← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Walter Yannis
Thread ID: 11610 | Posts: 8 | Started: 2003-12-26
2003-12-26 11:19 | User Profile
This appeared in the 26 December 2003 [URL=http://www.catholicexchange.com/vm/index.asp?art_id=21756]Catholic Exchange.[/URL].
Of course the "we" in the title refers to pro-lifers of all kinds, without regard to race. The author thus mistakenly assumes that somehow mass immigration doesn't change the result, and that mass immigration is not part and parcel of the very plan to reproduce the cultural meme of child murder through massive recruitment of gullible browns.
The article does have some interesting facts, especially the survey results that show the young are more conservative than their parents. In general, I think that Americans - whites at least - will be increasingly conservative as time goes on, largely because liberals have so few children.
I would like to add for the benefit of my liberal, pro-abort friends that the Nueremberg laws established many interesting precedents with direct application to abortion on demand, including prohibitions against genocide, the nullity of "but it was legal at the time" defense in the case of murder, and that there is NO STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS for murder and crimes against humanity. If you performed an abortion, or assisted another to procure an abortion, you'll get yours. It'll take a long time, but we'll see every baby killer brought to justice when Christ again rules the hearts of Americans.
If this article is right, that happy day isn't so far off.
As an aside, I read a book by the author of this article, Stephen Mosher, called "Hegemon". It's about Chinese political ambitions. Mosher is a Chinese scholar. It's a good book, worth a look.
And yes, I know that Mosher is Tribal by blood, although I think he's now a Converso. What can you do?
Walter
Pro-lifers may be on the defensive in the courtroom, but they are winning the battle of the cradle. The first person to point this out to me was Father Paul Marx, a family sociologist by training.
Father had noticed in his travels around the United States that pro-lifers had larger families than the American average. I had observed the same thing. Pro-life events attracted families with four, six, or even eight children. It only made sense, we agreed, that those who respect the sanctity of unborn life would average more children than those who do not. [I]For one thing, their children are at far less risk of being aborted than are the children of pro-aborts.[/I]
It was left to crack HLI researcher Brian Clowes to clothe these impressions with statistics. Dr. Clowes concluded from the sketchy survey data then available that there were significant, even striking differences in fertility between the two groups. While those who professed pro-life sentiments far exceeded the American average of two children, those who supported legal abortion fell far short of this figure. Specifically, he found that pro-lifers averaged three children, while pro-aborts averaged one. [B]This is to say, pro-lifers were out-reproducing pro-aborts by a margin of three to one.[/B]
At the time, in the mid-nineties, the polls showed that Americans were more or less evenly divided on the abortion question. But if we were right, the poll numbers would inexorably shift in a pro-life direction as time passed. Demography is destiny, after all. If the pro-lifers were having three times as many children as the pro-aborts, then the ranks of the pro-lifers would swell while the ranks of the pro-aborts thinned. [B]The pro-abortion movement would have signed its own death warrant.[/B]
Pro-lifers, on the other hand, would be busy signing birth certificates. After a generation, the country would be overwhelmingly pro-life.
The mind is drawn toward pleasant prospects, but is there any hard evidence of such a demographic shift? I am happy to report that there is. A new Gallup poll of teenagers, reported on November 24, 2003 by WorldNetDaily.com, found that 72 percent of those queried believe abortion is morally wrong.
[B]The survey of youth, aged 13 to 17, indicated just 19 percent believe abortion should be legal in all circumstances, compared to 26 percent for adults. [/B]
About 47 percent of teens said it should be legal under some circumstances, while 55 percent of adults agreed. Most strikingly, about 32 percent of teens thought abortion should never be permitted, while only 17 percent of adults said the same.
Religious conviction played a part in these views. Only 12 percent of churchgoing youth thought that abortion is morally acceptable, compared with about 38 percent of non-churchgoing youth. About 40 percent of churchgoing teens believe abortion should be illegal under any circumstance, compared to 26 percent for non-churchgoers.
The Gallup Youth Survey was done through a scientific methodology via the Internet to ensure a representative sample of the U.S. population. The questionnaire was completed by 517 youths.
[B]Richard Land, president of the Southern Baptist Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, told Baptist Press that "We're winning the struggle for hearts and minds. The young people are more conservative than their parents."[/B]
But I believe it would be accurate to say that we are winning the battle of the cradle. The young people surveyed are, by and large, the sons and daughters of parents of pro-life sentiments. Like begets like, only in greater number.
The battle is not over yet, however.
The pro-aborts are not going quietly into demographic oblivion. (Do they ever do anything quietly?) [B]While they have largely stopped reproducing themselves biologically, they are continuing to replicate themselves culturally. What do I mean? I mean that the Culture of Death controls MTV and passes its anti-people and anti-baby attitudes along to unsuspecting young viewers. It controls elite institutions of higher education. Tenured abortion radicals are zealous in making new recruits to their anti-life views.[/B]
This means that it is not enough to simply welcome more children into the world. People of pro-life sentiments must ensure that their own children ââ¬â and as many other young people as they can reach ââ¬â are properly taught the Culture of Life values that they are the product of. They will find their pro-life views under assault as they go on to college, and must be taught to defend them.
If this is done, then this country will move sharply in a pro-life direction over the next decade. And the stage will be set to outlaw not merely partial-birth abortions, but all abortions.
Steve Mosher is the president of Population Research Institute, a non-profit organization dedicated to debunking the myth that the world is overpopulated.
