← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Walter Yannis
Thread ID: 11087 | Posts: 17 | Started: 2003-11-15
2003-11-15 14:38 | User Profile
This appeared in the New York Times, 15 November 2003.
[url]http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/15/opinion/15SAT1.html?th[/url]
It actually points out the obvious relationship between illegal immigration and the loss of decent wages for native Americans.
Walter
The battle to prevent middle-class service jobs from turning into poverty-level ones. The supermarkets say they are forced to lower their labor costs to compete with Wal-Mart, a nonunion, low-wage employer aggressively moving into the grocery business. Everyone should be concerned about this fight. It is, at bottom, about the ability of retail workers to earn wages that keep their families out of poverty.
Grocery stores in Southern California are bracing for the arrival, in February, of the first of 40 Wal-Mart grocery supercenters. Wal-Mart's prices are about 14 percent lower than other groceries' because the company is aggressive about squeezing costs, including labor costs. Its workers earn a third less than unionized grocery workers, and pay for much of their health insurance. Wal-Mart uses hardball tactics to ward off unions. Since 1995, the government has issued at least 60 complaints alleging illegal anti-union activities.
Southern California's supermarket chains have reacted by demanding a two-year freeze on current workers' salaries and lower pay for newly hired workers, and they want employees to pay more for health insurance. The union counters that if the supermarkets match Wal-Mart, their workers will be pushed out of the middle class. Those workers are already only a step ââ¬â or a second family income ââ¬â from poverty, with wages of roughly $18,000 a year. Wal-Mart sales clerks make about $14,000 a year, below the $15,060 poverty line for a family of three.
[B]Wal-Mart may also be driving down costs by using undocumented immigrants. Last month, federal agents raided Wal-Marts in 21 states. Wal-Mart is facing a grand jury investigation, and a civil racketeering class-action filed by cleaners who say they were underpaid when working for contractors hired by Wal-Mart. Wal-Mart insists that it was unaware of its contractors' practices. But aware or not, it may have helped to deprive legally employable janitors of jobs and adequate pay.[/B] This Wal-Martization of the work force, to which other low-cost, low-pay stores also contribute, threatens to push many Americans into poverty. The first step in countering it is to enforce the law. The government must act more vigorously, and more quickly, when Wal-Mart uses illegal tactics to block union organizing. [B]And Wal-Mart must be made to pay if it exploits undocumented workers. [/B] Unions understand that the quickest way to win this war is to organize Wal-Mart workers. And Wal-Mart's competitors have to strive for Wal-Mart's efficiency without making workers bear the brunt. Consumers can also play a part. Wal-Mart likes to wrap itself in American values. It should be reminded that one of those is paying workers enough to give their families a decent life.
2003-11-15 19:53 | User Profile
Roy Batty stated recently that certain Jews are perhaps warry of the unbridled immigration that is rapidly transforming the U.S. into a place not [B]Good for the Jews (TM)[/B]. The article above definitely supports that postulate.
2003-11-15 22:06 | User Profile
JAT,
I don't remember a missile launcher in "Falling Down". A great movie, even though the main character is a zhid (but doesn't play one).
2003-11-16 03:53 | User Profile
[QUOTE=JAT]Roy Batty stated recently that certain Jews are perhaps warry of the unbridled immigration that is rapidly transforming the U.S. into a place not [B]Good for the Jews (TM)[/B]. The article above definitely supports that postulate.[/QUOTE]
Read this: [url]http://www.cis.org/articles/2001/back1301.html[/url]
It is interesting reading, to say the least.
The hypocrisy and arrogance are breathtaking, as are the statements wherein this jew admits (without realizing it) that Kevin MacDonald is right on the money. Amazing. They can't think ahead very well when it comes to grasping how their ideas might/will backfire in the end. Boom or bust. Always boom or bust. The greediest of all two legged organisms.
2003-11-16 05:40 | User Profile
[QUOTE=madrussian]JAT,
I don't remember a missile launcher in "Falling Down". A great movie, even though the main character is a zhid (but doesn't play one).[/QUOTE] It was used against construction equipment after a construction worker admits that the only reason he and his co-workers are doing street repairs is to justify their over-inflated budget.
