← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · triskelion
Thread ID: 10926 | Posts: 1 | Started: 2003-11-04
2003-11-04 22:12 | User Profile
The recent threat about the Columbine jew mass murders made me recall another hysterical media campaign about "nazi killers". It also has a lot to do with the Hollywood nazi set that has also been overed here recently:
The "Nazi Killers" That Never Were Part 2 - The Truth Behind The London "Nazi" Bombs
THE EMOTION and trauma generated by the London bombings is now several months behind us. So too is the frenzy of hatred and hysteria of the mass media. In a somewhat cooler atmosphere, we can look more closely at what was and is going on.
Lets first look at how the mass media presented the whole affair. The masonic, Sunday Telegraph, ran the headline: "Neo-Nazis come out of the Shadows" in its April 25th number, following the bomb in Brixton. The article read in part: "Police investigating the nail bomb attack are convinced that the bomber had a racist motive". Strangely, the Deputy Assistant Commissioner, Alan Fry, Head of the Metropolitan Police anti-terrorist branch, responding to the news that a small neo-Nazi group, Combat 18 (C18), had claimed responsibility said: "This line of inquiry is being taken very seriously, but there is absolutely no evidence at this time to support this claim. We are keeping a completely open mind, and we cannot rule out the fact that this may have been a hoax call".
See what is happening? The Press is telling us that the "police are convinced", whilst the police are telling us that they have an open mind on the subject. The police, of course, took the correct line since they are duty bound to find clues that lead to suspects and convictions, whilst the media's only duty, it seems, is to sell newspapers with sensationalist headlines. This divergence of opinion was to be found throughout the entire affair. At the same time, Jack Straw, is opening a book of condolence and outrage in Brixton, and he invites all sections of the community to sign it as a way of showing "solidarity with the victims" and "rejecting the racists". Since little more was heard of this New Labour farce, one can only assume that it went down like a lead balloon.
By April 26th, the ball game has changed again with the explosion of another bomb. The Times ran the headline: "Police says racists will strike again", and its opening paragraph began: "Police fear the neo-Nazi racists who planted the nail bombs in Brixton and Brick Lane will strike" etc. etc. Nothing, of course, has changed in terms of evidence, yet the media again is telling us that the bomb is racist. In the same issue of The Times, Paul Condon, a poor excuse for a Metropolitan Police Commissioner, was quoted as saying that there was "no doubt", in the light of the Brick Lane bombing, that the two attacks were racist. This was the opening of a second divergence in media coverage. The politically-minded police, like Condon, were mouthing all the platitudes and false outrage coming from Parliament and Fleet Street, whilst ordinary coppers were keeping their eyes on the ball, searching for suspects NOT scapegoats.
On April 26th too, The Express, ran a lurid and highly inaccurate feature, where the lowdown was given on all the groups "of the Far Right". Saying that the feature was fanciful would be an understatement. The Third Position, for example, was said, in hushed and solemn tones, to be "forging disturbing links in Europe and the USA". What does that mean? Nothing at all, but it follows the well worn media tactic of apparently saying something substantial without saying anything. It is left to Joe Public to decide how much colour and substance he wants to give the phrase. In the same piece, we are told that the New Order KKK Realm of England - which is probably a front created by the British Security Services - "is said to be gaining strength in Britain, with leaders claiming a membership of 2,800". In other newspapers, this membership claim simply becomes a fact. The reality is, of course, that the number of people in the country, who like wearing bedsheets and spooky hats, is so small that it would be difficult not to get them all into a minibus! The journalist knew, of course, that the claim was ludicrous, but it was all grist to the mill of media-inspired hatred.
Of course, one would expect such things from "the tabloids", but the "quality press" was different, right? Well, on April 26th, The Guardian, was informing its readers that "the right wing terror group behind the explosions in London" etc. etc. In other words, the Masonic, Left and Liberal press were at one in pushing the "Nazi" thesis of responsibility.
In the following days, every national and regional newspaper was pushing the same line for all it was worth. The Nazis and racists were responsible; these people have to be hunted down; new laws are needed. The experts were called in from every field conceivable, so as to give "substance" to the campaign. On May 1st, in the wake of the bombing of the homosexual pub in central London, the Daily Mirror ran the sub-heading in bold: "70 injured in Nazi outrage". So, there is no doubt that the Nazis are responsible, right? Yet the final paragraph says: "Scotland Yard suspects that the bombing may be the work of right wing extremists". Note the words "suspects" and "may be". Also note that some at Scotland Yard still have doubts as to responsibility, whilst Condon has, as we have seen, "no doubts".
