← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · TexasAnarch

Project: Demolition of The Times' demolition of the times

Thread ID: 11808 | Posts: 7 | Started: 2004-01-09

Wayback Archive

TexasAnarch [OP]

2004-01-09 00:43 | User Profile

These referenced arguments and analyses leading to charges against the New York Times of criminal malfeasance for deliberately and wilfully corrupting the public mind, spirituality, and grasp of reality, are distributed under OD forum headings: 1. Current Events: charging complicity in cover-up of mercenary sniper killings linking Washington, D.C. and Smarra, Iraq 2. Christianity: charging rape of the spirit of Chrismas by the Jewish menorah shown lit at Baghdad for hanuka this year. 3. Philosophy: Refuting Jewish pseudo-science of number-crunched re-definitions of actual temporal experience (now, in contxt) (base: Bertrand Russell's early work; my Ph.D. thesis at the U. of Wisconsin), and exposing the political motive Zionists have to cancel the metaphysics of the Common Christian Age (prepatrory, I predict, to their demanding recognition of the Jewish calendar, in attempt to recreate a perpetual simulacrum of the Temple of Solomon in Jerusalem as part of humanity's fate).

The politics of this work is nationalistic, described in any manner that is joined to demand expulsion of the demonstrated 5th column neocon influence/control over American culture, policies and destiny.

I would greatly value your interests, feedback, dissemination.

TexasAnarch

2004-01-09 00:52 | User Profile

first installment. Introduction

IT’S ABOUT TIME to TAKE DOWN THE TIMES !
to EXPURGATE NEOCON INFLUENCE INSIDE THE NEW YORK TIMES ….OR, IT BE LEVELLED TO THE GROUND …. As the record shows they have done to TriBeca, America, the Middle East

           This must be done to protect our homeland, Christianity, humanity, planet earth, reason, sanity – all turned against what they have done, are.  Though the incidents cited below in proof are recent, the condition is long-standing, on-going, vastly extensive in scope, power, historical maleficence.  What brings them together, now, in cymbol-crashing, symbol-clashing vitriolic, violent imperative, is the impending catastrophic, irreversible consequence of their actions. The Sword of the Millenium hangs over their head.

Examination of the detail of three cases of New York Times journalism – First, National/international news coverage of the Washington, D.C-Smarra, Iraq sniper teams (2.2.04). – Second, spread of a Jewish menorah lit at Baghdad on the 12.19.03 Op-Ed page - Third, publication of a pseudo-intellectual attempt to purge reality of time itself by sci-fi new age academic Columbia U. guru Brian Greene. show the same hand working behind the scenes in each case separately, and in all together, constantly and consistently, to advance the cause of Jewish Zionism in the pages of America’s newspaper of record.

The charge is criminal malfeasance of the institution , including betrayal of public trust; corruption of scientific, historical and metaphysical understanding and truth; willful, deliberate premeditated deceptions arising from intent to manufacture communications favorable to the Jews.

TexasAnarch

2004-01-09 00:56 | User Profile

Second installment. Case 1

Case 1. Coverage of the DC Sniper event, lack of responsible editorial comment

Editorial malfeasance was shown by the Times, first of all, in the assignment of Jayson Blair to head the Times’ news coverage of the D.C. sniper case October ’02. After Bush White House Press Secretary Ari Fleisher’s “for the price of a single bullet” crack Wednesday morning the Second, referring to assassination of Saddam Hussein as one way of preventing the war being planned against Iraq, there were overtones of an international, organized response-in-kind. Fleisher, portraying Jewishness in appearance on camera, had announced sniper assassination as a state weapon against a world leader; why shouldn’t that leader retaliate in kind? This point could not have escaped the editors. Their solution? go with Jayson.

