← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Mithras
Thread ID: 11340 | Posts: 20 | Started: 2003-12-02
2003-12-02 18:53 | User Profile
[B]On the Quest for a One World Government[/B]
The Protocols of Zion speak of two oppositional factions: that of the Jew and the Gentile (or goyim, a slur for ââ¬Ëgentileââ¬â¢), out of which, the White or European race is the greatest enemy of the Jews. The text is a blueprint for a One World Government based on Communism or its equivalents (Socialism, liberalism, Marxism). Called for is the enslavement of all gentiles under a world dictatorship of Jewish masters. Also is mentioned that of Freemasonry, for the Craft was and still is a sort of plaything for governmental figures, which though it started out as an occult society for the perfectibility of man, has long been corrupted.
It matters not who wrote the text, though the evil and egomaniacal nature of the author is apparent. All that matters is that the text exists. The parallels of this text with reality are of foremost interest. What is found therein is absolute evil, the complete opposite of what is suggested in Sir Thomas Moreââ¬â¢s [I]Utopia[/I]. This is so true that the author of the protocols regards liberalism as a poison which will disintegrate the worldââ¬â¢s greatest forces in order that the masses may come to bow at the heels of the Red International. (One would do well to note that Communism is a Jewish invention that relied in practice on a large Jewish involvement, as proven historically by Jewish Bolshevism. For the goals of Communism are the same as laid out in the text of the protocols.)
Here follows excerpts from [I]The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion[/I]ââ¬Â¦
Protocol I:
The political has nothing in common with the moral. The ruler who is governed by the moral is not a skilled politician, and is therefore unstable on his throne. He who wishes to rule must have recourse both to cunning and to make-believe. Great national qualities, like frankness and honesty, are vices in politics, for they bring down rulers from their thrones more effectively and more certainly than the most powerful enemy. Such qualities must be the attributes of the kingdoms of the goyim, but we must in no wise be guided by them.
Our right lies in force. The word "right" is an abstract thought and proved by nothing. The word means no more than: --Give me what I want in order that thereby I may have a proof that I am stronger than you.
Where does right begin? Where does it end?
In any State in which there is a bad organization of authority, an impersonality of laws and of the rulers who have lost their personality amid the flood of rights ever multiplying out of liberalism, I find a new right--to attack by the right of the strong, and to scatter to the winds all existing forces of order and regulation, to reconstruct all institutions and to become the sovereign lord of those who have left to us the rights of their power by laying them down voluntarily in their liberalism.
Protocol III:
We appear on the scene as alleged saviours of the worker from this oppression when we propose to him to enter the ranks of our fighting forces--Socialists, Anarchists, Communists--to whom we always give support in accordance with an alleged brotherly rule (of the solidarity of all humanity) of our social masonry. The aristocracy, which enjoyed by law the labour of the workers, was interested in seeing that the workers were well fed, healthy and strong. We are interested in just the opposite--in the diminution, the killing out of the GOYIM.
Protocol IV:
But even freedom might be harmless and have its place in the State economy without injury to the well-being of the peoples if it rested upon the foundation of faith in God, upon the brotherhood of humanity, unconnected with the conception of equality, which is negated by the very laws of creation, for they have established subordination. With such a faith as this a people might be governed by a wardship of parishes, and would walk contentedly and humbly under the guiding hand of its spiritual pastor submitting to the dispositions of God upon earth. This is the reason why it is indispensable for us to undermine all faith, to tear of minds out of the GOYIM the very principle of Godhead and the spirit, and to put in its place arithmetical calculations and material needs.
Protocol V:
What form of administrative rule can be given to communities in which corruption has penetrated everywhere, communities where riches are attained only by the clever surprise tactics of semi-swindling tricks; where looseness reigns: where morality is maintained by penal measures and harsh laws but not by voluntarily accepted principles: where the feelings toward faith and country are obliterated by cosmopolitan convictions? What form of rule is to be given to these communities if not that despotism which I shall describe to you later? We shall create an intensified centralization of government in order to grip in [our] hands all the forces of the community. We shall regulate mechanically all the actions of the political life of our subjects by new laws. These laws will withdraw one by one all the indulgences and liberties which have been permitted by the goyim, and our kingdom will be distinguished by a despotism of such magnificent proportions as to be at any moment and in every place in a position to wipe out any goyim who oppose us by deed or word.
