← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Franco
Thread ID: 11917 | Posts: 9 | Started: 2004-01-16
2004-01-16 01:56 | User Profile
1-15-04
It's Martin Luther King, Jr. Day! Just goes to show: anyone can have a holiday named after them. How do you all feel about a Malcolm X Day? Nifty idea? No? How about a Che Guevara Day? No? Oh, you're so intolerant...
MLK, Jr.'s Academic History
[url]http://chem-gharbison.unl.edu/mlk/plagiarism.html[/url]
How are you gonna honor The Good Doctor? Bwa-ha-ha-ha...
[title edited ]
2004-01-16 16:37 | User Profile
[SIZE=4]"MARTIN LUTHER" KING, JR. COMMUNIST FRAUD[/SIZE] By: Alan Stang
Let us now praise famous men ââ¬â if we can. There are two reasons you donââ¬â¢t need to know anything about Mike (even his name is a fraud) King, to know that we should not be celebrating a holiday in his name. First, a respectable time needs to pass after a man dies, during which the facts will mature. After sober reflection has considered them, a national clamor will spontaneously call such an honor into being ââ¬â it if is deserved.
To force such a holiday into law soon after a man dies, almost gasping in haste as in an emergency, using intimidation and threats, is unseemly to say the least; but that is how the present farce we uncelebrate was arranged. Need we add that this principle applies to any man, whatever his name, whatever his color.
The second reason proves ipso facto that the "Martin Luther" King holiday is a fraud. The only American who used to be so honored ââ¬â the only one ââ¬â was George Washington himself, the Father of our country, because sober reflection on the facts proved he deserved it.
Since then, George Washington has been demoted. Look at your calendar. His birthday has been submerged in "Presidents Day," with the result that the only American honored with a holiday all his own is Mike King. Even if you knew nothing about him before you started reading this, the obvious question should erupt from your monitor: Does this man ââ¬â does any American ââ¬â deserve to be honored above Washington?
Mike was said to be an apostle of Mohandas K. Gandhiââ¬â¢s non-violence. Many Americans at the time wondered why it was that, wherever King went, violence erupted. He explained it himself, in a piece he wrote for Saturday Review (April 3, 1965), in which he set forth the four steps of his technique.
"1. Nonviolent demonstrators go into the streets to exercise their constitutional rights. 2. Racists resist by unleashing violence against them. 3. Americans of conscience in the name of decency demand federal intervention and legislation. 4. The administration, under mass pressure, initiates measures of immediate intervention and remedial legislation."
Remember, this is not something we are accusing him of. Mike King wrote this himself. Notice that step two of his formulation calls for violence. The reason violence broke out wherever he went was that violence was what he went into the streets to get. His lieutenants would do things in the target city deliberately designed to drive normal human beings berserk.
What would you do if you looked out your bay window some glorious morning and saw someone peeing on your lawn? What would you do if you saw a couple there enjoying sex? What would you do if you were a mounted policeman and someone tried to disembowel your horse?
The Communist Broadcasting System, etc., would not record this, but it would broadcast graphic coverage of what you did when you went crazy, with the logical result that fair-minded people around the country believed you attacked the "nonviolent demonstrators exercising their constitutional rights" for no reason. This was a typical King "nonviolent" demonstration.
I participated in a modest effort to defuse some of this, as the only white member of a strike team that would travel to a targeted town and explain the scheme before Mikeââ¬â¢s terrorists arrived to foment animosity. For instance, King chose Sandersville, Georgia as a target and Julia Brown and I went there to do what we could.
Mrs. Brown had served as an F.B.I. undercover agent for many years in Cleveland. (This was the original, American F.B.I., not todayââ¬â¢s terrorist gang that commits mass murder of Americans and has merged with the Soviet KGB.) Julia and I worked together many times. She would delight in telling people I was her grandson, which raised some eyebrows among people too polite to ask how a black lady could have a grandson as white as Herman Talmadge.
When we arrived, Sandersville was simmering. Kingââ¬â¢s men had already provoked so much tension that it would have been dangerous to bring the black and white residents together to the same hall to hear us. So, we spoke to them on two consecutive evenings, one evening to the blacks, the other to the whites.