2003-12-26 12:43 | User Profile
The young people are more conservative than their parents.
Nothing that surprises me, the GenXers are more conservative than the baby boomers. Overall, today's young are the survivors of the abortion holocaust. One might ask if not the socially destructive behaviour fostered by liberals with their libertine attitudes towards drugs, abortion and family life is not giving momentum towards conservatives. Basically, in the past children were not the result of a conscious decision. Nowadays on the other hand political attitudes have an impact on fertility. But I guess the abortion issue is an ethical and not a strategic one.
2003-12-26 13:56 | User Profile
[QUOTE=jamestown]Nothing that surprises me, the GenXers are more conservative than the baby boomers. Overall, today's young are the survivors of the abortion holocaust. One might ask if not the socially destructive behaviour fostered by liberals with their libertine attitudes towards drugs, abortion and family life is not giving momentum towards conservatives. Basically, in the past children were not the result of a conscious decision. Nowadays on the other hand political attitudes have an impact on fertility. But I guess the abortion issue is an ethical and not a strategic one.[/QUOTE]
I think that the abortion issue is strategic. It goes directly to our demographic destiny.
If you really want to poke a finger in the eye of the Regime, have a bunch of white babies and homeschool them.
And there's nothing ZOG can do about it.
Bwaahaaaaa!
Watler
2003-12-26 17:07 | User Profile
Blacks have 40% of the abortions. not to be rude here, but i don't want them "pro-life" And I DO hate saying that, but it's the way i feel.
the most baby-making of the whites are the Mormons. I don't share their religious beliefs. Protestants are still having 2 kids/per, and i don't want to live in a lily-white town that's....full of mormons.
-Jay
2003-12-29 13:57 | User Profile
[QUOTE]1. Blacks have 40% of the abortions. not to be rude here, but i don't want them "pro-life" And I DO hate saying that, but it's the way i feel.[/QUOTE]
It's okay that you feel that way. Those feelings are natural and normal. You see your people under threat from blacks and naturally don't want to see them born.
But morality is faith + reason, and our traditional Christian Faith informs us that even innocent black babies have a right to live and our reason compels us to conclude that killing them (or allowing others to do so) is just plain wrong.
Thus the moral dangers of multiculturalism. Forcing whites and blacks to unnaturally share a habitat leads them into temptation with a capital "T". It leads them to desire the murder of innocents.
Much to your credit you recognize your own feelings on this subject, which I naturally share. But we must rise above our feelings and live moral lives. The big problem are the liberals who in their self-righteousness refuse to look their own motives for supporting abotion on demand in the face.
The obvious remedy to these feelings is to separate whites and blacks into autonomous territories. I assure you that once that is accomplished and the black threat to our way of life is removed, your (and my) feelings will change, and we'll come to see blacks for the (often beautiful and talented) mental children that they are as a group. We'll even seek to help them, as the better angels of our natures come to the fore. Of course, liberals (especially Tribal liberals) intuit precisely this conclusion that "we therefore must separate to lead moral lives," and are willing to murder innocents to avoid the question from even arising. This is the thing that makes them not only guilty of crimes against humanity, it makes them hypocritical ones at that.
The problem is that nobody will recognize and talk about their feelings honestly on this subject. If we could only do that - bring the feelings that we have about each other out into the open and talk about it calmly - then the problem would be half solved.
[QUOTE]2. the most baby-making of the whites are the Mormons. I don't share their religious beliefs. Protestants are still having 2 kids/per, and i don't want to live in a lily-white town that's....full of mormons.[/QUOTE]
I generally like Mormons. They're suburban versions of the Amish. I grew up around the Amish, who also make great neighbors.
Anyway, you can always do your part to change the world by having another baby!
Walter
2003-12-29 16:48 | User Profile
Sorry, I can't agree. Regrettably, the complete elimination of the the Negro genetic stock will benefit not only Whites, but the World as a whole.
2003-12-29 16:56 | User Profile
WY:
I too would like to live my life in the "above the fray" mentality regarding moral views. But I dont' forsee ANY possible way to segregate the US, and I don't want my future children to grow up in a country that looks like Los ANgeles.
Abortion to me, is....well: legalized genocide. It sucks, but on the other hand, I do understand we are a species, and we can be destroyed if we can't replicate. It's depressing that so many suburban whites would rather watch the NFL and drive SUV's than have children.
When they're on their deathbed, who's going to tell them goodbye? The pair of SUV keys sitting next to their bed? Therefore, I think abortion is almost a necessary evil, much like the plague is in much of the Turd World.
-Jay
2003-12-29 21:44 | User Profile
[Walter Yannis]This appeared in the 26 December 2003 [URL=http://www.catholicexchange.com/vm/index.asp?art_id=21756]Catholic Exchange.[/URL].
Of course the "we" in the title refers to pro-lifers of all kinds, without regard to race. The author thus mistakenly assumes that somehow mass immigration doesn't change the result, and that mass immigration is not part and parcel of the very plan to reproduce the cultural meme of child murder through massive recruitment of gullible browns.
[B]****[/B] Repeating: the Solution to the abortion issue in politics: make it retroactive for everyone who opposes it.
There is nothing in the history of the Catholic church that is really anti-abortion until Cardinal John O'Connor found out it was little jewbbies they were killing in there in the abortion industry, and the ones doing it are Nazis. The holy orders were too busy having to carry it out.
Equating The Unborn with a mature person.... there you go Anti-aborts jumping up and down waving BABY KILLER! sigs at Democrats.... there you go