you who say, "Hey, it's only a movie and, he's just an actor playing a part" -- forgive me, but I believe in holding people accountable for their actions. He's a whore, like most actors, and nothing more. Certainly he's no hero.

Lethal Weapon movies:

Braveheart

The Patriot


If Gibson really had any guts, he'd make a film about [url=http://www.wichita-massacre.com/]The Witchita Massacre[/url], but that might offend his pal, Danny Glover.


il ragno

2004-02-09 18:55 | User Profile

I am troubled by this suddenly-unanimous chorus of [I]the Romans were the REAL villains who killed Jesus[/I] -over the objections of the compassionate Jews yet! - that I figure is in large measure responsible for the endorsements of, among others, Savage and David Horowitz. Troubled....not [I]surprised[/I].

It's part and parcel of an ongoing PC rewritte of all human history. The Jews merely wanted Pilate to give the heretic Jesus a good stern [I]talking-to[/I], you see, but you know those toga'ed dagos were little better than animals to begin with. Oh, and usury was forced upon medieval Jews by white hate that denied them any other trade to ply. Sure they invented vigorish to make the gentile a landless stranger in his own country, but they did it with [I]tears [/I] in their eyes, y'see. Never their idea, merely their [I]response [/I] to our slope-browed hate and intolerance. Just like the canard of Jewish involvement in both Bolshevism and Weimar decadence......[I]another [/I] anti-Semitic lie.

By the time you've bought this line of crap, you're sufficiently softened up to start buying the one about the black washroom attendant who accidentally invented the microprocessor in 1919 while trying to put tailfins on the comb he'd invented the year previous.


madrussian

2004-02-09 19:14 | User Profile

Wiener, another "man of integrity", just like Foxman.


xmetalhead

2004-02-09 19:44 | User Profile

"The Passion" can be reviewed this way: See what happens when you go toe to toe with the massive power of world jewry? Jew or gentile, no matter, we're taking you out, son.

Anyways.....Christians are saved by the blood of Jesus Christ and guaranteed everlasting life through Christ's resurrection, for those that would believe on Him through faith.

Hope Mel's movie does well.


Sisyfos

2004-02-09 21:34 | User Profile

Savage is hedging.

The film has already been made, been seen by few, and will shortly be seen by many more. Why turn the affair into a spectacle? Every week we are treated to yet another example of a nonevent grown out of proportion because the press screamed blasphemy. Now it’s true that Jewish criticism is, well, special, but even they are not immune from the law of diminishing returns, especially when it comes to criticizing works of entertainment. Each new decibel that their whiney buzz attains amounts to a louder plea for lookie-lookie.

Kurt. Chill! I agree that taken in their totality Gibson’s films do not a white nationalist’s library make, but that is no reason to call the man a whore. By that lax definition there isn’t a soul working in Hollywood, or, for that matter, anyone who ever signed a contract with a Jew or Jew-owned business, who isn’t one.

The objective here is to give the cabal that makes decisions over what we may see the one-finger salute, and to show filmmakers with inhibited pro-white sentiments that the genre can sustain livelihoods and may even turn a profit.

This flick promises satiation for variety of passions, including religion, history, good old fashioned blood & gore, and dead languages. If these don’t intrigue find something about it that may. Judging by your familiarity with cinematic crafts it’s obvious you’ve parted with more than a few shekels on Jewish products in the past, so here is your chance to park them where they sting back at the hive.


Roy Batty

2004-02-10 00:14 | User Profile

Regarding the "crimes" of ol' Mel - he has stated on many an occasion he did films etc. he didn't like (that contained politics he disagreed with) in order to make the money to pursue his own projects. Hollywood is a closed shop, believe me. People will have differing views of Longshanks - ask the Scots or even the Irish for example.

If Mel hadn't done the Lethal Weapon series there wouldn't have been a Braveheart or The Passion... for us to comment on. For all the complaints either way, Mel is pissing off the tribe, but good. And people have noticed. Others have noticed Robert Duvall's growing discontent and comments - likewise with John Rhys-Davies. Sure, they haven't gone as far as we would like, but publicly they've gone a lot farther than most of us have yet. That's for sure. I take them all as signs of the coming collapse and regeneration of the West. Whites as a whole must feel backed into a corner. Not some whites here or there. All whites. It IS going to happen.


Smedley Butler

2004-02-10 06:07 | User Profile

[QUOTE=Roy Batty]Regarding the "crimes" of ol' Mel - he has stated on many an occasion he did films etc. he didn't like (that contained politics he disagreed with) in order to make the money to pursue his own projects. Hollywood is a closed shop, believe me. People will have differing views of Longshanks - ask the Scots or even the Irish for example.

If Mel hadn't done the Lethal Weapon series there wouldn't have been a Braveheart or The Passion... for us to comment on. For all the complaints either way, Mel is pissing off the tribe, but good. And people have noticed. Others have noticed Robert Duvall's growing discontent and comments - likewise with John Rhys-Davies. Sure, they haven't gone as far as we would like, but publicly they've gone a lot farther than most of us have yet. That's for sure. I take them all as signs of the coming collapse and regeneration of the West. Whites as a whole must feel backed into a corner. Not some whites here or there. All whites. It IS going to happen.[/QUOTE] Roy, this is an excellent post and to a sharp point too. Thanks for saving me from having to write what you did.. Those who critized Mel Gibson, are perhaps shallow and over all un-read, really. Plus perhaps those who attack Gibson's rolls really can't see the over all picture.. THERE is no room for attacking him, by any real thinking White Man, who claims to be a white nationalist. [url]www.ussliberty.org[/url] Machine gunning wounded white men on Yellow Life Raft's! Let U.S. not loose our focus, shall we.. Thanks all.


heritagelost

2004-02-10 18:56 | User Profile

The only one that Gibson produced was Braveheart. He had no control over the content of the other movies.

