← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Ed Toner
Thread ID: 11349 | Posts: 5 | Started: 2003-12-03
2003-12-03 16:30 | User Profile
Instauration March 1996
Good-Bye to CNN
As most of our readers know, Turner Broadcasting System, which has now been gobbled up by Time Warner, was more or less controlled by its founder, Ted Turner, variously known as The Mouth of the South and Captain Outrageous, a mogul of the old school, a corporate buccaneer and a character straight out ot a B-movie. While there are aspects of Ted Turner which would give pause to an Instaurationist, compared to almost any other major business figure in America in the 1990s, he was a positive force. To begin with, he controlled the only major news operation in the country that was not firmly in Chosenite hands. Turner's own view of God's favorite Tribe was always ambivalent, to say the least. He was the object of deep-and probably well-justified---suspicion by the Jewish cabal that exert such power over the major TV networks, the major news magazines and the so-called newspapers of record, the Washington Post and, more importantly, the N.Y ' Times. That list, of course, just touches the surface. Turner was also one of the very few business magnates who seem to have some purpose in life other than raking in shekels and piling them higher and higher.
CNN, the news operation that is the core of TBS, is by no means a flawless operation. Some of its international correspondents so openly grind political axes that it is almost embarrassing to watch them perform (i.e., Christiane Amanpour, the half-Iranian pitchwoman for the Bosnian Muslims, and Ronnie Loveler, an old-style lefty married to a Sandinista, are two examples). Neither is CNN the most cerebral organization on earth. Coverage can be shallow and on a slow night geared to blood, gore and two headed calves.
This said, CNN is miles ahead of any of the major network news bureaus. ABC, NBC and CBS are the most obvious overt arms of ZOG-and the most dangerous to a citizenry that has had its brain vacuumed for years to remove any trace of original thought. The pathetic hacks dragged out year after year from these kosher journalistic dumpsters are dyed-in-the-wool liberal pinheads. What honest man or woman can stare at Sam Donaldson, Peter Jennings, Barbara Walters, Dan Rather or any of the other news readers and interviewers and do anything but gag?
By the time Turner invented CNN, the news-slanting by these talking eggheads had gotten so bad that even ghetto crackheads were doing double-takes when the evening news came on.
CNN was run unlike any of the network news shows. First, the people reading the news were just that, newsreaders. They were told to eliminate irritating body language, raised eyebrows and uncalled-for editorial comments. just read it. Let viewers themselves decide whether or not we should bomb the stuffings out of the Bosnian Serbs. Second, CNN made room for uncut uncensored news footage from other countries, even icky places like Iraq and Libya. Third, the network made a genuine effort to present both sides of a story, even one involving, say, the KKK or the Aryan Nations. Of course, these reporters were never allowed to get out of hand, but the entire tone was strikingly different from that heard on network news.
As an added bonus, Turner made sure that most of the ladies hired as newsreaders were attractive and classy and without that case-hardened look so common to female journalists almost anywhere else, most of whom have an expression suggesting that they discovered a severe run in their panty hose minutes before air time. The guys tend to be clean-cut and normal, as opposed to freaks like Donaldson and Rather.
As you might expect, the success of a company like CNN was viewed with gasping horror and panic by the Chosenites assigned to control the flow of lies to the Great Unwashed. In letting Turner get loose they had really dropped the ball. When Ted made noises like he wanted to buy a major network, alarm bells went off everywhere. The Chosen are not fools. If they lose their media monopoly, they are finished. They are well aware that the spread of the information Revolution has punched a thousand points of light in their closed shop news system.
Planning began almost immediately to nail Turner or, barring that, wrap him so tightly in a financial straitjacket that it would cost him his freedom of action. The first option having fizzled, the Chosen went to work on the second. As I write, it seems that they have won, unless Ted has an ace up his sleeve we don't know about. He has been appointed second in command of the Time Warner conglomerate, but this is probably nothing but eye-wash.
