← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · friedrich braun
Thread ID: 12233 | Posts: 6 | Started: 2004-02-09
2004-02-09 04:55 | User Profile
Falwell, the American Judaizer par excellence, makes American Christianity stink by shamelessly shilling for lying Dubya's illegitimate adventure in Iraq.
Falwellââ¬â¢s Folly by Laurence M. Vance
Jerry Falwell has done it again. Just like Jacobââ¬â¢s sons Simeon and Levi made him "stink among the inhabitants of the land" (Genesis 34:30), so Falwell has made Christians stink. Case in point ââ¬â Falwellââ¬â¢s recent WorldNetDaily article in which he made an attempt, and a very feeble one, to justify, with Scripture, President Bushââ¬â¢s invasion of Iraq ââ¬â an invasion which has resulted, and continues to result, in the senseless deaths of American servicemen. And if the article itself wasnââ¬â¢t bad enough, he had the audacity to entitle it: "God is pro-war." As a Christian of the Independent Baptist persuasion (like Falwell), I am almost ashamed to identify myself as such. Although Falwell has been an embarrassment to Independent Baptists for years, his recent article is just too much to stomach.
Falwell is certainly correct when he says about war that "the Bible is not silent on the subject." Yes, it is true that "just as there are numerous references to peace in the Bible, there are frequent references to God-ordained war." And yes, it is true that Jesus is depicted in Revelation 19 as "bearing a ââ¬Ësharp swordââ¬â¢ and smiting nations, ruling them with ââ¬Ëa rod of iron.ââ¬â¢" And yes again, it is true that "the Song of Victory in Exodus 15 hails God as a God of war." Furthermore, no one can deny that "God actually strengthened individuals for war, including Moses, Joshua, and many of the Old Testament judges who demonstrated great faith in battle." And finally, it is true that "the Bible tells us war will be a reality until Christ returns. And when the time is right, Jesus will indeed come again, ending all wars."
Falwell is also correct when he says about society that "we continue to live in violent times." And yes, "America continues to face the horrible realities of our fallen world. Suicide bombings and terrorist actions are beamed live into our homes daily."
The problem with Falwellââ¬â¢s article is not with these observations that anyone who read the Bible and watched the nightly news already knew. The problem with the article is the numerous distortions of Scripture and the truth that occur in it.
Falwellââ¬â¢s first distortion is the inappropriate use of that portion of Scripture that prefaces his article: "To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven: A time to be born . . . , a time of war." This implies that the present war in Iraq is just because, after all, there is "a time of war." If the United States was invaded then it would certainly be "a time of war." But it would be a morally justifiable defensive war against an aggressor. The war in Iraq is neither defensive nor against an aggressor.
Falwellââ¬â¢s second distortion is the title of his article itself: "God is pro-war." To say that because God permitted wars to take place, and even commanded the nation of Israel in the Old Testament to conduct them, that he is "pro-war" is ludicrous. We know from the Bible that God is pro-holiness and pro-righteousness, but to say that God is "pro-war" doesnââ¬â¢t sound like any description of Godââ¬â¢s attributes that I ever read in a systematic theology book. Was God pro-Crimean War? Was God pro-War of the Austrian Succession? Was God pro-War of the Roses? Whose side was he on in these conflicts? What Falwell really means is that God is pro-American wars. Falwellââ¬â¢s shameless pseudo-patriotism is a violation of the third commandment in the Bible he professes to believe: "Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain" (Exodus 20:7).
Falwellââ¬â¢s third distortion: "God even gives counsel to be wise in war. Proverbs 20:18: 'Every purpose is established by counsel: and with good advice make war.'" How this verse is supposed to mean that "God even gives counsel to be wise in war" is beyond me. Nothing in the verse or the context suggests that God is giving the counsel or the advice. Did God give Hitler and Stalin counsel to be wise in war? Did God give Pol Pot and Ho Chi Min advice to make war? Oh, I guess it just means that God only gives U.S. presidents counsel and advise to be wise in war? But could that even be the case? Did God give Lincoln counsel to invade the South after Lincoln said: "I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so."? Did God give advice to Wilson to make the world safe for democracy after Wilson sought reelection on the slogan "he kept us out of war"?
Falwellââ¬â¢s fourth distortion: "It is apparent that our God-authored freedoms must be defended. Throughout the book of Judges, God calls the Israelites to go to war against the Midianites and Philistines. Why? Because these nations were trying to conquer Israel, and Godââ¬â¢s people were called to defend themselves." But what does invading Iraq have to do with defending our God-authored freedoms? For this analogy to be credible, several things must of necessity be true. First, Iraq would had to have been trying to conquer the United States ââ¬â which it wasnââ¬â¢t, and couldnââ¬â¢t possibly have done so if it tried. Second, the citizens of the United States would have to be Godââ¬â¢s people ââ¬â quite strange in view of the fact that God and his Bible are unwelcome in most of the countryââ¬â¢s schools. Christians can quote 2 Chronicles 7:14 all they want, but it still wonââ¬â¢t change the fact that America is not made up of Godââ¬â¢s people like Israel of the Old Testament. Third, invading another country would have to be a means of defending our God-authored freedoms. That is, we owe our freedoms to offensive wars by the United States military away from American soil in places that most Americans couldnââ¬â¢t locate on a map. And fourth, the state would have to be the defender of our God-given freedoms. But who has always been the greatest opponent of anyoneââ¬â¢s God-authored freedoms? Why, the state, of course.