On May 2nd, the Sunday Mirror, raises the temperature again by specifying who is probably responsible. Beneath a huge headline saying: "Nail the Wolf Man" is a picture of a man in a bobble hat and netting, standing in front of a swastika flag and carrying a pistol. We are told that this man is Del O'Connor, the leader of the White Wolves. "Police are concerned that O'Connor may be masterminding the bomb attacks from his lair in the USA". Given the look on the face of O'Connor, one suspects that the word "masterminding" is highly inappropriate! Nor are readers informed that there is serious doubt as to whether the "White Wolves" even exists, beyond the sending out of semi-literate hate mail to assorted public figures. But why spoil a good story with Facts?
On May 2nd too, The Sunday Telegraph, just to show that it knows how to compete with the tabloids in the bullshit stakes, runs a huge spread entitled: "Manifesto of Hate: The War is On". In part, it states that the feature seeks to "explore the mind set of the White Wolves, the Far-Right splinter group behind the Soho bombing". The proof for saying that this probably in existent group carried out the bombings? Nowhere to be found.
On May 3rd, the situation changes radically. The Times runs the simple headline: "Nail Bombs - Loner Charged". In the twinkling of an eye, the whole "Far Right bombing campaign" disappears and is replaced by a loner, David Copeland. Tony Blair, however, showing how up to the minute and fresh and cool he is, is still found bleating in The Sun of May 3rd that "these Nazis are like Serbs". Perhaps, in spite of himself, he was saying that all of the groups in England falsely accused of these bombs were just like the Serbs in Kosovo - INNOCENT! But we all know Tony now, don't we?!
Only the Daily Telegraph showed any sense of decency with the headline: "Links with Neo-Nazis ruled out". It quoted David Veness, Assistant Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, as saying: "There is no suggestion at this stage that the arrest is linked in any way to the extreme right wing groups that have been reportedly claiming responsibility". In other words, Condon, the buffoon, is exposed as a contemptible non-entity, whilst the ordinary police are vindicated by traditional police methods of detection.
The Daily Telegraph also did the country a service by pointing out the motives behind this campaign of parliamentary and media slander: "Yet it now seems that the atrocities had nothing to do with the White Wolves or any other organised group - a possibility that this newspaper has been almost alone in considering amid all the demands for repressive measures. The authoritarian Left [that's journalese for Tony] has constructed a vast edifice of outrage, not on weak foundations, but on no foundations whatever".
The astute reader might, however, point out that on May 25th the Daily Mirror ran a headline: "The Link". Beneath was a picture of David Copeland standing behind John Tyndall, the leader of the BNP. The newspaper insisted that this was proof that there was "a fascist connection". Such a reader might NOT have heard on an early morning talk show that the Mirror later conceded that the photograph was a FAKE, but that it had been justified because Copeland had been in the area for a meeting to be addressed by Tyndall!
So, is Copeland a Nazi? Our investigations have shown that Copeland was indeed a member of the BNP for a few months in 1997, though he later left because, he claimed, he was going abroad. It is also alleged that he was a member/enquirer of a bizarre Nazi-Satanist group called the National Socialist Movement. It disbanded voluntarily during the bombing campaign, though the leaders of this weirdo group were raided by police nonetheless. No arrests were made, and nothing has come to light since. This appears to be the extent of Copeland's "Nazi" background. It is, at best, a flimsy case, at worst a sick joke in the light of the media's hate campaign.
If the case against Copeland being a Nazi is less than convincing, we have to ask what other possibilities there are to explain his actions. The media are now largely very keen on the theory of "a lone wolf", though whether that will stand up in the light of evidence in the forthcoming court case has to be seen.
One thing is sure: from the moment that Copeland was arrested, the media changed its tune in a radical way. Suddenly, we were presented with stories about "the anguish of bombers father". We were being told that neighbors thought that Copeland "was a nice lad", that this didn't seem to be him at all, and so on. It is almost as if "a human face" was being given to Copeland. On the Internet, we received information that David Copeland, just like the "Nazi", Dylan Klebold, involved in the Colorado school massacre, was Jewish. We have not been able to confirm this, though we have discovered that not only does Copeland's mother work in a Jewish hospital, which might be a coincidence, but that his lawyer, Peter Silver, is also Jewish. Such facts might explain why the police RUSHED to rule out a racist motive, so as to avoid accusations of "anti-Semitism" further down the line.
We have since heard that Jack Straw said in a private discussion with a journalist named Jones, who works for Mirror/People group, that he wants to have Copeland declared insane and sent to Broadmoor. The idea is that if he is shown to be nuts, a trial could be avoided and a lot of potentially embarrassing details kept from the public. This might be easy given that only the insane are said to be against Tony's vision of building "the tolerant, multi-racial Britain the vast majority of us want to see". When did Tony or anyone else in Parliament ever ask us what we thought about immigration into England?