This sloughing off responsibility mas matched by actual deception on the part of Gannet-USA, “Mike” Buchanan “leaking” news of the Tarot Card to the press at the Oct. 7 of Iran Brown, which carried loudly shouted symbolic message overtones of child-sacrifice.. As to re-inforce the international “this is tit for tat” terrorism. “You kill one of us, we kill one of yours.” – a thought Americans might well have dwelt on more deeply as a consequence of what the bi-partisan, but neo-con driven war party was advocating. “I Am God” were the words Gannet/Usa/Washington Post published were on the card; in fact, we learned later, “Call Me God” was printed, then used in xecret behind-the-scenes communications between JOC (Joint Office of Command) under ATF’s Cavanaugh, who had done the job at Waco (his rule: “control communication – get in contact”). This is slight0of-hand with sign-use played on the public mind, requiring a psychosemiotic forensics to prosecute.

The New York Times sending Jayson Blair to cover what became an in-house sort of AFT – to Muhammed & Malvo dialogue, as it became after the deception, links darkly with use of black aspirations to muffle complaints about fudged objectivity. Montgomery County, Maryland Police Chief Moose also fits this description.. Used by media-image managers.as front-man to the public eye. Now Malvo is being crucified, that’s all one could call it. Never placed at the scene of a single crime with which he was charged, entirely lacking benefit of defense of his innocence, which would require the state to match the wrongly-obtained “evidence” of his alleged early confession, later admittedly contrived against facts at the scene of the crimes, he was convicted with no proof of guilt, but for our = yours, especially guilt “framed” to punish him for. And what is that guilt? BUSHMASTERMINDEDYOUTHTOKILLWITHOUT CONSCIENCEINTRANCESTATEFATHERSONMYSTICALEVIL CONTROL.

That is what is left behind, imprinted in the mind under the trauma of the events at the time, when Democrats were trying to find a voice to prevent the war on Iraq.

How startlingly further congruent, then, was the picture of two U.S. snipers crouched in nighttime attack gear outside Baghdad,, ready to plug ‘em – the enemy looking to plug “our” boys. “I shot one guy in the head and his head exploded,” said Sgt. Randy Davis, one of about 40 snipers in the Army’s new 3,600-soldier Brigade from Fort Lewis, Wash. “Usually, though, you just see a dust cloud pop up off their clothes, and see a little blood splatter come out the front.” The editor’s Page One message? “In Iraq’s Murky Battle, Snipers Offer U.S. a Precision Weapon.” If this is not a provocation of The Almighty, Himself, there isn’t one.

There are other odd Jewish connections to the Malvo case. The shooting of a Torah scroll in a Tacoma, Wash. Synagogue was alleged; the USA TV channel movie “23 Days of Fear” shown in November ’03, was made by a Jewish woman, Orley Adelman, from the announced motive of recognizing the sympathetic bonding of Israel and America in vulnerability to terrorism – then, the movie showed Malvo making phone calls, padding out the increasingly cockamamie, hilarious narrative the prosecution was later stuck with never have to prove a word of, of the way things went down. “Anti-Semitic” remarks, or drawings were alleged to have been among his jail-cell leavings, but no questioning of their authorship or authenticity was legally entered. Sounds right to convict him of, though, certainly. (That is what crucifixion is, in the larger sense.) “Malvo” as total media-image construct was then linked to The Matrix movie. “He watched it a hundred times,” said Prosecutor Horan. It is supposed to have had the effect of inculcating belief he was Neo, rescuing a sleeping-controlled humanity by freeing himself from the Matrix, thereby becoming a member of a Rebel human remnant aboard spaceship Nebechanezer who want to save Zion, where doth survive another remnant; it being rumored that He might be The One “sent” to rescue them. Then, at the trial, the careful, conscientious defense psychiatrist, becomes intent on making him look as insane as possible, when the time comes for punishment. He is described as disassociated, unfeeling, anti-social because he plugged a cat, sissified but cuning and super-accurate with a rifle, when under Muhammad’s control. All this BS, rather than him just being a “big-guy” dominated, over-stimulated and spaced out normal teenage kid. So in the “defence” projection, the mind of :Malvo” morphs easily into anti-White, anti-Israeli, but Pro-North Korean (??) ideologue. The more that came out about him, the more you could see this kid really had his shit together. Or somebody’s.