Braveheart kicks ass, and is one of the greatest movies of all times.

[QUOTE=Kurt]But ... but ... I thought all Jews hated Mel Gibson and The Passion? I thought Mel Gibson was going to be the "Great White Christian Hope" who was going to kick some Jew ass?

Savage's Review of 'The Passion'

(link: [url=http://www.homestead.com/prosites-prs/savagepassion.html]http://www.homestead.com/prosites-prs/savagepassion.html[/url])

The Capture of Jesus choreographed in Kurosawa-esque movements.

The ancient Hebrew, Aramaic, and Latin linguistics.

A must for every Christian and Jew; every rebel, independent, iconoclast who has felt the blunt steel of rejection, isolation, humiliation, or castigation.

As for portraying Jews in a negative light - a resounding NO! That is, for rational educated people. There is always the fear that bigots will use this film as they might use any pretext to advance their hateful agenda. The wild card question is: How will radical Muslims use this film? Will they seek to turn Christians against Jews?

During the trial of Jesus, two ancient Hebrew Judges who loudly claim the hearing biased are boldly thrown from the court. The biased judges do not want to hear the opinion that Jesus is innocent of the charges against him.

Good Jews. Fair Jews. Bad Jews. Biased Jews.

Good Romans. Bad Romans. Like today, in historical context.

A passion play about faith and fear, the blessed and the cursed.

The loyal and traitorous. For everyone who has craved a portrait of living biblical history, there has never been a more accurate portrayal.

The Judas-tree scene alone is worth the price of admission. Both for its dramatic content as for its moral imperative.

For every parent wanting to instill moral values in a child, The Passion can be a good teacher.

But we mustn't run from the most pregnant question. Some Jewish organizations have legitimate fears that this remarkable work of art might instigate hatred against the Jewish people. We cannot predict what demented bigots might do nor should we permit them to dictate the terms of our civilization and its artistic creations.

How is it that the most vile films imaginable are being made with little or no protest from the very same organizations attacking Gibson's artistic creation. Murder, Rape, Drug Usage - all standard fair in a theater near you. No protest about these vile works from these organizations who object to what appears to be 100% biblically correct.

Following the screening of his controversial film, Mr. Gibson asked me what I thought of it. I said, "Of course there are going to be those who are going to look to blame the Jewish people, but it is the Romans who flay Jesus nearly to death and who actually crucify him." I added, "Mel, what are people going to do, stop eating pasta!" There was then much laughter all around the boardroom. But I repeat, are people to stop eating Italian food because of Pontius Pilate and the Roman sadists? It would be foolish to think so.

[img]http://www.homestead.com/prosites-prs/files/savagegibsontheone.jpg[/img]

--

This is one White man who will not be wasting his money on this film.

I never did care for Gibson anyway.

[u]The anti-White crimes of Mel Gibson:[/u]

Starred in the anti-White Lethal Weapon series (the [url=http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0097733/]second one[/url] was particularly vile) with the negro Danny "I-can't-get-a-cab-in-NYC-due-to-the-evil-White-man-and-his-racism (even though 99% of cab drivers aren't White)" Glover. And for all of you who say, "Hey, it's only a movie and, he's just an actor playing a part" -- forgive me, but I believe in holding people accountable for their actions. He's a whore, like most actors, and nothing more. Certainly he's no hero.

Lethal Weapon movies:

Braveheart

The Patriot


If Gibson really had any guts, he'd make a film about [url=http://www.wichita-massacre.com/]The Witchita Massacre[/url], but that might offend his pal, Danny Glover.[/QUOTE]


Happy Hacker

2004-02-10 20:12 | User Profile

In the lethal weapons movies, the black cop had some very anti-white lines, such as a serious comment that the US should not restrict immigration.


madrussian

2004-02-10 20:34 | User Profile

[img]http://www.homestead.com/prosites-prs/files/savagegibsontheone.jpg[/img]

The rat-faced (of course) zhid Wiener looks like Lenin on this photo.


xmetalhead

2004-02-10 21:31 | User Profile

Mel also starred in "Conspiracy Theory", 1997.[url]http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0118883/[/url]

A sample of some plot explanations:

[COLOR=Blue]Mel Gibson is a New York taxi driver, who has a strange habit. He makes complicated scenarios of conspiracies and publishes them to the Internet. He keeps doing that, until something unbelievable happens: One of his "conspiracy theories" turns out to be real, and so he finds himself chased by the man hiding behind the whole thing.[/COLOR]

[COLOR=DarkGreen]Jerry Fletcher is a man in love with a woman he observes from afar. She works for the government. Fletcher is an outspoken critic of that government. He has conspiracy theories for everything, from aliens to political assassinations. But soon, one of his theories finds itself to be accurate. But which one? Some dangerous people want him dead and the only person he trusts is that woman he loves but does not know.[/COLOR]

I might have to see this film again!!