← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Gregz
Thread ID: 11345 | Posts: 6 | Started: 2003-12-03
2003-12-03 08:15 | User Profile
NewsMax.com Friday, Nov. 8, 2002
Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon says the U.S. war on terror shouldn't end with Iraq.
Iran is just as dangerous and a top priority for a regime change, Sharon said this week. He argued that although Iraq is an "insane" regime, Iran is a "center of world terror."
In an exclusive interview with the New York Post, Sharon said that as soon as Iraq is dealt with, he "will push for Iran to be at the top of the 'to do' list."
"Iran makes every effort to possess weapons of mass destruction ââ¬Â¦ and ballistic missiles ââ¬Â¦ That is a danger to the Middle East, and a danger to Europe,ââ¬Â he said.
Repeating that Iran is "behind terror all around the world,ââ¬Â Sharon claimed Iran was working with terrorist groups to harm Israel.
Some reports have indicated that Iran, a Russian ally, is in a state of de facto war with Israel in providing as much as $100 million to Hezbollah, one of the main groups using homicide bombers within Israel.
Regarding Europe, Sharon says that his relationships with its leaders are good, but that he has a problem with the continent. [I]"I told them many times that I would like to see Europe more involved ââ¬Â¦ I should say regretfully that there is no balanced approach,ââ¬Â[/I] meaning that he thinks the Europeans are far too sympathetic toward the Palestinians.
He has eased his view of negotiations with the Palestinians. He told the Post: "There are those among the Palestinians who understand that they will not be able to achieve anything by force. Those that are ready to speak peace, I am ready to talk and negotiate with. As a matter of fact, I am in contact with them now.ââ¬Â
These people presumably do not include Yasser Arafat, with whom the Israelis would rather not negotiate any more, as they want him ousted as leader of the Palestinians. Sharon shares many of his views with his new defense minister, Shaul Mofaz, who recently echoed Sharonââ¬â¢s sentiments on Iran and Arafat.
Sharon believes he can make peace with the Arabs. "I think I am one of the only ones [with] the power and strength to tell the citizens of Israel what they have to do ââ¬Â¦ to make painful compromises.ââ¬Â
And if Sharon loses leadership of his party and Israel before any of these goals can be accomplished? He replied, "I am 74 years old ââ¬Â¦ I donââ¬â¢t have any further political ambitions.ââ¬Â
2003-12-03 08:28 | User Profile
US welcomes Iran nuclear report
Iran says its nuclear programme is to meet energy needs only The United States has voiced its support for a resolution by the United Nations nuclear watchdog censuring Iran for concealing its nuclear programme. But Iran also welcomed the resolution, saying the decision not to refer its nuclear programme to the UN Security Council represented a victory.
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) resolution [I]stops short of recommending sanctions against Iran. [/I] It follows a compromise deal between the US and Europe.
Britain, France and Germany had opposed a move by Washington to have Tehran face possible sanctions over its nuclear programme.
The US accuses Iran of trying secretly to develop nuclear weapons - an allegation strongly denied by Tehran.
White House spokeswoman Claire Buchan told reporters: "We welcome that resolution and believe that it underscores the international community's serious concerns with Iran's nuclear activities and the urgent requirement of Iran to come into full compliance with nuclear non-proliferation obligations".
Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Hamid Reza Asefi said the resolution underlined the peaceful nature of Iran's nuclear activities and showed that its programme was honest and transparent.
"This resolution was an achievement for Iran and proved that Iran has followed its peaceful nuclear activities with transparency and truthfulness and that, despite all the fuss made by some arrogant circles, it was not trying to produce and obtain nuclear arms," he said in a statement faxed to Reuters news agency.
BBC Tehran correspondent Jim Muir says that, although Iran is not happy with some of the language of the resolution, it essentially got what it wanted when it decided to come clean, stop uranium enrichment activities and sign up for tougher inspections.
'Serious and ominous'
The resolution, adopted by consensus by the 35-nation board of governors of the IAEA, followed days of intensive negotiations between the US and the Europeans over how to respond to Tehran.
The head of the IAEA, Mohamed ElBaradei, warned that any further Iranian failure to co-operate would not be tolerated.
Should any further serious Iranian failures come to light, the board of governors would consider... all options at its disposal
Draft resolution: Excerpts
He said it was a "serious and ominous" message to Iran that it must comply with its nuclear obligations in the future.
Mr ElBaradei said he would report early next year on Iran's compliance.
The resolution "welcomes Iran's offer of co-operation and openness" but also "strongly deplores" Tehran's past cover-up of its nuclear activities and calls for a "particularly robust verification system" .
It warns against "further serious Iranian failures", saying that could lead the IAEA to consider all options at its disposal - shorthand, correspondents say, for Security Council action.
Mr ElBaradei said the international community had stood as one to address an issue with major implications.
"It's a good day for peace, a good day for multilateralism and a good day for non-proliferation," he told a news conference after the vote.
There was much work to be done before the IAEA could conclude whether Iran's nuclear programme was purely peaceful, he said.
Negotiations
The IAEA had admonished Iran for concealing aspects of its nuclear programme for nearly two decades and a recent report from the agency said Tehran had been secretly enriching uranium and producing plutonium.
Washington originally rejected a draft resolution put forward by Europe as too weak - insisting it should contain a threat of action by the UN Security Council.
However, Britain, Germany and France were concerned that this might alienate Iran, which has shown increased co-operation with the IAEA in recent weeks.