Ragnar

2004-01-09 08:54 | User Profile

[QUOTE]“Malvo” as total media-image construct was then linked to The Matrix movie. “He watched it a hundred times,” said Prosecutor Horan. It is supposed to have had the effect of inculcating belief he was Neo, rescuing a sleeping-controlled humanity by freeing himself from the Matrix, thereby becoming a member of a Rebel human remnant aboard spaceship Nebechanezer who want to save Zion, where doth survive another remnant; it being rumored that He might be The One “sent” to rescue them.[/QUOTE]

Still digesting some of the above, but this got my attention. I'm wondering if there's an MKULTRA quotient here? I have read into the murder of John Lennon, I singer I never liked, because the MKU-Q there is huge. Lennon's killer was not a "deranged fan" and according to the soberest account was barely aware of Lennon or the Beatles, but was apparently part of something else entirely.

The "Malvo" business brings it back. Do we have lone nuts or programmed nuts and whose agenda is really being served here? We know that American intelligence agencies have always infiltrated peaceful protests to turn them violent -- from union organizing to the Democratic Convention of '68. That sort of provocation at least makes rough sense. (Anyway shows American screws learned something from the Czars!).

These killers are something else again. In a way it's as if someone is creating monsters, turning them loose, and then demanding more from us after the explosion. It's got me thinking it might be later than it seems. A day may come when there are too many monsters.

TexasAnarch

2004-01-09 13:11 | User Profile

[QUOTE=Ragnar]Still digesting some of the above, but this got my attention. I'm wondering if there's an MKULTRA quotient here? I have read into the murder of John Lennon, I singer I never liked, because the MKU-Q there is huge. Lennon's killer was not a "deranged fan" and according to the soberest account was barely aware of Lennon or the Beatles, but was apparently part of something else entirely.

The "Malvo" business brings it back. Do we have lone nuts or programmed nuts and whose agenda is really being served here? We know that American intelligence agencies have always infiltrated peaceful protests to turn them violent -- from union organizing to the Democratic Convention of '68. That sort of provocation at least makes rough sense. (Anyway shows American screws learned something from the Czars!).

These killers are something else again. In a way it's as if someone is creating monsters, turning them loose, and then demanding more from us after the explosion. It's got me thinking it might be later than it seems. A day may come when there are too many monsters.[/QUOTE]

Lennon [B]was[/B] The One ...the only one who could have stopped Reagan (Nixon and Hoover hated him fiercely, as you must know.) The album Double-Fantasy had three songs that went directly to the top 10, first time in music history. He had just come out of extended inactivity, and with people like myself, who saw through everything the pre-Bush people would emerged to represent, in 2000 -- which you apparently did not; didn you protest the Vietnam war? -- he was not only hope but victory. (Don't forget, the Mop tops started out German, including the finest state-of-the-art guitars of the time, and with sympathy for those killed fighting for Hitler, something the right-wing pathological liars and psychological killers here never arrived at, even now, which is why they are pathological liars and psychotic killers aka Repubelikkuns -- I am cro-magnon liberal, and they killed one of my boys for their zero-nesses, and the Jews knew how to make them pay for the guilt, walla neocons.)

So, you are right about Chapman, IMHO -- I read a lot a lot about it back around Dec. 8, working up remarks for a radio talk show for the Public Affairs dept. at WHRWfm.org SUNY campus upstate at Binghamton. His murder led, if you've tracked it, back to Roman Polanski, the Tate-LaBianca murders, and Arthur Koestler's The Thirteenth Tribe, then back again through Pan Am flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland (w/ Assistant FBI "Buck" Revell pulling his son-in-law off the flight before it left Heathro that night),(Not: the Libyans; notice the Israelis had secret meetings with Khadafi before last month's "surprise" overture?) Waco, OkC, Columbine, the poisoned anthrax letters. and "Muhammed and Malvo" (Maryn Monroe -convert to Judaism), Mickey Mouse, M & M's, em 'n em, MMIV, etc.)