BTW, to those who haven't seen the film [URL=http://www.movieprop.com/tvandmovie/reviews/fallingdown.htm]Falling Down[/URL] , I recommend seeing it on video or premium cable, as network televitz and basic cable stations tend to edit the film's un-PC dialog. :dry:
2003-11-17 22:02 | User Profile
[QUOTE=JAT]It was used against construction equipment after a construction worker admits that the only reason he and his co-workers are doing street repairs is to justify their over-inflated budget.
BTW, to those who haven't seen the film [URL=http://www.movieprop.com/tvandmovie/reviews/fallingdown.htm]Falling Down[/URL] , I recommend seeing it on video or premium cable, as network televitz and basic cable stations tend to edit the film's un-PC dialog. :dry:[/QUOTE]
Then I must have seen the cut version, because I can't recall that particular scene.
Another overlooked movie is "187" which is about a black teacher in cucaracha-infested LA school retaliating against cucarachas. The portrayal of divershitty is really nauseating. Since Roy Batty likes to talk about black and messicans fighting, he might like that one too.
2003-11-17 22:17 | User Profile
[B]Another overlooked movie is "187" which is about a black teacher in cucaracha-infested LA school retaliating against cucarachas. The portrayal of divershitty is really nauseating. Since Roy Batty likes to talk about black and messicans fighting, he might like that one too.[/B]
Not that I like to talk about it ... but it is a fact of life, heheehehe.
I've seen 187. Here's some background on the film - the screenwriter had worked in TV on game shows, but couldn't sell a screenplay to save his life. He quit, and became a substitute teacher. After enduring several years of Hell in the jr. and sr. high schools, he wrote a script about it. Most of the incidents in the film are based on things that happened to him, or other teachers he met (not the Russian Roultette scene of course ...). The script was ignored - until MEL GIBSON'S company, Icon, got hold of it. They thought it was ... interesting and true to life in many ways. The studio funding the pic, wanted to make the gangsters WHITE, believe it or not. The writer, Gibson, and crew, gave the money men the collective finger. The studio didn't want to see the project march off somewhere else, so they dealed back and forth, and the concession the writer agreed to was making the lead character, the sub, black.
Of course, the screenwriter admitted that he would have loved to have been able to go out and blow whatever brains the mestizo animals might have right out of their little hard skulls.
The 'kids' in the film reminded me of the animals I encountered in school in LA - but they didn't have the firepower or gall that is now the rule in LA City Schools. They have become a complete disaster, with the exception of some schools on the Westside, near the beaches, or in the Valley. The schools in the 'urban' areas have been completely ruined, far beyond what you see in the film.
2003-11-17 22:24 | User Profile
There was already a movie about a white principal and black thugs, "The Principal". Of course, it's several years older.
Note that the movies that don't show divershitty in a favorable light are delegated to the B-status. I thought of "187" as a fairly decent movie, but it was hardly noticed or promoted. Same with "Falling Down".
2003-11-17 22:33 | User Profile
MR -both films are from the same studio - WB. One one hand, I think the studios let the films be made, then look at them, and freak, wondering how such awful (thruths) things made it on screen. So ... little promotion goes into the flick. On the other hand, they are then able to say they are making films that show the other side, show reality. Sure. They can write the films off as a loss, I suppose. They write hits off, claiming no profits, so what's the difference? No studio has really lost money on a film in over a decade anyway, with cable, overseas, video, ancillary items, etc.
Falling down had some truths, but in the end, the worn out white man was a kook. I did chuckle at the scene with the two bean dogs in the field in downtown LA. In real life, they'd sneak up behind a guy like 'd-fens'. The shooting skills of the mexicans were spot on, though. Every night on the news we hear about the innocent bystanders killed by beaners and boolies trying to hit their rivals.
2003-11-17 22:36 | User Profile
One more thing. If I'm in the same business after the collapse and clean up, I sometimes wonder if I'll end up working on effects etc. for films reflecting this horrible time in our nation's industry, and be asked to create digital beandogs and boolies to play the bad guys. Or maybe we'll just resort to prosthetic make up. There won't be any shortage of whites who could be made up to play yahoodis ... hehehehee. It's nice to dream ...