Protocol VI:
In all ages the peoples of the world, equally with individuals, have accepted words for deeds, for they are content with a show and rarely pause to note, in the public arena, whether promises are followed by performance. Therefore we shall establish show institutions which will give eloquent proof of their benefit to progress.
We shall assume to ourselves the liberal physiognomy of all parties, of all directions, and we shall give that physiognomy a voice in orators who will speak so much that they will exhaust the patience of their hearers and produce an abhorrence of oratory.
In order to put public opinion into our hands we must bring it into a state of bewilderment by giving expression from all sides to so many contradictory opinions and for such length of time as will suffice to make the GOYIM lose their heads in the labyrinth and come to see that the best thing is to have no opinion of any kind in matters political, which it is not given to the public to understand, because they are understood only by him who guides the public. This is the first secret.
The second secret requisite for the success of our government is comprised in the following: To multiply to such an extent national failings, habits, passions, conditions of civil life, that it will be impossible for anyone to know where he is in the resulting chaos, so that the people in consequence will fail to understand one another. This measure will also serve us in another way, namely, to sow discord in all parties, to dislocate all collective forces which are still unwilling to submit to us, and to discourage any kind of personal initiative which might in any degree hinder our affair. There is nothing more dangerous than personal initiative; if it has genius behind it, such initiative can do more than can be done by millions of people among whom we have sown discord. We must so direct the education of the goyim communities that whenever they come upon a matter requiring initiative they may drop their hands in despairing impotence. The strain which results from freedom of action saps the forces when it meets with the freedom of another. From this collision arise grave moral shocks, disenchantments, failures. By all these means we shall so wear down the GOYIM that they will be compelled to offer us international power of a nature that by its position will enable us without any violence gradually to absorb all the State forces of the world and to form a Super-Government. In place of the rulers of to-day we shall set up a bogey which will be called the Super-Government Administration. Its hands will reach out in all directions like nippers and its organization will be of such colossal dimensions that it cannot fail to subdue all the nations of the world.
Protocol XIV:
When we come into our kingdom it will be undesirable for us that there should exist any other religion than ours of the One God with whom our destiny is bound up by our position as the Chosen People and through whom our same destiny is united with the destinies of the world. We must therefore sweep away all other forms of belief. If this gives birth to the atheists whom we see to-day, it will not, being only a transitional stage, interfere with our views, but will serve as a warning for those generations which will hearken to our preaching of the religion of Moses, that, by its stable and thoroughly elaborated system has brought all the peoples of the world into subjection to us. Therein we shall emphasize its mystical right, on which, as we shall say, all its educative power is based. . . Then at every possible opportunity we shall publish articles in which we shall make comparisons between our beneficent rule and those of past ages. The blessings of tranquility, though it be a tranquility forcibly brought about by centuries of agitation, will throw into higher relief the benefits to which we shall point. The errors of the goyim governments will be depicted by us in the most vivid hues. We shall implant such an abhorrence of them that the peoples will prefer tranquility in a state of serfdom to those rights of vaunted freedom which have tortured humanity and exhausted the very sources of human existence, sources which have been exploited by a mob of rascally adventurers who know not what they do. . . Useless changes of forms of government to which we instigated the GOYIM when we were undermining their state structures, will have so wearied the peoples by that time that they will prefer to suffer anything under us rather than run the risk of enduring again all the agitations and miseries they have gone through.
[ââ¬Â¦]
The whole force of our principles and methods will lie in the fact that we shall present them and expound them as a splendid contrast to the dead and decomposed old order of things in social life.
Our philosophers will discuss all the shortcomings of the various beliefs of the GOYIM, but no one will ever bring under discussion our faith from its true point of view since this will be fully learned by none save ours, who will never dare to betray its secrets.
In countries known as progressive and enlightened we have created a senseless, filthy, abominable literature. For some time after our entrance to power we shall continue to encourage its existence in order to provide a telling relief by contrast to the speeches, party programme, which will be distributed from exalted quarters of ours. Our wise men, trained to become leaders of the goyim, will compose speeches, projects, memoirs, articles, which will be used by us to influence the minds of the goyim, directing them towards such understanding and forms of knowledge as have been determined by us.
