← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Ragnar
Thread ID: 11683 | Posts: 10 | Started: 2004-01-01
2004-01-01 03:16 | User Profile
[B]2004 - Year Of The Slave[/B]
[url]http://www.rense.com/general47/slave.htm[/url]
Originally published at What Really Happened.com
1-1-04
You are a slave.
I know that's not what you want to hear as you hoist your New Year's champagne, but it is the unpleasant truth that we all face going into 2004.
Movies and public school like to portray slaves as bound by chains and beaten with whips, creating a polarized image of slavery that can be pointed to with the comment, "You are not like that, therefore you are not a slave." But history shows that slaves have been treated in all manner of ways, some more cruel than others, yet even with the most kind treatment, a slave remains a slave.
Setting aside the stereotyped image of a slave as a bleeding chain-bound wretch, slaves throughout history are often hard to recognize. In some cases, such as the Medieval Serfs, they were held slaves to the rulers by religious belief, and did not see themselves as slaves even though they were treated as such. The favored slaves of Asian potentates wore jewels to make a movie star gasp, yet were still slaves for all their finery and comfort.
So, what is a slave? How do we define a slave? What test do we use to tell if someone is a slave. What makes them different from free people?
Free people can say "no". Free people can refuse demands for their money, time, and children. Slaves cannot. There is no freedom without the freedom to say "no". If someone demands that you do something and you can say "no" and refuse to do it, then you are a free human being. If you can be forced to do something or surrender something that you do not wish to, then you are a slave. No other test need be applied.
When you are forced to surrender half your life's work to the government in ever-increasing taxes, then you are a slave. Throughout history, slaves were expected to perform the work needed for their own upkeep, then perform additional work for the rulers. For Roman slaves, the ratio of work-for-self versus work-for-rulers was about 50-50. The same ratio applied to Medieval Serfs, and even to the slaves of the American south. And, when you add up all the overt taxes, covert fees, tariffs, excises, plus the increased price you pay for products to pay the taxes of the companies that make those products, you will find that Americans are at that same "half-for-self" versus "half-for-rulers" ratio! Can you say "no" to the confiscation of half of your life? Can you even get the masters to maybe reduce the burden by a significant amount? No? Congratulations. You are a slave.
The masters have decided they want wars on anyone living over oil. The idea is that it is better for American corporations to steal the oil they need than to pay for it. Millions of Americans (and millions more around the globe) did not want the war, but the masters started them anyway, by lying to the people. Could you refuse the war? Can you refuse being lied to? No? Congratulations. You are a slave.
The rulers want your children for their future wars. Legislation for a draft is already in Congress. Can you refuse the confiscation of your children? No? Congratulations. You are a slave.
The government has been caught lying over and over again to the people, from who really did 9-11, to the legality of the tax system, to Cheney's Energy Task Force papers, to Saddam's WMDs. Americans are the most lied-to people on Earth. Can you refuse to be lied to? Can you punish the liars? No? Congratulations. You are a slave.
Vote fraud is rampant in the nation, and the mandated imposition of audit-less electronic voting systems means that elections will be decided (as Stalin admitted) not by those who vote but by those who count the vote. Can you refuse a dishonest voting process? No? Congratulations. You are a slave.
Just because you cannot see the slave-chains doesn't mean they are not there. Chains made of steel are obvious, but chains made of beliefs are not always recognized for what they are. Hitler enslaved the German people to war with a belief that Poland was about to invade. LBJ enslaved the American people to war with the belief that Vietnam had attacked the USS Maddox in the Gulf of Tonkin. Poland wasn't invading. There were no torpedoes in the Gulf of Tonkin, but the slaves, held by invisible chains of beliefs, went to war. Millions died.