We told them what this man King was, which organizations and people he worked with and fronted for, how he did it and what his purpose was. We explained that he was trying to divide the races and foment violence in behalf of his bosses who had more contempt for Negroes, as people of color then were known, than the worst racist concocted by the perfervid imagination of Harriet Beecher Stowe
And, mirabile dictu, the tension dissipated. The people of Sandersville, Georgia, black and white, united in understanding who their true enemy was. Kingââ¬â¢s revolutionaries left. There was no riot. Later, Congressman Larry McDonald, the Georgia Democrat, invited Julia and me to testify against the proposed holiday for Mike. My beautiful "grandmother" and I flew together to the District of Criminals for the purpose. Julia testified that while she was a Party member, she "knew Martin Luther King to be closely connected with the Communist Party."
Mrs. Brown became a one-woman truth squad. When word arrived about the next town King planned to terrorize, she would go there first and talk to the townspeople of both races who were willing to listen. Mikeââ¬â¢s scheme would fizzle. So effective was she at exposing what Mike really was, so discredited and ineffective did he become, I worried that his Communist bosses might have him killed. As a martyr, he would be much more valuable to them than he had become.
Wanting Mike to remain alive and ineffective, I warned my colleagues of my fear, hoping that sufficient publicity could neutralize the threat, but a few weeks later he was dead, killed by the usual "lone assassin." As usual, there was "no conspiracy." There never is. Waving a shirt he said was drenched with Kingââ¬â¢s blood (it wasnââ¬â¢t), Jesse Jackson, who said he cradled the dying King in his arms (he didnââ¬â¢t), launched a career selling "protection," that no doubt has turned Cosa Nostra black with envy.
So, what was "Martin Luther" King, Jr.? Please look at the piece I did a year ago on the subject, which you will find in the archives of etherzone.com. He was a Communist. For proof of this, look, for just one example, at my book, Itââ¬â¢s Very Simple: The True Story of Civil Rights (Boston, Western Island, 1965), which sold half a million copies.
Itââ¬â¢s Very Simple talks about Bayard Rustin, Kingââ¬â¢s sodomite "secretary," who spent his entire life in Communist Party activities, and who demanded that "more bloody Negro suffering should be encouraged so that squeamish Northern Negroes would be horrified into line. . . ." There was also a man named Hunter Pitts Oââ¬â¢Dell, who ran Kingââ¬â¢s organization. Oââ¬â¢Dell was a member of the national committee of the Communist Party. The media of the time kept exposing Oââ¬â¢Dell and Mike kept pretending to fire him, but Oââ¬â¢Dell later would turn up elsewhere in Kingââ¬â¢s apparatus.
But the thing that has always amused me is that, after the book was published, we learned much more about Kingââ¬â¢s Communist and other activities than we knew before. I had to write many magazine articles to catch up. For instance, when I wrote Itââ¬â¢s Very Simple I did not yet know about Stanley Levison.
Suddenly, King started to make speeches about the war in Vietnam. Well meaning Americans scratched their heads. The war took him far afield from "civil rights," and his speeches sounded like enemy propaganda cooked up in Hanoi. The reason was that Stanley Levison was writing those speeches. So who was Stanley Levison?
Stanley was the paymaster in this country for the KGB, the Soviet secret police. The KGB would send Stanley the rubles to pay for all Soviet activities in the United States, and he would distribute the money. How high up in the Soviet apparatus would you have to be ââ¬â how much would the KGB have to trust you ââ¬â to get that job? Stanley Levison, of the KGB, financed Mike King and wrote his speeches.
I also did not yet know that "Dr." King was a consummate plagiarist, who stole enormous chunks of other peopleââ¬â¢s work. Anyone else doing that to such an extent would be summarily stripped of his doctorate, but "Dr." King is more than equal. (See George Orwellââ¬â¢s Animal Farm.) He also turns out to have been a world-class womanizer, maybe even surpassing his protector, Jack Kennedy. Remember that King was allegedly a preacher of the gospel.
The giveaway to all this is that even Kingââ¬â¢s admirers ââ¬â unable to staunch the extrusion of treason and filth ââ¬â reluctantly admit it. See for instance the work of Professor David J. Garrow, certainly a sympathetic King scholar. This is the record of the man our Communist leaders in the District of Criminals have even elevated above Washington.