My sense of things is that the agencies don't really want to kill us, anymore than is necessary to keep control of the situation for Repubelikkun political gunners. Manchurian candiate assassinations aren't that reliable, so professional Horiucis must be trained, de-sensitized, and those new sorts of "patsies" they have devised, since the Dead Kennedy's (like them?-- the goup, I mean? -- "California Uber Alles!"?) are mind-controlled to THINK they do it, as Salvador argues for CHapman. They "wake up" with blood spattered everywhere, spreading documents like the Unabomber (my, what a full house he had) that "prove" the targets of the general public are imlicated, such as the patriotic militias Tim McVeigh was "sheep-dipped" (he never had any more affinity with them than Chapman had with the Beatles) to discredit, and the "North Koreans" "Malvo" was supposed to support. Hey! it got 'em elected in '02. What works works. They'll farm out the killing then kill the witnesses and dissenters. (For who "they" are, please see The Oklahoma City Bombing and the Politics of Terror, by David Hoffman, if you can get a copy anymore -- Media By-pass, '98)

But it is terrible, a procedure of last resort, one they've got down pat now.

(I never got that older. Asian woman thing JL had for Yoko, but he at least didn't make love a cliche, like (Charlie) Mcarthy. His contribution to Christmas, with Instant Karma, was worth a lifetime.)

Ragnar

2004-01-12 07:47 | User Profile

[QUOTE]My sense of things is that the agencies don't really want to kill us, anymore than is necessary to keep control of the situation for Repubelikkun political gunners...[/QUOTE]

Okay, I just got done going thru as much on Lennon as I had (took till Sunday, but I'm moving stuff back and forth).

I think it's a case of "kill one -- scare many" because, as I recall, there was lots of activity in anti-nukes and so forth about the time Lennon got popped. Suddenly "stars" were finding other ways to be "active".

There was mention that some of the "Live Aid" and philanthopic rock stuff, which really didn't get moving till a couple years after the shots at Dakota, was sort of a placebo. Their fans expected some of this sort of thing by then so they collected money for Africa. It got them on MTV (never mind) and it probably salved their consciences, assuming they had such.

Bob Dylan may/may not have made an oblique comment on this situation. He made a movie last year called Masked and Anonymous, which is a bit of an editorial all by itself. In the movie he plays a singer named Jack Fate who is sprung from prison to sing a benefit to a country that is falling apart. Riots. Wars. Revolutionaries and counter-revolutionaries and one says "I changed sides - nobody noticed".

Dylan's odd contribution is that the soundtrack is "multicultural" which might be the point he is making. Multi-cult = Chaos = Collapse. Is Dylan, a Jew, noting that what he sowed is what we reap? I cannot say for sure. The soundtrack CD starts with a rousing version of "My Back Pages" by the Magokaro Brothers in Japanese.

As disturbing as death in a different way.

TexasAnarch

2004-01-12 12:45 | User Profile

[QUOTE=Ragnar]I think it's a case of "kill one -- scare many" because, as I recall, there was lots of activity in anti-nukes and so forth about the time Lennon got popped. Suddenly "stars" were finding other ways to be "active".

There was mention that some of the "Live Aid" and philanthopic rock stuff, which really didn't get moving till a couple years after the shots at Dakota, was sort of a placebo. Their fans expected some of this sort of thing by then so they collected money for Africa. It got them on MTV (never mind) and it probably salved their consciences, assuming they had such.

Bob Dylan......[/QUOTE]

Right. Great headspace.

The anti-nuke thing was sure hitting America big about then ("Reagan's America", L. deMause, published in July '83 -- predicted Reagan would send troops into Nigaragua on a pre-text by '84 -- we* (=John Q.) were suppsoed to be "geting over the Vietnam war syndrome" by "thinking the unthinkable", so, many were indeed losing their shit. You knew Dylan's song "Jokerman" (on "Infidel") was about Reagan? ("...born with a snake in both his fists while a hurricane was blowin'....freedom's ... just around the corner from you, but with truth so far off, what good would it do? ...jokerman, oh, oh, oh oh, jokerman..")

So while it may have been "kill one...scare many", it was Lennon they had to pop John, because a. he knew; b. he could stop it, c. and intended to.