In 2003, however, the chains started to become visible. The Constitutional right to freedom of expression was confined to "free-speech" zones. A slave may have an opinion, so long as it is not expressed where it might upset the other slaves. The Constitutional right to an armed populace, the means by which the men who set up a nation of free citizens hoped to keep them free, is under constant attack from those who fear a nation of free citizens, and who will not sleep soundly until we are a nation entirely of slaves. Armed citizens can, after all, say "no" and make it stick. That was why there was a Second Amendment, to allow the people to say "no" to those who would return them to the slavery they had so recently escaped from. Other Constitutional rights and protections have been set aside. The government can now search through your private records without cause and without warrant, even break into your home and not have to tell you. Simply by declaring a citizen an enemy combatant, the government can now lock up US citizens without a charge and without a lawyer. You can be prevented from traveling simply for having the wrong name. If you purchase too much gold or take home too much cash, or hoard food, the government will take notice. Having a Farmer's Almanac is grounds for suspicion. Talking about the Constitution is now deemed grounds to suspect a terrorist link. Torture is now espoused as "necessary" to "deal with the crisis". Were you able to refuse those changes to the Constitution? No? Congratulations. You are a slave.
The government (at all levels) has borrowed trillions of dollars and stuck your kids with the payments. Children not even born will be paying off the bills. To declare the lives of children not yet born, let alone old enough to vote, indentured to the state is slavery most obvious and odious. Can you refuse responsibility for payments on debts the government incurred without your permission? No? Congratulations. You are a slave.
The government has borrowed so much money that it has long ago run out of gold to pledge as collateral on the debts. Starting in Nixon's administration, natural resources were used as collateral for the mounting debts. Borrow more money, promise a chunk of public lands as collateral. These land pledges were concealed behind "Environmentalism" to disguise the real purpose. Numerous names such as "Wilderness Reserve", "Wetland", "Heritage River", and so forth were used to conceal the true scale of the confiscations. But the end result was the same. Huge tracts of public land containing natural resources were walled away from the public that owned them, mortgaged to the holders of the US Government debt. We are well on our way from being citizens, to being mere tenants. Were you able to refuse having your public lands placed at risk by the US Government to cover loans you never authorized the government to make? No? Congratulations. You are a slave.
Trust funds under government control are being looted, from the Social Security trust fund to Native American trust accounts to Federal Retirement Funds. Congress pays lip service to the looting of Social Security, but considers only more taxes to cover the looted shortfall. Meanwhile, court cases over other looted trust accounts drag on without resolution. Are you able to refuse corrupt and dishonest government? No? Congratulations. You are a slave.
You are a slave because the ruling class can do what they want, take what they want, and you cannot refuse. You may have freedom to decide what TV channel to watch tonight, or just which style car you will drive to your work in, but little power over the rest of your life. Even that home you have worked to pay for over the last decade can be taken from you at a moment's notice via "eminent domain". Can you refuse? No? Congratulations. You are a slave.
In October 2001 I wrote that more damage would be done to our nation by those claiming to save us from the terrorists than by any actual terrorist act. Even as Bush claimed that the terrorists hated the US because of our freedoms, he took what few remaining freedoms we had away until we are more watched, more spied on, more limited, more silenced, more taxed, and more enslaved that at any other time in our nation's history. Not only are we slaves, we are at last starting to see that we have been slaves all along. We did not have rights, because a right cannot be taken away. What we had were indulgences, granted by the masters to the slaves, to be removed when the masters grow fearful of the slaves' resentment and anger.
I know this is a very depressing article to read on the New Year, but I have watched through 2003 as people I care about lost their homes and businesses, as the labors of a lifetime evaporated in stock market manipulations by corporate crooks. These Americans who had worked hard to achieve the American dream lost it all through no fault of their own. Our schools are broke, hospitals under-staffed, the roads and bridges and rails of the nation are crumbling while billions of dollars are given away to foreign nations, favored cronies, and the ravenous war machine. The priorities of the government that feeds on taxes seems focused everywhere but on those who pay those taxes. And we can't seem to refuse that either.