The groundwork for the gelding (oh what irony is in that word!) of CNN has been laid for quite some time. A couple of years ago an article appeared in the New Republic, the house organ of the queer/jewish/liberal/neocon gang. It was written by a second-string, unknown Israelite hack, but what it said could have been dictated by ZOG's most exalted oracle.
The article was daring and risky, for it revealed much too much about the thought patterns of our media masters. Simply put, the great sin of CNN was not its Gentile origin and its outlandish location. (In Atlanta of all places! Why, you can't get a decent bagel there, much less find a competent psychoanalyst!) The great sin was that CNN allowed newsmakers to speak for themselves and say their say without previous editing. Ah, there was the rub!
The New York-based networks have a set policy against allowing "controversial" (read: ZOG unapproved) personalities to speak on the news without prior editing. While CNN edits, like any news organization, it generally allows aberrant figures to speak their minds, be they David Duke or Michael Jackson. In the Big Three this is a definite no-no.
To let foreigners tell their side of the story, without the obligatory Zionist rewrite, is really hot territory. CNN's coverage of the Palestinian Intifada was a major factor in forcing Israel to the peace table with the PLO. You'd better believe that this "mistake" will not be forgotten.
The dolt who wrote the New Republic article stated that the news media had the 'right" and "responsibility" to clear what went out on the airwaves of anything that might, for want of a better description, cause people to question the standard ZOG line.
Any doubts I had about the ZOG plans for CNN were cleared up by Mark Landler in the N.Y. Times business section (Sept. 18, 1995), who wrote a smirking, transparent gloat piece which should be read by all, especially CNN staffers. It outlines the future of their workplace in ghastly detail, for those who know how to read between the lines.
Entitled, "CNN Newsroom Gets a Visit From a Suitor,' a more appropriate title for Landler's article might be, "CNN Gets the Once Over From Its Future Rapist.' The "rapist' Landier referred to was Gerald M. Levin, CEO of Time Warner, who went to Atlanta to slobber over the choice morsel that would soon be his to do with as he wished. As Porter Bibb, a "media industry banker" at Ladenburg, Thalmann and Company put it: 'When you add the editorial clout of Time and Fortune to the worldwide distribution of CNN, you've got a substantial powerhouse."
Landler's questions in the article are amusingly revealing: "[W]ill Time bring some editorial sophistication to CNN's rip-and-read style?" In other words, how long will it take Time to muzzle CNN and ensure that its "product" is 100% kosher? How about until next Tuesday.
We can surely take comfort in knowing that Tom Johnson, the president of CNN, recently met with Time's editor-in-chief, Norman Pearistine, and his Jewish aides-decamp, Walter Isaacson and Paul Sagan, to "discuss potential synergies." You can bet there was plenty of give-andtake in that session. The Jews taking and Johnson left in his boxers.
A coy paragraph reads, "At this point in the talks. . . Turner would continue to run CNN and the network would remain in Atlanta." Landier added, "Mr. Turner and Mr. Levin may decide to merge the news operations [of CNN and Time Warner]. At a minimum, the news bureaus of CNN and Time, Inc. would share office space.' Translation: "Listen up all you goyim at CNN. Forget about Daddy Turner. We're shutting down this cow-town operation and moving it to the Rotten Apple. Don't plan on making the big move if you don't toe the line." All of which means, CNN as we know it, is fin ito.
There is more from Landler's pen: "But if Time, Inc. has been slow to break into television journalism, its magazines have mastered the craft of analytical and investigative journalism. Some media experts say that CNN could use that expertise." Translation: CNN is going to 'grow up.,,
Needless to say the personnel at CNN will have to be, upgraded." Take Mr. Pearistine. With a face that would scare the hell out of a fire insurance salesman, Pearlstine is no doubt just the man to tighten things up around CNN. After all, "Lou Dobbs and Ed Turner are running that shop themselves," as Porter Bibb put it. Two goyim controlling a major television news operation! Not on your life.
