← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Recluse
Thread ID: 12120 | Posts: 17 | Started: 2004-02-02
2004-02-02 20:53 | User Profile
We've all heard this story and my only comment is that it's way down on my list of things to worry about and if I went to the people who are upset about this and said to them that if they elect me President, I'll take away the broadcast licenses from the jewboys that push this filth, most of them would want me to be arrested for a hate crime. So eff 'em. Learn how to fight back or learn how to be quiet. No one wants to hear a perpetual loser whine.
MTV Boasts Janet Afterwards: "Janet Gets Nasty!"
A network insider insisted that nothing like last night's bodice-ripping had happened during rehearsals, which were closely watched by CBS suits to make sure there was no hanky-panky, except of course the simulated-sex dance. "That's why the rehearsals were so closely watched," the CBS insider said.
But while CBS was protesting its ignorance and innocence, MTV -- both are owned by Viacom, remember -- was still bragging about it as of midnight.
"Janet Gets Nasty!" MTV crowed on its Web site.
"Janet Jackson got nasty at the MTV-produced Super Bowl Halftime Show," the cable network boasted.
"Jaws across the country hit the carpet at exactly the same time. You know what we're talking about . . . Janet Jackson, Justin Timberlake and a kinky finale that rocked the Super Bowl to its core," the network enthused.
"MTV was Super Bowl central, so armchair quarterbacks, fair weather fanatics and fans of Janet Jackson and her pasties were definitely in the right place."
MTV's Web coverage goes on to say that "the organizers of the Super Bowl XXXVIII halftime show had hoped that a surprise guest would get people talking long after the game, but they wound up with one more surprise than they had bargained for."
Bad boy Timberlake, however, apparently reconsidered the play -- maybe he got worried that CBS would uninvite him from performing at next Sunday's Grammy Awards. Timberlake said he did not intend to expose Jackson's breast, calling it a "wardrobe malfunction."
The NFL did not share MTV's enthusiasm for the halftime surprise, saying in a statement that "it's unlikely that MTV will produce another Super Bowl halftime."
[url]http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1070187/posts[/url]
2004-02-02 21:05 | User Profile
They show negro boobs all the time on Discovery Channel.
2004-02-02 21:55 | User Profile
I must admit once I realized "halftime" meant Janet Jackson and Justin Timberlake I dove for the remote. I'd flick back every few minutes to see if the coast was clear only to see bits of her interminable big number ,which -like always- seemed to be a hideously overchoreographed paean to Jane Goodall injecting Viagra into her charges' bananas. Then she started babbling nonsense like "Say no to illiteracy!" and I had to change the channel again. Say no to chimpanzees like this instead, kids, and the literacy problem will mend [I]itself[/I].
I did find myself reflecting on her "musical family" as I watched her make whore faces and whore gestures at the camera over and over, and what I thought was - if her brother had never undergone [I]one [/I] surgery or squeezed [I]one [/I] little pink dick, we would still be left with the Jacksons' ostensible claim to fame, their body of music, which by any standard of measurement, no matter how degraded, is as vapid and flavorless and insubstantial and assembly-line product as a garishly-overproduced Doritoes commercial that lasts [I]twenty years [/I] or so.
And given that we are drowning in queers these days - and they're supposed to drip with good taste and all - why aren't any of those style-maven Rear Admirals pointing out that Janet Jackson and the grotesque unintentional-comedy of her her [I]mating time at the monkey house[/I] stage show is the height of gaucherie, created by and for slope-browed clods? Maybe because this is the best you can hope for from "Black Culture", and quickly becoming the accepted norm for [I]good [/I] taste - especially if you'd like to keep your byline and/or tv gig, and stay suspended on air above the 'nobodies' for one more day.
2004-02-02 22:04 | User Profile
Ape grunting and genitalia displaying on stage is what televitz wants to make audience to accept as the norm, after having monopolized the televitz screen and not allowing anything else. Market at work etc. Newspapers print what people read and televitz shows what people want to see. Yada, yada.
2004-02-03 07:11 | User Profile
I didn't watch the superbowl, but I found a video of the half-time show with Jackson and Jason. When Jackson is exposed, Jason is singing the words "I'm going to have you naked by the end of this song."
I guess pornographic songs are good family fair and there's nothing wrong with the simulated sex that was the dancing during Jackson and Jason's performance. But, exposing a boob (the boob itself was hardly seen, but the act of exposing was easy to see) is doing something wrong?
Anyone willing to watch the show in the first place is hardly in a position to cry offense, without being a hypocrite.