Protocol XV:
When we at last definitely come into our kingdom by the aid of coups d'etat prepared everywhere for one and the same day, after the worthlessness of all existing forms of government has been definitely acknowledged (and not a little time will pass before that comes about, perhaps even a whole century) we shall make it our task to see that against us such things as plots shall no longer exist. With this purpose we shall slay without mercy all who take arms (in hand) to oppose our coming into our kingdom. Every kind of new institution of anything like a secret society will also be punished with death; those of them which are now in existence, are known to us, serve us and have served us, we shall disband and send into exile to continents far removed from Europe. In this way we shall proceed with those GOY masons who know too much; such of these as we may for some reason spare will be kept in constant fear of exile. We shall promulgate a law making all former members of secret societies liable to exile from Europe as the centre of our rule.
Resolutions of our government will be final, without appeal.
In the goy societies, in which we have planted and deeply rooted discord and Protestantism, the only possible way of restoring order is to employ merciless measures that prove the direct force of authority: no regard must be paid to the victims who fall; they suffer for the well being of the future.
[ââ¬Â¦]
When the King of Israel sets upon his sacred head the crown offered him by Europe he will become patriarch of the world.
2003-12-02 19:24 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Mithras]This is the reason why it is indispensable for us to undermine all faith, to tear of minds out of the GOYIM the very principle of Godhead and the spirit, and to put in its place arithmetical calculations and material needs. [/QUOTE]
Hmmmm....
:smoke:
2003-12-03 15:20 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Texas Dissident]Hmmmm.... [/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]When we come into our kingdom it will be undesirable for us that there should exist any other religion than ours of the One God with whom our destiny is bound up by our position as the Chosen People and through whom our same destiny is united with the destinies of the world. We must therefore sweep away all other forms of belief. If this gives birth to the atheists whom we see to-day, it will not, being only a transitional stage, interfere with our views, but will serve as a warning for those generations which will hearken to our preaching of the religion of Moses, that, by its stable and thoroughly elaborated system has brought all the peoples of the world into subjection to us.[/QUOTE]
As long as jews decide what is right and what is wrong Christianity is no longer an effective tool to use in the fight against them. A thinking and strong-minded Christian who opposes the chosen people is worth one million braindead Christians. Unfortunately, I think the jews have rendered Christianity irreparable, as we see so many of the blind sheep embracing tolerance, supporting israel, and attacking means by which man achieves the Godhead. The jews are using our most powerful weapons against us. That is exactly why we are losing.
2003-12-03 16:52 | User Profile
I think also that if there was bushido or a code of the warrior in which the masses followed we would never have these problems with jews and reds. Warriors would not be dishonored; they would never tolerate the communist fraud or the subordination of gentiles to the jews.
2003-12-03 16:59 | User Profile
"Called for is the enslavement of all gentiles under a world dictatorship of Jewish masters. Also is mentioned that of Freemasonry, for the Craft was and still is a sort of plaything for governmental figures, which though it started out as an occult society for the perfectibility of man, has long been corrupted."
Analyzing world events and the Protocols calls for a determination of facts. Seeing things in the perspective of good vs evil does not get us any closer to the ojective of understanding the strategic value of the Protocols and all the various Jewish machinations.
I'm disappointed in the absence of discussions on this site about Freemasonry and other secret societies and of speculation concerning how they fit into the scheme of things. I think this is very important, as Masons may potentially be an ally in our cause, which they currently are not.
Frontiersmen remarked at the Indians inability to mount effective strategies, which I think is reflective of Indian intellect. Jews see us dumb gentiles the same way. Our inclination towards moral evaluations fogs our vision. IMO, the best way to visualize the problem and solution is to see everything in the perspective of strategies.
2003-12-03 17:34 | User Profile
[QUOTE=travis] Analyzing world events and the Protocols calls for a determination of facts. Seeing things in the perspective of good vs evil does not get us any closer to the ojective of understanding the strategic value of the Protocols and all the various Jewish machinations. [/QUOTE]
But it is an observation itself, a fact, based on the text. For:
[QUOTE]The political has nothing in common with the moral. The ruler who is governed by the moral is not a skilled politician, and is therefore unstable on his throne. He who wishes to rule must have recourse both to cunning and to make-believe. Great national qualities, like frankness and honesty, are vices in politics, for they bring down rulers from their thrones more effectively and more certainly than the most powerful enemy. Such qualities must be the attributes of the kingdoms of the goyim, but we must in no wise be guided by them.[/QUOTE]
This is what they want you to believe. GIven the choice, I'll take honesty over filthy jews any day. Certain morals are a strength. Therefore this is a jewish lie: "Great national qualities, like frankness and honesty, are vices in politics, for they bring down rulers from their thrones more effectively and more certainly than the most powerful enemy." I cherish 'great national qualities' like those.
