← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · heritagelost
Thread ID: 12210 | Posts: 12 | Started: 2004-02-08
2004-02-08 02:39 | User Profile
South Carolina is a third black and it was estimated that 40% of the voters in the Democratic primary were black. Sharpton got 10%, which means only 25% of blacks voted for him.
The Michigan result are in. Sharpton also got 10%. Michigan is less than 15% black. If we assume that 20% of Democratic voters were black, that would mean approx. 50% of blacks voted for Sharpton.
This demonstrates the stereotype that northern blacks walk around with a chip on their shoulder complaining about whitie all the time, while Southern blacks are happier and more content.
It looks like northern blacks are much more racially polarized.
2004-02-08 04:27 | User Profile
yea, thats basically true. AS someone who has been born and raised in New England, I see it, matter of fact I've felt it. I personally know what its like to be jumped by 5 black youths and have two puffy eyes full of blood, although they did not break my hard jaw it was swollen. I would have fought back if it was one or two, but I can't fight five, and it happenned so fast, they ran. Security came, but they were gone. The reason why Northern negroes ( I cannot stand referring to them as blacks ) are cockier is because they believe themselves to be physically superior, and while " inheriting " the burden of slavery that we continue to owe them. IN other words, the real negro southerners have an impression handed down to them by the grandparents and great grandparents. Northern Negroes by large have no basis in ancestry. They mostly have fathers who are dead, as the average negro male dies in his early sixties, and there's only about a 40 % chance that he even raised the child in any way. Its further aggravated by the MTV media and the total degeneracy of the arts, which is very sad.
2004-02-08 05:01 | User Profile
Gentleman, I do not want to rehash my story of 1958 NYC on walking home from school to my home on 117th street. P.S. 7 was on 120th street, but I was attacked by two teen aged Congoid Savage beast's and beaten unconscious by them and had my nose broke too. I was 7 and they were 14 or 15. No, I had never either of the beast's before and never said a word to them, I remember they were laughing while beating me.. This was my first violent experience with these beasts.. The Jews alone with the usual idiot whites have caused this and allowed it. Too many whites think it's okay if whites are murdered and raped as they think this is some kind of Karma or pay back for slavery or something, thanks to Jewish media.I do not hate these beast's only stupid race traitor white elites, who need hemp on their neck and should pay one day dearly.....If there is ever a day of justice.... One more thing, in the second grade these Spic's and Congoids would want to yell F.U.'s all over, yes even back then really, I did not know what it even meant, and fight any white as they were 80% of P.S. 7 at that time, now I am sure it's 100% beast's.. See the pathology towards whites by these beast's and their familie's... See Jared Taylor's report on Tuskgee Alabama, P.B.S. and N.P.R. did a special on hate whitey with this documentry that was baseless, harmful, and caused more hate towards whites. Yet, no congressional investagation,s or cut off of funding for National Yiddish Radio..
2004-02-08 06:12 | User Profile
[QUOTE=heritagelost] It looks like northern blacks are much more racially polarized.[/QUOTE]
Northern blacks are usually more urban, more likely to have no roots whatever in their communities, and (most recently) more likely to be unemployed.
They are likely to have come up north to take advantages of "job opportunities" that were either nonexistant or overblown. Lots of older blacks are still pissed that they weren't handed the keys to the corporate bathroom when they got off the Greyhound in Chicago.
They're also most likely to be heading back down south, but I'll let the League of the South keep cheering that part on. (No kidding, they were!)
2004-02-08 06:19 | User Profile
Will you Southron's please take back your beloved negroids? Thank you.
Sincerely,
Kurt
A proud White Man who just happens to live in the Northeastern portion of the "country" known as the United States of America, but puts his Race above his geographic location, unlike those known as "Southrons". My heritage lies in Europe: specifically Germany, Ireland, and Wales. The US is a phony Jew construct doomed to failure. Thank you.
2004-02-08 12:49 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Kurt]Will you Southron's please take back your beloved negroids? Thank you.
Sincerely,
Kurt
[/QUOTE]
Your holier-than-thou Yank ancestors stomped South to free "our" "beloved" knuckledraggers and make them "equal" to Whitey - and of course to have a ball burning, looting, creating widows & orphans, all that fun stuff. If anyone deserves to be plagued by the worst nigras (and of course no one really does), it's their equally holier-than-thou descendants.
We're all in the same boat now, whether we like it or not.
2004-02-08 18:34 | User Profile
Four years in the Navy taught me that blacks and whites from the South get along pretty well, they even like each other. They seemed to have a lot in common and the felt easy around each other. This is in complete opposition to the situation in the north, where we don't even talk to each other at all, and feel racial tension whenever our paths cross.
Irish kids from Boston hated blacks with smoldering fury, and northern ghetto blacks were violent animals. My racial education really started on an aircraft carrier. These guys were just unfit for civilized society, and even then I had to contantly remind myself that as bad as these negroes were they were the cream of the crop for their "communities" else the Navy wouldn't have taken them even to chip paint and cook (which they mostly did).
NBF - what you say is true, but keep in mind that Lincoln wanted to colonize them in Liberia after the war. But he was killed, and so ended that noble (and very practical) vision. Anyway, that's all ancient history, and as you say "we're all in the same boat" now.
Man, we screwed the pooch on this whole racial thing. What fools we are.
Walter
2004-02-08 18:53 | User Profile
[QUOTE]Keep in mind that Lincoln wanted to colonize them in Liberia after the war. But he was killed, and so ended that noble (and very practical) vision[/QUOTE]
Good point, and one that is never touched upon by the DiLorenzo crowd; even Joe Sobran hews to this [I]Lincoln wasn't just a tyrant, he was a racist too[/I] interpretation like gospel. But if Lincoln's idea was a genuine commitment to repatriation of American blacks....I don't see how he differs from your garden-variety 'worse is better' OD racial separatist. Because he died and his idea failed...backfired even? I dunno....Hitler's dream backfired even worse and he's got a [I]lot [/I] of fans in these precincts.