I think the state of the nation can be summed up by a simple contrast. Tommy Chong is in jail for selling a pipe, while Ken Lay walks around a free man with the billions he stole from his employees and investors. Any way you slice it, that's a pretty screwed up situation.
I promised a reader that I would make some predictions for 2004 in this article. I wish I hadn't because I am hoping I am wrong on most of them.
There will be another fake terror attack. The Neocon war agenda cannot move forward without it. Those who hoped Iraq would be the end of the wars are in for a rude shock. The hawks want the entire planet, either directly ruled by the US, or ruled by obedient puppet regimes. Another "attack" is needed.
The US will eventually lose their war of conquest of the world. The US does not have enough troops to garrison the planet, and as Hitler learned much too late, merely having superior weapons isn't going to win a war when you've pissed off absolutely everyone else in the world. On a more practical level, sooner or later the US will wind up at war with someone who really DOES have nuclear weapons of mass destruction. That this is the government plan is witnessed by the numerous underground facilities which have been built or upgraded in recent years. You paid for them, but you won't be allowed in them. Such an attack on the US is small price to pay for those who promote these wars, not for America, but for another nation standing by while its victims are tricked into fighting each other.
Minus a war, the US Government will eventually collapse as did the Soviet Union, dragged down by debt and corruption. As the final collapse looms closer, look for the looting of the nation to become even bolder than it is now. The last official act of any government is to loot the nation.
I am opposed to violence. I wish it could be avoided but I do believe that this nation is headed towards a collision between the rulers and the ruled. The government fears this as well or we wouldn't see so much bullet-proof Lexan between us and our "public servants". I think that the reason we have not seen it yet is that Americans have been conditioned to expect a hero or savior to come and make things right. We know things have gone wrong, but we are waiting for someone else to fix it, Superman, the cavalry riding to the rescue, Spartacus, the Messiah, Batman, What Really Happened, etc. This belief that one should wait quietly for a hero is part of the slavery mechanism, to keep you in your place, rendering unto Caesar, breeding more slaves, waiting for salvation that never comes. However, as history has shown, even the patience of an entire people can run out, and I predict that when the final upheaval comes, it will arrive as suddenly as that which occurred in Romania. In November 1989, Romania seemed stable under the rule of Nicholai Ceausescu. One month later, a sporting event erupted into a spontaneous political protest and on December 25th, Nicholai Ceausescu was tried and sentenced to death. Ceausescu proved that tyrants should not confuse silence with consent. The Romanian people finally realized that nobody was coming to save them, and they had the courage to save themselves. The collapse of the USSR was equally rapid and almost as unexpected. So shall it be in the US.
Like I said above, I hope I am wrong in my forecasts. However it is clear that the US Government is under the control of individuals intent on personal enrichment, or loyalty to a foreign nation above our own, and seeing no reason at all not to continue on their present course. Confrontation seems inevitable.
The founding fathers set up a nation in which government was by the consent of the people. We The People agreed to certain obligations, and the government we allowed to care for our national sovereignty agreed to abide by certain limits set forth in the Constitution. The present government has broken the agreement, discarding the Constitutional limits on their power and authority while at the same time piling more and more obligations onto the people. Were you able to refuse them? No? This more than any of the other reasons is why you have ceased to be a free human being, and are now a slave.
You are a slave. When you live under a government that takes your wealth and your children and lies to you to keep you docile and scares you to keep you obedient, how can it be otherwise?
You are a slave. You can stay that way, or not. It's that simple. Nobody is coming to save you. There are no heroes, no cavalry riding to the rescue. Whether you and your children will live as slaves or as free human beings is entirely up to you.
2004-01-01 07:10 | User Profile
That is a SUPERB article. I'm definitely going to spread it around.
2004-01-01 12:55 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Angler]That is a SUPERB article. I'm definitely going to spread it around.[/QUOTE]
You and me both!! :thumbsup:
2004-01-02 05:14 | User Profile
Ragnar,
Thus we have no manhood or hope?