Iââ¬â¢ll be talking about King for the entire two hours on my radio show on Monday. Compare what I tell you to what every other host on the radio says. Simply go to my website, [url]http://www.stangbooks.com/[/url], click on Network Talk Radio and click on Listen. I also have a few copies of the first and second editions of the paperback Itââ¬â¢s Very Simple available. They are "new," but remember that they are almost 40 years old and somewhat yellowed and faded. Call the North Hollywood American Opinion Bookstore, 800 470-8783.
"Published originally at [url]http://www.etherzone.com/:[/url] republication allowed with this notice and hyperlink intact."
2004-01-16 18:28 | User Profile
Had Michael King, Jr. lived today, he would be just another black agitating annoyance like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton.
What I find very interesting about King is that his only claim to fame was his August 1963 appearance in Washington D.C. What did King do between that appearance and his assassination. How come the only clips we see of him is his appearance in D.C.? What other "courageous" acts on behalf of mankind did King make between that time?
I'm sure there is a sizeable segment of the population that knows about King's files being sealed by the FBI until the year 2037. How come these files won't be released any time sooner? What is there to hide about the second God?
It doesn't surprise me that our enemies look to the past to go about their current lives. If they aren't worshipping a dead idol, they're regurgitating a holocaust against the Chosen some 60 years ago. There is very little in the present day for these people to exploit because they are the ones with the influence and control in our society.
2004-01-18 16:27 | User Profile
I sent this letter to dozens of editors; basically I copied most of it from Kevin Alfred Strom:
Dear Editor,
I have a problem with this National Holiday honoring The Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.. We have only two holidays honoring individuals; One is Jesus Christ, the other is MLK. The man was more of a beast than a Saint, but most of our politicians lack the guts to point out the facts to their constituents, for fear of being labeled a racist.
His title "Doctor" comes from his PhD from Boston University and Crozer Theological Seminary. King's doctoral dissertation was plaguarized, pirated and his writings are tragically flawed by numerous instances of plagiarism. King cheated because he had chosen for himself a political role in which a PhD would be useful, and, lacking the intellectual ability to obtain the title fairly, went after it by any means necessary.
If King was not a Communist, as he claimed, he certainly had Communist leanings and associates. From 1955 to 1960, Martin Luther King's associate, advisor, and personal secretary was one Bayard Rustin, a member of The Young Communist league. Rustin served 2 years in Federal prison for draft dodging, and another 60 days or lewd vagrancy and homosexual perversion. Other associates of King included Jack O'Dell, Myles Horton, Don West, Stanley Levinson, and Robert Williams, along with Abner Berry and James Dumbrowski, all open and acknowledged members of the Communist Party, USA
The Federal Bureau of Investigation had for many years been aware of Stanley Levison's Communist activities. It was Levison's close association with King that brought about the initial FBI interest in King. According to Assistant Director Sullivan, who had direct access to the surveillance files on King which are denied the American people, King had embezzled or misapplied substantial amounts of money contributed to the "civil rights" movement. King used SCLC funds to pay for liquor, and numerous prostitutes, who were brought to his hotel rooms, often two at a time, for drunken sex parties which sometimes lasted for several days. King spent his last night on Earth having sexual intercourse with two women at the motel wher he was leter murdered, and physically beating and abusing a third.
You may wonder why none of this has been made public. Simple. A judge has sealed the FBI files on King until the year 2027.
It has been said that "Ignorance is the mother of devotion." . This gem of wisdom certainly applies to the observance of the MLK National Holiday.
For publication,
Ed Toner 481B Jason Place Brick NJ 08724. 732-840-4203 [email]captained@comcast.net[/email]
.
2004-01-19 03:20 | User Profile
Very good show, Ed. And it takes a lot of guts to send such politically incorrect (but otherwise very correct) letters out under your real name. I trust that you are well-armed despite living in NJ (they say a 12-gauge loaded with 00 buckshot is still the deadliest short-range weapon known to man).
2004-01-19 10:28 | User Profile
Too bad James Earl Ray culled the brillo; that was an agitprop godsend for der Jude: they used it to portray the whoremongering monkey as a "martyr", thus enabling them to browbeat Guilty Racist Whitey into cringing submission ever since.
If Ray had been smart, he'd have snuffed Levinson and Da Revvun Doctuh's other faceless jew handlers instead (and not gotten caught, of course). It certainly would have terrorized the Behind the Curtain Tribe, and besides - can you imagine a national Stanley Levinson Day?