2003-12-03 20:18 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Mithras]Unfortunately, I think the jews have rendered Christianity irreparable, as we see so many of the blind sheep embracing tolerance, supporting israel, and attacking means by which man achieves the Godhead. [/QUOTE]
You could make the exact same argument for any aspect of white culture, even whites themselves. Yet for some reason, Christianity is always singled out by atheistic racialists in common cause with the jewish Protocols.
This is the bottom line reason why folks like myself cannot make political or organizational common cause with the great majority of self-identifying racialists.
2003-12-03 21:44 | User Profile
You could make the exact same argument for any aspect of white culture, even whites themselves. Yet for some reason, Christianity is always singled out by atheistic racialists in common cause with the jewish Protocols.
Tex,
Not sure what you mean in your first sentence, but I think that one of the reasons Christianity gets hammered by racialists so often is that its universality, its name recognition, if you will, is the reason it can do so much damage when misapplied and misappropriated and its high visibility is also simply more prone to attack. I will also say that just because something retains it name, i.e. Christianity, it does not mean that it actually is that thing anymore. What jew meddling in Christianity has done is turn it into something that bears no more relation to what you or I would consider a healthy religion than a vulture does to an eagle. Yeah, the basic shape is there, but they're two totally different things, though I think I may have given offense to vultures by comparing them to what Pat Roberston vomits forth. Only certain, useful-to-tikkun-olam bits of Christianity are even allowed in today's world, and I argue that you can't take only the parts without losing the whole. In that vein, the attacks on the hollow, earthly, shell of the faith do not offend me, and if there are those that truly are attacking that faith which is held in one's heart, I feel poorly for them, but not angered.
You could argue that the racialist anti-Christian tar brush is too broad (and I would agree) but to get down to categorizing, minutiae and hair-splitting is something I personally don't think we have time left for. I think it is up to Christians to wrest control back from the monsters that currently steer it and bring it back to sanity, and not so that Alex Linder or other racialists won't have cause for complaint, but for Christ's sake, literally.
This is the bottom line reason why folks like myself cannot make political or organizational common cause with the great majority of self-identifying racialists.
Times are bound to get interesting, aren't they?
I know you've pointed out that I'm wasting time on bridge-building efforts, and you could be right, but I do it anyway, though I get discouraged.
Sometimes, you gotta have, well, faith!
2003-12-03 21:47 | User Profile
I have no problem with a one-world government -- as long as I [and other WNs] can run that one-world government. Heh, heh. Just picture it.... it would be like the Roman Empire, but global.... sigh
:)
2003-12-03 21:56 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Texas Dissident]You could make the exact same argument for any aspect of white culture, even whites themselves. Yet for some reason, Christianity is always singled out by atheistic racialists in common cause with the jewish Protocols.
This is the bottom line reason why folks like myself cannot make political or organizational common cause with the great majority of self-identifying racialists.[/QUOTE]
That's fine, but I'm not an atheist. The reason why I can't ally with Christians is because they view me as "atheistic trash" if I don't call my self a Christian. The failure to realize that 99% of all Christians are controlled by the jews is the other reason why I see no point in allying with racialist Christians. I can't change reality. It is what it is. If Christianity was such a success against the jews then why are Christians falling over backwards to please the jews? Thirdly, racialist Christians like Buchanan and company act as if our cause is all about restoring "Christian values" and completely ignore the racial aspect. Our cause has nothing to do with Christianity IMHO, and everything to do with race. Fourth, Christians are easily duped because of the stupid nature of Christianity: they believe that "God" exists in stale bread and the means of attaining "Communion with the Holy Spirit" is by eating this "cracker." If this is an example of the pinnacle of White culture then I see no point in fighting for it.
But what do I know? I'm just a devil-worshipper (sigh). I attain the joys of which Christians speak but are so damned ignorant as to not understand that of which they speak.