I am no slave. And have no intention of being so. Acceptance is easy and a simplistic way of life - as you no doubt observe.
However, we must choose a way. There is no such thing as complete freedom - that does not exist and cannot - a factual truth in human relations.
But we must choose our path. And remain true to it and fight for it, regardless of the negativity or apathy that presents itself. People may die and property destroyed. But good ideas never die.
My regards.
2004-01-02 05:44 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Mentzer] Thus we have no manhood or hope? [/QUOTE]
Mentzer,
No. Read the last paragraph again. Nobody is coming to save you. We must state these things as bluntly as we can. Then we get together and get moving to reverse the trends outlined above - or we really are slaves and we leave an unfree world when we pass on.
It is time to [B]use[/B] manhood and stop [B]hoping[/B] things will get better on their own! :lol:
2004-01-02 06:26 | User Profile
Agreed, Ragnar,
And we must unify in a concentrated political force. Indivisible and determined in order to be effective and with strong leadership.
Small, individual groupings, are worthless and ineffectual. It requires national, perhaps international, cooperation with a singular aim. No distractions or negativity can be tolerated.
It will be apparent. But will the leadership be American or European? Either way it must be combined to be successful.
2004-01-02 08:08 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Mentzer]But will the leadership be American or European? [/QUOTE]
Ah, this question is worth a thread by itself.
At the risk of offending some of the thinner-skinned Americans here, I'm regretfully assuming the leadership will be European. Putin showed more brass last year than any US president has shown in the last 50.
Europeans still have shared cultural and blood ties that cover whole nations. Americans are fragmented, distracted - even Americans with roots and culture tend to be isolated or region-specific.
Europe will lead the way to the liberation of European man, which seems logical when you get right down to it.
2004-01-04 02:48 | User Profile
Ragnar,
I also think it will be European leadership.
There is a toughness and determination I have not witnessed before - Good Europeans.
I hope the Good Americans come on board.
Mentzer.
2004-01-10 18:44 | User Profile
[QUOTE]Small, individual groupings, are worthless and ineffectual. and But will the leadership be American or European?[/QUOTE] [QUOTE]I'm regretfully assuming the leadership will be European.[/QUOTE]
Um, isn't this EXACTLY "waiting for someone to save you?"
Are you guys just saying: "Yes, we'll join up and rise up -- just as SOON as the "right leader" shows up."
Which direction is he coming from and how soon will he be here? And how will you recognize him?
Ragnar has it right: Nobody is coming to save you.
[COLOR=Red]NOBODY is coming to save you!!![/COLOR]
2004-01-10 20:41 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Avalanche]Um, isn't this EXACTLY "waiting for someone to save you?"[/QUOTE]
Um...well... not exactly (yeah, it sounds like a contradiction!)
I think what Mentzer and I meant (speaking for meself, anyhow) was where the locus of anti-global tyranny is likely to spring first among our people. US or the "old country"? Who is likely to say NO first and with the most brass? Less looking for leaders than wondering [B]Where Shall the Games Begin?[/B]
I say Europe. Family of mine just back from a stay in Budapest were telling me how the Hungarians were seething at the suggestion that they should "open their borders" to various refugees (Somalis, Afganis, whatever) and saying it quite openly on the streets and in the press. As part of the "coalition", Americans assumed Hungary was going to let their cities turn into East L.A. The Hungarians educated the Yanks real fast.
Europeans still stick up for each other. Americans (legalistic-minded) pay too much attention to Europe's idiot censorship laws and forget that allwhite people pass too many laws. As a practical matter, Europeans are far freer to discuss race/national issues than Americans are. This gets more noticable as you get further east, and by the time you're among my wife's kinfolk in Poland, it's like being at a White Power convention on any random streetcorner.
So smart money says they'll light the firecracker. Whether they hold the reigns after the BOOM is another matter. :)