2004-01-19 15:07 | User Profile
What a great role model for our children:
[url]http://chem-gharbison.unl.edu/mlk/plagiarism.html[/url]
2004-01-20 00:07 | User Profile
[QUOTE=N.B. Forrest]Too bad James Earl Ray culled the brillo; that was an agitprop godsend for der Jude: they used it to portray the whoremongering monkey as a "martyr", thus enabling them to browbeat Guilty Racist Whitey into cringing submission ever since.
If Ray had been smart, he'd have snuffed Levinson and Da Revvun Doctuh's other faceless jew handlers instead (and not gotten caught, of course). It certainly would have terrorized the Behind the Curtain Tribe, and besides - can you imagine a national Stanley Levinson Day?[/QUOTE]Some believe that Ray wasn't the assasin, but rather the patsy:
[url]http://www.sfbayview.com/010704/assassinations010704.shtml[/url] [url]http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/archives/2004_01.html[/url]
The assassinations of Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X
In the case of Martin Luther King, James Earl Ray was jailed on the basis of a coerced confession which was immediately retracted. The judge refused to admit the retraction and Ray went to jail. There was one ballistics test on the rifle that James Earl Ray was supposed to have used to kill Dr. King which showed that a manufacturing defect left deep scores on all of the bullets fired by the rifle, scores which did NOT appear on the bullet recovered from Dr. King. The FBI insisted that the test results were flawed because the rifle was not properly "prepared", then stalled a second ballistics match until James Earl Ray died in prison, whereupon the judge threw out the legal challenge to Ray's conviction without ever allowing a second test on the rifle. - M. R.
If this is true, then King served as a useful "tool" himself; first being used to help create the present conditions we suffer under, then when he was no longer useful alive, he was killed so as to serve as a kind of "plastic idol" for the masses to worship under the new state religion of "tolerance n' diversity".
2004-01-20 00:11 | User Profile
The Perfect American Holiday
by Edgar Steele
19 January 2004
"No other public holiday in the United States honors a single individual. Of all the great leaders in our Nation's history - none of them have their own holiday. All of our great war heroes share Memorial Day. All of our great presidents share President's Day. Yet King -- a man who was a phony, a cheater, a traitor, and a sexual degenerate -- gets a day of his own. I have a big problem with that." -- Author unknown
I've given this a lot of thought, in view of all the negative articles concerning Martin Luther King, Jr. that fly around the Internet at this time of year, and I'm coming out in support of its status as a national holiday.
In fact, I can't think of another holiday that better sums up all that America has come to represent.
Besides, the above quote is wrong. Columbus Day still is enough of a holiday to be considered national and it honors just one individual. In fact, since Christopher Columbus did not discover America first, an argument can be made that he deserves treatment equal to King's, pursuant to modern American standards.
Martin Luther King, Jr. Day is the perfect reflection of modern America, however, so it wins honors as the most perfect American holiday. Let's examine the top ten reasons why this is so:
In fact, the King coverup is actually more legitimate, because King's widow received a 1977 Federal court order which sealed the huge FBI file on her husband for 50 years, "because its release would destroy his reputation!"
"(W)herever King went, violence erupted. He explained it himself, in a piece he wrote for Saturday Review (April 3, 1965), in which he set forth the four steps of his technique: '1. Nonviolent demonstrators go into the streets to exercise their constitutional rights. 2. Racists resist by unleashing violence against them. 3. Americans of conscience in the name of decency demand federal intervention and legislation. 4. The administration, under mass pressure, initiates measures of immediate intervention and remedial legislation.'" Martin Luther King, Jr. - Communist Fraud, by Alan Stang (1/16/04, Etherzone.com) ([url]http://www.etherzone.com/2004/stang011604.shtml[/url])
"(N)o less an authoritative source than the four senior editors of The Papers of Martin Luther King, Jr. (an official publication of the Martin Luther King Center for Nonviolent Social Change, Inc., whose staff includes King's widow Coretta), stated of King's writings at both Boston University and Crozer Theological Seminary: 'Judged retroactively by the standards of academic scholarship, [his writings] are tragically flawed by numerous instances of plagiarism.... Appropriated passages are particularly evident in his writings in his major field of graduate study, systematic theology...only 49 per cent of sentences in the section on Tillich (in his doctoral dissertation) contain five or more words that were King's own....'" Hoffman, ibid.