I believed, still believe, everybody had to take a stand, back then, after a certain point, and not change, ever, because of what they saw and knew, and this included, especially, "stars". To me, that is what stars are and always have been for. You had to take a stand, after Our White Boots were sent out marching in a Yellow Land. It is part of what the meaning of "sin" is, that some things, once done, stand forever. It is a part Jews are constitutionally incapable of understanding (if I may be so bold as arrouse possible semitic frission). YHWH uber alles, "sin" is what Christians turn to Their Savior (yessir!) to gain forgiveness for. (Some actually succeed -- that's one of my recent lines: Jews have no way to forgive themselves of sin, which is the theologfical explanation of the way they are. He left them right there, where Snakeskin Joe is.)

It is the use of Bono power, and Ozzie galootery -- no match for the Clampetts, Green Acres -- to bring 15$ billion AIDS to AFRICA cleanup now, after the disease that broke out first in NYC among gays who volunteered for a trial Hepatitus B vaccine, later alleged to have been passed by green monkeys ih the wild to humans (like the Vietnam war was fought to save Vietnamese from "The Communists", in Peking, Moscow, Hanoi), a likely story, at best; a cover story for what David Horowitz (whose book "Toxic Warfare" in 2000 set out the scenario for the anthrax attack, which hardly anyone considered as a remote possibility at the time -- whatever you can make of a homosexual Jewish convert to some form of Utah pentacostal/California health addict Christian sect who documented CIA use of Salk smallpox vaccine in '60's smallpox to text biowarfare defenses, leaving trace genetic anomalies that, a generation later, re-crustalized into the very curious-looking AIDS virus (no, no, and no), traced the Ames strain mailed to liberal Senagtors Leahy and Daschle to Batelle Memorial Labs in West Jefferson, Ohio (funny whereTJ's name is always turning up), since disappeared into the Wilderness (I suppose).

 What I didn't know, back then -- late 60's -- is that, behind our backs -- I was the single faculty member to stand with a rag-tag bunchb of hippie kids on the steps of Harpur College administration to physically block the path of the US military recruiter, who had been sent in violation of the agreed-uipon policy that he would answer questions about his views of the war to students (the military refused to let him do so), but I was not SDS or even leftist-political; I knew the war was wrong, very wrong -- in our little upstate jewel of SUNY's excellect system then (credit Rockefeller, I do) the network of neoconism was taking shape, as right-wing, Israel-connected professors actually used the war protest to agitate for their causes (oh, yes, and, of course, "civil rights".  I was indeed revolutionary, then, in precisely the way I am, now, except with oceans of more material now to use. I as on the President's "Blue Ribbon" committee who helped draw up the policy, which is defensible on general grounds. This is the way it was passed on in the blood, through the blood, by the blood, tio that point.  But I am here to tell you, the blood, by itself, is not the way. Self-sacrifice is not the way, as Patton so graphically put it to the soldiers.  Will, in Fichte's sense ("A man cannot truly love (=will) himself unless he can will his country under the image of eternity.")  (turn-of-18th-19th cent. German Idealist) is not just what was  in the German blood, as German, but in them also (partly), what was in their  language.  This was an "empirical" matter of fact that functioned [I]apriori[/I] ; that is to say, through (what I call) Spirit.  I accept this as a metaphysical standpoint, and bring it forward to English. That is my rock-botton anti-multi-cultism.  Whatever else anyone might mean, or think they mean, by their use of the term "God", if they hold office in America, it must be translated into what the founders of the country communicated by it, accompanied by an oath of "no higher loyalty" to any such entity thereunto. That, and only that, is what I mean, and demand, as the Christian heritage for it.  This one piece of legislation, including requirement to index all personal refeerences to "God" by any official speaking publically, especially wearing a military uniform of the United States of America.  They must be required, if they so choose to do so, to index all such references in speech and writing  to the particular schtick they undeertake the chutzpah to tongue.  Without such legislation there will truly be a tower of Prometian (but with a Yiddish twist) Babel.

(You've got to hand it to LaRouche, right? -- been reading his amazing stuff for the first time. It's like asking my dr. about Viagra. He's definitely half-right, about everything.)