Falwellââ¬â¢s fifth distortion: "President Bush declared war in Iraq to defend innocent people. This is a worthy pursuit. In fact, Proverbs 21:15 tells us: 'It is joy to the just to do judgment: but destruction shall be to the workers of iniquity.'" Well, first of all, according to that archaic, neglected document in Washington known as the Constitution, the power to declare war belongs exclusively to Congress (Art. I, Sec. 8, Par. 11). The fact that Congress hasnââ¬â¢t officially issued a declaration of war since World War II doesnââ¬â¢t change anything. It only demonstrates that the Iraq fiasco is not any more constitutional than the Korea or Vietnam fiascos were. Secondly, I thought the war was all about finding weapons of mass destruction, destroying chemical weapons labs, or uncovering Iraqââ¬â¢s nascent nuclear capability? If the United States is so interested in defending innocent people in Iraq then why was not Saddam Hussein removed during the First Gulf War? Why let them suffer all these years? And why stop at Iraq? Why not defend the innocent people in North Korea who have suffered under oppressive regimes for decades? And if it is such a worthy pursuit to defend innocent people in Iraq, then why not defend innocent people in America? How many millions of unborn children have been slaughtered in the United States since the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision? How many thousands of people are languishing in U.S. prisons for victimless crimes? There are also two problems with Falwellââ¬â¢s equating the destruction of Iraq by the U.S. military with the destruction of the workers of iniquity. First off, I donââ¬â¢t recall reading in Proverbs that it is the job of the United States to destroy the workers of iniquity. And second, if "destruction shall be to the workers of iniquity," then the United States is in trouble, for we have worked iniquity all over the globe for the past fifty years.
Falwellââ¬â¢s sixth distortion: "One of the primary purposes of the church is to stop the spread of evil, even at the cost of human lives. If we do not stop the spread of evil, many innocent lives will be lost and the kingdom of God suffers." I thought one of the primary purposes of the church was to preach the gospel? I thought one of the primary purposes of the church was to teach converts? There is no mention anywhere in the New Testament of the church being commanded to stop the spread of evil. Only God himself can stop the spread of evil. The Apostle Paul preached the gospel and taught converts (Acts 14:21), he didnââ¬â¢t waste five minutes trying to stop the spread of something as nebulous as evil. And then there is the "cost of human lives." Should the church practice evil to stop evil? Does the end justify the means? Falwell apparently thinks it does, even though the Apostle Paul said it was slanderously reported that he was saying: "Let us do evil, that good may come?" (Romans 3:8). Falwellââ¬â¢s attitude is like the then U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, Madeleine Albright, in 1996, saying that the deaths of 500,000 Iraqi children because of U.S. sanctions was "worth it" in order to punish Saddam Hussein.
Falwellââ¬â¢s seventh distortion: "Some reading this column will surely ask, ââ¬ËDoesnââ¬â¢t the sixth commandment say, "Thou shalt not kill?"ââ¬â¢ Actually, no; it says: ââ¬ËThou shalt not commit murder.ââ¬â¢ There is a difference between killing and murdering. In fact, many times God commanded capital punishment for those who break the law." Falwell is exactly right, there is a difference between killing and murdering. The question then is this: Is dropping bombs on countries thousands of miles away for dubious reasons killing or murdering? I think the answer is quite obvious.
In addition to mentioning war, the writer of Ecclesiastes also says that there is "a time to keep silence" (Ecclesiastes 3:7). Mr. Falwell, are you listening?
February 7, 2004
Laurence M. Vance [send him mail] teaches Greek at Pensacola Bible Institute in Pensacola, FL. Visit his website.
Copyright é 2004 LewRockwell.com
[url]http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig4/vance6.html[/url]
2004-02-09 05:11 | User Profile
Friedrich,
[url]http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=36859[/url] Saturday, January 31, 2004
God is pro-war
January 31, 2004
By Rev. Jerry Falwell
é 2004 WorldNetDaily.com
"To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven: A time to be born, and a time to die; a time to plant, and a time to pluck up that which is planted; A time to kill, and a time to heal; a time to break down, and a time to build up; A time to weep, and a time to laugh; a time to mourn, and a time to dance; A time to cast away stones, and a time to gather stones together; a time to embrace, and a time to refrain from embracing; A time to get, and a time to lose; a time to keep, and a time to cast away; A time to rend, and a time to sew; a time to keep silence, and a time to speak; A time to love, and a time to hate; a time of war, and a time of peace." (Ecclesiastes 3:1-8) Christians have struggled with the issue of war for centuries. Before Jesus arrived on the scene, all good people wrestled with war and the existence of evil. Thankfully, the Bible is not silent on the subject.