It's all very thorny, very confusing. Much like when I read a paleo or WN rhapsodizing about our glorious heritage as a nation founded by Englishmen, and how we need to get back to those roots and values. It's all I can do not to laugh. Who do you think gave us all those colored folks anyway? Who enslaved their own people, shipped them to the colonies, then set them 'free' after 7 years or so, landless and adrift, to found the Great and Noble Traditions of migrant work and tenant farming? Who set into place a system by which a white man would pay $1200 for a black slave but hire out his most back-breaking and lethal labor to indigent white families for five and ten cents a day - the progeny of his once-white slaves? The Germans? The French?
And that vaunted "Englishness" dies hard. Every time a white person living in relative comfort feels more genuine sympathy and emotional kinship with a comically-moronic Negro on a tv sitcom - or a sad, blubbering one on a 'news report' - than with most actual living breathing working-class whites struggling to hang on in this, the era of their planned obsolescence, who fail to meet his criteria for [I]comportment[/I], that's Our Great English Traditions at work.
2004-02-09 13:37 | User Profile
[QUOTE]But if Lincoln's idea was a genuine commitment to repatriation of American blacks....I don't see how he differs from your garden-variety 'worse is better' OD racial separatist. Because he died and his idea failed...backfired even? I dunno....Hitler's dream backfired even worse and he's got a lot of fans in these precincts.[/QUOTE]
That's very well put. I think that the answer to your question is that Lincoln would feel very much at home with most of us here on OD.
We get half the story on Lincoln. Yes, he believed (correctly) that Negroes were human and so were endowed by their Creator with the inalienable rights to life, liberty, and property. As JPII might put it, as human beings they can only be subjects, never objects. I agree with that, and frankly I think that any man of goodwill is compelled to agree that blacks - as dumb and shiftless as they are as a group - have the God-given right to their own selves.
But that doesn't mean that they're equal to us. Lincoln scoffed at such patent nonsense. Negroes are BLODDY OBVIOUSLY much less intelligent than whites on average, and that this natural inequality makes sharing a territory a sure reciepe for conflict and ruin. Heck, he'd just taken the nation through an horrific war between the two competing economic/cultural systems that arose from the natural fact of Negro mental inferiority to whites, and I can't imagine that he would desire another round of that fratricidal idiocy.
So, Lincoln was faced with the economic chasm opening between the north and the Confederacy, growing international scandal of slavery, and the obvious need to separate from blacks. Answer: free them and help them set up a country in Africa. Frankly, that was the only rational approach then, just as it is now.
That's why I say in all seriousness "forward with Lincoln's program!" That really should be our motto, IMHO. We DO NOT NEED to import any foreign ideas to get us to where we need to go, because we already have Lincoln - not to mention Jefferson, Washington, and Lee.
Tragically, our ancestors missed the historical opportunity and now it's clear that we won't get there without some new cataclysm approaching CWII.
I'm reminded of the Robert Zimmerman (Bob Dylan) song, "Idiot Wind."
[I]We're idiots, babe It's a wonder that we still know how to breath.[/I]
Walter
2004-02-09 20:05 | User Profile
That's why I say in all seriousness "forward with Lincoln's program!" That really should be our motto, IMHO. We DO NOT NEED to import any foreign ideas to get us to where we need to go, because we already have Lincoln - not to mention Jefferson, Washington, and Lee.
Well put. Yes, if the Radical Abolitionist scum hadn't bollixed up Abe's plan (and the antebellum plan of the American Colonization Society) after the fool Booth ventilated him, we wouldn't be in this damnable fix now. Lincoln was certainly a tyrant who used the Constituion as so much high-class toilet paper, but his intentions vis a vis the Colored Brutha were the correct ones: freedom - then goodbye forever.
Tragically, our ancestors missed the historical opportunity and now it's clear that we won't get there without some new cataclysm approaching CWII.
Also very true.
2004-02-09 22:31 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Kurt]Will you Southron's please take back your beloved negroids? Thank you.
Sincerely,
Kurt
[/QUOTE]
Dear Kurt,
No, but thanks for asking. You're welcome to keep the ones you have, since The South has enough problems with the ones we have now.
Sincerely,
Ausonius
2004-02-10 04:03 | User Profile
When I was in Atlanta for the CofCC conference two years ago. We were the only white people around. I saw a huge difference between the blacks in Atlanta and the blacks in Ohio.
Most of the blacks I encountered were the more happy-go-lucky Negroes without a care in the world. In Columbus, you can't even enter a black area without every jiggaboo giving you the "nigger stare"
[QUOTE=AntiYuppie]Heritagelost's comments basically reflect my impressions, though I think that the divide is really one between urban and rural rather than north and south. An urban negro in Atlanta or East St. Louis is as much part of the "gangsta" culture as his counterparts in Harlem, Jamaica Plains (Boston), or Chicago. In contrast, rural negroes, though equally stupid, tend to be far more laid back and less violent. I suspect that their political leanings reflect this cultural divide, the "gangsta," should he vote at all, is far more likely to be inspired by a Sharpton than would his rural counterparts because the urban negro has more of an axe to grind.
I will add that I think that the urban/rural divide is probably just as important among whites as it is among blacks. The much publicized red/blue maps (not that voting for Bush was such a smart move for "conservatives", but it illustrates a point) showed blue concentrated around urban areas throughout the country and red in the rural areas. The South had more red not because it was the south but because it was less urbanized and congested.[/QUOTE]