Boston University officials eventually admitted, "There is no question but that Dr. King plagiarized in the dissertation." Even so, they concluded that, "No thought should be given to the revocation of Dr. King's doctoral degree, (because such action) would serve no purpose." New York Times, October 11, 1991, page 15.
An interesting side note: Lynne Cheney, wife of America's current Vice President, was Chairman of the National Endowment for the Humanities when it purposely and forcefully suppressed knowledge of King's extensive doctoral thesis plagiarism.
" The first book that King wrote, Stride Toward Freedom, was plagiarized from numerous sources, all unattributed, according to documentation recently assembled by sympathetic King scholars Keith D. Miller, Ira G. Zepp, Jr., and David J. Garrow." Hoffman, ibid.
King never outgrew his need to steal the intellectual work of others. For example, he lifted whole sections of his famous "I Have A Dream" speech from a sermon by 1950's black preacher Archibald Carey.
"According to Assistant (FBI) Director Sullivan, who had direct access to the surveillance files on King which are denied the American people, King had embezzled or misapplied substantial amounts of money contributed to the 'civil rights' movement. King used SCLC funds to pay for liquor and numerous prostitutes, both Black and White, who were brought to his hotel rooms, often two at a time, for drunken sex parties which sometimes lasted for several days." "The Beast As Saint, The Truth About Martin Luther King," by Kevin Alfred Strom ([url]http://www.revilo-oliver.com/Kevin-Strom-personal/Beast_as_Saint.html[/url])
He was born Michael King, but his self-ordained preacher father changed his own name to Martin Luther King in 1935, thereby grandiosely presuming to assume the mantle of the great Protestant reformer, Martin Luther. Thus, he became Martin Luther King, Jr.
FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover named Martin Luther King, Jr. "(t)he most notorious liar in the country."
King spent his last night on earth in an adulterous liaison with a white prostitute, just one in a long string of such assignations. And the Walls Came Tumbling Down, a biography of King by Rev. Ralph Abernathy (1989).
During his last night alive, King was witnessed beating the prostitute he procured for the evening. Abernathy, ibid.
"According to King's biographer and sympathizer David J. Garrow, 'King privately described himself as a Marxist.' In his 1981 book, The FBI and Martin Luther King, Jr., Garrow quotes King as saying in SCLC staff meetings, '...we have moved into a new era, which must be an era of revolution.... The whole structure of American life must be changed.... We are engaged in the class struggle.'" Strom, ibid.
None other than Bobby Kennedy, US Attorney General, had King's office and hotel rooms bugged during the mid-1960s, developing extensive evidence of King's communist affiliations, revealing his communist financing and disclosing his handlers. This is how the shocking discovery of his sexual perversions was made.
"Jewish Communist Stanley Levison can best be described as King's behind-the-scenes 'handler.' Levison, who had for years been in charge of the secret funneling of Soviet funds to the Communist Party, USA, was King's mentor and was actually the brains behind many of King's more successful ploys. It was Levison who edited King's book, Stride Toward Freedom. It was Levison who arranged for a publisher. Levison even prepared King's income tax returns! It was Levison who really controlled the fund-raising and agitation activities of the SCLC. Levison wrote many of King's speeches. King described Levison as one of his 'closest friends.'" Strom, ibid.
Also, generally, see "Was the Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King Jr. a Communist?" by Chuck Morse ([url]http://www.chuckmorse.com/was_mlk_a_communist.html[/url])
And, the number one reason why Martin Luther King, Jr. Day is the perfect reflection of America:
"Jewish Communist Stanley Levison can best be described as King's behind-the-scenes 'handler'...It was Levison who really controlled the fund-raising and agitation activities of the SCLC." Strom, ibid.
Only in recent years has the NAACP had a black president. Previously, the leadership was always jewish, the same people who created the organization in the first place.
Upon further reflection, I realized that Christmas, too, is a national holiday which honors but a single individual. However, Christmas now has been stripped bare of its origins and meaning by American zionists and their Shabbats Goyim, the American Christian fundamentalists, such that it has become merely a major shopping opportunity. Yet another perfect reflection of modern America.
How utterly perfect that the only true "religious" holidays left to Americans at the end of the year are one recently created for self profit by a black American ex-con (Kwanzaa) and one which celebrates the massacre of white European ancestors by jews (Chanukah).
New America. An idea whose time has come.
EDGAR STEELE
NJJR