2003-12-03 22:34 | User Profile
Mithras wrote:
The failure to realize that 99% of all Christians are controlled by the jews is the other reason why I see no point in allying with racialist Christians. I can't change reality. It is what it is. If Christianity was such a success against the jews then why are Christians falling over backwards to please the jews?
There MUST be a splitting-into-two-parts of ALL CHRISTIANITY: those who oppose the JWO and those who don't. A global, unified split. Now. This is top priority.
Why don't some of the Christians on this forum write some letters and network with church people who may embrace such an idea as above? Good idea? Yes-yes-yes.
2003-12-04 08:02 | User Profile
[QUOTE=MadScienceType]Tex,
Not sure what you mean in your first sentence,
Hello MST. What I mean is this: racialists or white nationalists or whatever name they want to go by consistently single out the Christian faith as the root cause of every ill that's befallen whites. Yet I could easily make the same argument against the white race in and of itself. We've always been white, haven't we? Then why the problems?
It is an inherent and fundamental contradiction in anti-Christian white racialist thought that casts blame on Christianity and turns a blind eye towards being of the white race. They arbitrarily draw race as the dividing line, when it could just as easily be being right-handed, having red hair, etc. Now their counter may well be that race is the dividing line that our enemies have chosen, so we must use the same criteria. Fair enough, that makes sense. But if that's the dividing line then it ought not to matter one iota if one is a Christian, Hindu, Muslim or Shirley MacLaine worshipping New Ager, as long as they are white. One is contradicting themselves if they state that race is the answer to all of our problems, but we've got to get rid of some kind of ideology. Ideologies don't have a place in a racialist world-view. If they do then one is necessarily implying that there is something higher than race and therefore the racialist holds a flawed and contradictory belief-system.
This is why I have consistently said that when a self-identifying racialist attacks the Christian faith the ultimate problem that concerns them is not their race, but rather Christianity itself and what demands it makes on them personally as individuals. Since the day Christ rolled back the stone and walked out of his grave this has been the true issue and I don't see that it will ever change in this age. Further, folks who are not Christians, nor ever attain to be, have no right whatsoever to criticize anything that occurs within greater Christendom, so their attacks fall on deaf ears as far as I'm concerned.
I know you've pointed out that I'm wasting time on bridge-building efforts, and you could be right, but I do it anyway, though I get discouraged.
Sometimes, you gotta have, well, faith![/QUOTE]
Well, faith is certainly all that I have left to cling to and I don't imagine that you could be any more discouraged than I have become over the last few weeks. But I do appreciate you taking the time to express yourself here. You're a good man and as always I wish you the best.
2003-12-04 15:07 | User Profile
Tex,
Thanks for your kind words.
Why do I get the feeling that the Founders wrestled with these very same issues on those hot summer days in Philadelphia all those years ago? I believe they came up with a working compromise between freedom, theology and the interests of the State, but it was the later generations who dropped the ball, allowing "Judeo-Christian" to replace "Christian" and "any featherless biped" to replace "White." I guess they felt no need to emphasize race, since it was self-obvious at the time. If only they could have known! Of course, they could have crafted the most perfectly-worded document and it would be meaningless without the will to back it up, a will we seem to have lost.
2003-12-04 22:21 | User Profile
Re: why do WNs attack Christians so much? Well, HERE IS THE NUGGET, for all of you Christians and lurkers as well. Remember this when this subject comes up again:
WNs feel as if it was the DUTY of "traditional" folk, i.e. Christians, to warn the West about the Jew. Who else was going to -- the liberal? Nope. It was the JOB of Christians to warn about Jews, and instead, what did they do? They EMBRACED the Jew. Not all of them, but most. And the ones who did not embrace the Jew sat by and watched the Jew wreck the West.
William Pierce and so many other WNs see JudeoChristians and some of the other kind as traitors. That is why WNs pick on Christians. Name one big-league preacher today who names the Jew regularly -- no, not just every year using crypto-speak, but regularly and pointedly? You can't!!
That is the key, folks, and you Christians should grasp that. Your own people let you, and us, down.
If those words are too pointed, sorry. That is the whole truth. I cannot be any plainer than that.