The meat of the message comes in the last four paragraphs of the article: 'Indeed, some CNN executives said that they were worried that Time, Inc. would end up dominating the network." After all, "Mr. Pearistine has close ties to Mr. Levin" Worried? I hope the CNN executives have their desks cleaned out. They will be lucky to be handing out towels and swatting flies in the Time Warner executive washroom six months from now.
"Yet some media experts said CNN could use an injection of new editorial blood, even if its center of gravity shifts to New York." There you have it, folks.
Mr. Reese Schonfeld, who was the first president of CNN (and who is now probably savoring the end of Turner's goyish rule), says, "To the extent that the focus shifts from Atlanta to New York, that's for the good. You wouldn't publish the International Herald Tribune in Lyons; you'd publish it in Paris." End of story.
It's a sad, sad tale. Turner has essentially sold out, but I will not cast the first stone. Who knows what financial decisions were behind this? I am sure, however, dingbat wife Jane was no help at all. My guess is that Turner is tired and just decided to cash in his chips.
The good news is: Jews are missing the boat and are too frantic, neurotic and out of touch to realize it. The genie is out of the bottle and buying CNN will not put it back. CNN broke forever the hammerlock of the networks on the news. The American people no longer care what Time, NBC, CBS, ABC or the Washington Post say. When it comes to the truth, the N.Y. Times is a positive liability. The computer explosion and the growth of cable, as well as talk radio and a tiost of other media outlets, renders outfits like Time Warner if not obsolete, at least obsolescent, Time Warner may make money, but money is not the real key to this deal.
As for the center of gravity shifting to New York, I am sorry to have to inform Mr. Levin that New York has been losing its "center of gravity" status for years. If CNN goes there, it will be trading a strong presence in an up-andcoming region of the country for a cold, dead and decaying has-been area. Those CNN newsreaders will just love dog doo-doo six inches deep on the sidewalks, Puerto Ri
cans stealing their tires and winos spitting on their windshields, to say nothing of $5,000-perrnonth rents and bosses who look and act like Bolshevik commissars. New York, New York!
This latest power grab is itself evidence of the decrepit state of ZOGism. Twenty years ago a man like Turner would have been squashed before he ever got on the air. Now the Jews had to buy him off with heavy coin. It reminds me of the Late Roman Empire and its effete, perfumed patricians. Their bloodlines diluted by generations of bad breeding, they smiled and trembled as they handed over tribute to the barbarian chiefs, all the while trying to hide they have beshat themselves from fright.
Get out the grindstones, boys. Soon it will be time to go a Viking!
N.B. FORREST
2003-12-03 22:46 | User Profile
Wasn't Ted Turner a native of Rhodesia?
2003-12-26 01:19 | User Profile
Born in Cincinnatti, another niggertown today. [url]http://iml.jou.ufl.edu/projects/Fall98/Hatcher/[/url]
2003-12-26 11:24 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Ed Toner]Born in Cincinnatti, another niggertown today. [url]http://iml.jou.ufl.edu/projects/Fall98/Hatcher/[/url][/QUOTE]
Ed, c'mon.
That's "negrotown" or "Chocolatetown" or "African-American town."
Or even "blue-gummed-burrhead-town" (my personal favourite).
But not "niggertown."
What, are you a racist??!!!!
:afro:
Walter
2003-12-26 14:49 | User Profile
I come from a long line of racists. I lived under the same roof as my father, grandfather and great grandfather, and I never heard them called anything but Niggers.
I lived in lily white neighborhoods, never met a nigger until I checked in the USMMA as a Plebe, and discovered my room mate was a Nigger, the only one in the class.
I was allowed one pay phone call a week, and I used it to call Dad, and I told him the news. He FLIPPED.
Two days later, I had a white roomate. Dad had called Msgr. Smith, who called our Congressman, and it was done.
That's how things were done on LI in 1949, believe it or not.