2003-11-17 22:37 | User Profile
Both "187" and "Falling Down" had lone white gun nuts. I guess that's an element no movie with any negative portrayal of divershit can be made without. To balance the negative, so to speak. That's probably the matter of negotiations between the zhids and those who make movies.
2003-11-17 22:47 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Roy Batty]One more thing. If I'm in the same business after the collapse and clean up, I sometimes wonder if I'll end up working on effects etc. for films reflecting this horrible time in our nation's industry, and be asked to create digital beandogs and boolies to play the bad guys. Or maybe we'll just resort to prosthetic make up. There won't be any shortage of whites who could be made up to play yahoodis ... hehehehee. It's nice to dream ...[/QUOTE]
Video games with messicans and blacks as the monsters and an urban motif would be pretty cool.
2003-11-18 01:58 | User Profile
[QUOTE]They have become a complete disaster, with the exception of some schools on the Westside, near the beaches, or in the Valley. The schools in the 'urban' areas have been completely ruined, far beyond what you see in the film.[/QUOTE] I passed by University High in West Los Angeles today, as I do occasionally. Judging by the Negro/Mestizo to non-Negro/non-Mestizo ratio, I'd say it's not far behind in becoming yet another cesspool of [I]Amerikwan edjewmacation[/I].
2003-11-18 02:00 | User Profile
[QUOTE]The shooting skills of the mexicans were spot on, though. [/QUOTE] LOL
2003-11-18 02:51 | User Profile
[QUOTE=JAT]I passed by University High in West Los Angeles today, as I do occasionally. Judging by the Negro/Mestizo to non-Negro/non-Mestizo ratio, I'd say it's not far behind in becoming yet another cesspool of [I]Amerikwan edjewmacation[/I].[/QUOTE]
I drive by there fairly often, so we must be 'covering' some of the same ground. Cruise by when the school buses pull up. Same crap for the last 25 years or so; Here come the boolies - with even more beandogs of course. The jews in the area have for the most part bailed on the school, sending their kids to Palisades (which itself gets a few busloads of sludge everyday) or to private jooschools that take academics seriously. This while the jew parents fight to continuously dumb down the public schools whitey attends.
JAT - ever bother to go a few miles West of there these days, to the Santa Monica Pier, and take a look at the beaners? It never ceases to amaze me that the ones who go into the water do so fully clothed. This includes the grandmothers who always wade in waist deep in their Sunday best. Unreal. It also makes me wonder how helpful our government is with the invaders when I see so many beandogs over age 60 wandering around, on the public dole, every last one, you can bet.
(I take my family up the coast to Pismo, etc. when it's time to hit the beach. A tip to anyone coming out here for a visit - stay away from most LA County beaches. With the exception of Redondo, Manhattan, Hermosa, the rest of them are filled with the stupidest, dirtiest messicans and boons you'll ever not want to see. Plus, the water around Santa Monica beach is a health hazard, most of it courtesy of those wacky beaners, tossing their trash, motor oil, dead pets and unwanted newborns into the storm drains. I kid you not. Go North, or South to the Orange County Beaches. Most of the beaches in Orange County are still OK, even though a few have a noticable beaner count.)
2003-11-18 04:27 | User Profile
Thank God NorCal is too cold to have disrobed bean dogs and boolies walking around.
2003-11-18 10:30 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Roy Batty] JAT - ever bother to go a few miles West of there these days, to the Santa Monica Pier, and take a look at the beaners? It never ceases to amaze me that the ones who go into the water do so fully clothed. This includes the grandmothers who always wade in waist deep in their Sunday best. Unreal. It also makes me wonder how helpful our government is with the invaders when I see so many beandogs over age 60 wandering around, on the public dole, every last one, you can bet. [/QUOTE] I stopped going there years ago, after seeing the flood of Mexishit that clusters at the pier and surrounding area. It's really too bad; I remember riding the carousel when I was a child.
Some redeeming qualities of all this, though: 1. The foolish Messicans probably eat the contaminated fish they catch from the pier. :clap: