← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Texas Dissident
Thread ID: 11461 | Posts: 15 | Started: 2003-12-13
2003-12-13 17:32 | User Profile
[url=http://www.southerncaucus.org/246.htm]What is the Southern Movement?[/url]
Now I will move into another killer of the Southern movement: Intolerance. No independence movement in modern America will be successful if built on intolerance for others within the voting bloc. If you think this movement is not intolerant you are fooling yourselves. Besides talking about most non Southern non European cultures and religions negatively in several articles, and disapproving of MLK and his birthday celebration, and being against gays, the Southern movement has sunk to a new low in intolerance by not tolerating 'metro-sexuals.' For those who don't know, a metro-sexual is a straight man who likes to do 'girly' things like pluck eyebrows, use flowery smelling shower gels, shave body hair, use lotion and eye cream, and some of those damned devils go so far as to get pedicures...heaven forbid.
Eye cream?? Oh my...
2003-12-14 04:18 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Texas Dissident] Eye cream?? Oh my...[/QUOTE]
It's just moisturizer, that is sold at twice the price, for use specifically around the eyes (that being more delicate skin than the rest of one's face...) It helps prevent wrinkles (or so everyone believes...) and nowadays, when MEN are judged by their looks (albeit not nearly so much as women are), wrinkles are bad...
{snicker} Avalanche
2003-12-14 04:27 | User Profile
T.D.,
I'll take a stab at this. Reading the essay leads me to believe that this person is saying in so many words that nothing can be done and up to a point I think that he is correct. The rest of the essay I couldn't disagree with more. In a nutshell, I don't think that there ever will be an independent South. Instead, I think that the ideas that our ancestors fought for will have to conquer America. At one time this was the case with the exception of certain circles in New England that would have liked to rejoined Great Britian. That is one aspect of the war against the South waged today by our enemies to portray the South of Jefferson Davis as un-American, if not downright treasonous. Once they suceed in that the rest of America can expect the same thing.
================================ I thought this was amusing.
The pro-southern propaganda must be placed where those who donââ¬â¢t already agree with you can see it. Keep preaching to yourselves and youââ¬â¢ll never get the support you need. That is why Judaism is small while Christianity is the largest religion on Earth.
Yes, this is true, but why is it that the Jews possess more power and influence? Numbers aren't everything if they are not used to one's advantage. If anything, they can lead to confusion.
2003-12-15 04:41 | User Profile
The author of this piece is confused, because he believes that what he identifies as 'the Southern Movement' lives or dies by whether 'independence' or secession is achieved. But no one in any kind of leadership position in 'Southern' or 'post-Confederate' organization believes there is any chance of achieving secession. It is not about this all-or-nothing game; nor is it about similar all-or-nothing games.
Rather, individuals in favor of preserving Southern heritage want to renovate the Southern identity, and push for a politics of decentralization, whereby not merely state rights are affirmed (for example, to achieve goals that both black and white Christian agree about, such as abortion or religion in schools), but also county and city rights (thereby allowing white majority communities autonomy).
In America, there is no white nationalism apart from the Southern Movement. To beleive that the Lincoln-JFK-LBJ axis of centralization and anti-white policies is acceptable, is to blind oneself to the primary tools used by internationalist and state-parasite class to sacrifice the white race. And there is not opposing this 'axis of evil' without understanding that the Confederate cause had its nobility, and that Reconstruction was the most shameful period in American history.
2003-12-17 12:05 | User Profile
So Chrissy the Well Moisturized Marine is calling for a "tolerant, inclusive," Southern nation; one in which uppity nigruhs, turd burglars, silky-smooth Metro Boys and of course Gawd's Limited Edition can all gambol about sans shackles - in other words: the exact same racial/cultural cesspool we're already up to our necks in.
Well, Themper Fi, you handthum hunk of man you.
On the other hand, the attitude of some of these pro-secesh Bahble Thumpers makes me sneer as well: "There shall be no filthy atheists or pagans in OUR Godly nation! Why, if we allowed any Satanic doubts to creep in, the Lord would remove our 'lampstand'!" Idiots. I have no more liking for them than I do for the offensive "Dead Jew on a Stick" crowd. There is so much that everyone can agree on, if only all sides would put the topic of religion (or lack thereof) off to the side. What we're dealing with is a temporal matter: the continued survival of our race in this world. Let each person come to his own conclusions about the next without ridiculing the beliefs of the other fellow - as long as those beliefs don't imperil our people. Shecky chortles with satisfaction as he watches us get bogged down in this largely immaterial (to the crucial task at hand) issue.
A quick note on my view of the Faggot Question: we've always been plagued by these vermin, and since that shows no sign of coming to an end anytime soon, I propose a common-sense solution: the Defectives would be tolerated only if they agree to sashay huffily back into The Closet and stay there for keeps. No more hideous drag queens & Moe Stooge bulldykes stinkin' up the streets with "Gay" "Rights" parades; no more Acting Up by throwing rubbers in church services, no more fag bars. Any queer with AIDS would be thrown into quarantine (let's hear it for my man Fidel). Any filthy fruit who dared to touch a child or even a confused teen would be publicly executed.
Religious toleration, invisible shirtlifters, non-existant nigs, spics & zhids: that's the sort White nation we should all be shooting for - whatever flag flutters over it.
2003-12-17 19:19 | User Profile
Well, there be brothers, and there be brothers. A select few can appreciate federalist ideals and the vision of the Founders. It would be good to have them within the Southern movement, as this lowers tension with the black community, and puts a generally good face on things.
I haven't actuall met such black folk, but there is Mitchell and Sowell on Townhall.com, who are both excellent (particularly Mitchell). I assume the columns aren't being ghost-written!
2003-12-17 19:56 | User Profile
N.B.,
Why, if we allowed any Satanic doubts to creep in, the Lord would remove our 'lampstand'!" Idiots. I have no more liking for them than I do for the offensive "Dead Jew on a Stick" crowd. [u]There is so much that everyone can agree on, if only all sides would put the topic of religion (or lack thereof) off to the side.[/u] What we're dealing with is a temporal matter: the continued survival of our race in this world. Let each person come to his own conclusions about the next without ridiculing the beliefs of the other fellow - as long as those beliefs don't imperil our people. Shecky chortles with satisfaction as he watches us get bogged down in this largely immaterial (to the crucial task at hand) issue.
Hear, hear!
Arguing about this serves no purpose except to aid our enemies.
2003-12-17 20:21 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Sertorius]Why, if we allowed any Satanic doubts to creep in, the Lord would remove our 'lampstand'!" Idiots. I have no more liking for them than I do for the offensive "Dead Jew on a Stick" crowd. There is so much that everyone can agree on, [B][I][COLOR=Red]if only all sides would put the topic of religion (or lack thereof) off to the side. [/COLOR] [/I] [/B]
Ezra Pound in witing [I][B]A Guide to Kulcher [/B] [/I] admitted that it took him many years to comprehend that the 18th century Frenchmen leading the rational advance were not concerned that Jesuits were educating their children. I concur heartily that the topic of religion divides many people and is extremely deleterious to our cause.
2003-12-17 20:35 | User Profile
In other words, "our people" should be a primary concern, and "our people" are primary to Western Civilization. As a non-religious person who values non-judeaized traditional Church as a cultural institution, I don't have any problems with beliefs of others as long as they don't try to derive falsehoods with their "Jesus was a Jew" schtick.
2003-12-18 00:43 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Sertorius]Arguing about this serves no purpose except to aid our enemies.[/QUOTE]
As one who has been experiencing some epiphanic moments as of late surrounding this issue, I'm going to agree with you and N.B., Sert. Of course I speak for no one but myself, but I'm ready and willing to see an armistice, even if tenuous and temporary. These critical times require serious and mature men who will focus and concentrate on what binds them instead of separates them.
Now let's see if any of the other side thinks the same.
2003-12-18 02:24 | User Profile
Tex wrote:
As one who has been experiencing some epiphanic moments as of late surrounding this issue, I'm going to agree with you and N.B., Sert.
Hey, I would bet big money that Uncle Franco's wise words were key in bringing about those moments, yup-yup-yup....
:holiday:
2003-12-21 06:39 | User Profile
A man once said: "Nothing I hate worse than a Liberal Sotherner!"
And I agree 100%!
PC Sothern Nationalism makes me sick!
2003-12-21 20:15 | User Profile
As one who has been experiencing some epiphanic moments as of late surrounding this issue, I'm going to agree with you and N.B., Sert.
Yeah!
The tools we need in our struggle for the temporal world are the pen, the gun and the shovel. Any White man who has skill with any of those and is willing to help us, I consider an ally.
2003-12-21 20:35 | User Profile
I am not even from the South, and I know this is true. Liberal Southerners are the most mixed up, incoherent, sickeningly hypocritical people on the planet.
At least Northern liberals have the accuse that they were just trying to give the federal government more power to loot the South for them.
[QUOTE=Faust]A man once said: "Nothing I hate worse than a Liberal Sotherner!"
And I agree 100%!
PC Sothern Nationalism makes me sick![/QUOTE]
2003-12-22 08:38 | User Profile
The pro-southern propaganda must be placed where those who donââ¬â¢t already agree with you can see it. Keep preaching to yourselves and youââ¬â¢ll never get the support you need. That is why Judaism is small while Christianity is the largest religion on Earth.
I think this pretty much sums up the deficiencies in his logic. He thinks like a white Christian southerner, addicted to formalities and proper.
He needs to ask himself why is it then that this small religion dominates and the large one cringes? Answer, the small one doesn't get stuck up on formalities - they go for power anyway and anyhow they can find it.
Hence the term for any great national movement according to Sam Francis - the Machievellians.