That twit, George Bush, wants to pump up the fines for airing obscenity from $75,000 to $750,000 (per station!). Excessive fines are no substitute for failure to for failure to enforce obscenity standards. Even the F-word is allowed on TV now (just as long as it isn't used as a reference to sex). Of course, Bush isn't interested in cleaning up TV, just in pretending like he wants to.
2004-02-03 10:01 | User Profile
[QUOTE]like always- seemed to be a hideously overchoreographed paean to Jane Goodall injecting Viagra into her charges' bananas. [/QUOTE]
Hah!
:lol:
Walter
2004-02-03 10:03 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Happy Hacker]I didn't watch the superbowl, but I found a video of the half-time show with Jackson and Jason. When Jackson is exposed, Jason is singing the words "I'm going to have you naked by the end of this song."
I guess pornographic songs are good family fair and there's nothing wrong with the simulated sex that was the dancing during Jackson and Jason's performance. But, exposing a boob (the boob itself was hardly seen, but the act of exposing was easy to see) is doing something wrong?
Anyone willing to watch the show in the first place is hardly in a position to cry offense, without being a hypocrite.[/QUOTE]
Well put.
Anybody who watches that crap, at least on anything like a regular basis, is to be shunned. Joe Sixpack types. They deserve what they get.
Walter
2004-02-03 11:09 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Happy Hacker] That twit, George Bush, wants to pump up the fines for airing obscenity from $75,000 to $750,000 (per station!). Excessive fines are no substitute for failure to for failure to enforce obscenity standards. Even the F-word is allowed on TV now (just as long as it isn't used as a reference to sex). Of course, Bush isn't interested in cleaning up TV, just in pretending like he wants to.[/QUOTE]
It's been demonstrated by pro-family groups and others that agenda always trumps profit with Murray Rothstein and his ilk, so I don't think fines would have much of an impact. Buchanan suggested breaking up the media monopolies when he was running for president and that's a step in the right direction, but we saw where his campaign went. BTW, isn't NFL commissioner Paul Tagliabue a member of the tribe? I think I remember reading that somewhere.
2004-02-03 14:18 | User Profile
Maybe for next year's toilet bowl they can do like Nero had his actors do. Instead of simulating sex, they can actually engage in it.
I'm glad I don't watch this crap anymore.
2004-02-03 15:36 | User Profile
Tangentially related to all this- an oldie but goodie from Matt Drudge:
[QUOTE]MTV'S JUDY MCGRATH: WANTED FOR THE MURDER OF MUSIC
BenStillerMarkWahlbergBenStillerMarkWahlbergBenStillerMarkWahlbergBenStiller MarkWahlbergBenStillerMarkWahlbergBenStillerMarkWahlberg.
One day we will wake up from this nightmare.
Long after we rip out the infected pierced stud in our tongues and wash off all our tats and forget we ever witnessed three-and-a-half-hours of something called The Eighteenth Annual MTV Video Music Awards... we'll possibly be able to look at ourselves in the mirror again.
President of the MTV Group Judy McGrath, 48, is wanted for the murder of music.
"J LO, PLEASE LET ME SNIFF YOUR BUTT."
"I'M ABOUT TO BE BORN AGAIN ON YOUR BASTARD ASSES."
Thursday night in New York City, McGrath, who has been there from the beginning, unleashed her latest remix of pop culture at the Metropolitan Opera; still determined to call her product Music Television, although any music is a side order in the Taco Bell-sponsored shopper's guide.
"THANKS TO EVERYONE WHO THOUGHT WE WOULD MAKE GOOD WHORES."
"THIS PERFORMANCE HAS BEEN DEDICATED TO THE LOVING MEMORY OF AALIYAH."
McGrath, a star in the VIACOMCBS family, knew she had hit the Zeitgeist with promos for the "Music Awards" which featured host Jamie Foxx simulating intercourse with a live sheep.
You could almost hear McGrath applaud, cheer and order heavy rotation as Foxx gyrated his pelvis into the sheep. Her latest exploitation of Black Americans, and sheep.
The usual corporate shills -- U2, Jennifer Lopez, Moby, Mick Jagger -- once again showed up to celebrate the McGrath vision:
Someone played a guitar.
Someone screamed into a microphone.
Someone picked up a pair of drumsticks and waved them in the air.
Someone wore a black leather jacket and thanked Joey Ramone who gave us Jessica Simpson who shot daggers at lip-syncing Britney who is still a virgin at least with humans but nevertheless qualified as McGrath's top carny.
"OUR NEXT PRESENTER IS THE STAR OF MTV'S JACKASS, AND SOMEONE WHO WILL JACK YOUR ASS."
Classic Judy McGrath.