Throughout this media campaign, most of the focus has been on Combat 18 and its alleged splinter, White Wolves. The angle has been that this is a dangerous group, hidden from sight, dedicated to Nazism. Yet in an article entitled: East London Bombing - Far Right faction aims to trigger violent Race War, written by Kim Sengupta, we are informed: "Combat 18 has also been heavily infiltrated by Scotland Yard's Special Branch and the security services, and used, at one time, to gather intelligence on the extreme Right and loyalist paramilitaries in Ulster, with whom the group had forged links". Sengupta might also have added that only a couple of weeks before the Brixton bombing, the homes of the C18 leadership were raided. If there were plans and bomb materials present, they would have been discovered. In other words, non-politically correct coppers knew from the outset that a C18/White Wolves campaign was highly improbable. One more point needs to be added to give depth to this analysis. C18 has an American connection, a connection that leads back to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (BATF) - the group responsible for the Columbine massacre. From the outset, C18 had used a post box in the USA, which belonged to one Harold Covington, formerly the leader of the National Socialist Party of America (NSPA), which had been run by a Jewish homosexual pedophile called Frank Collin, and now leader of the National Socialist White People's Party. Covington is also known as Winston Smith, Luther Williams and Myron Silverstein. Check the records of the United States District Court, Western District, North Carolina, Asheville Division, Criminal Case #A-CR-81-11, pages 4, 5, 232 and 313 and you will see that BATF agent, Michael Sweat, allegedly confirms in the witness box that Covington is an informant for BATF, who had also worked with agent, Bernie Butkovich. Thanks to Covington's work, it is claimed, people were arrested for bomb-making - people who had been incited by Covington to do so. Covington, of course, denies these claims, but it is certainly the case that he is widely regarded, rightly or wrongly, in America as an agent of the State. However, his connection with C18 and his alleged past seem to tie very nicely together - a coincidence or otherwise?
Again is it a coincidence that a "Nazi bombing campaign" ran in England so quickly after Columbine? Certainly, the Sargent brothers, who ran C18 until they set up the NSM, are not very intelligent by anyone's standards. One brother is now in prison for murder, the other is outside publishing material that boasts of not having condemned Copeland! Indeed, this idiot has widely circulated copies of a letter that he wrote recently to Harold Covington in which he has 'proven' his National Socialist credentials by not condemning Copeland. Clearly, something stinks in this whole affair. It was said for years that they were the mouthpieces of a more sinister element - is that element the State, British and/or American? Could it be that an "insane" Copeland might be the only way to prevent these possible connections from coming out?
The Secret State'S Outlets
OVER THE last year or so, there have been a number of Press exposés concerning "neo-Nazis", British soldiers and Ulster Loyalists. They are the kind of stories that the media jumps on, because they can heap on the swastikas, guns and terrorists. They are the kind of scare stories that are aimed at shocking unthinking Whites into accepting evermore hysterical anti-English action from the government and its minority allies.
Who is behind such scare stories? Strangely, they seem to appear simultaneously in the pages of the Sunday Telegraph (ST) and Searchlight, strange because the first is a right wing newspaper aimed at Middle England, whilst the second is aimed at Communists and weekend revolutionaries. The 'mystery' dissolves once you understand that they are both vehicles used by the Security Services to spread disinformation. Let us look at the evidence:
According to the London Jewish News - March 5th 1999 - in its front page article, "Fascists Active in the Army", it was Searchlight that "uncovered" the evidence of 'neo-Nazi' serving soldiers.
In Searchlight - April 1999 - the co-editor, Nick Lowles, a former member of the thugish group, Anti-Fascist Action, talks of "Searchlight's revelations last month". Indeed, the March issue about such infiltration of the military is actually billed "A Searchlight Exclusive".
So how is it that the Sunday Telegraph - March 7th - breaks exactly the same story as in Searchlight, but under the heading: "MI5 Swoops on Army Neo-Nazis"? The ST journalist tells us that the 'swoop' was the result of "a year long undercover investigation" by the Security Services NOT Searchlight! The ST journalist goes on to add that Ministry of Defence documents were "obtained" by Searchlight. Now, since Gable and company have not to our knowledge been charged with theft, one can only assume that they were GIVEN such documents by people at the MOD. How cosy and how typical that Communists and Capitalists are seen, once again, to be bedfellows!
Further proof of this collusion came when the same two journals, Searchlight and the Sunday Telegraph, simultaneously broke the news of "neo-Nazi" funding of Ulster Loyalist groups. Sam King, writing in the former rag, spoke about how C18 had organised concerts in the Province, whilst the ST hack kindly informed readers: "Special Branch and MI5 have evidence of collaboration" between the Loyalist Volunteer Force and C18.
What are the lessons? Firstly, the British State is sanctioning the passing of confidential documents on English citizens to a group of people, who have criminal and sexual convictions as long as their arms. Secondly, that whilst Searchlight is claiming 'exclusives' in its little read pages, it is, in fact, no more than a Security Services Lie Sheet. Thirdly, that the Right and the Left are always united against England and the English. Originally published in The Voice of St George No 18.