Before we examine war, though, let's look at the God of Peace.
One of God's primary attributes is peace. Isaiah said the Messiah would bear these names: Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace (Isaiah 9:6). God longs for all people to live in peace. That is how He created the universe ââ¬â in total peace and harmony.
Christians are to be people of peace.
One of the most notable biblical commands to live in peace is in Romans 12:18: "If it be possible, as much as lieth in you, live peaceably with all men."
With the Bible clear on our responsibility to live peaceably, it seems that there would be no reason to ever go to war. However, if one depends on the Bible as a guidepost for living, it is readily apparent that war is sometimes a necessary option. In fact, just as there are numerous references to peace in the Bible, there are frequent references to God-ordained war.
Many present-day pacifists hold Jesus as their example for unvarying peace. But they ignore the full revelation concerning Jesus pictured in the book of Revelation 19, where He is depicted bearing a "sharp sword" and smiting nations, ruling them with "a rod of iron."
Moreover, the Song of Victory in Exodus 15 hails God as a God of war: "ââ¬Â¦ The Lord is a man of war: the Lord is his name." And, as the verses that open this column indicate, there is indeed a time for war.
God actually strengthened individuals for war, including Moses, Joshua and many of the Old Testament judges who demonstrated great faith in battle. And God destroyed many armies challenging the Israelites. I Chronicles 14:15 describes God striking down the Philistines.
God even gives counsel to be wise in war. Proverbs 20:18: "Every purpose is established by counsel: and with good advice make war."
Today, America continues to face the horrible realities of our fallen world. Suicide bombings and terrorist actions are beamed live into our homes daily. This serves as a constant reminder of the frailty of our flesh.
It is apparent that our God-authored freedoms must be defended.
Throughout the book of Judges, God calls the Israelites to go to war against the Midianites and Philistines. Why? Because these nations were trying to conquer Israel, and God's people were called to defend themselves.
President Bush declared war in Iraq to defend innocent people. This is a worthy pursuit. In fact, Proverbs 21:15 tells us: "It is joy to the just to do judgment: but destruction shall be to the workers of iniquity."
One of the primary purposes of the church is to stop the spread of evil, even at the cost of human lives. If we do not stop the spread of evil, many innocent lives will be lost and the kingdom of God suffers.
Finally, some reading this column will surely ask, "Doesn't the sixth commandment say, 'Thou shalt not kill?'"
Actually, no; it says: "Thou shalt not commit murder."
There is a difference between killing and murdering. In fact, many times God commanded capital punishment for those who break the law.
We continue to live in violent times. The Bible tells us war will be a reality until Christ returns. And when the time is right, Jesus will indeed come again, ending all wars.
Until that time, however, Christians must live as Galatians 6:2 instructs: "Bear ye one another's burdens, and so fulfill the law of Christ."
Rev. Jerry Falwell, a nationally recognized Christian minister and television show host, is the founder of Jerry Falwell Ministries and is chancellor of Liberty University in Lynchburg, Va.
2004-02-09 07:06 | User Profile
I think Falwell's 15 minutes are about up. Not kidding; the guy hasn't said much new since mid-Reagan or so, and the others are about the same. Hey, maybe some of the younger "fire & brimstone" preachers will aim in the right direction...
Bring on the new bunch! :)
2004-02-09 07:30 | User Profile
Sertorius,
I used you read him more often a couple of years ago, but his libertarianism has progressively become too annoying to take in large doses. Although he continues to say good things on some issues, notably most of his stuff on American foreign policy is on target.
2004-02-09 13:31 | User Profile
The last time I saw The Old Time Gospel Hour, Falwell was offering to send $500-and-up contributors small, bagged handfuls of dirt from the Holy Land that he had [I]personally[/I] prayed over.
That this jowly clown is even still being [I]asked [/I] his opinion on real-world matters is astonishing...but not as astonishing as his replies being widely disseminated as though he were something [U]besides [/U] a con-man perpetually on the make.
2004-02-09 16:57 | User Profile
Falwell, IMHO, is just a snake oil salesman. The principals are the same: Sell hope and promise to the gullible. Everyone wants something to believe in in an otherwise pointless existance. Falwell is just playing to the crowd. They want something to believe in, and he gives it to them.
Don't get me wrong, I'm a Christian. Not saying that what I believe in is any better than anyone else's (after all, all the different sects of Christianity are just beliefs in different interpretations of the same Truth), but if it is conducted privately, between you and Higher Management without fanfare, it's a good thing.
Falwell's slicked-up, TV propogandized, I-got-a-Hotline-to-God-so-gimmie-50-bucks phony baloney approach is just too much to stomach. I just hope the Almighty has a nice warm spot in Hell earmarked for that sonofabitch. It's not so bad that he's a preacher, but that he takes advantage of the old, sick, lame, unwitting, and gullible in the world, all for the sole purpose of making [I]money[/I]. (Not against that either, but taking advantage of good people, gullible or not, to do it is unethical and morally wrong) Methinks he should come clean for once and admit his real name is Moshie Rabinowitz and get it over with.
Ausonius