The woman who murdered music. [/QUOTE]
Also a perfect classroom exercise for Spotting the Neo-Kahn. There is almost always
A]- one telltale phrase or sentence that gives away the Neo; one that interrupts the logic-momentum of what appears to be unflinching, straightforward reportage or commentary with gross and unsupportable sentimentality that defangs and deflects the empty tough talk preceding it, and
B]- the Vital Omission- the deliberate turning away of the head at precisely that moment when the evidence being collected points towards someone or something the reporter would prefer his "indictment" stops well short of indicting.
In this case, A is embodied in the phrase [I]"Her latest exploitation of Black Americans, and sheep"[/I]. We neoKahns are tough and uncompromising when it comes to drumming up outrage in the rabble and handing them a road map ...not so hot at arriving at the destination ourselves, though. That would damage our denial strategy in case anything backfires. (Besides, pushing the mob forward from way in the back, out of sight, might come in handy later.... when we [I]denounce [/I] the mob in front of the clicking cameras after pulling yet [I]another [/I] 180...)
And B, of course, is to bring our indictment skidding to a halt well short of the actual Jews in charge, coming to rest at the desk of the highest-ranking second-tier gentile we can throw to the lions. In this case, hard-selling some woman named McGrath as the murderer of culture without [I]ever [/I] uttering the name "Sumner Redstone", let alone "Murray Rothstein"....nor qualifying the word "culture" with the hated adjective "white".
2004-02-03 21:43 | User Profile
I didn't catch Justin Whiggerlake's "shocking!" exposure Koko's dirty pillow. Nor did I see Shitney frenching Ye Olde Slag last year. Whoa - I'm, like, culturally backward, dude!
Somebody throw a chain around Murray's ankles and take him for a joy ride, eh?
2004-02-04 01:57 | User Profile
Free Republic had quite a few interesting threads on this overall. Course when they talk about "cultural depravity" you can never say where it comes from. Anyway foor the record here's the thread.
[url=http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/search?m=all;o=time;s=Super%20Bowl]Free Republic Search[/url]
And some contact info for those inclined.
To register a complaint about the Super Bowl half-time: Tom Freston, Chairman, MTV 212.258.8000 Leslie Moonves, President, CBS 323.575.2345 Sumner Redstone, CEO, Viacom 212.975.3247 How to Contact the FCC Chairman Michael K. Powell: [email]mpowell@fcc.gov[/email] Commissioner Kathleen Q. Abernathy: [email]kabernat@fcc.gov[/email] Commissioner Michael J. Copps: [email]mcopps@fcc.gov[/email] Commissioner Kevin J. Martin: [email]kjmweb@fcc.gov[/email] Commissioner Jonathan S. Adelstein: [email]jadelste@fcc.gov[/email]
We've always wanted to give these guys a piece of our minds anyway.
And you know, this might be the time when we can be a little bit more forthright on the exact nature, causes, and culprits of this "cultural decline"
2004-02-04 11:08 | User Profile
[QUOTE=wintermute]They're called breasts, mama. Every woman has them.
Wintermute[/QUOTE]
Nice to see you, Wintermute.
You've been missed.
Walter
2004-02-04 22:35 | User Profile
I'm afraid I can't see this as the deathblow to what's left of Western Culture, as so many here seem to imagine. Amerikan televitzim is 24/7 race-mixing filth leavened with a generous dose of Holy Holocaust(tm) propaganda, but we're supposed to believe that a highly unappealing negress baring one pastie-encrusted tit is the precursor to the Apocalypse? Bare boobs on the boob tube have been old news in Europe for a generation. This whole manufactured "controversy" is nothing but smoke and mirrors to keep the lemmings tut-tutting over That Awful Smut while the propaganda machine happily grinds out more and more of the usual poison, unnoticed. There's plenty of obscenity on amerikan televitz, all right, but it has nothing whatever to do with nudity.
And no, I didn't see the Jackson halftime show, any other part of the "super" Bowl, or any other televised mind-warping, for that matter. My TV viewing is limited to early-morning consultations with the Weather Channel, which is quite offensive enough, thank you.
2004-02-04 22:47 | User Profile
Sometimes I think that showing boobs on televitz would be good. At least Americans would get over with their fixation on breasts and think about something else. Besides, the Faux News may lose some of its appeal to the "they hate us for our freedom" crowd.
2004-02-05 00:23 | User Profile
[QUOTE=madrussian]Sometimes I think that showing boobs on televitz would be good. At least Americans would get over with their fixation on breasts and think about something else. Besides, the Faux News may lose some of its appeal to the "they hate us for our freedom" crowd.[/QUOTE]
No, I think it would feed it.
2004-02-05 16:18 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Walter Yannis]Nice to see you, Wintermute.
You've been missed.
Walter[/QUOTE]
I second that emotion. OD just isn't as good without Wintermute. Peace be upon this excellent American.