[edited]
2003-12-04 22:32 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Franco]That is the key, folks, and you Christians should grasp that. Your own people let you, and us, down. [/QUOTE]
Sorry Franco, but you still haven't addressed my key argument. Using the same yardstick as you, I can say very forthrightly that white people themselves let me down. Why should I have any faith in white folks to make it right? By and large the white race itself has been much more of a failure than Christendom. Your critique still doesn't wash, I'm afraid.
Your materialist, 'anti-ideology' of racialism is flawed with contradictions and therefore bankrupt. Racialists need to get the log out of their collective eye before worrying about the twig in the eye of the catholic Church.
2003-12-04 22:54 | User Profile
You are right that the whites have failed to have a sustainable zhid-aware strategy. However, there is no ideological crap akin to Judeo-"Christianity" that's been so instrumental in making the whites blind to the zhid machinations.
Franco is incorrect to make a blanket condemnation of Christianity, but there is such a phenomenon.
2003-12-05 00:29 | User Profile
Actually, the matter above goes farther than that. Who has led the assault on Christianity in the 20th century? JEWS! So, the very people attacking Christianity -- e.g. getting the Ten Commandments banned -- are never mentioned by Christians as being Jewish. The Christians merely say that their opponents are "liberal." Ditto abortion -- who virtually invented the abortion movement in America? Jews. But will a Christian say that? Nope. It's almost funny. Almost.
I saw a video interview with a pro-life woman [a pro-life leader] about 3 days ago. Did she even HINT that Jews might dominate the abortion movement? Bwa-ha-ha-ha-ha! Fat chance, sweetheart! That gal would rather jump in front of a train than say the word "Jew."
And I don't have the right to criticize that Christian feature above? Heck, I'm surprised I don't mention it MORE.
As far as Whites collectively letting Jews dominate them, as Tex said, there is some truth to that, but again, traditionalists were supposed to be manning the cultural gates, opposing social change, as was their duty. They did not oppose change very well. The very change-agent doing the most damage [the Jew] was embraced by Christians. It is really very sad to see.
2003-12-05 00:31 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Texas Dissident] Racialists need to get the log out of their collective eye before worrying about the twig in the eye of the catholic Church.[/QUOTE]
Sorry, Tex, but I hold ideology very high. A man without conviction and ideology is a man without any standards or goals.
Chrisitian denominations are fair game for criticism for the fact that the official churches come out publicly and collectively on political issues such as embracing homosexuality, condemning racism and anti-semitism, condeming the warrior tradition, and misrepresenting and condemning magick.
It also stands to reason that the bible was written by jews. White culture was not invented by a non-white. Therefore, I cannot sympathize with your argument when the reality contradicts in the abovementioned ways.
There is nothing in white culture that says jews are the chosen people.
2003-12-05 00:33 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Franco]Actually, the matter above goes farther than that. Who has led the assault on Christianity in the 20th century? JEWS! So, the very people attacking Christianity -- e.g. getting the Ten Commandments banned -- are never mentioned by Christians as being Jewish. The Christians merely say that their opponents are "liberal." [/QUOTE]
Good point. If I were Christian I would be pissed off at the lack of leadership of the church that even if I remained Christian I would still attack the church.
2003-12-05 01:37 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Franco]Actually, the matter above goes farther than that. Who has led the assault on (whites) in the 20th century? JEWS! So, the very people attacking (whites) -- e.g. getting (whites' freedom of association banned) -- are never mentioned by (whites) as being Jewish. The (whites) merely say that their opponents are "liberal." Ditto (hate speech) -- who virtually invented the (hate speech) movement in America? Jews. But will a (white) say that? Nope. It's almost funny. Almost.
I saw a video interview with an (atheist) woman [an (atheist) leader] about 3 days ago. Did she even HINT that Jews might dominate the (atheist)movement? Bwa-ha-ha-ha-ha! Fat chance, sweetheart! That gal would rather jump in front of a train than say the word "Jew."
And I don't have the right to criticize that (atheist) feature above? Heck, I'm surprised I don't mention it MORE.
As far as Whites collectively letting Jews dominate them, as Tex said, there is some truth to that, but again, (whites) were supposed to be manning the cultural gates, opposing social change, as was their duty. They did not oppose change very well. The very change-agent doing the most damage [the Jew] was embraced by (whites). It is really very sad to see.[/QUOTE]
Keep trying, Franco.