The BBC's Jon Leyne in Washington said that, despite America's concession, the resolution was still harder on the Iranians than France, Britain and Germany had wanted.
The European countries originally called on Iran to continue its commitment to open its nuclear facilities to strict IAEA scrutiny.
The Iranians say their nuclear programme is designed to meet the country's energy needs only.
Although the IAEA says Tehran has breached nuclear safeguards for almost two decades, it also said there was [B]no evidence of an Iranian nuclear weapons programme.[/B]
2003-12-03 09:28 | User Profile
Whilst a on going covert Iranian nuclear weapons program admittedly is bad news. If they decide to push this issue to it's logical conclusion and take action to liberate Iran. The Neo-Cons and Israelis are likely to meet very heavy resistance from the EU on this matter.
Iran is extremely important to Europe geo-strategically. In the event of a war, Europe could possible be forced in to taking a very major part in her occupation in order to guaranty the EU's own oil supplies.
Gregz
"Neither should men study war with a view to the enslavement of those who do not deserve to be enslaved; but first of all they should provide against their own enslavement, and in the second place obtain empire for the good of the governed, and not for the sake of exercising a general despotism, and in the third place they should seek to be masters only over those who deserve to be slaves.
Facts, as well as arguments, prove that the legislator should direct all his military and other measures to the provision of leisure and the establishment of peace. For most of these military states are safe only while they are at war, but fall when they have acquired their empire; like unused iron they lose their temper in times of peace. And for this the legislator is to blame, he never having taught them how to lead a life of peace."
Aristotle - Book of politics 350 BC
2003-12-03 20:35 | User Profile
This may prove to be the yidz' downfall. There are many many Iranis/Persians in the US, who have been here actually for generations. The ones who refer to themselves proudly as Persians are very Aryan-friendly and some could qualify as Aryan themselves. They are well-integrated into American society, tend to hate muds and blacks as much as any decent White, and tend to be on good terms with Whites. In other words, in the present political climate, Whites are likely to listen to and ally with, Persians.
In the 70s it was easy for the yidz to teach Americans to hate Iranis via the artificially engineered oil crisis and the monopolistic media of the time. That's not so easy now. With the Internet, and with 30 years of Iranis being in the US and being the least of our troubles, it's going to be very hard for the yidz to get Americans to dance to their tune, and attempts to do so are likely to only result in the opposite. Close Iran and European ties are another good point.
I'd say things are shaping up nicely, the beginnings of the formation of a Jew-wise body of Whites worldwide, sharing info and eventually containing and controlling the parasite in a coordinated way, instead of the methods of the past, where Whites in one area fought off the parasite, only to be thwarted by parasite-brainwashed Whites from another region. This was how it was with many diseases, smallpox would be controlled in one area, rampant in another. It was not until worldwide scientific knowledge by Whites resulted in the control of smallpox in White areas and eventually worldwide, that that particular parasite was vanquished. This one is more dangerous, since it's a mind-parasite, as so aptly described by Kevin McDonald.
2003-12-04 09:12 | User Profile
Hello Acorn
The Persians are both Europe's Eastern neighbour and ancient adversity. Our enemies enemy is are friend. A Nationalist Christian Europe would likely have no real quarrel with a strong modern Iran. Such a state of affairs has existed before many times in the past.
Europe's influence on Iran is a growing if admittedly not always a constructive one. However political reform is a foot in Iran, it's young population are becoming increasingly restless and it's government is now being forced to meet it's outstanding international obligations.
It's worth noting that in the end the Turkish I[/I] government where unable politically to fully support the war on Iraq. Over 25% of Iran's population are ethnic Turk's. I can't see the US taking on opposition from both the EU and Turkey and invading Iran. Especially whilst the better half of the US's military is already committed to securing Iraq.
Europe's Iranian oil supply lines serve to counter Russian and Saudi market dependance. Iran has large reserves of oil and gas and the capability to extract, refine and pipe it to it's regional export markets. Whilst their may be a lot of oil in other regions such as Central Asia, I[/I]. It's not doing anyone any good sitting in the ground.
The solution is quite simple: 1.) Exile all the Jews to Israel. 2.) Embargo and isolate Israel, until they dismantle there illegal WMD and missile programs. 3.) Prohibit and confine Israeli citizens movements to within national borders.
The Anti-Christ, Jews and their moronic Freemason lackey's are a fixed star. They are on the whole a wrenched, fanatical, retrogressive, apocalyptic people. Who have never even once made a sincere attempted to change their appalling relationship with other peoples. It is the intention of the Jews to manipulate, exploit, enslave and murder all non-Jews.
Gregz
"I know the blasphemy of those who say they are Jews, and are not, but are of the synagogue of Satan." - Revelations 2:9
2003-12-04 18:58 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Gregz]NewsMax.com Friday, Nov. 8, 2002
[COLOR=Red]Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon says the U.S. war on terror shouldn't end with Iraq.
Iran is just as dangerous and a top priority for a regime change, Sharon said this week. He argued that although Iraq is an "insane" regime, Iran is a "center of world terror."
In an exclusive interview with the New York Post, Sharon said that as soon as Iraq is dealt with, he "will push for Iran to be at the top of the 'to do' list."[/COLOR][/QUOTE]When the former Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu appeared before a Congressional Committee and urged American aggression in the Middle East to include transmitting pornograpy to Iran, Dennis Kucinich asked him at the end of his testimony if there were any more countries he wanted the United States to invade.
American blood and treasure once again for the benefit of Israel.